Sarah Longwell (3:02)

Yeah, I mean, look, I, I've said this on the next level and other, you know, one of the. We were talking about Epstein and I was saying to the guys, like, hey, this story's got real legs in a way that that other stories haven't. And I said, look, we're definitely going to be talking about this again next week. And Tim's question was, but will we be talking about it next summer? And, you know, the answer to that is we will be if Democrats make it an issue. And look, I think there are ways to weave in a whole bunch of things for me, Epstein. And look, here's the thing. You're going to get pushback from people. Like, I think what Nancy Pelosi was trying to say, and you're going to hear this from other people, is the normies aren't focused on Epstein. Right. They're trying to figure out how to pay their bills. And this is true. Listen, I listen to voters every week in focus groups. You ask them how things are going in the country. They're not going to tell you that things are bad because of Epstein. They're going to tell you things are too expensive. They're going to tell you their cost of living is too high, that their housing prices is too high. That is where everybody goes sort of right away. But they also talk about the broader. Their broader concerns about where America is headed and, like, what are we doing here? And they are concerned. Like, the way to tag into their concerns about prices is, number one, to tell them you got a plan to lower them, but also that Donald Trump is not doing it. Right. I mean, he was elected by a lot of people who said, look, the guy's a businessman. Joe Biden, Kamala Harris. They're not Getting it done in terms of prices. I want inflation down. I want things to be cheaper. And so tell that like they know things aren't getting cheaper. They know their prices are still really high. They're. If you look at any poll about Trump's handling of the economy, they will tell you like people think he should be focused more on prices. And so I think people sometimes think like these are two separate issues as opposed to seeing how you can bring these issues together to take one that is salacious. Right. And this is, this is what people, I think Nancy Pelosi and the Gerontocracy. We've got to get you guys to think it's. Everybody should you, you did a great job. But maybe it's time to exit stage left because we need people who understand that for low information voters, as we've long talked about them, are no longer low information. They have tons of information. They are swimming in information. But they are not news seekers. They are not digging into the big billionaires bill to figure out what the tax breaks are for the billionaires versus what they're going to get. Like, they are passive consumers of a lot of news. And so a lot of times it's like, well, what jumps out are people going to read about the pedophile who was extremely good friends with the President of the United States who killed himself under very strange circumstances. They might. They're much more likely to attach to that. It's one of the reasons Republicans talk about trans issues all the time. It's because it's an easy thing to understand and an easy thing to have an opinion about. And so if you can get people's attention with Epstein and then use that to say Trump has been protecting his elite friends, which is exactly what he did with the big billionaires bill, which is exactly what he did when he let Elon pay for his campaign. I mean, there's just so many ways to take what Donald Trump has done during the first part of his administration and take it back to the fact that he lied to you guys. He said he was going to lower grocery prices. He said he was going to release the Epstein files. He hasn't done any of that. Said he was going to cut money, cut the debt. He didn't do that either. Like, there's a lot to work with. And I think it is just a matter of. And this is what I would like to say to Dems. Get mad about it. Like, don't, don't stay on message because someone who does focus groups told you to like, be genuinely upset that the Attorney General is lying to you. And then you won't forget your talking points because you'll be genuinely upset that Donald Trump lied to your constituents about lowering grocery prices to get their votes and then didn't do anything, anything about it, didn't even focus on it. Sorry, now I'm just ranting at you, Lauren.

Lauren Egan (7:12)

Yeah, no, but I think, like, you're touching onto this concept of the attention economy, which is something we've talked a lot about. And I do think that Democrats are finally sort of starting to get it a little bit. I talked to plenty of strategists for the story, and a few of them admitted, off the record, that, like, when they first the Epstein, things started bubbling up again. They're like, yeah, that was not really, like an area we felt comfortable sort of like, talking about, but they kind of like, we had to come around to it because in politics, the most important thing right now is if people are paying attention to your message or not. And as much as Democrats would love to just be out there talking about Medicaid and only Medicaid and just sticking to these, like, safe policy zones that they feel really comfortable in, that's just not going to get people, people's attention like, you know, Epstein is. And if you can start there and tie it to what you're saying, tie that into Medicaid, because it is all part of the same story. People are going to lose their Medicaid because Trump cut it so that he could fund a tax break for his wealthy friends. That is basically what the message is.

Sarah Longwell (8:13)

Do Dems feel like, comfortable with this? Like, do they feel like they've got it or they still feel like, I don't know, will Epstein still be around or, or do they feel like observers of the Epstein thing? This is the thing I worry about that Democrats see at the Epstein issue as a fight between MAGA and sort of Trump and like, they're a third party observer as opposed to saying, no, we're Americans. And I want answers from Pam Bondi, the Attorney General. Like, do you get that sense that Democrats feel. Because I guess my, my sense from them has been that they've lost some of their. They're too cynical now. Like, they've lost the ability to get their back up in a way that's meaningful because nothing has seemed to matter for so long. But do you the sense that they're starting to find not just their talking points, but their sense of indignation at the way things are going?

Lauren Egan (9:11)

Yeah, but I still feel like it's kind of coming from like, the same group of people for the most part. I mean, you know, with the Epstein thing too, there's some Democrats who are like, well, we don't want to lean too hard into it because if this looks like an issue that Democrats have completely, like, taken over, then we're just going to, you know, risk sort of like spoiling it and that people won't want to. Want to pay attention as much. But the indignation, I mean, it's there among some, but you still talk to lawmakers, and there's plenty of people in the Senate, there's plenty of people in Congress who are the more vocal Democrats about, like, this is a really scary moment in American politics and they will tell you that not the entire caucus is fully on board. And, you know, thinking that way, even though, you know, we've seen seen a lot of crazy shit go down and it's only six months in.

Sarah Longwell (10:03)

So I talk about the other part of your newsletter, because that was also interesting to me, which is that the, the Republicans who are in the most competitive seats are raising a lot of money, whereas it's a lot of the Democrats in the safe seats who have good institutional fundraising. They're the ones raising money right now and not the Democrats who are in really competitive seats or could be in competitive seats. Like, what is going on with the fundraising on the Dem side right now?

Lauren Egan (10:27)

Yeah, I think this has always been a problem for Democrats, or at least it has been in the past few years. I always think about the Jamie Harrison Senate race in South Carolina as like a perfect example of this kind of problem that Democrats have. I mean, I forget what the exact number was, but Jamie Harrison raised an insane amount of money in that South Carolina Senate race against Lindsey Graham. This was right before he went on to be the DNC chair. And it just captures the seed of Democrats like to give to who's going to pop off on social media who kind of makes them feel good. Harrison had no shot of winning that South Carolina seat. I family in South Carolina that is one of the reddest states in America. And yet he raised a ton of money. And you're kind of seeing the same thing happen in some House races right now. And there are some moderate Democrats out there being like, hey guys, we need to change this up if we actually want to win in these purple districts in these competitive races. Like, why are we giving so much money to, you know, so and so who's in a super safe seat who just has great social media and like, makes us feel really good about being Democrats. That's not the strategy that we should.

Sarah Longwell (11:30)

Be employing, is it? Is it going, are these small dollar donations? Like, it's not like this is coming from the right.

Lauren Egan (11:36)

Exactly right. It's like, who's going to hop on Act Blue and give a few bucks? Exactly.

Sarah Longwell (11:41)

Well, this is the problem. I mean, I saw this. You see a lot of like, people jumping in races. Again, the reason Jamie Harrison raised so much money isn't just because he was good on social media. It's because he was running against Lindsey Graham, who everyone was super pissed at for being such a weirdo in the sort of post John McCain Republican Party and for totally starting going from major Trump critic to Trump bootlicker. And everybody's like, let's get rid of this guy. Even though South Carolina was going to elect a Republican. And so, and you saw this with like Amy McGrath. You saw it with that guy who ran against mtg. Like this people run in these races and they're not competitive races, but people want to give to them because they hate the opponent. And that is not the strategy. The strategy is to go fund people and they're probably less exciting because they're probably more moderate because they have to win a seat that is R plus 4. And so like, you might not, they might not be your favorite personally, but they are the ones who are going to get you where you want to go in terms of lawmaking, correct?

Lauren Egan (12:50)

Absolutely. Yeah. Like they're not going to be the people. To your point that. Yeah. Are going to make you feel the most excited probably. But if you want to win the House, that's where your dollars have to go.

Ryan (13:01)

Hello, it is Ryan. And we could all use an extra bright spot in our day, couldn't we? Just to make up for things like sitting in traffic, doing the dishes, counting your steps, you know, all the mundane stuff. That is why I'm such a big fan of Chumba Casino. Chumba Casino has all your favorite social casino style games that you can play for free anytime, anywhere with daily bonuses. So sign up now@chumbac casino.com that's chumbacasino.

Sarah Longwell (13:26)

Com.

Unknown (13:26)

No purchase necessary vgw group void where prohibited by law 21 + terms and conditions apply.

Sarah Longwell (13:33)

Yeah, well, I appreciated that you covered the Epstein in a political context. I think that. Actually I want to go back to one thing you said because this is worth spinning on for just a couple of minutes. This idea of Democrats not wanting to be the ones to push the Epstein story lest it, like, re Coalesce the MAGA coalition is kind of a fair concern. I can see that nothing sort of re, sort of brings the MAGA coalition back together then when they think Donald Trump is being unfairly persecuted. Here's the one thing that I think is different about this situation than every other time this has happened, whether it's been Russia or the Mueller investigation or the impeachments. In all of those cases, those started with Democrats, right? Those were. Or I mean, I guess the Mueller investigation isn't like a democratic thing, but they were all seen as ways to like get Donald Trump from his enemies. And so that sort of did like that, that coalesced people. This is coming from the MAGA coalition. It's. And it calling the MAGA coalition isn't even quite right. It is coming from sort of two different camps. One is the activist class, the talkers, the podcasters, the people who go to a Turning Point USA conference. And that matters energy. Right. And so the idea that you're able to sort of diminish people's sense of urgency around their support for Trump because. Or even a lot of these people, they rationalize their support for, well, we gotta do this because he's the only, you got to forgive all the other stuff because he's the only one who's going to show us this critical stuff sort of depletes some of that and that that matters. Then the other cohort and these ones are much less attached to Trump. Are a lot of these in more independent kind of bro y guys, it's your Theo Vons, it's your Joe Rogan's people who made sort of a real time coalition with Trump because they were annoyed with Democrats, they're annoyed with wokeness, you know, whatever. And they thought, you know, well, Trump's more authentic. Trump's sort of telling you like it is, whatever. This is the kind of thing. And a lot of them tend to be, they're like, they were sort of stealth styled free speech warriors. They don't like being censored themselves. And so they feel some kinship with Trump in a way that him not releasing the Epstein files, him being a constant anti free speech president, then also him bombing Iran, you know, sending the weapons to Ukraine. Like these tend to be people who are on the horseshoe continuum. And so when Trump starts to behave the way he's behaved on a lot of different fronts, those people fall off pretty quickly. And so I do think it matters. And I also think Democrats can go on offense in a way in these races and say, I'm going to, you know, if, if I'm elected in Congress and we have a majority, we're going to make sure that this guy's held accountable. We're going to make sure that we get these files out there, whatever they may be, because he is covering things up, he is lying about them. And I, I think that the risk. I understand what people are saying, but sometimes this is where Democrats to me, do a little bit of, like, they get paralysis by analysis, where they spend so much time talking about what their message should be, as opposed to just like, drive, drive, drive the message. Go, go, go. Instead of this, like, I think this is a distraction and we should be talking about this. Just talk about what you think is important.

Lauren Egan (17:10)

They should stop using the word distraction. I just think that they would be best off if they don't use the word distraction from here until midterms. But to that point, I think, yeah, I think you're exactly right. I don't think Democrats can afford to not try, you know, the party. Over the past few months, there's been a lot of conversation about, like, okay, well, do you let Trump just kind of like, drive his own numbers down? Do you let him just get himself in trouble, or do Democrats actually have a role to play in that? And I do think sort of the, some of the apprehension about, like, how do you engage with Epstein is coming from a place where some Democrats feel like they don't really always have a role to play in public opinion, that their best, the best thing they can do is kind of just be hands off about it. And there is a pretty big disagreement in the party about how you shape public opinion and what the party's role should be in that. And I think the, how they're handling Epstein is a bit of a manifestation of that.

Sarah Longwell (18:04)

Okay, well, guys, let me tell you, the Epstein things got legs. And the. What you can do is like, fine, you don't, don't. You don't have to be a social media influencer or a pundit about it. Although I do think for some enterprising young Democrats, like, you've got some attack dogs in your roster and, you know, when they get out there and they kind of go in all directions, they're not always as, as good as they could be. But you sick them on Epstein, get them on this, let them go out there. And you do need at least part of the party that is out there on offense being aggressive about this, pushing the story. And also, like, what, what the moment we're in now. I did a thing With Bill on Sunday. You guys should go watch it. It was one of the, it was like a live substack thing. But it's on YouTube where we're talking about the anatomy of a scandal. Like, when I say it's got legs, what I mean is, is it has been set in motion sufficiently that in the public interest now is sufficient that media is starting to cover new developments in the story. And that means new people are coming forward, sources are being pressed. What do you know? You know, Julie K. I'm so terrible, I'm blanking on her name. Who did the original reporting for the Miami Herald? Bill had her on the show. You know, she's been back out there talking about her original reporting, looking out for the victims, pressing for accountability for the victims. They're talking about having Ghislaine or however you pronounce her name in front of Congress. Like, these are the things that create a story that develops, captures the nation's attention. And if you go back to Nixon or any other big Iran Contra, you know, these things weren't like blown wide open in the first minute. Like you had to press them and that. And that is how, like, new things come unearthed and new details come to light. And Donald Trump clearly doesn't want to talk about this. And so Democrats, I think, should sense that vulnerability and press on it. That's Donald Trump's lizard brain ability is to like, see where the other side is weak and go right for it. And the idea that they would look at Trump's weird fear about this, whether it's that he did something wrong or whether he's engaged in some cover up or whatever it is, like smell the weakness, go for the jugular. Where's your killer instinct, guys? Go find it. All right, guys, sorry, I've ranted enough. This has been. Lauren, thank you for doing real reporting, not just ranting, talking to people. Because I think that, I think that this is how the story ends up moving forward, is the Democrats understand their role to play. Great job. Thanks to all of you for listening to one of our bulwark takes. Go and subscribe. Subscribe on YouTube. Subscribe on Substack. Go be a free subscriber. If you just have never subscribed to anything, go be a free subscriber. And you're gonna get 90 of our stuff completely for free. We pay awesome stuff from time to time, but most of it is made free for you because we're chasing influence and we want more people to find out about us. So help us do that. If you love the channel. We'll see you guys soon.

Bubba Wallace (21:21)

Bubba Wallace here from 2311 Racing. Funny thing about being fast. You end up waiting a lot. First to show up, first in line, then just waiting. Me, I rev up. Jumbo casino with over 200 social casino games. No slow lanes here. Why sit around when you can spin? I'm already racing. Your turn. Play for free@jumbacasino.com. let's Chumba.

Sarah Longwell (21:44)

Sponsored by Chumba a casino. No purchase necessary. VGW group void where prohibited by law 21 + terms and conditions apply.