Loading summary
Ryan Seacrest
How to have fun anytime, anywhere. Step 1 Go to chumbacasino.com chumbacasino.com Got it. Step 2 Collect your welcome bonus.
Chumba Casino
Come to papa. Welcome bonus.
Ryan Seacrest
Step 3 Play hundreds of casino style games for free.
Chumba Casino
That's a lot of games, all for free.
Ryan Seacrest
Step 4 Unleash your excitement.
Chumba Casino
Choo Choo Choo Chumba.
Ryan Seacrest
Chumba Casino has been delivering thrills for over a decade. So claim your free welcome bonus now and live the chumba life. Visit chumbacasino.com no purchase necessary vgw group.
Mona Charen
Void where prohibited by law 21 +.
Will Saletan
Terms and conditions apply hey everybody. Mona Charan here with the Bulwark. I'm here with two of my colleagues, Will Salatin and Sarah Longwell, to give you our immediate reactions to Trump's comments to Meet THE PRESS today that no, he's not joking. He definitely is considering a third term. Will, how did he put it? And then I want to get to Kristen Welker's reaction because this is really, really, it's a small thing, but it, to me, it's very annoying. So tell us what he said and, you know, spell it out. You've got the transcript.
Sarah Longwell
Yeah, I'm looking at the transcript. She first of all, he didn't bring this up. She brought it up. So, and this is a common refrain of a lot of journalists who want to. So that's, that's a factor. However, to me, what's new in the interview is that he admits, he suggests that he's been talking to people about it. She asks him, have people, have you been presented with any potential plans that would allow you to serve a third term? And he says, well, there are plans. There are, well, there are methods by which you could do it. And then she starts asking him, and he says, well, she asks about the one where Vance gets elected and then hands it over to Trump. And Trump says, well, that's one, but there are others, too. So clearly Trump has been talking with people about multiple ways of doing this that's separate from whether he would actually do it. But that's a new development as far as knowing what he's doing.
Unnamed Speaker
Sarah.
Will Saletan
So the Welker, first of all, she, she says, you're thinking about this. And then he immediately comes out with a complete, you know, lie exaggeration of his popularity. He says, well, of course, I'm extremely popular. I'm more popular than any president in the history of the universe. And popularity ratings are right now in the high 70s. He says, as you know, he always does this with Journalists, as you know. And instead of saying, well, actually, sir, you're underwater in your popularity, she's just like, oh, but how. What ways are you thinking of in terms of getting a third term, as if this is a real thing, as if there are legal pathways to. For him to serve a third term. Did it bother you?
Unnamed Speaker
So here's the thing. So did you watch it or did you read the transcript? Okay, so I also read it and I this. But it jumped out at me because she wasn't just saying. She wasn't just that. She didn't push back. She kept saying, right, right. Like, she kept, like, affirming it. Now, having not watched it, I was quite certain, though, that she was trying to like, yeah, like, she's kind of doing like, I assume. Yeah, yeah. But, like, answer my question. But it has the consequence of affirming or normalizing or acting like it is not preposterous and flagrantly unconstitutional to do this. And then worse. And I don't necessarily want to pick on Welker specifically, but it was bizarre that she threw out the Vance switcheroo as though, like, could this be your strategy? I'm like, why are you giving him ideas? I mean, sure, it's obvious, but it's like, why are you pitching these things to him? Stop doing that. Don't do that.
Will Saletan
And making it. Giving, giving it legitimacy. Right? Because obviously it's not just, like, MAGA weirdos who are having these thoughts. It's people at NBC News, it's NBC News anchors who also think that you can. Well, this would be a clever way. I mean, so. Well, one of the things that struck me was for all those people who are constantly saying he would never do X. Right? Oh, he wouldn't do that. He wouldn't do that. You know, after January 6th, after sicing a violent mob on the Capitol and attempting to stage a coup, how anyone in their right mind can say he would never do X just bewilders me. Right. He would never take. He might go after some illegal immigrants who are here and deport them, but he's not going to go after green card holders. Right?
Sarah Longwell
I mean, well, okay, I'll be the skeptic here. I'll be the skeptic because I've been a skeptic all along. This nudges me a little bit away from that. But I'm, I'm still skeptical that you raised the January 6th situation. That was really not that legally complicated in the sense that Trump claimed that he had just won his second election and it had been stolen from him. So he didn't have to like mess with constitutional amendments or any of that. He had to come up with some fans. He had to get John Eastman in. And it's clear that in this situation he would get another John Eastman, maybe John Eastman himself, to like come up with a legal theory about, you know, the legal theory is the 22nd amendment only says you can't be elected to a third term, but you could not be elected to president. You could be elected vice president and then the President, I. E. J.D. vance, hands it over to you. So that's a loophole. So you'd have this, you'd have to go through that. It's a more, a much more difficult process legally in terms of coming up with an argument why the text allows him to do this than it was to just say an election was stolen from him. So I'm not sure that he would cross that threshold or that the public would, would elect him if there's sort of a widespread understanding that this is fake. We say you're voting for J.D. vance, but you're really voting for Trump.
Will Saletan
Sarah, I'm not sure I agree with Will on this. What about you?
Unnamed Speaker
Well, I agree, agree with Will in the sense that I think if he did, would because this, now we're talking about what an 82 year old Donald Trump saying he's going to run for a third term. I think it doesn't fly. And actually there's part of me that's like, give it a run, bro. Like, I want to see you try this. And, and so I and Barack Obama could. Yeah, that's right. And we'll just live in hell. We'll just live in hell. And time is a flat circle and, and we move forward ever. The reason, one of the reasons I was interested in jumping on though is that Bill and I did a substack live this morning and we were talking about what it would take to beat Trump. One of the things I've been arguing is, and it's, this is not a revelation but like we need to get Trump down to the 30s. I argue 32% is where he really, people start to abandon him. And one of the reasons that I think he needs to be down low and that we should all be focused on lowering his approval rating is that nobody's going to speculate about him running again if he's in the 30s. Right. Like, and he can start to say he's in the 70s when he's in the 30s. But like, that chasm is too, too Far for the truth to stretch. I think, like he can stretch the truth pretty far, especially with his people, but that is too far to stretch. And at that point you're talking about most of the normies. And the reason some people are saying, like, why do you think 32% and I think 32% is basically cult numbers, like that is what his culture is. People who will never abandon him under any circumstances. But I do think people, once you're saying, oh, I'm gonna do this fake thing with J.D. vance, like people, I don't think people like that. What I think Will might not be right about is the idea that he wouldn't try. Like an 82 year old Trump who at this point is dealing with a totally supine Congress. Maybe, maybe he loses the midterms. But it's not, it's a little bit like last time. We're like, they lose, but it's narrow and it's not so bad. And it's not like a thorough repudiation, because this has always been my argument with Trump and it's the thing we've never gotten, which is a thorough repudiation of Trump. He has lost, but it has not been a thorough repudiation ever. And we're going to have to have that to move not just past Trump, but a past like this moment. And so I'm not sure he won't try, but it would be interesting to watch him. I also think, look, I've been sitting there like, okay, so they're gaming this out. What are lawyers telling him? It's flagrantly unconstitutional. So they're like Supreme Court, though they could, I mean, isn't that the play? They'd have to somehow challenge it up to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court would have to side with him.
Will Saletan
I mean, actually. So this, this hearkens back to a argument that we had. Remember when there was the big discussion about whether the 14th Amendment should forbid him from even being on the ballots in states because he was ineligible because he had participated in insurrection. In this case, it really would be up to the Secretaries of State of the various States of the Union to say, I'm sorry, the Constitution says you're ineligible to be to run if you've already served two terms, therefore we cannot put you on the ballot. I don't think it even goes to the Supreme Court. But I'd be curious to hear both of you on another topic, which is this. It seems to me it's so hard to know what is the civic knowledge and what are the Norms that still beat in the breasts of Americans and do they still have a visceral sense that in this country we don't have kings, we don't have, you know, we, we abide by the cons, by the term limits in the Constitution. And this is just wrong. And I, you know, I don't know, what do you guys say? I mean, it seems to me that this, unlike, as Will was saying earlier, unlike arguing about a stolen election or, you know, the Electoral Count act or anything, this is so obvious, it's so blatant, it's so flagrant. What do you think? But then again, he's done other really blatant, flagrant, horrible things and gotten away with them.
Sarah Longwell
Well, in terms of what the public would put up with. So, Mona, I don't believe in rules anymore. I mean, I believe in the rules like we all believe in. The rules should exist, people should follow them. But as to whether Americans will follow them, I'm not going to count on that. What I am going to count on is fatigue. Fatigue doesn't require any rules. People just get tired of you. They get tired of, you know, unless you have some means, like Vladimir Putin has, of throwing people out of windows and, you know, getting rid of all opposition. People are just going to get, they're not going to want Donald Trump to be president forever. And the guy just, he grates on people over time. So I count on that. But let me just put forward an alternative theory of what's going on here. I don't think he's planning to run for a third term, but I think he loves the idea to be out there, that he might, because he doesn't want to be a lame duck. Right. And he has all we wanted, always wanted power. My theory up to this point has been that Trump doesn't intend to run for a third term, but he can always exert power over the Republican Party. If Donald Trump marshals people against you in a primary, you're dead. So he will always have power. But maybe he thinks that by fostering this idea out there that he could run for a third term, even if he doesn't plan to. He keeps going the idea that Donald Trump will always be around, will always have the, you know, the ability to punish you, Mr. And Mrs. Republican Congressperson, and that that gives him power in the short term.
Unnamed Speaker
Can I just, can I just push back on Will, though?
Will Saletan
And Sarah, does it also. Oh, yeah, you can. But, but also answer this, if you wouldn't mind. Does it also perhaps inhibit those Republicans who might Be gearing up to think.
Unnamed Speaker
Yeah, I mean, this is the thing where it's so much of this is conditional. Right? So I'm talking about a scenario in which he's underwater, deeply underwater, and approval. But let's say hypothetically, economy's roaring, he has rebuilt our manufacturing base. The car companies are all in the U.S. now, we have stopped our global trade. Tariffs are working and he is at 55% and people are begging him for a third term. Okay, then I think with tears in their eyes. And I want Will Saladan to tell me if he's at 55%, he doesn't make a run for it. Also, wait, second condition. It's all conditional. Right. Also, the condition is Kamala Harris has just has won the Democratic primary versus most, a lot of other people versus Mark Cuban or, you know, Josh Shapiro, whatever. So let's say Kamala's running against him. He's at 55 approval. He's got a story to tell about how he brought back American manufacturing. Will Salatin tell me he's not running for a third term under those circumstances.
Sarah Longwell
Man, Sarah, you have really stacked this hypothetical. You've got Kamala Harris so it's somebody he thinks he can beat. By the way, you guys brought up Obama coming back, like you may be former Republicans. I'm not. I like that. I'll take Obama against Trump.
Unnamed Speaker
I would take it too.
Will Saletan
2.
Unnamed Speaker
I guess I'm just sort of like, do we have to, can we not. Do we get to not move forward in time ever?
Will Saletan
I was just, I was just mentioning it though, because I don't know that they've thoroughly thought this through. I mean, if we no longer have a two term limit.
Sarah Longwell
Wait, Mona, you don't think they've thought something through?
Will Saletan
Amazing. I know. So, okay, Will go, go back to the hypothetical.
Sarah Longwell
I. This is the eternal question. Does Donald Trump care more about power or ego? I mean, they converge, but they also diverge. You know, he loves the idea of people wanting him. Does he want the, I mean, she asked him in the interview, do you want the responsibility? And he's like, I like working. Oh, come on. He doesn't like working. He likes being adored. Mona, this goes back to what you said at the beginning. It's all about being adored. It's all about the poll ratings. And if the poll ratings aren't good, it's the fake. It's the, the. He literally says the real polls have me at 70%. So it's all about this North Korea style ego. So I just don't Know, if Donald Trump actually wants power the way that Kim Jong Un or President Xi or Putin want power, I mean, he's doing more than I thought he would, but I still think he's fundamentally a narcissist. He's not really about the power. And so when you get to that moment, Sarah, where it's like, do I actually run again? Try to do the job again.
Unnamed Speaker
Sorry, I don't buy this for one second. And the reason is we said this. I don't even last time, like, before, when it was like, will he come back and run again? There were people who were arguing like, he doesn't really want the job, he just wants to. And he did it. I don't. How many more. How many times do we have to be beaten over the head on this? He will take.
Will Saletan
And he's not. Sorry. Two versus go ahead. No, no.
Unnamed Speaker
He just didn't take this as far as he thinks he can go.
Will Saletan
That's right. And I don't think that he is behaving right now as somebody who just wanted a sinecure. He's got an agenda. He wants to remake the entire country in his image. And he's going about it, I would say, kind of aggressively. So, yeah, I think he does want power. He's using power in a way we've never seen in American history. So, yeah, he definitely wants power. I have one question for you, Sarah. Maybe we can close on this. So, yeah, I love the idea of Donald Trump being able to drive down his approval to 32%, but I'm not sure that's within our power. I mean, how do you do that if everything goes his way? Come on.
Unnamed Speaker
So you can go watch my 36 minutes I did with Bill this morning, because I did a lot of this. And Mona, you've heard me talk about this. But listen, either one of two things is going to happen in terms of the speed at which Donald Trump and his minions like Elon are dismantling the government, imposing tariffs, and enacting this agenda very fast. They're doing it faster. They do the agenda faster. The consequences of the agenda. And so are we going to invade and annex Greenland?
Will Saletan
Are we.
Unnamed Speaker
I mean, I. I do think that Donald Trump. So how are we going to do it? I mean, we are going to tell the story and help amplify the stories of the negative personal consequences of the impact of Donald Trump's agenda on people, especially his voters. That's number one. But number two, Donald Trump is going to do a lot of this by having terrible policies and Acting as though, and this is where I think it sort of relates back to this discussion. He's acting as though he doesn't need to get reelected in four years. He's acting like a lame duck. He's acting like a person who can act without electoral consequences. And so I think that he's doing Hail Mary, doing exactly what he wants to do. And it will either work and he will be popular and he will pursue a third term, or it will not work. It will have tremendous negative consequences on the electorate. People will abandon him who are not cult like, because cult like people will be like, well, I'll pay $20,000 more dollars for that car, sir. Because you, sir, are. I want to be part of your 10 dimensional chess genius idea of tariffs. It's really stick it to the Canadians, maybe. And Democratic, there's 32% of people who will do that. The question is, what about the rest of those people? And that's why it's always margins. It's always margins.
Will Saletan
Yeah. Okay, so in other words, what you're saying, if I understand it correctly, is Trump is going to do this for us. I mean, there's absolutely nothing that we're going to be doing. It's. He is going to do things that are going to make him unpopular and it's a matter of waiting him out. So.
Unnamed Speaker
Well, so, no, because I want to say, I want to make this clear. It's exactly not the Carville strategy. It is letting Trump do it. Okay, but the problem with the Carvel strategy, and I hate the Carvel strategy and I hate strategies that where the, the, the, the strategy is do nothing and everything will work out. No, the Democrats have had a problem this whole time with not being able to communicate. What does Donald Trump do? When Donald Trump is in office, he runs around going, best economy for women, best economy for black people. How's your 401k, buddy? Democrats are in office and he's like, worst economy ever. Joe Biden has destroyed America. No, we have to do our part in making sure that when people start saying, my goodness, he's got Social Security, or my goodness, he has, you know, enacted these tariffs, we need to make sure we are amplifying or telling the story of the damage that this is doing. Because if you just sit back and let Trump control this narrative, you will lose it. We have been shown that time and time again. So you can't just sit there and wait for it to happen.
Will Saletan
Amen, sister. All right, Will, Sarah, thanks so much for joining me on this. I guess we could call this an emergency take on the Trump third term. It is.
Chumba Casino
Ryan Seacrest here. There was a recent social media trend which consisted of flying on a plane with no music, no movies, no entertainment. But a better trend would be going to Chumba Casino. Com. It's like having a mini social casino in your pocket. Chumba casino has over 100 online casino style games, all absolutely free. It's the most fun you can have online and on a plane. So grab your free welcome bonus now@chumbacasino.com sponsored by Chumba Casino.
Mona Charen
No purchase necessary. VGW Group void where prohibited by law 21 + terms and conditions apply.
Podcast Summary: Bulwark Takes – "Trump’s Third Term Talk Is All A Part Of His Power Game"
Release Date: March 30, 2025
Host/Author: The Bulwark
Participants: Mona Charen, Will Saletan, Sarah Longwell
1. Introduction to Trump’s Third Term Comments
In the March 30, 2025 episode of Bulwark Takes, host Mona Charen opens the discussion by addressing former President Donald Trump's recent comments during his interview with Meet The Press. Trump insinuated his consideration of a third presidential term, sparking immediate reactions from the Bulwark team. Mona introduces her colleagues, Will Saletan and Sarah Longwell, to dissect Trump's remarks and the broader implications of such statements.
Notable Quote:
2. Analysis of Kristen Welker’s Interview with Trump
Sarah Longwell delves into the specifics of Kristen Welker's interview with Trump, highlighting that it was not Trump who introduced the topic but Welker herself. This dynamic, according to Sarah, reflects a common journalistic strategy where journalists steer the conversation. Notably, Trump admitted to discussing potential pathways for a third term, mentioning methods beyond traditional avenues.
Notable Quote:
Will Saletan criticizes Welker's approach, emphasizing that instead of challenging Trump's assertions, she inadvertently legitimizes them by not effectively pushing back.
Notable Quote:
3. Legal Pathways for a Third Term: Discussion
The conversation transitions to the legal feasibility of a third term. Sarah points out that Trump would need to navigate complex constitutional amendments or exploit loopholes, such as appointing a vice president who could then hand over the presidency to him. Will counters by referencing the 14th Amendment, suggesting that Secretaries of State could block Trump's eligibility based on his participation in insurrection, thereby negating his bids without Supreme Court intervention.
Notable Quote:
Sarah Longwell [06:00]: "The 22nd amendment only says you can't be elected to a third term, but you could ... elect vice president and then the President ... hands it over to you."
Will Saletan [08:41]: "It really would be up to the Secretaries of State of the various States of the Union to say, I'm sorry, the Constitution says you're ineligible to be on the ballot."
4. Public Approval Ratings and Their Impact
A significant portion of the discussion revolves around Trump's public approval ratings. Sarah expresses skepticism about Trump's claims of high popularity, noting his history of inflated self-assessments. She theorizes that Trump's strategies aim to maintain his influence within the Republican Party rather than a genuine pursuit of a third term.
Notable Quote:
Will Saletan [02:50]: "He says ... popularity ratings are right now in the high 70s."
Sarah Longwell [10:19]: "Fatigue doesn't require any rules. People just get tired of you."
5. Trump’s Motivation: Power or Ego
Will and Sarah debate whether Trump's motivations are driven by a desire for power or fueled by ego. Will argues that Trump's aggressive actions and agenda indicate a clear ambition for reshaping the country, suggesting a thirst for power akin to authoritarian leaders. Conversely, Sarah posits that Trump's actions are more about maintaining relevance and adoration rather than an inherent desire to govern indefinitely.
Notable Quote:
Sarah Longwell [13:49]: "Does Donald Trump care more about power or ego? ... he loves the idea of people wanting him."
Will Saletan [15:14]: "I think he does want power. He's using power in a way we've never seen in American history."
6. Strategies to Counter Trump's Power
The team explores potential strategies to mitigate Trump's influence, especially if he attempts a third term. Will emphasizes the importance of lowering Trump's approval ratings to erode his support base. Meanwhile, another speaker underscores the need for active Democratic efforts to communicate the negative impacts of Trump's policies, rather than adopting a passive approach.
Notable Quote:
Unnamed Speaker [16:33]: "We have to amplify the stories of the damage that this is doing."
Will Saletan [16:02]: "Trump is going to do things that are going to make him unpopular and it's a matter of waiting him out."
7. Conclusion
The episode concludes with Mona summarizing the gravity of Trump's third-term talk as an urgent issue. The Bulwark team underscores the constitutional challenges, the psychological tactics employed by Trump, and the critical need for strategic countermeasures to prevent an unconstitutional extension of his presidency.
Notable Quote:
Final Thoughts
The Bulwark Takes episode provides a comprehensive analysis of Donald Trump's insinuations about pursuing a third presidential term. Through insightful discussions, the team examines the legal improbabilities, the psychological strategies at play, and the necessary actions to safeguard democratic norms. The episode serves as a critical resource for listeners seeking to understand the intricate dynamics of Trump's ongoing political maneuvers and their potential ramifications on American democracy.