
Loading summary
Northwest Handling Systems
Northwest Handling Systems is hiring now recognized for their industry leading products. They're hiring field service technicians for equipment troubleshooting, diagnosis and repair. Entry level technicians start at $27 an hour with full benefits plus a $2,000 sign on bonus. A leading distributor of material handling equipment for over 50 years serving Alaska, Washington and Oregon. Apply today@nwhs.com careers Northwest Handling Systems, an equal opportunity employer.
Tim Miller
Hey guys, I just got off Alex Witt show on MSNBC and we talked about a bunch of issues but kicked off focusing on Al Green's reply to the censure. Talking about how that Trump and Musk are not treating people with dignity, that they're capricious and arbitrary firing of people. It's not giving folks due process and it's really not treating them like humans that are that we're serving the public and serving the country in their own way. And I think that it's a really great point. Alex's first question to me about was whether that was politically salient. I don't know really and I don't care. I think it's important to say sometimes it is important just to stand up for people and let the chips fall where they may. And so we had a good chat about that and then we got into some other issues about Doge and what's happening with something that I haven't got to on the podcast yet, which is Trump targeting law firms and trying to bully and intimidate them, particularly the firms that had, you know, been involved in the investigations against him during the first term. It's really chilling stuff. So stick around for my discussion with Alex Witt. Subscribe to the feed and we'll be talking to you soon.
Al Green
Where's the dignity in all of what he's doing? Where's the dignity a person who's working, you have children in school, you may have someone that you're a caregiver for and you receive a letter indicating that you are no longer going to have the job that is so important to you and the many people who depend on you. It seems to me that there is no due process in this. But due process is one thing. Another thing is just the dignity that.
Alex Witt
Humanity Democratic Congressman Al Green there reacting to mass layoffs and cuts in the federal government. Green was censured by the House this week for disrupting Trump's joint address to Congress. And joining me now we have our friend Tim Miller, MSNBC political analyst and host of the Bulwark podcast. Tim, is that what the Democrats should be focusing on right now? Less the illegality, the abuse of power and more, just the cruelty and rash nature of these cuts. Are they effectively getting their message out to Americans?
Tim Miller
Yeah, well, I think they need to do all of it, you know, and you could always use more. I think probably the most effective thing to do is to talk about the human cost of this. Right. Like the real stories of veterans who are losing their job indiscriminately. You know, people that are losing, people that really need it, that are losing access to government services, are kind of getting Social Security offices around the country that people call into when they have problems getting their checks right. Like, I think focusing on these real world examples is probably the best. But to be honest, Alex, I We are 19, 20 months away from the midterm elections. I think that the Democrats really shouldn't be totally preoccupied with what is the best possible political message right now and be focused more on just raising as creating as much noise as possible about the damage that is being wrought by Elon Musk's, as you mentioned, illegal actions. As an unelected autocrat, you are exactly.
Alex Witt
Echoing the sentiments of another analyst I had on in the last hour who said the same thing. Trump, though, is going after law firms that represented his political enemies. This week he signed an executive order hitting the firm that represented Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC in 2016. He also went after the firm representing special counsel Jack Smith. Is retribution his priority? And if so, Tim, would will issues like the economy and cost of living, are they going to suffer from a lack of focus?
Tim Miller
Yeah, I'm glad you brought this story up because this is one of those examples. This is just a shocking abuse of power. Obviously, D.C. law firms are not going to be the most sympathetic victims here of Donald Trump and like the most effective people to put forth during a political campaign. But that doesn't mean that there shouldn't be a focus on it. I mean, it is absolutely outrageous that a law firm would be targeted by the federal government for doing its job, which is, you know, defending clients. The ripple effects of this are real. The other thing is there are only certain number of law firms. I know it feels like there are a lot of lawyers in D.C. and there are, but there really are only a certain number of law firms that can take on especially sensitive cases. Right. And so if the federal government continues to go after, you know, people on Jack Smith's team, go after people from the Mueller investigation, et cetera, there, it's going to be hard for them to find counsel that has the experience, et Cetera, to be able to represent them if Trump's going after these law firms. So I think it's a major story. And yes, I also do think that it's distracting the administration from what would probably be a more prudent use of their time on the economy.
Alex Witt
And let me remind our viewers that Trump was asked in a debate if he will seek retribution against his political enemies. And he said, quote, my retribution is going to be my success. Is that what we've seen so far, or has it been a lot of retribution?
Tim Miller
No, we've seen mostly him focusing on retribution and, you know, culture wars and advancing kind of the silly agenda, items of changing the names of bodies of water, et cetera. I look, the economy, I, from the start was deeply skeptical of Trump's economic agenda. I think it was undercovered during the campaign. I think it was very obvious that it was going to be disruptive to the country and probably inflationary. But even I am shocked that like six weeks in, the damage that has been done to, you know, the loss of jobs, as we mentioned, from federal government workers, but then the ripple effects of the people in those communities that are going to be harmed. And then on top of that, we've seen the stock market crashing, consumer confidence is way down, the Fed's estimates for our GDP growth is way down. There are real storm clouds on the horizon. I know it's felt longer, but he's only been in there six weeks. It's been really kind of an astonishing, you know, amount of economic failure already from the first month and a half of his presidency.
Alex Witt
So the New York Times has a new report on those who used to speak out against Trump but are now silent, fearing retribution from Trump and Musk. One prominent first term critic of Trump said he wouldn't comment on the record and in fact didn't want to be mentioned in this article at all. Is the administration, is this one better at intimidation than it was in the first Trump term? And if so, how and why?
Tim Miller
I think people assess that the people around Trump are more willing to go after foes. You know, I think that there was a sensor in the first term that like Trump might tweet at you and that might cause, you know, harm to you. You know, you might get bullied by people on the Internet. There might be death threats against you. But, you know, a lot of the folks that were in the agencies weren't really gonna use their power to go after people. There were some exceptions. This time it feels like the entire administration is on board with the agenda from the DOJ to Cash Patel's FBI. And I think that does have a lot of people scared. I will say this though. I don't really like the pre surrender at all. I don't like that this narrative is out there. They haven't really successfully targeted anybody yet. This is not Russia's, Putin's Russia, yet. People still have due process. This guy, that is the district attorney Ed Martin, who's been, you know, sending off letters to people. You know, he sent off a letter to Congressman who said, I don't care what you say. Sent a letter to Georgetown. Georgetown said, no, I'm not going to follow it. He tried, he tried to get somebody a grand jury together. I forget who it was that he was targeting. And the grand jury said, no, you don't have evidence to prosecute this person. So, you know, for them to actually go after you, there are still rules. There's still the rule of law in this country. And I think it's unfortunate that people are backing down, you know, before the fight has even really begun.
Alex Witt
So quickly, Tim, to what extent do you think the courts are providing a check on his power and will that last?
Tim Miller
Some, some. And we've seen people are very upset at Justice Barrett right now on the maga. Right. About her rul regarding the USAID funds that, that had to be paid out. And you know, we've obviously seen some.
Alex Witt
District courts bench, by the way.
Tim Miller
Yeah, right, sure. I mean, it was a cut and dry clays. It's kind of crazy. It was only five to four. But even still, you know, so far, so good on, on checks from the courts. We'll see how it plays out.
Alex Witt
Okay, we'll have you back soon, my friend. Thank you, Tim Miller.
Tim Miller
Thanks, Alex.
Podcast Summary: Trump’s War on Law Firms Is Another Shocking Abuse of Power
Podcast Information:
Introduction In this episode of Bulwark Takes, host Tim Miller delves into the alarming actions taken by former President Donald Trump against law firms that represented his political adversaries. The discussion highlights Trump's continued abuse of power, drawing parallels to his previous term and examining the broader implications for the rule of law and democratic institutions.
Key Discussion Points
Trump and Musk’s Disregard for Dignity and Due Process
Tim Miller opens the conversation by referencing his recent appearance on the Alex Witt show on MSNBC. He emphasizes the critical issue of Trump and Elon Musk's treatment of individuals, characterized by "capricious and arbitrary firing of people" without due process.
Al Green, a Democratic Congressman, echoes these sentiments, questioning the lack of dignity and due process in Trump's actions, especially concerning federal employees facing layoffs.
Targeting Law Firms as Retribution
The core of the episode centers on Trump's targeting of law firms that defended him and other Democrats. Tim Miller discusses how Trump signed an executive order against the firm that represented Hillary Clinton and the DNC in 2016, as well as against the firm representing Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Miller describes this move as a "shocking abuse of power," noting the potential long-term impacts on legal representation for sensitive cases.
Impact on the Legal Landscape and Democracy
Alex Witt raises concerns about whether these actions signal a prioritization of retribution over addressing substantial issues like the economy and cost of living.
Tim Miller argues that such actions distract the administration from more pressing matters. He underscores the potential difficulty in finding competent legal counsel if this trend continues, thereby undermining the justice system's integrity.
Intimidation and Silence Among Critics
The episode touches on the New York Times report highlighting former Trump critics who have gone silent out of fear of retribution from Trump and Musk. Miller discusses whether the current administration is more intimidating than the first term.
He notes that while intimidation tactics are apparent, the rule of law remains intact, as seen in instances where attempts to prosecute have been thwarted by insufficient evidence or institutional pushback.
Role of the Judiciary as a Check on Presidential Power
Alex Witt inquires about the courts' effectiveness in providing checks on Trump's power.
Tim Miller acknowledges that while some district courts have acted to curb abuses—for example, Justice Barrett ruling against misuse of USAID funds—the overall effectiveness of the judiciary in the long term remains to be seen.
Conclusions and Insights
Tim Miller concludes that Trump's actions against law firms represent a significant threat to democratic norms and the rule of law. By targeting legal defenders of his political enemies, Trump not only intimidates individuals and firms but also undermines the foundational principles of legal representation and justice. The ongoing intimidation of critics and the administration's focus on retribution over governance could have lasting detrimental effects on the political landscape and public trust in institutions.
Moreover, while the judiciary currently serves as a crucial check against such abuses, the sustainability of these protections will depend on continued oversight and resistance against attempts to erode democratic safeguards.
Notable Quotes Summary
Final Thoughts This episode of Bulwark Takes offers a comprehensive examination of the troubling patterns of power abuse by Donald Trump, particularly his recent targeting of law firms. Through insightful analysis and compelling quotes, Tim Miller underscores the urgent need to safeguard democratic institutions and uphold the rule of law against such authoritarian tendencies.