Bulwark Takes: Tim Miller RIPS Andrew Schulz’s Gross And Dumb Reason For Voting MAGA
Release Date: April 22, 2025

In this episode of Bulwark Takes, Tim Miller from The Bulwark delivers a scathing critique of comedian and podcaster Andrew Schulz’s recently articulated reasons for supporting the MAGA movement. The episode delves deep into the rationale behind Schulz's political shift, Miller's rebuttal, and the broader implications for free speech and political integrity in the current climate.

1. Introduction

Tim Miller opens the episode by introducing Andrew Schulz, characterizing him as a prominent bro comedian and podcaster who recently transitioned from liberal Democratic support to championing the Republican MAGA agenda. Miller sets the stage for a critical analysis of Schulz's motivations and the validity of his arguments.

Tim Miller [00:30]: "Andrew Schultz is one of those bro comedian podcasters everyone's talking about who, you know, used to be liberal or used to vote for Democrats and now has been red pilled and is voting for Republicans."

2. Andrew Schulz's Argument for Voting MAGA

Miller plays a segment from Schulz to present his viewpoint, which centers around superficial and personal motivations for political alignment. Schulz argues that his support for MAGA stems from a desire to align with politicians who embody certain personal freedoms and lifestyle choices.

Andrew Schulz [00:56]:
"Side switched so much. You know, when I was younger, like Democrats were cool. They were getting their dick sucked in the office. They were like, right? They were like, they were like supportive of like hip hop music. They said, do whatever you want. Like we don't want to be in your bedroom. They were cool with gay people. Like it was cool to be a Democrat. Now conservatives got three baby mama. The president got three baby mamas. He's getting left and right, right. He's cool. He's the one saying say whatever the you want. So now conservatives have become Democrats. So I don't think I've changed. I just like the dudes that get and say whatever they want."

Schulz emphasizes his preference for leaders who are permissive in personal expression and lifestyle, suggesting that this is his primary criterion for political support.

3. Tim Miller's Rebuttal

Miller vehemently disagrees with Schulz's rationale, labeling it as immature and misguided. He challenges the validity of basing political support on personal gratification and superficial traits rather than substantive policy and governance capabilities.

Tim Miller [01:33]:
"First off, you're a child, okay? Like you're a child at age 41. You are determining who you want to be president and make policy for the country based on who you think it's the most. Pussy. Like really? Are you a teenage boy?"

Miller accuses Schulz of being irresponsible, questioning whether personal desires should influence decisions that affect national policy and governance. He dismisses Schulz's argument as "childish" and "totally wrong," suggesting that it lacks depth and understanding of the broader political landscape.

4. Key Examples and Evidence

To substantiate his critique, Miller presents several instances where he argues that the MAGA movement, contrary to Schulz's claims, is actually infringing upon free speech and personal freedoms.

a. Suppression of Free Speech

Miller cites actions taken by the Trump administration that he interprets as suppressive, undermining the very freedoms Schulz claims to prioritize.

Tim Miller [02:10]:
"Donald Trump has detained and jailed a woman for writing an op ed where she expressed concerns about Israel's war in Gaza... Donald Trump is doing that right now."

He contrasts this with the Biden administration, noting a lack of similar repression under Democratic leadership.

b. Targeting Personal Expression

Miller highlights policies targeting personal expressions, such as tattoos, as examples of the erosion of individual freedoms.

Tim Miller [03:45]:
"Guys are getting sent to El Salvador because of their tattoos. Are tattoos not free speech? Is that not creativity?"

He references documents from the Department of Homeland Security indicating that individuals are being detained based on the content of their tattoos, drawing a direct line between personal expression and governmental overreach.

c. Political Reprisals

Another significant point Miller raises is the targeting of political figures who express dissenting opinions.

Tim Miller [05:20]:
"The president just signed an executive order specifically targeting Chris Krebs... he spoke out and said that he did not think that any of the conspiracy theories of the 2020 election are true and that the 2020 election was safe... the President of the United States is signing an executive order telling his Department of Justice to investigate him."

This example is used to illustrate a suppression of truthful discourse and a threat to free speech within political environments.

5. Challenge to Schulz's Priorities

Miller challenges Schulz's prioritization of personal gratification ("pussy") and superficial freedoms over the substantive threats to free speech and democratic integrity.

Tim Miller [09:00]:
"If your agenda is going to be pussy and free speech, to actually be an advocate for both, I think you can do that. Andrew Schultz, I appreciate you."

He urges Schulz to broaden his perspective and consider the ramifications of his political support beyond personal freedoms, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding free speech from governmental suppression.

6. Conclusion and Final Thoughts

In wrapping up, Miller reiterates his disapproval of Schulz's motivations for supporting MAGA, emphasizing the dangers of electing leaders based on superficial traits rather than governance capabilities. He warns of the potential consequences of such choices, including policy failures and erosion of democratic principles.

Tim Miller [12:00]:
"Responsible grown people, they support people for office because they think they'll do a good job of the job of governing, which isn't really related to the job of banging sluts. It's like those two things aren't really that aligned."

Miller calls for a more mature and responsible approach to political support, advocating for the selection of leaders based on their ability to govern effectively rather than personal indulgences.

Key Takeaways

• Superficial Motivations: Andrew Schulz's support for MAGA is primarily based on personal gratification and superficial traits, which Tim Miller criticizes as immature and irresponsible.

• Suppression of Free Speech: Contrary to Schulz's claims, Miller argues that the MAGA movement under Trump has led to significant infringements on free speech and personal freedoms through actions like detaining individuals for their opinions or tattoos.

• Importance of Governance: Miller emphasizes the importance of supporting political leaders based on their governance capabilities and policies rather than personal attributes or indulgences.

• Broader Implications: The episode highlights the broader implications of electing leaders based on superficial reasons, warning of potential threats to democratic principles and individual freedoms.

Notable Quotes

• Tim Miller [00:30]:
  "Andrew Schultz is one of those bro comedian podcasters everyone's talking about who, you know, used to be liberal or used to vote for Democrats and now has been red pilled and is voting for Republicans."

• Andrew Schulz [00:56]:
  "Now conservatives have become Democrats. So I don't think I've changed. I just like the dudes that get and say whatever they want."

• Tim Miller [01:33]:
  "First off, you're a child, okay? Like you're a child at age 41. You are determining who you want to be president and make policy for the country based on who you think it's the most. Pussy."

• Tim Miller [03:45]:
  "Guys are getting sent to El Salvador because of their tattoos. Are tattoos not free speech? Is that not creativity?"

• Tim Miller [12:00]:
  "Responsible grown people, they support people for office because they think they'll do a good job of the job of governing, which isn't really related to the job of banging sluts."

This episode serves as a critical examination of the motivations behind political support, emphasizing the necessity of prioritizing governance and policy over personal gratification and superficial traits. Tim Miller's articulate and evidence-based rebuttal challenges listeners to reevaluate the criteria they use for political allegiance, advocating for a more informed and responsible approach to democracy.