Transcript
A (0:00)
Hey, it's Jack Cottrella with the bull work. And today I am so excited to be talking about the time honored tradition of Republicans going on the Sunday shows to debase themselves. We know that MAGA generally has this humiliation kink, but today, J.D. vance, oh, he really tapped into it with probably one of the worst performances I've ever seen at a Vance. He's usually okay at, not to give him a compliment, but like evading questions and pretending that he's the debate bro who's kind of dunking on the lid. But today it was horrible for a couple of reasons. The first, he was so unable to answer one of George Stephanopoulos questions that he was literally removed from the show. They just decided that he was going to have to bounce. The other was because Vance once again found himself in a disagreement with Donald Trump. In a resurface clip. We're going to get into it all. I want to start with Vance just getting kicked off of air by Stephanopoulos for refusing to answer a question about Tom Homan because it's what journalists should be doing. And then we'll get into how he had to go against Donald Trump's own words.
B (1:04)
The White House borders. Our Tom Holman was recorded on an FBI surveillance tape in September 2024 accepting $50,000 in cash. Did he keep that money or give it back?
C (1:16)
George, you've covered the story ad nauseum. Tom Homan did not take a bribe. It's a ridiculous smear. And the reason you guys are going after Tom Hom aggressively is because he's doing the job of enforcing the law. I think it's really preposterous. I know Tom. I think that he's a good man. He gets death threats, he gets attacked. He gets constantly threatened by people because he has the audacity to want to enforce the country's immigration law. I think that it would be a much more interesting story about why is it that Tom Homan, who is simply enforcing America's immigration laws, is getting constantly harassed and threatened to, to the point of death threats? That's a much more interesting question that I think journalists should focus on. We can agree to disagree on that question.
B (2:02)
You said he didn't take a bribe, but I'm not sure you answered the question. Are you saying that he did not accept the $50,000?
C (2:10)
George, this story has been covered ad nauseum. He did not take a bribe. He did so $50,000. I'm sure that in the course of Tom Homan's life, he has been paid more than $50,000 for services. And the question, what does that do? Something illegal. And there's absolutely no evidence that Tom Holland has never taken A different question I'm asking you, which is why he's working in the administration.
B (2:32)
