Adrian Carrascuelo (4:15)

Yeah, I mean, I think this is unprecedented. Certainly in this administration. They said his executive orders, if you're being anti Semitic, it's crazy because that first, like, they said the order had said they would come from the White House, and then they suddenly said, oh, no, no, no, this order is coming from dhs. There were so many moments during this situation where they seem to be flying by the seat of their pants. They say he has a student visa. And then actually, oh, no, no, no. When they find out from the lawyer that he has a green card. Yeah, yeah, we're revoking that, too.

Sam Stein (4:50)

And they can do that as far.

Adrian Carrascuelo (4:51)

As there's a law that authorizes deportation from the Secretary of State. And I think that's why Rubio got involved with sharing the tweet where he said he posted on Exxon Sunday, we're revoking the visas or green cards of Hamas supporters in America so they can be deported. And so, yeah, and this, what I do feel is also happening here from Doge Cuts to what I've written about his national emergency decree is so much about your choose your own reality. And we're going to tell you, like, at the border. This is an invasion. And now that it's an invasion, this is unlocking certain things for it to be true. Now they're saying that they want to deport, you know, support alleged Hamas supporters and things like that. This is an early example to show we're going to do it. And this is the first one. I think that's why you and me are sort of like, what the hell's going on here? But it's not going to go well.

Sam Stein (5:42)

It's because it's different. Right? It's like there is that there's an obvious distinction between saying people are crossing the border illegally or are here illegally and we need to throw them out of the country because they've broken a fundamental law. Right. You might not agree with that. You might think that's ill advised, you might think that that is a waste of resources. You might think it's incredibly socially and economically disruptive. But at least you can say they are not supposed to be here legally and we have an obligation to enforce that law. In this case. No one is disputing that he's here legally. He has a green card. The question is, did he in some tangible way support Hamas? And if so, did he do it to a degree that constitutes a threat to US national security interests or foreign interests? And if so, does the government have a right to deport him? Because obviously that is three gray areas in a row. And now we're in a place where the state's essentially saying so and so words or so and so actions. We believe we interpret those as a violation or sorry, as tangible sport for terrorist organization. And you can see just how slippery this slope gets 100%.

Adrian Carrascuelo (7:04)

Columbia University has declined to comment. I don't think they. Why don't think. Look, I don't think they've covered themselves in glory this entire time dealing with the Trump administration, dealing with fears about what was going on with the protests, the way they were cracking down on the protests. Now you have this situation happening, which, which is really interesting because if you think back to 9 11, as far as I know, we were not revoking the visas of Muslims during 9 11. Now there was a, a registry that they created, which I wrote about recently, sort of comparing this 911 registry where they wanted Muslims to sign up to.

Sam Stein (7:42)

Who was in the registry. I'm sorry, post 9 11. What was the registry? Post 9 11? It was comprised of.

Adrian Carrascuelo (7:47)

Yeah, I mean, it was comprised of asking Muslims who were here, you know, sort of. I guess there were people who had overstayed their Visas who were deported. Right. So out of 80,000 people that registered, 13,000 were deported. But like I said, some people had overstayed their visas. This guy's here legally with a green card. He has an eight month pregnant wife who's a US citizen. So this is again, I think, just like this new, unprecedented territory that we're reaching into.

Sam Stein (8:14)

The people who have defended the administration's actions say Khalil was, again, they allege that he was tangibly trying to, I guess, help Hamas, that the protests on Columbia's campuses were threatening to Jewish students there, and that they were prohibiting their ability to pursue their own education, literally blocking them from facilities. This is the. I'm just presenting the other side of this in that there was an obligation for ICE to act because of that. Does ICE have the authority? Yes, we've established that. But ultimately, doesn't this open up any other college campus for this type of action? And suddenly you now have to wonder, are you. Can you protest things on campus, is the question. And if you can, to what degree can you bring those protests? I mean, what is the actual line at which you could potentially be risking deportation? Now, this is for green card holders. This is for international students. No one has arrested a natural born US Citizen. But it does raise these questions.

Adrian Carrascuelo (9:30)

Yeah, absolutely does. He has some First Amendment rights. I saw activists today saying that if you can get someone, if you can target someone with a green card, it's not that far from getting a U.S. citizen, you know, And I think that that's one of the things that's. That's going in here again with this sort of like making up the rules as they went along. Clearly they had never done this before. And I mean, in January, Khalil, when asked about the president targeting him, had said that, you know, it's racist to label pro Palestinian protesters as terrorists, and it undermines their fundamental rights to free speech and assembly. It sets a dangerous precedent. So I think that that's clearly, as you and I are figuring out what's going on here and we're gonna be following this week. It's just, it hasn't happened before. And I think it sends a chill through so many people who, in 2017, there was such an opposition to Trump, what was called a resistance. And now you can see in so many areas and so many industries and sectors, people are scared. There's a chill, and they're like, if I oppose Trump, will I be walked out of a federal building? Will I be put on a deportation list? You know?

Sam Stein (10:33)

Right, okay. And now the pushback here so far is that his, his, his lawyer is filing habeas corpus petition on his behalf related to his detention, and there are protests or protests being organized demanding his release, organized by a group called the People's Forum. It's being planned in New York City's Federal Plaza for Monday afternoon. By the time we put this up, it probably will have been happening. Are you aware of anything else in this space? I mean, I guess it could be both on the free speech side, so you can imagine the ACLU get heavily involved in this, and on the immigration side.

Adrian Carrascuelo (11:09)

What I have seen covering immigration so far is that there are certain cases that rise above where the ACLU and the other legal groups are. So it's such an assault on their resources, their, the literal, the people that they have available to do these things, I think by design, by the, by the Trump administration. So this one is one that I suspect, I saw the protest that's happening later, that there's going to be a lot of strong pushback on this, because like I said, from any issue that you are going to oppose a Trump administration. If they can find ways to deport somebody, why can't they go try to deport one of your family members? I mean, they threatened his wife with arrest as well, and she's a US Citizen. So we've already gone past all the guardrails that we thought were here, and we're definitely in your territory.

Sam Stein (11:51)

I'll just say the other context and you alluded to this is Columbia University. So the school has had these student protests and 10 decampments during the height of the opposition to the, the war in, in Gaza. And they have acknowledged that there's ICE officials now around the campus, but they've also said that they will continue to follow the law. Sort of a vague open statement Colombia just had. The Trump administration just said it would be pulling $400 million of federal support to Colombia. First of all, I didn't. Maybe I'm an idiot, but I had no idea if that the federal government sent $400 million to one elite Ivy League academic institution. I am a graduate of the School of Journalism there, but, you know, I don't know if they need the 400 million, but whatever. Putting that aside, it's a huge chunk of change, and they feel threatened, obviously, by the government because that's hanging over their head.

Adrian Carrascuelo (12:44)

I mean, I think at the same time, we know that universities for so long have defended free speech, have been these liberal bastions. Colombia is not only declining to comment, they're also saying, like, ICE can come onto their campus and they're, if you see them, don't get it. Don't get in the way. Don't, don't. Don't involve yourself. You know, it's just so interesting because you could imagine other universities saying, like, hold on, you know, check with us. A lot of educational places, obviously it's different if it's public school or if it's high school, but they've said, we want the government officials to come in, check with us, check with the administrators. We can figure this out. And so just that they're sort of allowing ICE to be. Because he was in an apartment that was a Columbia University owned apartment. We're just, I mean, I don't know how else to say. New territory, unprecedented. You know, it's. It's kind of crazy.

Sam Stein (13:30)

You've said it. You said it three times. Yes. No, it's freaking nuts. Look, you might come down on some other side of the. The debate on Israel and Palestine. I think that's totally fair game. And I think putting that aside, though, having government officials come into college campuses and say the speech was over the line, you probably should recognize that there are some real bad implications to that and the directions it can go. Anyways, Adrian, thanks for unpacking this with us. I know it's a little bit off field for you, but it's helpful to get a good sense of where the immigration rights groups are and the civil liberties groups and how this is affecting people's psyche. We will be following the story. Really appreciate it, Adrian. Take care, buddy.

Adrian Carrascuelo (14:15)

Thank you.