Loading summary
Commercial Voice 1
What do you think makes the perfect snack?
AM PM Spokesperson
Hmm. It's gotta be when I'm really craving it and it's convenient.
Commercial Voice 1
Could you be more specific?
AM PM Spokesperson
When it's cravinient.
Commercial Voice 2
Okay.
AM PM Spokesperson
Like a freshly baked cookie made with real butter, available right down the street at a.m. p.m. Or a savory breakfast sandwich I can grab in just a second at am pm.
Commercial Voice 1
I'm seeing a pattern here.
AM PM Spokesperson
Well, yeah, we're talking about what I.
Commercial Voice 1
Crave, which is anything from am pm.
AM PM Spokesperson
What more could you want? Stop by AM PM where the snacks and drinks are perfectly craveable and convenient. That's cravenience AM PM Too much Good stuff.
Josh Barro
Cloud.
Commercial Voice 3
And I need yummy wrist tonight. And I need it more. My kid wet the bed and the smell never leaves. I don't know what to do. I'm always in the dark. The sweat and that shark smells like a dark. I'm Downy Rin tonight.
Josh Barro
Downy Rinse fights stubborn odors in just one wash. When impossible odors get stuck in.
Commercial Voice 3
Rinse it out.
Josh Barro
Hello, everyone. There is a private company putting out unemployment reports this week because that's not something the United States government does anymore because it's bad news. And there can be no bad news in Donald Trump's government, according to the firm Challenger Gray and Christmas. Happy Christmas. US based employers announced 153,074 job cuts in October, up 175% from a year prior to that when Joe Biden was president. Sarah, is that good?
Sarah Longwell
I'm pretty sure it's bad. Another nugget that's in there is. It is 1.1 million jobs lost in total this year. So since Donald Trump took office, we have experienced a net decline of over a million jobs. That is bad. That's bad.
Josh Barro
I mean, it's a good thing he doesn't have a Department of Bureau of Labor statistics to put out numbers on these things anymore. It is, yeah, that would be horrible.
Sarah Longwell
You know, private sector to the rescue. We are still, still getting our unemployment numbers and they're terrible. And I gotta say, this is one of those things. So obviously this has bigger economic implications. I'm not an economist. And so, you know, and you sometimes are very good at, you know, playing one of these on a podcast. Like, you're great at that. So maybe you can tell us what this contraction means in terms of our eventual slide into recession territory or stagflation territory because inflation remains. I think the big takeaway for me though is Donald Trump is spending his time building gilded ballrooms with the private Funds of his rich friends literally gilded of his rich friends, who he is making richer every day through the kleptocracy that he is running with the American government. Everybody in immediate proximity to Trump is getting richer, while the vast majority of Americans are getting poorer and people are losing their jobs. And the cutbacks are, are coming in part like we're seeing all these firms, companies like Target ups, other places, announcing massive job losses or layoffs that they're going to be doing. And many of these are the worst since either 2003 or 2009, if you remember 2009, which was quite a bad year for the economy. And so it looks like we are headed in that direction. And this is why you've seen Donald Trump's numbers for the first time are really starting to fall. And I think it is because the actual pain is starting to hit people.
Josh Barro
So I want to read from the Challenger Gray Christmas Report. Some industries are correcting after the hiring boom of the pandemic, but this comes as AI adoption, softening consumer and corporate spending. I want to underline that. And rising costs drive belt tightening and hiring for freezes. Those laid off now are finding it harder to quickly secure new roles which could further loosen the labor market. So again, on what we're seeing here is, I mean, this suggests that overall unemployment rate is actually going up. It isn't just churn, it isn't just people leaving one job for another time. On unemployment is now increasing. And what that is going to do is it's going to lower wages. Right. Supply and demand. When, when there are more people seeking jobs than there than there are jobs, the employers can pay less for them. And then on top of all of this, you have the push and pull that the Fed is going to have. They cut rates recently, they're going to want to cut rates again if the economy is slowing like this. Except that inflation is also persistent. So inflation is, it's not terrible right now, but it is a tick above where it's where people want it to be. And having inflation running slightly hotter than it should be while the economy is cooling rapidly. No bueno.
Sarah Longwell
No bueno.
Josh Barro
No bueno. And I gotta say, Sarah, maybe you could explain it to me, but I don't understand how this could be happening. Because Donald Trump was a businessman on TV once, so he understands business.
Sarah Longwell
Yeah. He fired Gilbert Godfrey on a soundstage. And, and he promised to lower grocery prices, which is what he was hired to do. I actually think one of the things that's really important about what's in these jobs reports is that the. And I thought this is where you were going when you said you wanted to underline that particular part of it in terms of the belt tightening of, of corporate America. A lot of that. That's the tariffs like these are. This is the thing to understand is that look, people were upset about the economy going in to the 2024 election and what Joe Biden had done was stage a recovery from the bottom dropping out during COVID Right. And where we had tremendous stimulus activity. And so he. But this was the thing is like on paper he was doing like the hard work of digging us out. But of course people were still feeling pain. And so they hired Donald Trump. Not everybody, but lots of people hired Donald Trump because of prices. I think that prices had a lot to in the fact that nothing is going well with them had a lot to do with why Donald Trump was just resoundingly delivered defeat. I think it was Trump, I mean I think he was a big drag that led Democrats to just crush in these off year elections. But Donald Trump has done nothing to improve the economy. The economy has not. Economy has gotten worse. Like to the extent Biden was going like this, going like this and then Trump like this, especially in the manufacturing sector. But I just, I could go on about tariffs for a while and what it's doing.
Josh Barro
No, but Trump has done exactly the opposite. Right. If Trump had simply gone golfing economy would be fine. We are in a man made disaster. And this is, it's, it's everything. It is the tariffs. It's not just the tariffs but the way in which the tariffs have been implemented. Where it's on again, off again, it's capricious. Nobody knows. Like it isn't just tariffs that everybody can then adjust to. It is chaos which freezes people. Right. If it was just, if he even just did a straightforward trade war like we're going to, we're going to punish the people who are importing to America. We're going to put a lot of tariffs on it. Everybody else figure it out. Then it leaked. It'd be a drag on the economy and it would be an increased input of inefficiency. But people can make plans around it. Instead we have economic paralysis. Nobody knows what to do. Because the thing that is today, well, if, if Donald Trump sees a commercial during the World Series that he doesn't like, tomorrow he's going to change the tariff rate. And like how can you plan for that if you're a business. Right?
Sarah Longwell
That's right.
Josh Barro
And the other thing you see that has happened is this word. Again, it said softening consumer spending. Why is consumer spending softening? Because consumer confidence is in the toilet. Like, if you just again, look at all the consumer confidence surveys and it's very, very bad. People think like, oh, this isn't going well. So here's my question. So the Supreme Court held her the Trump tariffs, oral arguments. I think that the general consensus seems to be that they're going to save Trump from himself and they're going to say, no, he can't do that. At which point Trump will either have to declare victory and say, see, it worked. We got everything we wanted. We have all the best deals. Won't make any sense, but that doesn't mean he can't do it. Or he could go to Congress and try to make the Republican Congress approve his tariffs legislatively. That's more likely to happen if he kills the filibuster.
Sarah Longwell
No, I was just going to say this is one of the reasons I have become pro nuking the filibuster after all this time, in part because Congress has to be in the position to do this. Like, the filibuster has made Congress, along with Trump, right? Has made it so that Congress is dysfunctional, they cannot do anything, and so everything ends up in the hands of executive power. And this is where I finally start to move on the filibuster, because it has to balance two of my more conservative instincts, right? One of my conservative instincts is that I think that it's good to have these mechanisms and institutions of compromise, except nobody's compromising. It is not doing that. It is simply the actual thing that is accomplishing is total paralysis of Congress. My other conservative instinct is to hate too much power in the hands of the executive.
Commercial Voice 2
Right.
Sarah Longwell
We have a system of checks and balances that is very important to American liberal democracy. It is our Madisonian vision for how the government operates. Right now, we do not have a Congress. It's just not there. And so it's literally not there.
Commercial Voice 2
Go ahead.
Josh Barro
The House is out of discussion.
Sarah Longwell
Let's. Let's get rid of the filibuster, make Trump go to Congress, and then the Senate and Congress have to give him his tariffs, and then they won't be insulated from the electoral repercussions that come with that. And I think this is important. I think we talked about this a lot at the beginning of the term, which is sort of the touch the stove nature of what has to happen. And I think, look, touch it. Nobody touch it. I don't want people to experience economic pain. They voted, they voted for something else.
Josh Barro
I didn't mean that.
Sarah Longwell
Yeah, they voted for this outcome. And so, okay, like Democrats or like people shouldn't save them from it. And, and, and Senate and congressional Republicans should not be inoculated from the electoral consequences of doing it. And so I want Trump to nuke the filibuster and I want Republicans to have to grapple decisively with, with the tariffs, man.
Josh Barro
We'll just say that even with the filibuster, Joe Biden was able to pass a lot of bipartisan legislation. He like passed a full legalization of gay marriage, passed a really common sense gun reform bill, passed a big infrastructure package that shoveled money into red states to help, to help the forgotten men and women of America. I mean, some people can do compromise. Not, not these particular people. That's okay. All right, Sarah, I guess this is a process question, so I'll just let, if you want to talk about it, you can. If not, is it a problem that we now exist in a country where not only is the rule of law basically just a guideline, Right. You know, like Jim Comey can get indicted, but everybody else is allowed to do whatever they want. But we also have a government that you can't trust the basic data. Right. The government has simply stopped publishing data that it doesn't like, which is what they do in China. Right. I know this from like demographics world back when I used to pay attention to demographics. And you would always be very, very wary about demographic data coming out of China. And the people who study this stuff seriously would get most of their understanding of what was going on China by talking to Chinese researchers at international conferences where they could have like conversations at a bar and be told what the actual numbers were saying because, you know, you just can't publish numbers that the regime doesn't like. Isn't this long term a gigantic problem for America because you can't just go back, right, like, okay, so Donald Trump loses and then you get some replacement level Democrat as president again. And everyone says, well now you can trust government data, but if 40,000 voters in Wisconsin go the other way next time around, then we have to stop trusting government. Like how, how does that work?
Sarah Longwell
I, I will say of all there are a lot of this question of what do we do post Trump is sort of is a sticky one across so many different vectors. On this one though, like the, the problem of long term trust, that one's really hard. Like that's, you know, you can, you build trust over decades, you can lose.
Josh Barro
Economies are built on trust.
Sarah Longwell
That's right. Our economy, specifically in the global, from the global standpoint, people, you know, using the dollar as they're the currency that they, that, that they measure, that they use as the measurement tool, like all of those things are compromised by Donald Trump. I do think they can start publishing the numbers again though. I mean, everybody knows that the problem is not that people don't trust the numbers right now, is that Donald Trump just took the numbers away so that people couldn't see them. And that's something I think that they can re institute and we'll see when.
Josh Barro
They start publishing numbers again if they're trustworthy.
Sarah Longwell
Yeah, that's a good point. I guess we'll see. We'll see whether or not they start publishing the numbers. The good news is just like we're getting economic numbers out of the private sector. Like unlike the Chinese regime where no company would step up and say there's no private sector data that would come out and contravene what the regime was saying, that is still not true in America. In America, there is still an enormous appetite for the actual information and people will provide it. Private sector, they will provide it. And so we will know. The other thing is, is that you can not tell people. But this is one of those things where like people are going to feel it. They are feeling it. Can I ask you something though?
Josh Barro
Yeah.
Sarah Longwell
One of the things that they point to as a, as a reason for the jobs softening numbers is AI. And it's amazing to me how little Trump and this administration talk about AI like it is coming at us like a thunderbolt to our system that is going to impact us in so many different ways. And it's not just that they don't have a plan for how to deal with it or anything like that. It's just not even talking about it. About the fact that from an economic standpoint, forget the information environment, but from an economic standpoint, a lot of jobs that used to exist, compiling data or reading legal briefs, like there's just all. A lot of them are white collar jobs that used to be in research. They're just getting replaced by AI. And to your point earlier, those are not going somewhere else. Right. They're just disappearing. And so I do think that Democrats have an opportunity to be forward looking, to feel like they are on top of the future by starting to have a plan for what they're going to do to build an economy when AI is going to like just swallow tons of jobs like and it's not an easy thing. But this is where my hire a million teachers, hire a million nurses, we're going to hire a million social safety, you know, social workers. Like these are a plan where we are going to build out sectors of the economy where things have been shrinking, where AI is not going to steal the jobs, like AI is not going to take them. And we need to invest in building those sectors. We need to invest in educating people for the new environment where AI can do these things. And somebody with a plan for that I think can go far.
Josh Barro
My plan, we send ChatGPT on a Falcon Heavy into the sun.
Sarah Longwell
It's not going to happen. That's the thing is can we kill.
Josh Barro
AI and social media together at the same time? Like a red wedding of the tech universe? No. No, can't do that. All right, I'm jbl. She's my best friend, Sarah Longwell. Come follow us at the Bulwark and do us a quick solid hit like hit subscribe. We'll be back next time.
Sarah Longwell
Bye.
Josh Barro
Good luck, America.
Commercial Voice 1
You know that big bargain detergent jug is 80% water, right? It doesn't clean as well. 80% water. I thought I was getting a better deal because it's so big. If you want a better clean, Tide pods are only 12% water. The rest is pure concentrated cleaning ingredients. Oh, let me make an announcement. Attention shoppers, if you want a real deal, try Tide pods. Stop paying for watered down detergents. Pay for clean. If it's got to be clean, it's got to be Tide pods. Water content based on the leading bargain liquid detergent.
Commercial Voice 2
When you think about businesses that are selling through the roof, Allbirds or skims. Sure you think about a great product, a cool brand and brilliant marketing. But an often overlooked secret is actually the businesses behind the business making, selling and for the shoppers buying. Simple. For millions of businesses, that business is Shopify. Nobody does selling better than Shopify. Home of the number one checkout on the planet. And the not so secret with shop pay that boosts conversions up to 50%, meaning way less carts going abandoned and way more sales going. So if you're into growing your business, your commerce platform better be ready to sell wherever your customers are scrolling or strolling on the web, in your store, in their feed and everywhere in between. Businesses that sell more sell on Shopify. Upgrade your business and get the same checkout skims uses. Sign up for your $1 per month trial period at shopify.com audioboom all lowercase go to shopify.com audioboom to upgrade your selling today. Shopify.com audioboom are you a parent looking.
Evergreen Virtual Academy Announcer
For an independent, flexible and tuition free school in Oregon? Evergreen Virtual Academy offers a dynamic and tuition free public education with Oregon certified teachers for PK through 12th grade students. Your student gets a laptop, live class sessions, and the ability to chart their own unique path plus in person events and social activities all year. When school has no walls, learning has no limits. Learn more and enroll now. Evergreen Virtual Academy evergreenvirtual.
Commercial Voice 2
Org.
Podcast: Bulwark Takes
Host(s): Josh Barro, Sarah Longwell
Date: November 7, 2025
This episode of Bulwark Takes delivers sharp, timely analysis of the latest jobs report under President Trump’s administration—a report the hosts argue he wouldn’t want people to see. Josh Barro and Sarah Longwell break down the economic numbers now sourced from private sector firms (due to government suppression), the political and social repercussions of these figures, the chaotic implementation of tariffs, and the lingering damage to American institutions and trust. They also explore the looming economic impact of AI—an area they say Trump is ignoring.
Sarah Longwell, on the economic pain:
“Everybody in immediate proximity to Trump is getting richer, while the vast majority of Americans are getting poorer and people are losing their jobs.” [02:21]
Josh Barro, on economic chaos:
“Instead we have economic paralysis. Nobody knows what to do. Because the thing that is today, well, if Donald Trump sees a commercial during the World Series that he doesn't like, tomorrow he's going to change the tariff rate.” [07:24]
Sarah Longwell, on Congressional dysfunction:
“The filibuster has made Congress, along with Trump, right? Has made it so that Congress is dysfunctional, they cannot do anything, and so everything ends up in the hands of executive power.” [09:01]
Josh Barro, on the consequences for trust:
“Isn't this long term a gigantic problem for America because you can't just go back… if 40,000 voters in Wisconsin go the other way next time around, then we have to stop trusting government. Like how, how does that work?” [11:55]
Sarah Longwell, on AI and workforce planning:
“...We need to invest in educating people for the new environment where AI can do these things. And somebody with a plan for that I think can go far.” [15:40]
| Timestamp | Segment Description | |-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------| | 01:00 | Government stops publishing jobs data; private firms step in| | 01:32 | 1.1 million net jobs lost since Trump took office | | 03:36 | Challenger, Gray & Christmas report analysis | | 05:16 | Tariffs, erratic policy, and economic contraction | | 08:44 | Filibuster, Congressional dysfunction, executive overreach | | 10:48 | Comparison to China, suppression of data, trust erosion | | 14:26 | AI job losses, political blind spots, and future policy | | 16:05 | Sarcastic "solution" to AI disruption |
The tone: sharply critical, often wry or sarcastic, and deeply concerned about both economic realities and the. state of American democracy. The hosts balance data-driven analysis with pointed, accessible commentary and the occasional biting joke.
This episode is a candid, sometimes caustic exploration of economic pain in Trump’s America, linking job losses to erratic policy and democratic erosion. Barro and Longwell warn of the dangers of suppressed data and institutional damage, but retain some hope that transparency, accountability, and forward-looking policy—especially around AI—can eventually repair both trust and the economy.