Podcast Summary: "Blake Lively Filed A Sham Lawsuit. Is This Now A Criminal Case?" | Candace Ep 179

Release Date: April 21, 2025
Host: Candace Owens
Description: This time it's just Candace. Free and unfiltered.

I. Introduction

In Episode 179 of her podcast, Candace Owens delves into the controversial case involving actress Blake Lively and actor Ryan Reynolds, examining allegations of a sham lawsuit and its potential escalation into a criminal matter. Owens provides a detailed analysis of the events, implicating various PR firms and legal professionals in what she describes as white-collar crimes.

II. The Blake Lively Sham Lawsuit

A. Background and Overview

Candace Owens opens the discussion by highlighting recent developments in the Ryan Reynolds and Blake Lively case. She emphasizes the gravity of the situation, suggesting that the legal actions taken are more sinister than initially perceived.

[05:15] Candace Owens: "The case is now solved and it's so much uglier and more psychotic than any of us could have possibly envisioned."

B. Timeline of Events

Owens meticulously outlines the timeline, starting from Jennifer Abel's resignation to the filing of the sham lawsuit by Van Zan Incorporated.

1. July 10, 2024: Jennifer Abel resigns from her position.
2. August 21, 2024: Stephanie Jones confiscates Abel's personal phone under the guise of complying with a subpoena.
3. August 29, 2024: Ryan Reynolds sends a message urging silence regarding the situation.
4. September 27, 2024: Van Zan Incorporated files the sham lawsuit.
5. October 1, 2024: The actual subpoena is issued.
6. December 10, 2024: Connections deepen with Liz Plank updating her production documents linked to the same address as Van Zan Incorporated.

[12:45] Candace Owens: "On September 27th, a sham lawsuit is filed. This is the most explosive update since it all began."

C. Key Players and Their Roles

• Blake Lively & Ryan Reynolds: Central figures accused of orchestrating the sham lawsuit.
• Stephanie Jones: PR executive who confiscated Jennifer Abel's phone.
• Jennifer Abel: Former employee whose personal phone was seized, leading to the discovery of incriminating text messages.
• Samantha Katz: Attorney who facilitated the filing of the fraudulent lawsuit through Van Zan Incorporated.
• Molly Caro: PR officer with connections to Vision PR and ties to Taylor Swift's productions, further entangling the network.

[20:30] Candace Owens: "Samantha Katz is the moron that involved herself. She devised with her clients to file this lawsuit, which nobody could have found before."

D. The Sham Lawsuit Details

Owens scrutinizes the merits of the Van Zan Incorporated lawsuit, noting its vague accusations against "10 Jane Does" and the suspicious absence of named defendants.

[24:10] Candace Owens: "The language throughout the lawsuit is intentionally vague... They never wanted the public to find it."

E. Criminal Implications

Highlighting the discrepancies in the timeline, Owens argues that the actions taken by the involved parties likely constitute criminal behavior, specifically white-collar crimes such as theft and fraud.

[35:20] Candace Owens: "You can't just steal someone's phone and then try to legitimize it. This is white-collar crime. They all should go spend some time in jail."

F. PR Firms' Involvement

The podcast delves into the collusion between PR firms like Vision PR and management companies, suggesting a coordinated effort to manipulate public perception and legal outcomes.

[28:50] Candace Owens: "Leslie Sloan's Vision PR colluded with Stephanie Jones' PR firm to file this sham lawsuit because they wanted to legitimize the seizure of Jennifer Abel's phone."

III. Roseanne Barr's Threat and Apology

A. The Threat

Owens addresses a contentious moment where comedian Roseanne Barr threatened her, prompting a response from Barr that was both aggressive and later retracted.

[37:53] Roseanne Barr: "Monster. If I see you, I'll knock her out. She's an Islamist."

B. Roseanne's Apology

Following the threat, Roseanne Barr issued an apology, which Owens discusses in detail, highlighting inconsistencies and ulterior motives behind the apology.

[38:07] Roseanne Barr: "It's not fake to apologize. I felt bad for threatening violence, not for being upset by your words."

[38:22] Candace Owens: "We cut off the end of her apology, but she shared the entirety, expressing fear for her family's safety, which I found irrelevant given the context."

IV. Religious Discussions

A. Passing of Pope Francis

Owens shifts focus to the recent passing of Pope Francis, exploring its significance and the ensuing reactions within the Catholic community.

[25:30] Candace Owens: "Pope Francis passed away at the age of 88. The Catholic Church is growing, especially with a resurgence towards the Latin liturgy."

B. Growth of the Catholic Church

She observes a trend of increasing conversions to Catholicism, particularly among younger generations seeking structure and authority.

[30:10] Candace Owens: "Young people are converting to Catholicism en masse, driven by the pandemic, the internet, and a desire for more traditional lifestyles."

C. Conversion to Catholicism

Owens shares perspectives on her own and others' journeys toward Catholicism, emphasizing the search for spiritual authority and community.

[33:45] Candace Owens: "I converted to Catholicism because I felt the need for authority and structure that Protestantism didn't provide me."

V. Conclusion and Reflections

Candace Owens wraps up the episode by reinforcing her stance against white-collar crime and emphasizing the importance of moral and principled behavior. She encourages listeners to stay informed and critically evaluate the actions of public figures and institutions.

[45:00] Candace Owens: "People hate rich people because they let their money and power bully others without consequence. This case is a prime example of that corruption."

Notable Quotes

• Candace Owens: "They think their money can buy them immunity, but the truth always comes out eventually." [15:30]
• Candace Owens: "This sham lawsuit is a blatant attempt to manipulate the legal system for personal gain." [22:50]
• Roseanne Barr: "I'm an Islamist. Everything she says is straight out of it." [37:53]
• Candace Owens: "White-collar criminals like them should face jail time to set an example." [35:20]

Key Takeaways

1. Sham Lawsuit Allegations: Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds are implicated in filing a fraudulent lawsuit through Van Zan Incorporated, involving the unethical seizure of a former employee's phone to manipulate public perception.

2. PR Firm Collusion: Vision PR and other associated firms are accused of collaborating to legitimize the sham lawsuit, highlighting potential coordinated misconduct.

3. Criminal Implications: The actions described suggest possible white-collar crimes, urging legal authorities to investigate and hold the involved parties accountable.

4. Religious Shifts: The Catholic Church is experiencing growth, particularly among younger demographics seeking structured and authoritative spiritual guidance.

5. Public Figures' Accountability: The episode underscores the importance of scrutinizing the actions of wealthy and influential individuals to prevent abuse of power.

Conclusion

Candace Owens provides a comprehensive and critical examination of the Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds lawsuit saga, intertwining it with broader themes of accountability, corruption, and the search for moral authority. By dissecting timelines, motives, and the involvement of various PR entities, Owens urges listeners to remain vigilant and advocate for justice against white-collar abuses. Additionally, the episode touches upon significant religious shifts and personal reflections, offering a multifaceted perspective on contemporary societal issues.