Tim Miller RIPS Andrew Schulz’s Gross And Dumb Reason For Voting MAGA

Summary

Bulwark Takes: Tim Miller RIPS Andrew Schulz’s Gross And Dumb Reason For Voting MAGA
Release Date: April 22, 2025

In this episode of Bulwark Takes, Tim Miller from The Bulwark delivers a scathing critique of comedian and podcaster Andrew Schulz’s recently articulated reasons for supporting the MAGA movement. The episode delves deep into the rationale behind Schulz's political shift, Miller's rebuttal, and the broader implications for free speech and political integrity in the current climate.

---

1. Introduction

Tim Miller opens the episode by introducing Andrew Schulz, characterizing him as a prominent bro comedian and podcaster who recently transitioned from liberal Democratic support to championing the Republican MAGA agenda. Miller sets the stage for a critical analysis of Schulz's motivations and the validity of his arguments.

Tim Miller [00:30]: "Andrew Schultz is one of those bro comedian podcasters everyone's talking about who, you know, used to be liberal or used to vote for Democrats and now has been red pilled and is voting for Republicans."

---

2. Andrew Schulz's Argument for Voting MAGA

Miller plays a segment from Schulz to present his viewpoint, which centers around superficial and personal motivations for political alignment. Schulz argues that his support for MAGA stems from a desire to align with politicians who embody certain personal freedoms and lifestyle choices.

Andrew Schulz [00:56]:
"Side switched so much. You know, when I was younger, like Democrats were cool. They were getting their dick sucked in the office. They were like, right? They were like, they were like supportive of like hip hop music. They said, do whatever you want. Like we don't want to be in your bedroom. They were cool with gay people. Like it was cool to be a Democrat. Now conservatives got three baby mama. The president got three baby mamas. He's getting left and right, right. He's cool. He's the one saying say whatever the you want. So now conservatives have become Democrats. So I don't think I've changed. I just like the dudes that get and say whatever they want."

Schulz emphasizes his preference for leaders who are permissive in personal expression and lifestyle, suggesting that this is his primary criterion for political support.

---

3. Tim Miller's Rebuttal

Miller vehemently disagrees with Schulz's rationale, labeling it as immature and misguided. He challenges the validity of basing political support on personal gratification and superficial traits rather than substantive policy and governance capabilities.

Tim Miller [01:33]:
"First off, you're a child, okay? Like you're a child at age 41. You are determining who you want to be president and make policy for the country based on who you think it's the most. Pussy. Like really? Are you a teenage boy?"

Miller accuses Schulz of being irresponsible, questioning whether personal desires should influence decisions that affect national policy and governance. He dismisses Schulz's argument as "childish" and "totally wrong," suggesting that it lacks depth and understanding of the broader political landscape.

---

4. Key Examples and Evidence

To substantiate his critique, Miller presents several instances where he argues that the MAGA movement, contrary to Schulz's claims, is actually infringing upon free speech and personal freedoms.

a. Suppression of Free Speech

Miller cites actions taken by the Trump administration that he interprets as suppressive, undermining the very freedoms Schulz claims to prioritize.

Tim Miller [02:10]:
"Donald Trump has detained and jailed a woman for writing an op ed where she expressed concerns about Israel's war in Gaza... Donald Trump is doing that right now."

He contrasts this with the Biden administration, noting a lack of similar repression under Democratic leadership.

b. Targeting Personal Expression

Miller highlights policies targeting personal expressions, such as tattoos, as examples of the erosion of individual freedoms.

Tim Miller [03:45]:
"Guys are getting sent to El Salvador because of their tattoos. Are tattoos not free speech? Is that not creativity?"

He references documents from the Department of Homeland Security indicating that individuals are being detained based on the content of their tattoos, drawing a direct line between personal expression and governmental overreach.

c. Political Reprisals

Another significant point Miller raises is the targeting of political figures who express dissenting opinions.

Tim Miller [05:20]:
"The president just signed an executive order specifically targeting Chris Krebs... he spoke out and said that he did not think that any of the conspiracy theories of the 2020 election are true and that the 2020 election was safe... the President of the United States is signing an executive order telling his Department of Justice to investigate him."

This example is used to illustrate a suppression of truthful discourse and a threat to free speech within political environments.

---

5. Challenge to Schulz's Priorities

Miller challenges Schulz's prioritization of personal gratification ("pussy") and superficial freedoms over the substantive threats to free speech and democratic integrity.

Tim Miller [09:00]:
"If your agenda is going to be pussy and free speech, to actually be an advocate for both, I think you can do that. Andrew Schultz, I appreciate you."

He urges Schulz to broaden his perspective and consider the ramifications of his political support beyond personal freedoms, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding free speech from governmental suppression.

---

6. Conclusion and Final Thoughts

In wrapping up, Miller reiterates his disapproval of Schulz's motivations for supporting MAGA, emphasizing the dangers of electing leaders based on superficial traits rather than governance capabilities. He warns of the potential consequences of such choices, including policy failures and erosion of democratic principles.

Tim Miller [12:00]:
"Responsible grown people, they support people for office because they think they'll do a good job of the job of governing, which isn't really related to the job of banging sluts. It's like those two things aren't really that aligned."

Miller calls for a more mature and responsible approach to political support, advocating for the selection of leaders based on their ability to govern effectively rather than personal indulgences.

---

Key Takeaways

• Superficial Motivations: Andrew Schulz's support for MAGA is primarily based on personal gratification and superficial traits, which Tim Miller criticizes as immature and irresponsible.

• Suppression of Free Speech: Contrary to Schulz's claims, Miller argues that the MAGA movement under Trump has led to significant infringements on free speech and personal freedoms through actions like detaining individuals for their opinions or tattoos.

• Importance of Governance: Miller emphasizes the importance of supporting political leaders based on their governance capabilities and policies rather than personal attributes or indulgences.

• Broader Implications: The episode highlights the broader implications of electing leaders based on superficial reasons, warning of potential threats to democratic principles and individual freedoms.

---

Notable Quotes

• Tim Miller [00:30]:
  "Andrew Schultz is one of those bro comedian podcasters everyone's talking about who, you know, used to be liberal or used to vote for Democrats and now has been red pilled and is voting for Republicans."

• Andrew Schulz [00:56]:
  "Now conservatives have become Democrats. So I don't think I've changed. I just like the dudes that get and say whatever they want."

• Tim Miller [01:33]:
  "First off, you're a child, okay? Like you're a child at age 41. You are determining who you want to be president and make policy for the country based on who you think it's the most. Pussy."

• Tim Miller [03:45]:
  "Guys are getting sent to El Salvador because of their tattoos. Are tattoos not free speech? Is that not creativity?"

• Tim Miller [12:00]:
  "Responsible grown people, they support people for office because they think they'll do a good job of the job of governing, which isn't really related to the job of banging sluts."

---

This episode serves as a critical examination of the motivations behind political support, emphasizing the necessity of prioritizing governance and policy over personal gratification and superficial traits. Tim Miller's articulate and evidence-based rebuttal challenges listeners to reevaluate the criteria they use for political allegiance, advocating for a more informed and responsible approach to democracy.

Transcript

[Ryan]

Hello, it is Ryan. And I was on a flight the other day playing one of my favorite social spin slot games on jumbacasino.com I looked over the person sitting next to me and you know what they were doing? They were also playing Chumba Casino. Coincidence? I think not everybody's loving having fun with it. Chumba Casino is home to hundreds of casino style games that you can play for free anytime, anywhere, even at 30,000ft. So sign up [e-mail] to claim your free welcome bonus. That's chumbacasino.com and live the Chumba life.

[Unknown]

No purchase necessary. VGW Revoid or prohibited by law. See terms and conditions 18/ hey guys.

[Tim Miller]

Tim Miller from the Bulwark. Andrew Schultz is one of those bro comedian podcasters everyone's talking about who, you know, used to be liberal or used to vote for Democrats and now has been red pilled and is voting for Republicans. Well, he offered possibly the stupidest argument for a transition to MAGA that I've ever heard on a podcast earlier this week. And so I want to play that for you and respond to it on the other side.

[Andrew Schultz]

Side switched so much. You know, when I was younger, like Democrats were cool. They were getting their dick sucked in the office. They were like, right? They were like, they were like supportive of like hip hop music. They said, do whatever you want. Like we don't want to be in your bedroom. They were cool with gay people. Like it was cool to be a Democrat. Now conservatives got three baby mama. The president got three baby mamas. He's getting left and right, right. He's cool. He's the one saying say whatever the you want. So now conservatives have become Democrats. So I don't think I've changed. I just like the dudes that get and say whatever they want. So it's very. You want me to be a Democrat again? Get some pussy, tell me to say whatever I want.

[Tim Miller]

I'm there. First off, you're a child, okay? Like you're a child at age 41. You are determining who you want to be president and make policy for the country based on who you think it's the most. Pussy. Like really? Are you a teenage boy? I know you have a kid, Andrew. Are you going to decide what school they go to based on which principal? Seems like he's the biggest pussy hound. Like, do you, do you have any responsibility or accountability in your life? Anyway, rather than lecture you, I don't want to be one of those woke libs that lecture you. Rather than lecture Andrew, I want to actually respond to the merits of his arguments, which are also totally wrong. Okay, It's a childish argument, but it's also a wrong argument. And maybe it's supposed to be funny. It's a little funny, but it's not true. And I think that's the most important thing. Here's Andrew saying that he just likes the dudes that get pussy and say whatever they want. He wants politicians that will let people say whatever they want. He argues that the Democrats used to be that party, more libertine, and now it's the Republicans who want people to say whatever they want. Have you paid attention to the news? This Republican government, Donald Trump has detained and jailed a woman for writing an op ed. Co writing an op ed where she expressed concerns about Israel's war in Gaza. Okay. I don't remember Joe Biden doing that, jailing somebody, detaining someone because of their political opinion. Donald Trump is doing that right now. You know what else is happening right now? Guys are getting sent to El Salvador because of their tattoos. Are tattoos not free speech? Is that not creativity? Is that not, you know, do people not have free expression to put whatever tattoos they want on their body in this country? There is tons of evidence. There are even documents out of the Department of Homeland Security that the Trump administration determined who to send to the El Salvador prison, in part based on whether they had tattoos that were similar to the Trenda Aragua Venezuelan tattoos, which isn't even really a thing, but whatever. Like, you know, one of the guys we've been talking about, the makeup artist Andre, has a tattoo of his mother and father with a crown. And he got sent to the prison in part because supposedly the crown tattoo is related to what to Trenda Aragua and the types of tattoos that Trenda Aragua members have. So. So, like, we are detaining and jailing people in this country right now based on their opinions and based on their tattoos. Is that cool? Is that free speech? Is that letting people say whatever they want? Andrew Schultz. I don't think so. You know what else? The president just signed an executive order specifically targeting Chris Krebs, who worked for the Trump administration, who's a Republican, for speaking out and saying that he thought that as an expert in cybersecurity who has paid to keep the 2020 election safe by our government, he spoke out and said that he did not think that any of the conspiracy theories of the 2020 election are true and that the 2020 election was safe. And, you know, he used his free speech rights to express that opinion in interviews. And do you know what that got him? The President of the United States is signing an executive order telling his Department of Justice to investigate him. Okay, Andrew Schultz, does that. Does that sound like a party that wants to let people say whatever they want? Maybe what you mean when you say, I want to let people say whatever they want is I want to be able to say pussy and retard and do racial slurs without having anybody nag me about it. I'm not gonna nag you, bro. Go, ham. Go ham. Make whatever jokes you want. You know, say whatever words you want. You just really love saying pussy over and over again. Go ahead and say it. You know, you want to call me a gay slur. Do it. Make them up with a funny joke. Call me a poof. Jer. Whatever. I don't. I don't care. Okay, but, like, if that is what you mean by Donald Trump will let you say whatever you want, then, yeah, like, Donald Trump doesn't care if you do racist jokes on your podcast, all right? And. And MAGA supporters probably aren't going to tweet about how you offended them or hurt their feelings, okay? And, I mean, you know, unless you go after Christians or, you know, unless you call them stupid mouth breathers or, you know, unless you make some other kind of joke, call them deplorables. If you call them deplorables, they might get kind of upset, all right? But, yeah, they're not gonna get mad at you if you do a racial slurp, so go Ham. But here's the thing. Free speech in this country is about more than podcasters being able to do racist jokes, okay? It also means that people need to be able to speak out about their political opinions without fear of reprisal from the government. And right now, the biggest threat to free speech in this country is the President of the United States specifically targeting political foes and telling his Department of Justice to target them because of their political views and. Or sending migrants who came here because they wanted to have free speech rights, who fled Venezuela, who fled communist Venezuela to come to the land of milk and honey, and now we're sending them to a hole in a foreign country because we don't think their tattoos look right. Like, those are the real threats to free speech rights. Andrew Schultz, your free speech rights were never a threat under Joe Biden. You were never in danger of going to jail or whatever. You. You were in danger of some annoying people nagging you on social media, and that's annoying. I get it, fine. But if this is your red line, if this is the reason you've been red pilled, that you think everybody should be able to say what they want without any concerns, then I would think that in addition to your concerns about being nagged, you would also have concerns, or even greater concerns really, about the people who were shackled and sent on a plane to another country and had their, you know, head shaved and were slapped and are now in a hole for 23 hours a day with no access to a lawyer or their family. I wonder, Andrew Schultz, if you think that is a threat to free speech rights. So look, if you're telling me you're going to vote for whoever gets the most pussy, okay. I mean, Donald Trump used to do pretty good with women. It seems like the rest of the. Are you a Republican now, though? I mean, J.D. vance, J.D. vance doesn't really seem like he's banging people out. The speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, he monitors his own son's porn. I'd be a little concerned about Mike Johnson taking over the party if I were you, Andrew Schultz. I don't know if you want the speaker of the House monitoring the type of material you're googling on. Pornhub. John Thune, the Republican Senate leader, you probably never even heard of him because you have no serious thoughts about politics, but go ahead and Google that guy. I don't think that's. That's a fella that's, you know, slaying. All right, so, like, this whole thing is just ridiculous. I mean, let me just break it down. Let me just tell you something. There are a lot of Democrats that get laid. There are Republicans that get laid. There are Republicans that are annoying Christian scolds. There are Democrats that are kind of annoying woke scolds, right? Like, this is not a reason to make somebody the leader of the free world. What happens when you make a moron the leader of the free world? Because you liked the fact that in the 80s he got herpes because he was banging out so many models, then what you get is a stock market crash, people being sent without due process. You get all the negatives that are associated with that. Responsible grown people, they support people for office because they think they'll do a good job of the job of governing, which isn't really related to the job of banging sluts. It's like those two things aren't really that aligned. I mean, every once in a while they overlap. There have been people who are good at governing or also good at finding chicks to hook up with. There have also been people that are bad at governing, that are good at finding chicks to hook up with. There have been people that are good at governing, that have no game. Like, you know, this isn't. This isn't. This should not be, like, the top qualification that you're looking for if you're going to change your whole political identity. Just. Just one. One little tip there. Oh, yeah, and last thing, one other thing. You're like, again, when you're talking about when you were younger, Democrats were cool. They were supportive of hip hop music. They're like, do what you want. We don't want to be in your bedroom. They support gays. That's still the Democrats. And did you watch Kendrick's super bowl halftime show? I mean, like, do you want to poll the rappers? Like, there are a couple Republican rappers. There's Kanye, who is just, you know, doing some very strange tweets. Well, first about how he's a Nazi, and then about some, like, kind of sexual liaison he was having with his cousin as a child. I don't. I don't know what's happening there. But you got. The MAGA does have him, and sadly for me, they got Boosie. Boosie. Seems like he went pro Trump. And maybe there are a couple other rappers, but, like, you know, most of the big rap name, most of the successful hip hop artists, you know, the guys that I think you'd want to look out to and hang out with, the ones that aren't Nazis, they're already still Democrats. Like, the. You know, this whole thing is just like, you're trying to create this rationale. Like, you're trying to create this universe that says, like, or you stayed the same, but everybody else changed. Well, like, not really, man. Jay Z stayed the same. Kendrick stayed the same. Right? Like, they. They didn't switch sides because they thought that Trump was better at slaying women. Like, they. They stuck. Okay, you changed. You decided to change. You decided to go along with Donald Trump because you thought he was cool. I guess you were just really impressed by all the make. The masculine makeup that he puts on and his many failed businesses and the fact that he lets you say whatever slurs you want to say without any reprisal. All right, that's fine. But that's a change. That's a choice that you made. It's a really dumb choice. We are all suffering the consequences right now. And so my ask of you, Andrew Schultz, is that if you're going to make this change, if you're going to go all in. If you're going to make and if you're going to say, I'm going to go MAGA and go Trump. Because the thing that's most important to me is pussy and free speech rights. Well, how about you hold the man that you now support? You've done an interview with accountable. Okay. How about you say that, hey, I came on board this team because I want people to be able to say what they want. And so people should be able to say what they want. And that includes people that thought the 2020 election wasn't stolen. That includes people that had issues about what's happening in Israel and Gaza. It includes people that are Venezuelan refugees, that have tattoos that you don't like that this government doesn't like. It includes people that want to watch porn and don't want the speaker of the House to monitor it or the governors of some of these states to ban it. Republican governors, Right. It includes people who want to speak about their gay parents. It includes students who want to speak about their gay parents at school. You know, and don't want the state to ban schools from talking about, talking about LGBT people. Right. Like they did in Florida. Right. You know, how about you do that? All right. If you're going to be on that team, the Republican team, because people want to say what they want. How about you make sure that everybody gets to say what they want, not just comedians who want to do raunchy jokes, because we're all for raunchy jokes. But, man, there are other people out there. There's a big universe out there. There are other folks out there that are being targeted, that are suffering right now that are not you. And it's time to grow up. And if your agenda is going to be pussy and free speech, to actually be an advocate for both, to do both, I think you can do that. Andrew Schultz, I appreciate you. Everybody else subscribe to the feed. We'll be back here. We'll see you soon. Andrew Schultz, you're always welcome on the board podcast. We can hash this out. All right, Come on. Yours. Happy to do it. We'll see you all soon.

[Ryan]

Hello, it is Ryan. And I was on a flight the other day playing one of my favorite social spin slot games on jumbacasino.com I looked over the person sitting next to me and you know what they were doing? They were also playing Jumba Casino. Coincidence? I think not. Everybody's loving having fun with it. Chumba Casino is home to hundreds of casino style games that you can play for free, anytime, anywhere, even at 30,000ft. So sign up [e-mail] to claim your free welcome bonus. That's chumbacasino.com and live the Chumba life.

[Unknown]

No purchase necessary. BMW void. We're prohibited by law. See terms and conditions 18 plus.