Loading summary
Donald Trump
This is Liberation Day in D.C. and we're going to take our Capitol back. We're taking it back. Under the authorities vested in me as the President of the United States, I'm officially invoking Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. You know what that is. And placing the D.C. metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control. And you'll be meeting the people that will be directly involved with that.
Sam Stein
Hey, guys. Sam Stein, managing editor at the Bulwark, here with JVL and Andrew Egger. We are here to talk about the announcement. Oh, welcome back, jvl. By the way, we're here, and you too, Edgar. Welcome back. We're here to talk about the announcement that Donald Trump will be instituting home rule for Washington, D.C. sending the National Guard to take over the law enforcement responsibilities here. Uh, he is putting the D.C. metropolitan Police under the jurisprudence of Pam Bondi, our Attorney General. He's not ruling out the possibility of sending the military into our nation's capital. He had a press conference. The press questions element of it went off the rails pretty quickly. The statement element of it was not much better. But it does add up to a fairly, I don't know, chilling, honestly, decision by the president, considering crime is fairly down in the nation's capital. I mean, still prom, but it's down. But jvl, why don't you start us off? What were your main takeaways from this?
JVL
I mean, he wants to put the military in the streets of America's cities. Right? I mean, it's just as simple as that. We saw this in Los Angeles. He's going to do it here. I think we should all basically plan for this to happen in every blue state type city between now and the elections. And he, he purpose, I mean, very, very pointedly did not rule out doing more of this for this during this press conference.
Sam Stein
No. In fact, you went through a list of cities and discussed them as if they were next targets. Right. Baltimore, Oakland, Chicago. I'm sure I'm missing a few.
JVL
Not Houston. Interesting.
Sam Stein
Not Houston.
JVL
Not Houston.
Sam Stein
Weirdly enough.
JVL
Not Oklahoma City.
Sam Stein
No, nothing like that. That's so bizarre. The other thing, Andrew, that really just sort of jumped out. I mean, we can get to the Hypocrisy stuff in January6. I want to get to that in a second. But it was just sort of like the kind of embrace of police brutality. Like, if they spit on you, we're gonna hit him back much harder. I mean, it's just like outwardly embracing the idea that the cops should just come down incredibly hard without any apology on people who commit crimes, which, look, it might be smart politics for him, but it is just an outward embrace of police brutality.
Andrew Egger
Yeah, yeah. And that's. I mean, there's. There's a couple different things that are. That are going on here. One is that Trump is, like, channeling just sort of, like this sort of broad Griev about crime in general. I mean, this is kind of a superpower forever is like, I'm going to solve everything. All the people who are in power before are fools and dummies and, and, you know, there's. There are real reasons why a lot of, you know, a lot of concerns about crime have come to the fore, especially coming out of, you know, Covid a few years ago when it was all really spiking everywhere. But, I mean, obviously that is no longer true, but he is still sort of channeling that same kind of angst. And then. And it's weird to, like, see him. I mean, this is all. This is classic Trump, too, right? He's kind of going off his prepared remarks about law and order and about how, you know, we're going to. We're going to make the streets safe for tourists and stuff. And then he kind of hops into his own register, which is you sort of speaking lovingly about. About the violence. You know, good violence. Good violence. Violence for a good cause of the. Of, you know, you don't need a lot of police officers. You just need police officers to be able to do whatever the hell they want. As he said here, you know, you have to be able to rush capital.
JVL
Police officers, though, Andrew, Capitol police officers are not allowed to do whatever the hell they want.
Sam Stein
In fact, they went too far. Right. That was the problem.
JVL
It's a very, very fine line that you gotta cut.
Andrew Egger
Okay, but let me just put a bow on this, because it really is. I mean, he's explicit about it. He's talking about the stuff that's been happening in D.C. recently, and he's talking about just sort of like roving gangs of juveniles in the city streets. He's basically like, you have to let police officers beat the hell out of him, because this is another direct quote. That's the only thing they understand. I mean, that's. It's really this kind of elemental, like. Like you just have to unleash violence on the bad Americans to make things, you know, more orderly for the good Americans. And I mean, I don't know, what do you guys. How do you guys think this is going to play? Like, it's Grotesque in a lot of ways.
Sam Stein
Sure. But I'm struck, I guess, to answer your question, about how it plays, and maybe you can pick this up too, jv, but, like, I'm kind of struck by how much of Trump's worldview is just based around late 80s, early 90s New York City.
JVL
Yeah.
Sam Stein
Like, this is, this is just Dinkins, right? And. And dinkins into Rudy. Right. It's like, let the cops just be the cops. They can rough up, rough up a few Haitians. Who cares? Right? Like, they can do it. And then, you know, if we just reduce that, you know, visible crime, people will reward you for it. And I just feel like so much of what he does is based around that worldview.
JVL
Totally. It's. Donald Trump views the entire criminal justice system through the lenses of Bernie Getz and Amadou Diallo. Right. And if, if you're not of a certain age or you didn't grow up in the New York metro, mean anything to you, but go Google them. Yeah, exactly. You'll figure it out. It is again, it's all they, them and in group, out group. Because again, the, the calls to violence are all. As you know, I brought up the capitol police in January 6th because this shows it isn't really about crime. It isn't about police. It's about using force against the out group. Right. In this case, the out group happens to be, you know, like black teenagers or homeless people or something. But, but if all of a sudden they're great patriots who are trying to overthrow the United States government. Well, hold on now. Don't, don't go getting crazy. Right? And that's. It isn't really about cri. It is just naked fascism. Like, I'm. I'm sorry. It's just naked fascism. Right? It isn't. It isn't just, you know, hey, he's trying to clean up the streets. He's just like Duterte or something. Duarte from the Philippines, something like that. That's not what this is. It's. That's how it's being coded. And how will it play? I mean, I, I have no idea, but it would not surprise me if it all plays very well, because Americans have shown, of course, the last decade that they have a real taste for us versus them polit. And maybe not all of them, maybe not a majority of them, but, like, do you think 40% of America likes this sort of thing? I do.
Sam Stein
Well, I, I thought the in most telling line. Well, one of them was when he started talking about the, the tourist from Iowa and Indiana. Who wants to just come to the nation's capital and can't because they're going to get mugged. And I think a lot of people who don't live here probably have this perception that you just literally cannot walk down the street, which is ridiculous. Can I ask you guys a question? Have you ever heard of the place called Anniston, Alabama? Either of you?
JVL
I have not, but I'd be willing to bet they've got a pretty high murder rate per capita. Per 100,000.
Sam Stein
They have, according to FBI data, a whopping 3,434 violent crimes per capita. This is a town of 22,000. That's about one violent crime for every seven people. It is one of the most violent places in the country. We're not sending anyone there.
JVL
I mean, I've been wanting to go there as a tourist, Sam, for years.
Sam Stein
There are tourists terrified to go.
JVL
Because I feel like if I step across the line into the that town, I wish we could send the National Guard in there to clean things up.
Sam Stein
There are tourist attractions there. It's the site of a couple Greyhound bus bombings during the civil rights movement. So. Fun place. Not sure I'm going to go there. My family. Let's talk about the hypocrisy and irony here. Republicans with Trump signature took a billion dollars out of the DC Budget during last government funding fight. Money that could be used for public safety measures. They said they were going to put it back. They have not. This was a promise that Chuck Schumer made with Donald Trump in order to get his signature. Chuck seems to have gotten played on that one. And then, of course, January 6th. I mean, we cannot talk about this without talking about January six. They defaced a D.C. building. The Capitol. It's a federal building. What's in D.C. they spat on and hit and harmed and led to the deaths of several Capitol Hill police officers. And then Trump pardoned the people who did it. And the fact that that was not. Neither of those questions were asked in the press briefly. I mean, maybe we're recording this kind of middle of the press here, but that's shocking to me. Like, those are just blatant hypocritical acts. But, Andrew, am I wrong?
Andrew Egger
Well, the important thing, Sam, is that if you're from Iowa or Indiana and you come to DC, you should be allowed to do what you want, right? If you just wanna go around to the monuments and visit some restaurants and have a good time, you should be able to do that unmolested. If you Want to storm the U.S. capitol on Donald Trump's behalf and try to hang Mike Pence, that's fine too. People from Iowa, Indiana are in charge and we are catering to that. Actually, not, not to go off on too much of a tangent, I went to a Trump rally in Iowa right ahead of the caucuses last time around and, and I happened to chat up a couple of people who were wives of, of January, six prisoners, political prisoners as they would say, who were at that time in prison. I'm sure now they're out, so who knows? Yeah, maybe, maybe they'll be coming back on a, on a tourist trip. But no, I mean, it's, it's obviously it's exactly what JBL said, right? I mean, it's the, the, you, you, you back the blue provisionally, which most of the time, because most of the time they are just sort of, you know, in a face off with like you say, the, the gangs of black teenagers in the streets of D.C. but, but when it comes to a face off between, you know, D.C. capitol Police and a, and a more protected class even than, than the police, which is our brave MAGA patriots, it's, it's pretty clear which side you have to get on for that one.
JVL
I got a question. Do you guys think they're going to. The Republicans and Trump are going to try to repeal the, is the 1973 legislation granting home rule to. Do you think that's where this heads, that this is a sort of a preemptive. Got to make sure that Democrats don't really pursue D.C. statehood. One of the ways we can do that is by repealing this legislation.
Sam Stein
So that was, there was a little bit of reporting around this this morning that that is in fact the, the end goal here for a few of them. Right. Like guy named Mike Davis who's kind of in the shadows of the legal warfare stuff for conservatives. That's that, that's what he wants. And it certainly seems that way. And I think to a degree what we're seeing here is just sort of like, it is sort of a test run to see what they can get away with. And if they can do that, right, like touch the hot stove, see how big a reaction you get. And look, I mean, if they, if they, I think we all expect them to turn around and say, hey, we got this under control, look at what the federal government can do, so on and so forth. But yeah, I mean, I don't know how would that, how does that work practically? You gotta put up for legislation, obviously. I mean, I'M assuming Democrats don't go for it. So I don't know how that works in theory, but I do think it's the end goal.
JVL
Yeah. Andrew, do you have thoughts on it or no. Or is it, is it the case that like Trump never cares about legislating on anything? Like he just likes doing stuff he could sign an executive order on and then declare victory?
Andrew Egger
Yeah, I don't know the ins and outs of the home rule stuff. But it was interesting today listening to Trump talk about legislation, cuz he mentioned that a couple of times. But his big thing for legislating, he was not talking about anything in particular, like the ins and outs of how D.C. is gonna fare. He was just talking about sort of like the big policy strokes like we're gonna end cashless bail. And then Jeanine Pirro got up and talked about how we're gonna stop judges from, from, you know, coming down too leniently on the, I mean, it's all, on these offenders. It's all, it's all, it's not a policy program. Right. It's all, it's all just in servants in service of this, this sort of broad generic sense that criminals are being treated too nicely, they're getting away with too much, people are letting them do all this stuff. And that's why, you know, that's why there's this sort of lawlessness that you see on the news.
Sam Stein
Jv, let me ask you this to close it out. So you, you're predicting that it's gonna, this is a test case, they're gonna do it in other cities. Let's talk about D.C. specifically. What's the next couple weeks going to look like, do you think?
JVL
I mean, I, I assume that a big part of this is really tied to homelessness and that Trump just hates the idea there being homeless people around his presidential palace and that I just assume that they're going to do something like cleansing basically, you know, just make all the poor people disappear or shove them into a part of the city that Trump never goes to.
Sam Stein
He said it, he said it in his post. Move him away from the city. He's going to take him and move him away from the city.
JVL
And. But this is, I mean, this is all part and parcel with the entire fascist, I'm sorry to say. Like, I come back from vacation and I'm just like, I don't know, can't we just say the F word like it's fascism? This feels like this is, this is that. Right? And it's all with, he started this press conference talking about the new ballroom that they're building, right? And it's going to be very real, going to be done faster than you can even imagine. It'd be so beautiful. And I, again, this is, this is Uday and Kusay Hussein type stuff. And like, you know, why is he building a presidential ballroom on this compound? To make it look like Mar a Lago North? Is it because he plans on leaving in three years? I don't fucking think so. Right. And I, I don't know, man. Like, maybe it's just I come back with no, no forks to give after being away for a week, but it all looks really bad. And when you come, when you combine, I know these seem very desperate, but combine this with the, like, hey, we don't like the labor statistics, so we're going to, we're going to make it so that nobody can trust the economic numbers coming out of the federal government, right? And it's because that's just the way it is now. You. We can't trust the numbers coming out of the federal government. Why do that? And the answer is because they think they can do pretty well in a post truth world where people are just reduced to. Are, are we listening to our guys or their guys? Right? And there is no more objective reality anymore. We just obliterate all of that. There are no homeless people, right? Look, see, the homeless people are all gone. Doesn't matter. We've just warehoused them someplace else or something off the street. Like this is.
Sam Stein
That's very interesting because he could have done this in a different way. Let me just kick the tires on this one. Crime is decent. Crime in D.C. is down. It is, statistically. He's been president for seven and a half months. In theory, this would never. I don't think he would ever done this, but in theory he could have said, hey, look at me. Seven months in, crime's down, I'm doing the job. But that's not what he did. That's not what he did. He said it's out of control and I need to get in there. So I do think, you know, I don't read into it what you will, but there is something of. Well, not something. It's all about to me creating this reality that doesn't exist so that people are impressed by you or give you the permission to do things that otherwise you wouldn't get.
Andrew Egger
Can I say one other thing on that too, which is that just to illustrate the way they're totally playing with Monopoly money with all of this stuff Right along lines of what you were just saying, Sam. When Doug Burgum then got up at the press conference, Secretary of the Interior got up to talk about homelessness, specifically in D.C. he said, during Joe Biden, they let homelessness run rampant around here, and we're cleaning that up. That was kind of the narrative he gave specifically on national parkland in D.C. and the circles and the tribes triangle parks in D.C. i covered this stuff while it was happening coming out of the pandemic in 2020 and 2021. What happened is, in 2020, during Donald Trump's presidency, park police relaxed a lot of the guidelines about camping and on public land. And that meant there were a lot of these homeless encampments that sprung up in D.C. in 2020. And as the pandemic kind of dragged on, people got really sick of those because they were just kind of like everywhere and sort of in a bunch of like high traffic and business areas and things like that. And it created a lot of tension. And in, in Joe Biden's first year, the park police basically started to crack down on that. And that sort of, it didn't go away because, I mean, they're homeless people, right? They're around. You can't just like put them all in jail and say you can't be on the street anymore. But the stuff that Bergam was talking about was a Trump first term phenomenon that then was dealt with in certain ways in Joe Biden. But none of that matters, right? I mean, nobody's going to fact check him and be like that. It's all, again, it's all this broad strokes. Who's addressing your grievances, who agrees with you that this stuff is a problem and you put it all on Joe Biden and you say Donald Trump is, is going to come clean it up. And there are a lot of possible outcomes, but the guaranteed outcome is that Trump gives himself more and more permission to accrue more and more power to himself, no matter what happens.
JVL
Can I just say one more thing? This is a. The difference between Democrats and Republicans is again, Democrats are, you know, Democrats confront homelessness. It's like, well, what policy levers could we push to ameliorate this? Should we be building more affordable housing? Should we use YIMBYs versus the socialists and. Right. And, you know, and Republicans just come in and it's like, we're going to disappear them. And like, I just, I don't know, like, if America is okay with that and not even all of America, if 40% of America is okay with that then that's what we're going to get and we're moving to like a post policy world and a world which is really, really different from what existed in America for the last 50 years.
Sam Stein
Hard agree. Let's leave this by listening to Donald TRUMP Compare D.C. unfavorably to Baghdad.
Donald Trump
Some charts. These are different cities throughout the world. Red is okay, the red is a place called Washington D.C. look at these. Baghdad is. We doubled up on Baghdad, Panama City, Brasilia, San Jose, Costa Rica, Bogota, Colombia, heavy drugs, Mexico City. I mentioned Lima, Peru. All double and triple what they are. So do you want to live in places like that? I don't think so. I don't think so. And I think the people in this room, if you wrote correctly, you'd see look at the kind of numbers we have. DC 41 per 100,000 number one that we can find anywhere in the world. Other cities are pretty bad, but they're not as bad as that.
Sam Stein
All right, there you have it. We are worse than Baghdad here in our nation's capital. Andrew. JVL thank you guys. Both really appreciate it. JVL so you bring up such sunshine and you return from vacation. It's like, yeah, how do we survive without this, without you this past week?
JVL
I'm sure you're all much happier without me for a week.
Sam Stein
Definitely happier. Yeah. Andrew, thanks man. Appreciate it. JVL thank you guys. Thank you for watching this. Subscribe to our feed where you get more uplifting conversations like this. Talk to you from the occupied D.C. soon. Later.
Release Date: August 11, 2025
Host/Authors: Sam Stein, JVL, and Andrew Egger
Podcast Description: Bulwark Takes offers bite-sized, insightful analyses of daily news from The Bulwark team, including perspectives from Sam Stein, JVL, and Bill Kristol.
In this intense episode of Bulwark Takes, host Sam Stein, alongside panelists JVL and Andrew Egger, dissect former President Donald Trump's alarming press conference. The focus centers on Trump's declaration of a "Liberation Day" in Washington, D.C., and his subsequent actions that signal a chilling shift in the nation's capital's governance and law enforcement.
The episode opens with a direct excerpt from Donald Trump's press conference:
[00:00] Donald Trump: "This is Liberation Day in D.C. and we're going to take our Capitol back... I'm officially invoking Section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act... placing the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control."
Trump's announcement signifies a major intervention in D.C.'s local governance, hinting at increased federal oversight and possible deployment of the National Guard to manage law enforcement.
Sam Stein introduces the gravity of Trump's announcement:
[00:28] Sam Stein: "Donald Trump will be instituting home rule for Washington, D.C., sending the National Guard to take over the law enforcement responsibilities here... a fairly, I don't know, chilling, honestly, decision by the president..."
The panel acknowledges that despite crime rates being relatively low in D.C., Trump's decision appears disproportionate and fear-inducing.
JVL immediately draws parallels to past instances of militarization:
[01:29] JVL: "He wants to put the military in the streets of America's cities... This will happen in every blue state type city between now and the elections."
Andrew Egger expands on the aggressive stance Trump is adopting:
[02:45] Andrew Egger: "Trump is... channeling that same kind of angst... he's speaking lovingly about... violence for a good cause... you just need police officers to be able to do whatever the hell they want."
This section underscores the panel's concern that Trump's rhetoric openly endorses police brutality and excessive force, reminiscent of authoritarian tactics.
JVL critiques Trump's approach as fascistic:
[05:14] JVL: "Donald Trump views the entire criminal justice system through the lenses of Bernie Goetz and Amadou Diallo... it's all in-group versus out-group... it's naked fascism."
The panel highlights how Trump's policies are not merely about reducing crime but about exerting control over marginalized groups, echoing fascist ideologies.
Sam Stein points out the inconsistencies in Republican actions:
[07:16] Sam Stein: "Republicans with Trump signature took a billion dollars out of the DC Budget... they have not put it back... January 6th... Trump pardoned the people who did it."
The discussion reveals the hypocrisy in promising to enhance public safety while retracting essential funds and overlooking the Capitol riot's ramifications.
JVL raises concerns about the long-term political objectives:
[10:05] JVL: "Do you think they're going to try to repeal the 1973 legislation granting home rule... to make sure that Democrats don't really pursue D.C. statehood?"
Sam Stein confirms the strategic intent behind Trump's actions:
[10:29] Sam Stein: "...Mike Davis... that's what he wants... it's a test run to see what they can get away with."
The panel suggests that Trump's maneuvering is a deliberate attempt to undermine D.C.'s autonomy and prevent its statehood, consolidating federal power.
The conversation shifts to homelessness in D.C., highlighting divergent Republican and Democratic approaches:
[12:33] JVL: "Trump just hates the idea there being homeless people around his presidential palace... make all the poor people disappear..."
Andrew Egger contrasts the policy measures:
[16:21] Andrew Egger: "Joe Biden's administration cracked down on homeless encampments... but Republicans just want to 'disappear them.'"
JVL emphasizes the moral and ethical divide:
[17:11] JVL: "Democrats confront homelessness with policy solutions... Republicans aim to eradicate it through force."
The panel criticizes the Republican approach as oppressive and lacking compassionate policy-making.
To encapsulate Trump's stance, Sam Stein plays a closing statement from Trump:
[18:03] Donald Trump: "Look at these [cities]. Washington D.C.... I think the people in this room... DC 41 per 100,000... All other cities are pretty bad, but they're not as bad as that."
Trump's comparison of D.C. to war-torn cities like Baghdad underscores his narrative of crisis, justifying extreme measures to "clean up" the nation's capital.
The episode concludes with Sam Stein urging listeners to ponder the dire implications of Trump's actions and the broader trajectory of American politics towards authoritarianism and societal division.
Key Takeaways:
Drastic Federal Intervention: Trump's invocation of Section 740 signals a significant federal takeover of D.C.'s law enforcement, raising alarms about increased militarization and potential abuse of power.
Fascistic Overtones: The panel identifies fascist tendencies in Trump's rhetoric, particularly his emphasis on strong-arm tactics against perceived out-groups.
Political Hypocrisy: Republicans' promises to enhance public safety are marred by inconsistent actions, such as budget cuts and controversial pardons.
Undermining D.C. Autonomy: There is a strategic effort to repeal home rule and prevent D.C. statehood, consolidating federal authority over the capital.
Contrasting Approaches to Homelessness: The Republican solution to homelessness in D.C. is criticized as forceful and inhumane, contrasting sharply with Democratic policy-oriented strategies.
Alarming Comparisons: Trump's portrayal of D.C. as comparable to cities like Baghdad is seen as an exaggerated and manipulative tactic to justify extreme measures.
This comprehensive analysis by Bulwark Takes provides listeners with a nuanced understanding of the potential ramifications of Trump's actions in D.C., highlighting concerns over authoritarianism, political hypocrisy, and societal division in the United States.