Episode Overview

Podcast: Bulwark Takes
Episode: People Sound Off on Trump’s Gilded White House Demolition
Date: October 23, 2025
Host: Sam Stein, with Tim Miller and various guest voices

Main Theme:
This episode of "Bulwark Takes" zeroes in on the public reaction to Donald Trump’s controversial demolition of the White House East Wing, intended to make way for a lavish, gold-themed ballroom. The hosts and The Bulwark team head to the White House to collect candid perspectives from experts, staff, and everyday people on the street. The discussion explores issues of historic preservation, process, aesthetics, funding, and the symbolic meaning of the project.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

The Announcement and Context

• [00:00] Sam Stein: Opens by framing the story: President Trump has ordered the demolition of the entire White House East Wing to build a “grotesque gilded ballroom” at a cost of $250 million. Raises issues of public funding, donor influence, and aesthetics.

Initial Reactions from Interviewees

• [01:19] Tim Miller: Directly asks people at the White House how they feel about the construction.

• Reactions:

  • "Pretty bad about it."
  • "I think it’s a joke."
  • "It is a travesty. It's not his house. He's taking down history and paving it and then gilding it in fake gold. I just hope that we can repair some of the damage he's going to leave behind." — Concerned Citizen

• [01:41] Political Analyst/Commentator: Outrage over lack of process, circumventing Congress:

  • "This is the people's house...there's a process for modifying historical buildings in Washington. I don’t believe it’s been followed from what I understand. So yeah, I think it’s an outrage."

The Aesthetic and Symbolic Significance

• [02:12] Tim Miller: Draws a historical comparison:
  • "It's summoning like Marie Antoinette to mind...with people worried about inflation...This is a vanity project. At the same time his supporters say he’s no king. It’s gilded. What more evidence could you have that maybe he isn’t a king, but he certainly aspires to that?"

Impact on History and Process

• [03:11] White House Historical Society Member: Expresses frustration about exclusion from the decision:

  • "Clearly they weren't involved in the decision..."
  • "This is a very serious moment in our history and just another example of regime out of control."

• [03:33] Political Commentator or Journalist: Stresses need for review, isn’t opposed to a ballroom per se but wants due process:

  • "This is the people's House...like anything, it should have been reviewed and looked over before he just started taking a backhoe to the thing and tearing it down."

Motivation and Psychology Behind the Project

• [03:55] Tim Miller: Asks why Trump wants to do it.

  • "Cause he's a narcissist." — Concerned Citizen
  • "Honestly, I don't know. I don't care what his motivation is. I think it's not his house. He's a temporary resident. I think it shows a lack of understanding of his role as a preserver of our history." — Political Analyst or Commentator

• [04:20] Historian/Preservation Expert: Suggests a legacy motive:

  • "I think he's doing it so he can name a part of the White House after himself that's even bigger than the White House...he's acting as if it’s his house and he can do whatever he damn well pleases."
  • Raises concerns about private funding and lack of public participation.

• [05:35] White House Historical Society Member:

  • "The most cynical view is that he doesn’t plan to leave and therefore he’ll have this place that reflects who he is...But it is very, very disturbing."
  • "I've been in that building many, many times...it's a beautiful, well proportioned, well designed structure that has integrity."

• [06:11] Political Commentator or Journalist:

  • "Donald Trump is a real estate developer and this is his instinct ... this is what you get when you vote in a real estate developer as president."

• [06:22] White House Staff or Enthusiast:

  • "He has such an enormous ego...anything he builds, he wants to put his name on. And he thinks that'll last for his entire lifetime and afterwards."

Promises vs. Reality

• [06:34] Tim Miller: Skeptical about Trump’s reassurances:

  • "I really do think he probably has fantasies of entertaining dignitaries in a gold leaf room that'll just blow their minds at the power impressiveness of Trump. All I know about the plans is that initially...he promised that there would be no damage to the facade."

• [07:05] White House Staff or Enthusiast:
  Attempts to reassure about effects on the main building:

  • "It'll be built over on the east side and it will be beautiful...it won't interfere with the current building..."

• [07:26] Tim Miller: Dismisses these reassurances:

  • "Anybody who believes anything he says is, I got a bridge in Brooklyn. But I think probably we're going to see a lot of portraits of him, the family. It's just going to be ugly."

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• “It is a travesty...he’s taking down history and gilding it in fake gold.”
  — Concerned Citizen ([01:25])

• “This is the people's house...there's a process for modifying historical buildings in Washington. I don't believe it's been followed...”
  — Political Analyst or Commentator ([01:41])

• “It's summoning like Marie Antoinette to mind…and I don't understand how it can be justified right now with the government shutdown...This is a vanity project.”
  — Tim Miller ([02:12])

• “I think he's doing it so he can name a part of the White House after himself that's even bigger than the White House.”
  — Historian or Preservation Expert ([04:20])

• “I really do think he probably has fantasies of entertaining dignitaries in a gold leaf room that'll just blow their minds at the power impressiveness of Trump.”
  — Tim Miller ([06:34])

Timestamps for Important Segments

• 00:00 – Episode setup and Trump’s demolition plan introduction (Sam Stein)
• 01:19–01:41 – Varied initial reactions: “Joke”, “travesty”, “outrage”
• 02:12 – Tim Miller’s Marie Antoinette analogy and vanity project critique
• 03:11 – White House Historical Society speaks out
• 03:33 – Public process and critique of rushing the project
• 03:55–06:22 – Exploring Trump’s motives (narcissism, legacy, real estate lens)
• 06:34–07:26 – Trump’s promises about the project vs. skepticism from staff and hosts

Tone and Style

The hosts and guests maintain a sharply critical, somewhat incredulous tone throughout, frequently invoking both humor and alarm. The original language is direct and sometimes biting, with frequent allusions to history and democracy. The encapsulating sentiment is one of collective concern and a desire for accountability, with skepticism about both motives and process.

Summary by Bulwark Takes: Unfiltered, journalistically driven, and fiercely articulate in its defense of America's history, this episode starkly catalogs the public’s opposition to the “gilded” White House project—questioning not just its extravagance, but its legitimacy and symbolism.