Loading summary
Dan
Foreign.
Nadav
You are listening to an art media podcast.
Podcast Host
It's 6pm on Tuesday, September 9th here in Washington, D.C. where I am. It's also 6pm on Tuesday, September 9th, in New York City. It is 1am on Wednesday, September 10th, in Israel, where Israelis learned about a little over eight hours ago that Israel had dropped 10 bombs on a building in Doha in the capital of Qatar, where senior Hamas leaders were believed to be meeting. The government of Qatar has issued a strong statement calling the attack, I'm quoting here, a criminal assault and a violation of all laws and norms. Others that have joined the list criticizing Israel's actions, Saudi Arabia, the uae, Jordan, Turkey and the Palestinian Authority all condemned the attack and expressed solidarity with Qatar. The US Government, the White House, issued a statement that was very critical of Israel's decision here. Yet at the same time, it was a little bit of a blurry message because it also said that this incident, this unfortunate incident, the White House described it as could be the basis for some kind of pursuit of peace or some kind of turnaround. So I want to turn to Nadaviel and Amit Segal here for their quick take in this new format we're testing called voice memo. So, Nadav Amit, my question is, has this attack changed the landscape of the war in Gaza and what now? What do you expect to unfold?
Nadav
Well, I think the situation changed dramatically in Gaza even if the assassination failed. And this is the most probable scenario first, because Qatar is no longer the mediator. If you are a Hamas leader, would you arrive again to Qatar to negotiate indirectly with Israel? If you are under the impression that they're going after you and that they are not negotiating but gathering intelligence before striking second, is that Israel choose a side. There was a debate in Israel whether Qatari is a partner to bring back the hostages like the Mossad said, or that Qatari is an enemy because it funds Hamas like the Shin Bets claims. Is it a friend or a foe? And Israel chose it's a foe. That's the main thing. So it actually brings the situation in Gaza to a better place because they see that Israel has no limits in trying to eliminate Hamas. They were under the impression prior to the war that hostages are actually their get out of jail card. And they see that it's not an insurance that Israel is going after Hamas everywhere. So I think at the end of the day, it's going to bring better results at a heavy price. The price is that Israel is more isolated in the region now and that the Qatari poison machine is going after Israel. Now, with full engines and the full amounts of money.
Dan
Dan, I think we can say for sure that the landscape of the war has changed, if not for one reason only, and that is that Qatar has been attacked by the Israeli Air Force, something that I suspect the Qataris never believed that could happen. And the fact that Qatar, that has been there since the beginning of the war and actually in the road to the war, by supporting Hamas with the endorsement of the Israeli government at the time, the fact that they are now being ejected through this action, and they are being ejected, they are super angry at the Israelis, they're super suspicious that the Americans did green light them, although the US is denying that. And the fact that this is the case means that now everything is shifting towards Cairo and towards the Egyptians, which is something that Israel's defense apparatus wanted to happen like a long time ago. Of course, if it turns out that indeed those Hamas officials are dead, what we call in Hebrew, I'm translating literally, Hamas overseas isn't there anymore and also changes the war because to a large extent, I think it delays the possibility of a deal, right? These are the people that were negotiating with Israel a hostage deal. These are the people also with blood on their hands that were responsible for two previous deals. And now if they're indeed dead, they're out of the question. But we will need to wait to see if indeed the Hamas denials. Hamas is saying that they are unheard. If this is indeed the case, Israeli intelligence is still checking this up and only then we will be able to say for certain what is their condition. By the way, if they have fled Qatar to Iran, probably Hamas overseas as a negotiating tool is also dead because the Israelis are not going to travel to Tehran to negotiate, right? Anyway, it changes the war.
Title: Voice Memo: Israel Strikes Qatar
Host: Dan Senor
Guests: Nadav Eyal, Amit Segal
Date: September 10, 2025
Theme:
The episode features a rapid-response discussion about the unprecedented Israeli airstrike in Doha, Qatar, which targeted senior Hamas leaders. The host and guests break down the immediate diplomatic fallout, the shifting regional dynamics, and the broader implications for the ongoing war in Gaza. The episode foregrounds the dilemmas and consequences faced by Israel in its efforts to dismantle Hamas, especially now that Qatar—historically a mediator—has become a direct target.
“If you are a Hamas leader, would you arrive again to Qatar to negotiate indirectly with Israel? If you are under the impression that they're going after you and that they are not negotiating but gathering intelligence before striking?” [01:50]
“Everything is shifting towards Cairo and towards the Egyptians, which is something that Israel's defense apparatus wanted to happen like a long time ago.” [03:29]
“To a large extent, I think it delays the possibility of a deal, right? These are the people that were negotiating with Israel a hostage deal. … If they're indeed dead, they're out of the question.” [03:39]
“The Israelis are not going to travel to Tehran to negotiate, right?” [04:10]
Nadav Eyal, on Israel’s recalibration:
“They were under the impression prior to the war that hostages are actually their get out of jail card. And they see that it's not an insurance—that Israel is going after Hamas everywhere.” [02:20]
Amit Segal, on the regional shock:
"I suspect the Qataris never believed that could happen." [03:11]
Nadav Eyal, on the cost of this new approach:
"It actually brings the situation in Gaza to a better place because they see that Israel has no limits in trying to eliminate Hamas... At a heavy price. The price is that Israel is more isolated in the region now." [02:22]
Amit Segal, on new regional alignments:
"Now everything is shifting towards Cairo and towards the Egyptians, which is something that Israel's defense apparatus wanted to happen like a long time ago." [03:29]
The tone is urgent, analytical, and grounded in the realpolitik of regional affairs. Both guests convey the sense of a watershed moment, in which Israel’s willingness to strike in Qatar fundamentally shifts diplomatic alignments, the mediation arena, and the calculus for both Hamas and the broader region.
The Israeli strike on a Hamas meeting location in Doha marks a historic and controversial escalation. It has ended Qatar’s role as mediator, isolated Israel diplomatically, and forced a recalibration of the war’s next phase. The future of hostage negotiations and larger diplomatic engagement is now deeply uncertain, with Egypt poised to play a greater role and hostile rhetoric intensifying on all fronts.