Transcript
A (0:00)
Foreign.
B (0:04)
You are listening to an art media podcast. Hi, it's Dan. This is a sneak peek from the members only edition of our show inside call me Back, where we pull back the curtain and have the conversations we typically have after the cameras stop rolling. I hope you enjoyed this segment and if you want to get the full episode and support our mission at ARC Media, please become an inside call me back member by following the link in the description or by going to arkmedia.org that's arkmedia.org and to all our insiders, thank you. It's your support that keeps the lights on at arc Media. Today we have a special inside call me back guest, Bret Stephens of the New York Times and Superior Journal. And. And the author of a very thought provoking, some would say provocative speech, an address that he delivered just a few nights ago that you could hear on the main call me back feed the state of world jury address that Brett delivered at the 92nd Street. Why, Brett, welcome to this cozy, safe space that we call inside Call me Back where you can let it all rip and say whatever you want to say, controversy be damned. Thanks for being here.
A (1:22)
It's just you, me and 500,000 Jews.
B (1:25)
You know what? What could go wrong? Yeah, I'm just. What's your experience been since delivering the address? Some could argue you kind of dropped a bomb there. What's been the experience for you in the days since Sunday night?
A (1:36)
Well, a little bit to my surprise, the response has been overwhelmingly positive. A lot of people who shall go nameless, but prominent names in the Jewish world have written me to say, this is something that we've been thinking about talking about privately for a long time, and you kind of name the problem and pointed away to the right kind of solution. So that's been gratifying. I didn't really know how the speech was gonna be received when I delivered it, and I feared that the response would be, in many quarters much angrier than it's proved to be. But that may be. It's just the case that I'm hearing from the people who liked it and not hearing from the people who didn't. Right.
B (2:21)
All right. One of the more controversial points I wanna get to this that you made in the address was that if it were up to you, I think you use the word dismantle the ADL or dismantle organizations like the adl, or just basically we're using the ADL here as an avatar. I mean, just generally speaking, this category of organizations which are on the front lines fighting anti semitism so that comment got a lot of attention, as you and I have talked about offline. Explain what you were thinking and making the point and how you would address the backlash to your comments.
