Transcript
Tim Miller (0:00)
What do you think makes the perfect snack?
AM PM Advertiser (0:02)
Hmm. It's gotta be when I'm really craving it and it's convenient.
Tim Miller (0:05)
Could you be more specific?
AM PM Advertiser (0:06)
When it's cravenient.
Sam Stein (0:08)
Okay.
AM PM Advertiser (0:08)
Like a freshly baked cookie made with real butter, available right down the street at am, pm Or a savory breakfast sandwich I can grab in just a second at am pm.
Tim Miller (0:16)
I'm seeing a pattern here.
AM PM Advertiser (0:17)
Well, yeah, we're talking about what I.
Tim Miller (0:19)
Crave, which is anything from am, pm.
AM PM Advertiser (0:21)
What more could you want? Stop by AM PM where the snacks and drinks are perfectly craveable and convenient. That's cravenience. Am, PM Too much good stuff.
Sam Stein (0:30)
And hey, everybody, it's me, Sam Stein, managing editor at the Bulwark, joined by Tim Miller. Look at him in what appears to be a hotel. Nice shirt. Getting ready to interview Kamala Harris.
Tim Miller (0:40)
Yeah, this is how you get ready to interview Kamala. You know, you just get into your cozy T shirt, you start to think about it. You start to think about everything, you know, everything that came before. You start to marinate, how you didn't just fall out of a coconut tree, you know, you get the product.
Sam Stein (0:53)
Yeah. Are you not eating coconuts to like prep for this?
Tim Miller (0:56)
I am. So I'm thinking about all that, just kind of getting in the right head space. I'm also thinking about redistricting.
Sam Stein (1:01)
Yes. Oh, wow. What a segue. What amazing turn. Yeah, we're going to talk about redistricting here. Two big stories that just popped today. It's like midday November Tuesday the 18th. The first I want to talk about is Texas because Texas was like the big get for Republicans. They made a big show. It started this whole process. They're going to redistrict. They're going to get five seats for Republicans. Anyways. Today a federal court in Texas blocked the state from using the redrawn maps. They did so because they said it was done as sort of on a racial biased level or try to racial gerryman the state. And so by two to one ruling, with one of the judges being a Trump appointee, they basically said, you're going to have to use the old maps for the midterms now before we get into. Can be appealed. It will be appealed. It can be state. It likely will be state, although who knows? But if it does hold, this would be an incredible embarrassment for Trump. Could end up meaning that the Democrats leave this entire process with an actual gain of a seat or two. So I don't know what your thoughts are on here, Tim.
