EMERGENCY EPISODE: AMERICA STRIKES IRAN - with Nadav Eyal and Amit Segal

Summary

Call Me Back - EMERGENCY EPISODE: AMERICA STRIKES IRAN With Nadav Eyal and Amit Segal
Release Date: June 22, 2025
Host: Dan Senor | Produced by Ark Media

---

Introduction and Context

In this unprecedented emergency episode of Call Me Back, host Dan Senor welcomes esteemed Israeli journalists and analysts Nadav Eyal and Amit Segal to discuss the historic military strike executed by the United States against Iran's nuclear facilities. The episode dives deep into the ramifications of this action, the coordination between the U.S. and Israel, and the broader geopolitical consequences.

Details of the US Military Operation

Dan Senor sets the stage by recounting President Trump's announcement on June 21 via Truth Social, declaring that the U.S. had launched attacks on three Iranian nuclear sites: Natanz, Esfahan, and the Fordow enrichment plant. This followed day 625 of Israel's "seven-front war."

Nadav Eyal elaborates on the specifics of the operation:

“We know the US used six bunker buster bombs that never been used before. It used B2 strategic bombers. It also shot about 30 cruise missiles from submarines and they hit Isfahan, Natanz and Fordo. These sites have been completely devastated and that Iran doesn't have a nuclear program as a result of these attacks.” (00:32)

The operation involved advanced weaponry, including B2 bombers and cruise missiles, aimed at decimating Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. Eyal emphasizes the significance of satellite imagery expected to confirm the extent of the damage.

Israel’s Involvement and Strategic Decisions

The discussion shifts to the collaborative nature of the strike. Eyal highlights the joint effort:

“You see that this was a joint operation of taking out the nuclear program. You see that the coordination was there all along the way that he was thanking Israel for that.” (02:16)

Amit Segal provides insight into Israel's role, suggesting that while Israel's direct involvement in the specific attack might have been limited to intelligence sharing, the groundwork was laid by Israel’s prior operations against Iranian targets:

“We know for sure that they had greenlighted the Israeli attack way before and... it was written on the wall.” (04:24)

Implications for Iran’s Nuclear Program

The conversation delves into the strategic choice not to target the enriched uranium directly. Eyal explains:

“...it's not about enriched uranium... it's about the centrifuges.” (08:16)

By targeting the centrifuges and the infrastructure necessary for uranium enrichment, the operation aims to cripple Iran’s ability to produce nuclear weapons without causing radioactive contamination from the uranium itself.

Dan Senor seeks clarification on the potential uses of moved enriched uranium:

“Assuming they did move the 400 kg of enriched uranium out of Fordo before this attack, what can they do with it?” (11:04)

Eyal responds by assessing the limitations:

“They can try and arm it... but the enrichment levels are not sufficient for a weapon yet.” (11:13)

This strategic focus underscores the objective to dismantle Iran’s nuclear capabilities while minimizing collateral environmental damage.

Regional Reactions and Saudi Arabia's Position

The impact of the U.S. involvement on regional dynamics is significant. Eyal discusses Saudi Arabia’s initial cautious stance:

“The Saudis took an extremely cautious position on this and they condemned Israel...” (25:50)

However, he anticipates a shift as the Saudi leadership recognizes the U.S.’s commitment to countering Iran:

“I think they're going to be more truthful as to their own positions.” (26:12)

This alignment could lead to stronger cooperation between Gulf states and the U.S., altering the balance of power in the Middle East.

Domestic Political Implications in Israel

The operation's success raises questions about its impact on Israeli politics. Segal addresses whether Prime Minister Netanyahu might call for early elections:

“In Israel, it doesn't really pay to call up an early election because it takes at least 90 days... Netanyahu still wants to hold this coalition together.” (24:06)

The coalition’s stability, bolstered by the operation's perceived success, suggests Netanyahu has little incentive to seek early elections, maintaining political continuity until the next scheduled vote in November 2026.

Economic Impact: Israel’s Stock Market

Contrary to the existential threat posed by the war, Israel's stock market has shown resilience and growth. Segal attributes this to investor confidence in Israel’s strategic position:

“Tel Aviv stock market marked its best week since COVID... the end of the biggest threat to Israelis ever posed.” (19:59)

This economic uptick reflects optimism about Israel’s security and future stability post-operation.

Concluding Remarks and Future Outlook

As the episode draws to a close, the guests offer their perspectives on the long-term implications of the strike.

Amit Segal envisions this moment as the beginning of the end for the Iranian nuclear threat:

“The end of the biggest threat to Israelis ever posed in the history of the country.” (19:59)

Nadav Eyal echoes this sentiment but cautions against potential prolonged conflict:

“It's the beginning of the end, but we're still not there... only if the regime is at stake will he back down.” (21:23)

The discussion also touches on the lingering issue of hostages in Gaza, emphasizing that military victories alone are insufficient without resolving humanitarian crises:

“We need to get them back... the hostages that are still in Gaza.” (31:10)

Notable Quotes

• Nadav Eyal on the operation’s historic nature:

  “This is really history in the making. This is a moment like no other.” (02:16)

• Amit Segal on the strategic success:

  “Mission accomplished in that respect.” (14:25)

• Sean Hannity (clip):

  “I want to thank and congratulate Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu... an operation the likes of which the world has not seen in many, many decades.” (29:10)

• Nadav Eyal on regional power shifts:

  “President Trump's historic decision to bomb Iran was essential, globally speaking.” (26:12)

Final Thoughts

The episode encapsulates a pivotal moment in Middle Eastern geopolitics, highlighting the collaboration between the U.S. and Israel in confronting Iran's nuclear ambitions. While celebrating the immediate successes, Nadav Eyal and Amit Segal caution about future uncertainties and the need for comprehensive strategies to ensure long-term peace and stability in the region.

For a deeper understanding of these developments, listeners are encouraged to explore more episodes and subscribe to Call Me Back at arkmedia.org.

---

Produced and edited by Ilan Benatar | Sound and Video Editing by Martin Huergo and Mariangelis Burgos | Director of Operations: Maya Rakoff | Research: Gabe Silverstein | Music: Yuval Semo

Transcript

[Dan Senor]

You are listening to an art media podcast.

[Sean Hannity]

Whipping away.

[Amit Segal]

Damn.

[Nadav Eyel]

Coming in.

[Dan Senor]

Foreign 30pm on Saturday, June 21 in New York City. It is 5:30am on Sunday, June 22 in Israel after what was certainly an eventful night for all of us. Earlier Today, on day 625 of Israel's seven front war, President Trump announced via Truth Social that the United States launched an attack on three Iranian nuclear sites. Natanz, Esfahan and of course the much talked about Fordeau enrichment plant. Tonight President Trump gave a public address from the White House. He called the attacks on Iran, quote, a spectacular military success. And he said that Iran's three targeted nuclear facilities had been, quote, completely and totally obliterated. He warned of tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the past eight days should Iran target the US in in response. This comes after days of intense uncertainty about whether America would join Israel's war against Iran's nuclear program. In the hours leading up to the US attack, there were reports the US was moving B2 bombers which carry the 30,000 pound bombs needed to destroy the underground 4Do facility to the Pacific island of Guam alongside fueling tankers. Trump told Fox News that six of these so called bunker buster bombs were dropped by the B2 bombers in this attack. I want to welcome Nadav Eyel and Amit Segal, both call me back regulars and among the most prominent journalists in Israel to this emergency episode during this historic moment. Nadav, Amit, thanks for being here.

[Nadav Eyel]

Thanks.

[Amit Segal]

Thank you. Good morning from Jerusalem.

[Dan Senor]

All right, so Nadav, what do we know about the military operation?

[Nadav Eyel]

We know the US used six bunker buster bombs that never been used before. It used B2 strategic bombers. It also shot about 30 cruise missiles from submarines and they hit Isfahan, Natanz and Fordo. These sites have been completely devastated and that Iran doesn't have a nuclear program as a result of these attacks. I think that would be prudent then to wait and see the satellite images in the morning. Satellites all around the world, Israeli, Americans, British, all the rest, Chinese, Russian, they're going to take satellite photos of these sites, specifically of Fodo to try and see what's the damage there. But this is not what's remarkable here. What's remarkable here is that the United States decided to be part of this war. And if you listen to the statement made by President Trump this evening, thanking Prime Minister Netanyahu, talking about him working as a team with Israel, thanking the IDF for what it has done and of course thanking the pilots of the United States of America and the team in the Pentagon for doing this. You see that this was a joint operation of taking out the nuclear program. You see that the coordination was there all along the way that he was thanking Israel for that. And it's truly a historic moment for the Middle East. But seeing this, seeing this happening, considering the opposition in the United States, considering the odds and the fact that this is a major decision for a US President with American interests across the region, American soldiers and bases in the Middle east and in the Gulf states, this is really history in the making. This is a moment like no other.

[Dan Senor]

Amit Nadav talked about how this was a joint Israel US Operation. And of course President Trump made that clear by praising Israel and thanking Israel for what it has done so far. But to what extent was Israel involved in this specific operation tonight?

[Amit Segal]

Maybe intelligence wise, but I mean it was quite ridiculous to follow the official statements by President Trump over the last few days and of course the various reports on the international media when we already knew what it was following the Israeli attack, because we knew following June 13, the Israeli attack, the beginning of the attack on Iran, the, that there is no correlation between what they say and what they do. We know for sure that they had greenlighted the Israeli attack way before and.

[Dan Senor]

At least that the US had greenlighted it.

[Amit Segal]

And now how can you take seriously what President Trump says when you know that he uses his true social networks network as a psychological weapon? Because he says, meaning when he was.

[Dan Senor]

Talking about two weeks in time for diplomacy and all that. You're right.

[Amit Segal]

And yet two hours before B2 bombed Fordeau, there was still a report in Reuters, I think about a heated debate between the Prime Minister Netanyahu and J.D. vance. It was all coordinated, not from day one on June 13th, but from day two. I would say once the US saw that it was a great success, it was only a question of when and not if. And all the process that we have seen over the last few days was not whether the US attacks or no question, but how to evacuate as efficiently as possible, the US military staff and diplomatic stuff from the Gulf, etc. Etc. So it was written on the wall. And I think we have an answer for the dilemma President Trump had faced. On one hand he promised, he had promised during the campaign not to begin new wars, but to end old wars. And on the other hand, he actually ordered the attack on Iranians nuclear facilities tonight. And I think what President Trump has just said in his speech is that this, in his opinion, this is the end of the war. He has no plans to further attack Iran unless Iran chooses to attack the U.S. now, according to the declarations from Iranian state TV, what left of Iranian state TV following the attack last week? They didn't get the memo. They didn't understand the message from the last two times in which they chose not to coordinate with President Trump. They had 60 days to negotiate and they thought they'll just muddle through. And they got the Israeli attack and then they refused to talk and they got the American attack. If they choose to attack American Viet again, I think they know we all know the future that looms ahead.

[Dan Senor]

Yeah. I will just say that while there was much chatter about the Reuters article and some other things happening, the three of us and Alon, Amit, Nadav and Alon, the four of us were online earlier today and I was pointing out that Sean Hannity was suddenly on deck on Fox News to do a special emergency broadcast on Fox News on a Saturday night, which Hannity never broadcasts on a Saturday night. And we all know that Hannity's very close to Trump. So actually, true analysts and insiders should not have been paying attention to Reuters. They should have been following what Sean Hannity is doing.

[Amit Segal]

Sean Hannity broadcasting on Saturday is like taking the tanks out of the.

[Dan Senor]

Exactly. Exactly. Nadav. The 400 kg of enriched uranium that was supposedly in Fordo, the Iranians have claimed that they've moved it out of Fordo, I think, I guess they're saying in anticipation of this attack and they moved all the personnel out, that the enriched uranium was relocated somewhere else in a quote, unquote, safe place. What do we know about that?

[Nadav Eyel]

Well, what we know is that at any rate, the US Or Israel was not targeting the enriched uranium, who was not trying to blow up the enriched uranium from several reasons. One of these reasons is that even if you collapse a mountain on the enriched uranium, it's not going to crush these containers. And secondly, if it blows out, it's a radioactive contamination that neither the US or Israel want to cause. It's not about enriched uranium or in other words, Dan, if they did know where the enriched uranium is, and I think they do know where it is, they wouldn't want to blow that up at this point. It's about the centrifuges.

[Amit Segal]

Okay?

[Dan Senor]

So that's key. That's key that where the enriched uranium is matters less than the center, the centrifuges and the infrastructure that was doing all this enrichment.

[Nadav Eyel]

This was the Israeli perception of the enriched ream. Okay, I want to be completely clear about that because I don't know what President Trump decided at the Oval Office as to the targets of this specific assault as of now, but it was the Israeli perception and at the time also the American perception that you shouldn't try to target the enriched uranium itself, but the means to produce it. And as far as we know, I started talking with Israeli sources. They're very optimistic as to the results of this strike. They are sort of saying, you know, we need to look at the photos and the images coming out in the morning to see if you need to have another sort of finalizing maneuver there, maybe a few more bombs to just make sure that this has happened. And we're also waiting. Then I should say the Iranian response to this. I'm starting to hear about a response by the Supreme Leader Khamenei, that's threatening the United States of America, saying that this decision will lead to consequences as far as the US Is concerned. But I don't see this as an official response of the Islamic Republic. And that's a big question that is really out there now for me, at least operationally speaking. The biggest question right now is whether or not Israel will say, okay, this is the first and last strike, as Amit said, as far as the US Is concerned for now. And if the Iranians will respond, does it mean that the Israeli air force seizes its own activities over the Iranian airspace right now and uses this exit point in order to say we've done what we could do? I'm not sure about that. Will this be the exit point of the war? And that's a big one.

[Dan Senor]

A very technical question, just so I understand this, what can Iran do? Assuming they did move the 400 kg of enriched uranium out of Fordo before this attack, what can they do with it?

[Nadav Eyel]

Well, basically they can try and arm it. You know, they can try to break for boom. If they still have the tools, the weapons group, the scientists to do that, they can hold to that 400 kg of enriched uranium indefinitely, Daniel, and then they can always break for it. So it's not over as long as they have that enriched uranium. The crisis of Iran's violations of its obligations to the Non Proliferation Treaty is still there when they hold to that enriched uranium. But could they enrich it to military grade uranium? And the answer is no, because right now it's not enriched to 90%, right? It's enriched to much less than that. Something 60%, something like that. If they don't have the facilities to do so, if they don't have the centrifuges around to do that. And if they don't have the scientists to place it in a warhead or in an installation of a primitive atomic bomb, they have nothing to do with it right now. But the question is even more dramatic because if they decide that they're going to attack American interests in the region, I suspect, and I don't need to suspect because the President has said so, that this would lead to a very aggressive response by the United States and that might lead to undermining the regime in a serious way. So until now, when we spoke about undermining the regime and regime change in Iran, all the Israeli sources said the same thing. Look, it might happen, but we're not really aiming for that. We're damaging symbols of the government. But it is a decision of the Iranian people or some power brokers within the Iranian regime if it's a coup d' etat. But it's a completely different story when the United States is in this game. Now this is signaling to the Iranian opposition that it's not only Israel, it's also the world's only superpower that is attacking the Islamic Republic's most important assets, its nuclear program, damaging its prestige, completely destroying the type of elements that gave it some sort of an immunity internationally speaking and regionally. And now the fact that they've been attacked in this way or maybe in the process of being in a conflict with the United States, this indeed changes the equation as to a possible regime change. It becomes much more plausible. Now saying that I need to emphasize again what the President basically said. This is a one off. This is not a campaign. This is not a war. There is not going to be boots on the ground as far as the President is concerned. But much depends now on the mistakes or not the mistakes made by the Iranian regime. As a response to this.

[Dan Senor]

Amit, what would be considered success for.

[Amit Segal]

Israel from tonight, what has just happened? Israel went on a mission, mission impossible. Mission impossible 3 following the Iraqi nuclear reactor and the Syrian one. But this was really impossible.

[Dan Senor]

A mission meaning 1981 with Begin, 2007 with Omer, Iraq and Syria respectively. And each one seemed harder than the one before it. And now this one's a whole other level.

[Amit Segal]

Yes. And this one, I mean, there was no way for Israel to fully eliminate the nuclear reactory, the nuclear facility in Fordo. And not only President Trump attacked Fordo, he finished the job in Isfahan and Athan. So mission accomplished in that respect. Now there are three remaining targets. One is to actually dismantle and destroy and hunt down each and every launcher of the ballistic missiles because this is the imminent threat on Israel. Two thirds of the launchers have already been eliminated. So I guess it's just a question of time. By the way, touch wood. But this was the last, the calmest 24 hours in Israel since the beginning of the war. There wasn't a single launch at Israel since Saturday, 5am till Sunday, 5am which means something. Second is to look for the enriched uranium. As Nadav said, the nightmare scenario is not Iranians trying to have the traditional nuclear facility, but the dirty bomb.

[Dan Senor]

And what's a dirty bomb? Can you describe what a dirty bomb is?

[Amit Segal]

It's a truck arriving at Allenby, Passage between Jordan and Israel, thus exploding in Tel Aviv. This is the nightmare scenario.

[Dan Senor]

Meaning gets through the border and then blows up in downtown Tel Aviv.

[Amit Segal]

Yes. Like, like Tom Clancy's in Tom Clancy's book to tell you this is quite feasible. I don't think so. But no one wants to take the risk.

[Dan Senor]

No one wants to take the risk in saying it's not a risk.

[Amit Segal]

Exactly. And that's why, I mean, if Iran decides to act like a terrorist organization and not as a country, that's what they are going to try. I don't think it's very feasible, but it's a threat. So it's better for the world to find this enriched uranium through an agreement. The other option is if they choose to attack Americans in the Middle east, then it's a full scale war, but not with Israel, but with the United States of America. So for Israel, Israel just keeps doing what it has done done for the last, but it has been doing for the last 10 days. And you know, the target bank is almost quite empty once Trump is done with Sodomatans and Isfahan.

[Dan Senor]

And I have a question for both of you. What is Israel's role now? What is Israel's role going forward?

[Nadav Eyel]

This is the major decision that the Israeli cabinet needs to take right now. And there are differences of opinions within the defense apparatus. If you ask, I think some parts of the Israeli Air Force, for instance, they'll say, look, we had the war aims, we are achieving them now. They can say we achieved. They can always do more. Right. It's like a candy shop for the Israeli Air Force or for the idf. It's Iran, it's an arch enemy. You can always find another factory, another quality target to hit in Iran. And there are always people within the defense apparatus who say, if not now, when? Let's use this opportunity, let's use this window in which they don't have air defenses in which we have the support of the United States. And as always, with Israeli wars in the Middle east, let's just grab some more time. Just another day or two. And there will be those who say this is an excellent point to exit and to let the US Lead this scenario from now on. Now, as far as the Iranian regime is concerned, let's remember one thing. These kind of regimes, they don't fall because of an aerial campaign. They fall because either the people rise against the regime or there is a faction within the regime that wants to take control and it's actually a coup d' etat. These are the scenarios. Since Israel is not going to occupy Iran, the United States is not going to occupy, try and take Iran and put boots on the ground. For the Iranians, it's also an exit. You know, they lost their nuclear program, but now, if they're not going to attack the Americans, if they're not going to escalate, what's going to be Israel's position in this? For the Iranian regime, it's really a great time to cut their losses. They still have their 400 kilograms of enriched uranium. Maybe they can rebuild. Right. This would be a extremely rational for the Islamic Republic to do so. Usually they don't take that rational choice.

[Dan Senor]

Right. And as Kareem, as Karim Sajapur Nadav said in our conversation that you and I had with him the other day, every time, once everyone, analysts want to project and strategists want to project onto the Iranians a path of rationality, it's never the path they actually take. Ever. Before we wrap, I have a couple more questions. I know it's hard to make predictions, but I will say that both of you, the three of us, actually, I should say all, believed that the US Would get involved in some kind of quote, unquote, final stage of this war, dealing with Fordeau. And even when all the chatter and all the noise was pointing in the opposite direction, the three of us, I think, were all looking at the signal as to the signal being that the US Was going to get involved. So therefore, I'm going to ask you to make a prediction. Now, I won't hold you to it, but what is this? The beginning of the end? The end of the beginning. If you, if you had to just paint a picture of what you think, and again, you can caveat it as much as you want, where you think things will be heading, what would you say? I'll start with you, Amit.

[Amit Segal]

I think it's the beginning of the end, even if Iranians try to attack Americans, it would be, you know, a bitter end. And they can try and negotiate, but at the end of the day, since Iran is no longer a nuclear superpower to be, I think we can see the, the light inside. I'll just give you an example. The Tel Aviv stock Exchange. Tel Aviv stock market marked its best week since COVID in the week in which original war erupted. Why? Because in the stock market you always look for the long run. And what people saw a week ago in the stock market now I think everyone sees is the end of the biggest threat to Israelis ever posed in the history of the country. I just want to explain something. Every time a child in Israel is frightened by terrorists, there is an Iranian at the end of the sentence. Every time a rocket was fired, a suicide bomber exploded in Jerusalem or in Tel Aviv, a Hamas terrorist invaded Beri and Israeli killed in a terrorist activity abroad over the last 40 years. It was Iran. So now when you see the fire erupting from Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, it signals the end of this terror superpower that ruled the Middle east for almost two generations. Very good news, Nadav.

[Nadav Eyel]

I agree with Amit. It's the beginning of the end, but we're still not there. And the reason for that is because we're very much dependent on the decisions made within the Islamic Republic regime and because Khamenei has always chosen a hard line position when he had the choice. And because of that, he can still drag the region into a prolonged kind of an attrition. And only if the regime is at stake will he back down. And my worry is that he will make the calculus, that it's better for him to have some sort of an attrition out there and that the US would want to sort of disassociate. So I'm always worried about these kind of scenarios. I'm worried this is a Jewish podcast, so I tend to be worried even in our most happiest moments. But at the end of the day, Israel decided to go to this specific phase of the war. The war began on October 7. Yahya Sinwar decided to launch a full time invasion into the State of Israel and conduct a pilot in genocide against Israelis at the end of the road. Right now, the Islamic Republic has just been struck by a blow it has never seen before. No one in the world would have imagined. In October 2023, Sinwar is dead. Nasrallah is dead. The Chief of staff of the Iranian army is dead. The commander of the Revolutionary Guard is dead, and the scientists working on their nuclear program, they are dead also. And for Duo has just been hit tonight. And I think that the consequence of this is when you look at power in the region and when you look at Israel and the United States, the axis of resistance and actually the axis of terror has collapsed.

[Dan Senor]

Amit, you mentioned the stock market and Israel's economy. I will just flag for our listeners the most recent episode of what's yous Number, which is an ARC Media podcast on the economy where we dealt, where Michal Levram and Yonatanadiri dove right into this question of why the stock market has been doing so well during this, what seemed like a very existential moment. And they go through four factors. So it's very much consistent with, with what you're saying. But it's a long conversation. I would be remiss to meet if I didn't ask you about the domestic political implications of this development inside Israel. Does Netanyahu call for elections tonight or does he wait till tomorrow morning?

[Amit Segal]

So, actually, in Israel, it doesn't really pay to call up an early election because it takes at least 90 days, three months. And in Israel, three months is eternity. So even if now we've just seen the most dramatic event in many, many years, it doesn't necessarily mean that this will be the issue on the agenda of the next election. So I think that at the end of the day, Netanyahu still wants to hold this coalition together. Why? Because now he has 66 Knesset members in his coalition out of 120. It's a very stable coalition, according to the polls, at least on channel 12, he gets only 50. So let's say even that thanks to this attack and the victory, he'll get 61, it's still less than he has at hand. So I think he has an incentive to actually keep his coalition till November 2026, the date of the election. And a second question arises now, after Netanyahu entered history, and not from the wrong side, from October 7 side, but as the one who actually spoke against Iran and then did what it took to dismantle its nuclear program, will he step down? Now, cemeteries are full with commentators who predicted the Netanyahu stepping down. So I wouldn't say this. I would just say that I would give it 0% a week ago, and now I give it 2%.

[Dan Senor]

Okay, Nadav, I would be I know you're in touch with many people in the Gulf, including in Saudi Arabia, including some of your colleagues in journalism in Saudi Arabia. So I would be remiss if I didn't ask you, if you're in Riyadh today and you're watching what happened tonight, what are you thinking?

[Nadav Eyel]

The Saudis took an extremely cautious position on this and they condemned Israel and they gave the impression they're extremely unhappy with Israeli operation against Iran. And I expect this position to change. I think they were basically playing for.

[Dan Senor]

The audience, playing for the street and playing for run, not to hit them.

[Nadav Eyel]

Exactly. And now that they've seen that the US Is very much in, I suspect that MBS would be more forceful to the real opinions of Gulf countries and Saudi Arabia as to the threat of Iran. They just can't believe it. Then one of their problems there is that they don't believe that the west is serious enough. Their problem is not with Israel. They know that Israel and Iran are mortal enemies. Their problem is that the west or the United States might not stand by its conviction against Iran. And then if they will have statements against Iran, positions against Iran, they'll be left out to dry. Then the Iranians will take their revenge. And now that they've seen that the United States has been part of this and has bombed Iran directly, I think they're going to be more truthful as to their own positions. This is taking the major enemy to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and to the Gulf countries out of the equation. And that's one of the things that the Saudis want to know about the future, that the US Is still there. UAE wants to know that, too, and that it's going to be playing a big part in the region. And to that extent, President Trump's historic decision to bomb Iran was essential, globally speaking. I think China is watching, Russia is watching. And it's these ideas, Trump chickening out. These ideas are definitely dead this evening.

[Dan Senor]

Right. And the model of this idea that if you think of the four biggest threats to the United States around the world, geopolitical threats, China, Russia, North Korea and Iran, three of those four countries have a nuclear bomb. One of them was on a pathway to getting a nuclear bomb, and now it's not going to happen. And that is just an extraordinary moment in terms of Israeli leadership, American leadership shaking up geopolitics and kind of reversing what was a very dangerous trend in terms of nuclear proliferation among enemies of the west, enemies of the United States also. It's just a reminder for those friends of Israel around the world to keep in mind that Israel does best from a position of strength when it is succeeding, not when it is looking like A victim and begging for help. And I think nothing has brought that idea into sharper relief than the last few days. President Trump got involved. I mean, I think he was supportive of what Israel was doing, he backed what Israel was doing, but he took a big risk. And the United States was willing to take a big risk because Israel was dazzling in its performance, not begging for partnership and help. And I just think this last few days is another exceptional case. Studying that. And then finally, I just want to play quickly for you guys this clip of President Trump tonight praising Israel and the idf. Alon, if we could just play this clip real quick.

[Sean Hannity]

I want to thank and congratulate Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before. And we've gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to Israel. I want to thank the Israeli military for the wonderful job they've done. And most importantly, I want to congratulate the great American patriots who flew those magnificent machines tonight and all of the United States military on an operation the likes of which the, the world has not seen in many, many decades.

[Dan Senor]

To have the American president praise the men and women of the idf. I'm moved by this because we just take for granted the IDF is just the object of excoriation everywhere around the world. Not just Israel, but the IDF especially is so toxic. And then to see the President here, the President, United States just unapologetically say, praising this, this force for good. I just, I move by it. So I don't know if you guys, I don't know if you have any reaction when you see the president, any president, but especially right now saying something like this.

[Amit Segal]

I think what we see now is the end of what began 625 days ago in Beri. And it was informed the most devastating failure of the Israeli army. We see now what can be, what will be perceived, what history would see as the first and last Israel Iran war. It wasn't an Israel Gaza war, it was an Iran Israel war. And it started with Israel's Pearl harbor, but it ends now with the end of the project that was aimed at killing millions of Israelis, millions of Jews. We can't forget any of the 1200 victims of this day. But this, this terrible price led to what we saw tonight in Fordona, Tanzania. Svarna dav.

[Nadav Eyel]

I agree, I agree with Amit and I want to say something else because we need to remember what has not been achieved yet, and that is the hostages that are still in Gaza. We need that military might we need that power. But there is something deeper that needs to happen within the Israeli society in terms of healing and rebuilding. And that's very much associated not with military victories, but of getting everyone else who's still held by Hamas in those dungeons in Gaza. For them, it doesn't matter because they're there and they're jailed and they're tortured and we need to get them back.

[Dan Senor]

I think the military power matters, but it's not sufficient.

[Nadav Eyel]

I think that to a large extent, even politically speaking, just very cynically speaking, the prime minister has now the chance to do basically whatever he wants in order to end the war on the best note possible and get this sort of agreement that will change the Gaza Strip in the region forever and maybe lead to normalization.

[Dan Senor]

Certainly an inflection point. Declare victory. Okay, Nadav, Amit, thank you. I know it's late, it's early, and you guys both have reporting to do and writing to do. So I will simply say good night.

[Amit Segal]

Thank you. Bye bye.

[Dan Senor]

That's our show for today. If you if you found this episode valuable, please share it with others who might appreciate it. Time and again we found that our listeners are the ones driving the growth of the Call Me Back community. So thank you. And to offer comments, suggestions, sign up for updates or explore past episodes, please visit our website, ark media.org that's ark media.org where you can deepen your understanding of the topics we cover. Call Me Back is produced and edited by Ilan Benatar, sound and video editing by Martin Huergo and Mariangelis Burgos. Our director of operations is Maya Rakoff. Research by Gabe Silverstein. Our music was composed by Yuval Semo. Until next time, I'm your host, Dan Senor.