Podcast Summary: Bulwark Takes – Tim Miller Shreds Vance’s Phony Outrage Act
Date: August 24, 2025
Host: Tim Miller (The Bulwark)
Episode Focus: An unvarnished critique of Vice President J.D. Vance’s recent television appearances, especially his comments about the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the investigation into John Bolton, and the deployment of National Guard troops to Washington D.C.
Episode Overview
This episode sees Tim Miller incisively break down Vice President J.D. Vance’s performance on the Sunday political shows, finding his rhetoric on Ukraine, U.S. foreign policy, and domestic law enforcement both disingenuous and historically ignorant. Miller points out the contradictions, misinformation, and political posturing inherent in Vance’s answers, with a focus on calling out hypocrisy and demanding accountability.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. J.D. Vance’s Ukraine Comments and Historical Comparisons
- Vance's Argument: Wars end in negotiation; WWII and WWI built as comparatives.
- Quote: “If you go back to World War II, if you go back to World War I, if you go back to every major conflict in human history, they all end with some kind of negotiation.” – J.D. Vance [02:20]
- Tim Miller’s Rebuttal:
- Highlights the false equivalency — WWII ended with unconditional surrender, not negotiation.
- Quote: “There was never a moment where Hitler and Mussolini were landing in America and FDR or Truman was waiting for them, clapping on the tarmac. That didn't happen.” – Tim Miller [03:16]
- Connects Vance’s logic to past instances where bad faith actors minimized anti-democratic actions:
- Quote: “This reminds me always of the Vance and others defense of the January 6th insurrection, which was like, it was a peaceful transfer of power...” – Co-host/Commentator [03:40]
- Emphasizes that coddling aggressors does not lead to peace, and that negotiating after territorial conquest sets a dangerous precedent.
- Quote: “The only way for this to end is for you to coddle Putin and rub his belly and treat him like he’s some great leader and give a bunch of concessions to him?” – Tim Miller [04:30]
- Highlights the false equivalency — WWII ended with unconditional surrender, not negotiation.
2. Vance’s Claims About Russian Concessions and the Path to Peace
- Vance's Spin: Russia is supposedly making major concessions and recognizing Ukraine’s independence.
- Quote: “What they have conceded is ... they've recognized that they're not going to be able to install a puppet regime in Kyiv... they’ve acknowledged there is going to be some security guarantee to the territorial integrity of Ukraine.” – J.D. Vance [05:03]
- Miller’s Reality Check:
- Flags these claims as unsubstantiated or misleading.
- Quote: “I don’t know if any of this is true ... And there’s also this idea that they're not going to get a puppet regime in Kyiv. Well, like if the deal is that Ukraine does not have self governance anymore ... you can call it whatever you want. It’s not a puppet regime, but it’s certainly Russia dictating the terms.” – Tim Miller [05:44 & 06:15]
- Points out that limiting Ukraine’s sovereignty is, functionally, dictating terms for a free country.
- Quote: “I don't think that Russia should get to dictate the terms of what happens to Ukraine when this war is over. To me, that is a non starter, non negotiable.” – Tim Miller [06:31]
- Flags these claims as unsubstantiated or misleading.
3. J.D. Vance’s Tepid Response to Russian Attack on American Interests
- Welker’s Question: Was Vance angry at Russia for targeting an American company in Ukraine?
- Vance’s Response:
- Quote: “I don’t like it, Kristen, but this is a war.” – J.D. Vance [07:15]
- Miller’s Critique:
- Calls out the lack of outrage, contrasting it to Vance’s performative anger in other situations.
- Quote: “He can’t even do that. It’s just like, well, I don't like it. Well, the Russians bombed one of our companies. What are we supposed to do? It’s a war. I don’t know. Fight back.” – Tim Miller [07:49]
- Suggests Vance is more upset about cultural grievances than actual acts of war against American interests.
- Calls out the lack of outrage, contrasting it to Vance’s performative anger in other situations.
4. Investigation into John Bolton
- Vance’s Slip: Refers to the investigation as “we are in the early stages,” implying political motivation.
- Quote: “We are in the very early stages of an ongoing investigation into John Bolton.” – J.D. Vance [09:02]
- Miller’s Observation:
- Notes the admission that the White House is running the probe, not an independent DOJ.
- Quote: “That’s an interesting slip there. We are. Who’s we? I guess you’re just admitting this. The Trump administration that is doing it. It’s not like an independent DOJ.” – Tim Miller [09:41]
- Highlights the hypocrisy in claiming law enforcement won’t be politicized while clearly pursuing political enemies.
- Notes the admission that the White House is running the probe, not an independent DOJ.
5. National Guard Troop Deployments to D.C.
- Vance’s Rationalization: Justifies sending troops to D.C., defers to Republican governors' authority.
- Quote: “If the local governors want to make that determination, we’ll leave it up to the local governors.” – J.D. Vance [10:52]
- Miller’s Rebuttal:
- Points out inconsistency — National Guard was previously deployed to Democratic-led cities against governors’ objections.
- Quote: “You literally deployed National Guard troops to Los Angeles over the objection of the local governor. Like these guys, just like only Republican politicians and rules matter, right?” – Tim Miller [11:56]
- Criticizes the wasteful and performative nature of the deployments.
- Quote: “It is really like kind of spitting in the eye of the citizens of these states to say they don't actually care about their concerns.” – Co-host/Commentator [11:32]
- Points out inconsistency — National Guard was previously deployed to Democratic-led cities against governors’ objections.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
- “Read a book maybe.” – Co-host/Commentator (to Vance, re: WWII analogies) [04:45]
- “Don’t fucking piss on me and tell me it’s raining, okay? Don’t tell me you care about state governors rights ... right after you went over the head of Gavin.” – Co-host/Commentator [13:21]
- “That’s why he’s there ... he’s got no other real job, so we’re here to push back on it.” – Tim Miller [13:43]
Timestamps for Important Segments
- [00:45] – Introduction to Vance’s Sunday show appearance.
- [02:03] – Vance fielded by Kristen Welker on Ukraine/China.
- [03:03] – Tim Miller dissects Vance’s historical analogies.
- [04:53] – Second major clip: Vance on supposed Russian concessions.
- [07:06] – Welker asks Vance if he’s mad about Russian strike on U.S. business.
- [09:02] – Vance on “we” investigating John Bolton.
- [10:35] – Republican states sending National Guard troops to D.C.
- [11:10] – Miller explains hypocrisy in National Guard deployment.
Tone and Takeaways
Tim Miller’s summary is sharp, unsparing, and deeply skeptical of J.D. Vance’s sincerity and logic. Through careful breakdowns and biting asides, Miller exposes what he sees as the phoniness and hypocrisy of Vance’s talking points, urging listeners not to be misled by retrofitted justifications and performative outrage.
Bottom Line
J.D. Vance’s Sunday show performance is, in Miller’s view, a showcase of evasion, revisionist history, and selective outrage—one that deserves close scrutiny and pushback rather than acceptance at face value.
