Candace Owens (20:34)
Plantation Khaleesi is quite the name nickname for Blake Lively. So he posts this video and then it gets taken down from tick tock on February 6, right? And he told me that when he looked into why it got taken down, essentially they received some sort of illegal threat in the background that, like, they could go after them for something defamatory in the video. So social media companies are not here to investigate. They're not here to be judges and lawyers. But having a lawyer email you on behalf of a client, and if it's an A list client saying, like, we're going to come after you TikTok for allowing this defamation to exist on the platform. They're not going to take a risk. They're not going to be like, I'm going to go with Marcos, right? I'm going to be like, listen, this person seems like they have a lot of money, they got a lot of power. I'm just going to take this Tik Tok video down. And that's what happened. And he was infuriated about this. And he essentially started tagging Brian Friedman's team and saying, like, hey, if you want, like, something that you should be looking into and potentially this could happen, you should be subpoenaing TikTok. Because if her entire argument is that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer team manipulated the press and she's doing the exact same thing right now, meaning she's upset about tiktokers coming out with information or believing that tiktokers are leaking information, well then that kind of defeats her own argument. And so they. Some. I mean, not they. Marco somehow was able to get this video reinstated by basically saying a tick tock, which is ridiculous. This is free speech. He said allegedly. He didn't say, like, this is confirmed. He said exactly how he heard it as a source. This is what, like, journalism is called. This is what you do when you report, you get information, you give it to the public and you give them exactly how you receive that information, which is like, this is allegedly. But it's a strong source. So we should probably. By the way, that's a major, major, major clue here. And everything that I'm seeing indicates that he's right. So that language in that first hearing, we might add a plaintiff. We're going to ask them to accept service, but if not, then we'll just subpoena. It's like, okay, so is the plaintiff willing to do this or do you feel like you can get this person to join the suit, or is this person fighting you? We don't know. So that's on February 6th. We should talk about Jenny Slate in general or why I just haven't even been speaking about Jenny Slate. Like, genuinely, I didn't mention her. She played some role in the movie and she instantly, when Blake Lively filed her complaint, did not mince words. She didn't try to make it seem like she wasn't picking a side. She strongly picked Blake Lively's side. This was a statement she released. She said, as Blake Lively's castmate and friend, I voice my support as she takes action against those reported to have planned and carried out an attack on her reputation. Blake is a leader, loyal friend, and a trusted source of emotional support for me and so many who know and love her. What has been revealed about the attack on Blake is terribly dark, disturbing, and wholly threatening. She added, I commend my friend. I admire her bravery and I stand by her side. Okay, so the reason why I kind of ignore Jenny Slate and all this is because, like, I just get vibes from people, and I just felt like that statement was just very theater kid. It was way too much. And it's like, I don't really need to care about this. There's something about her that just registered to me. I don't say this in, like, a derogatory way, but just, like. Like, doing too much. And I could imagine, very simply, that she got wrapped into this, like, Blake Lively spell of just, like, I'm gonna be the most amazing person. The fact that she, like, called, like, an emotional support puppy, like, one of these people on, like, on a plane who's like, I can't fly without my puppy. You know, I just was like, it's too much. It's too much too fast. And I just didn't think it was relevant to looking into everything. But I will say it is likely that similarly, she was under this spell of the Reynolds family, and she wanted to feel like the A list love. Like, she just wanted to ha with them one degree closer to Taylor Swift. Who knows? Maybe Taylor Swift even sprinkled a little glitter on her at a concert. We don't know what the connection is there, but she probably believed Blake Lively. And Blake Lively has proven. Ryan Reynolds has proven to be actually the smartest in the room and was likely manipulating her. And it is likely, this is my guess that Blake and Ryan have messages with her, because if she's that dramatic in a release statement, she probably was even more dramatic in, like, just being the friend that supports your friend even when you know you're lying. Like, women lie to each other. Like, we have to be honest about this. This kind of gets into. When I was going over, like, the fat acceptance movement, and you would see, like, pictures of people like Lena Dunham wearing a bathing suit, and, like, a bunch of women in the comments feel like you look amazing. And it's like, okay, why are we doing that? Because we want to make each other feel good. That's, like, what women do. We just want to be the emotional support to your friend. Like, you know, maybe her outfit doesn't look great, and she's like, how do I look? Like, you look so hot. You know, you look amazing. It's just this weird thing that women do. I don't know why, but we lie to each other on the Internet. I see it all the time. I want to call it out. I want to be like the Internet police and be like, you know that's not true. Stop supporting your friends when they're doing bad or harmful Things I think Jenny Slate, again, full opinion, full speculation, was that girl in the room who just wanted to, like, support whatever Blake was saying. And she probably texted her and was like, me, too. You know, I felt weird and creepy too, or whatever. So Blake and Ryan are all out of cards and they're. They've got nothing to prove this right now. And they're like, could we get Jenny Slate, the friend that nodded her head and said yes to everything to us, to join this lawsuit, to give it just a little bit more of a punch? Like, no, it was two of us, two of us that felt that we were harassed on set sexually. Like, you know, Justin Bozoni was just so into Jenny Slate, too. So into me also. He wasn't into me because I'm also accusing him of treating me fat. But don't worry about how those two things cancel each other out in this lawsuit. But, like, we have text messages with Jenny Slate, and I do think she was just being the rah, rah, rah friend. She just gives me that vibe. So it's interesting, it's very interesting to. To consider her as a potential piece of this. Again, he's saying, allegedly, I know nothing of this. I was not contacted by anybody in. Potentially in Jenny Slate's orbit. But we can begin to look at what just happened. Okay, so on February 10th, two days ago, Blake Lively's team, having just told them on February 3rd, like, we're going to add new people to. We're going to amend our complaint and we're going to add some new plaintiffs and maybe try to serve them, then filed two days ago for an extension. They're like, actually, we're not going to be able to make that amendment. Dates due date of February 14th. So I'm showing you what they filed and. And then it's. I'm just going to take you to the relevant points. Their lawyer wrote to. Dear Judge Lehman, February 14, 2025, is the original default deadline for Ms. Lively to file her amended complaint as a matter of course in relation to Responsive Pleadings of Wayfarer Studios LLC. Then they go on to say, Ms. Lively respectfully submits that an extension for filing an amended complaint as a matter of course to March 5, 2025, is warranted. So essentially, this is due February 14th. We're asking you to extend until March 5th. And then the reason she lists here for why she needs that extension is bizarre. She says the modest extension will allow for Ms. Lively to address the extensive new facts and claims at issue in this litigation. Such an extension is also warranted, given that after counsel for Ms. Lively informed the court on February 3rd that she intended to amend her complaint to additional parties and claims one of those intended parties, Jed Wallace, along with his company, Street Relations, filed an anticipatory and meritless 10 page complaint in the federal district court in Texas regarding issues that substantially overlap with the issues in this litigation. The additional time requested will allow Ms. Lively to address properly the procedural issues arising from this unmeritorious lawsuit as well. So she's saying, remember we talked about Jed, who she came after in her CRD filing? Well, j. And then she file. Had to file that in Texas. Well, Jed responded similarly to Brian Friedman responding on behalf of Wayfair. But this is a totally separate suit that's happening in Texas. And she's trying to justify an extension because he filed his response, which she would have had to do to her lawsuit. That makes entirely no sense anyways, because Brian Friedman is Brian Friedman, he hits them back pretty hard in his response. He writes back on behalf of Wayfarer and says, notwithstanding the Lively party's inexplicable refusal to consent to a similar extension requested by the Wayfarer parties, in the throes of the Los Angeles wildfires Shade, the Wayfarer parties have no objection to the extension sought by the Lively parties. They're like, whatever, take your extension. We don't even care. But if you do take your extension, then we're asking for an extension beyond that, essentially to allow us to respond there too on April 16. But then he hits her hard on this weird attempt to lie to the judge about Jed Wallace. And he says, unfortunately, the Lively party's letter goes further than a simple request for an extension of time leveling unnecessary and baseless, baseless attacks on non party Jed Wallace and the litigation pending against Ms. Lively in the USDC for the Western District of Texas. What Lively parties conspicuously failed to mention is that the now pending litigation in Texas was precipitated by Ms. Lively, who initiated legal action against Mr. Wallace in Texas state court on January 21, approximately two weeks before he filed his federal lawsuit. In response, while the Lively parties now claim that Mr. Wallace's Texas actions suffer from serious issues with respect to jurisdiction in Ms. Lively's verified position petition seeking a pre suit deposition of Mr. Wallace, Ms. Lively acknowledges that the jurisdiction in Texas is proffer proper given Mr. Wallace's domicile. So he's like, I have no idea why she's lying to the court. And then he attaches her initial petition in Texas which is just so embarrassing. Right. It's the same tactic that they're doing over and over again of trying to manipulate the courts to get what they want, thinking that people are not going to keep receipts like, hi, have you met Brian Friedman yet? I know I haven't, but I wouldn't try this game. I wouldn't try trying to manipulate Judge Lehman and trying to tell him I need this extension. Because this guy Jed did this crazy thing and filed somewhere where he doesn't have jurisdiction. As if Brian Freeman is not going to pull up and be like, actually, you established his jurisdiction. You filed first in Texas and he's replying. And by the way, he's not a party to our case here in New York. That's what Brian Freeman did. He's just a savage. Brian Friedman is actually my spirit animal. Anyways, Judge Lehman responds to this order and he slaps down. He just slaps her down. I don't know what else to say. Probably because he doesn't like. Probably doesn't take kind to just be being manipulated. You know, you should have been like, I want an extension because I don't have any proof. I need to potentially allegedly kind of try to get someone to join this suit. Please. Colleen Hoover, didn't you see something? Did you see him look at my butt? I don't know. Could you. I don't know. Can somebody please just join in? Maybe. Maybe young Lily Bloom, Elizabeth Farah. Did you see something that you didn't like? Like, she's. She's trying. They're essentially trying to lobby someone to give this thing some tea. And so this is the judge's order. He comes back and he says, order granting in part and denying in part the letter motion for the extension of time to file. He added one day. So supposed to be February 14th. That's a Friday that the. Their amended filing was due. He bumped it to February 17, which is a Monday, which is also a holiday. So I think it's still February 14th. I don't know. But which would be over the weekend, which. That would be the first Monday. And so, yeah, he gives an answer. The lively parties have not offered good cause for any further extension. And so maybe you just shouldn't have lied about why you needed the extension because that's not a good cause to talk about what's happening in Texas. It has nothing to do with this case. So completely shut down. All right, guys, I gotta get to talking to you about Ryan Reynolds. Teacher emailing me. Okay, that, that. It's. It's interesting it's very interesting. Before we do that, gotta throw it to some of our sponsors. Home Title Lock first and foremost, because did you know homeowners nationwide have over $32 trillion in equity? And cyber criminals are targeting it with a growing scam that the FBI calls house stealing. So scammers can now transfer your title out of your name using a one page document that they file at the county. Then they can take out loans against it or even sell it behind your back. And the scariest part is that you won't find out about it until collection or foreclosure notices start arriving in your mailbox. Which just leaves you with a financial and illegal nightmare. The best way to protect your equity is with Home Title Locks exclusive million dollar triple lock protection offers 24,7 monitoring urgent alerts. And if fraud should occur, their US based restoration team will spend up to $1 million to fix the fraud and restore your title. So when was the last time that you checked on your title? If your answer is never, that's exactly what these scammers are counting on. That's why I've partnered with Home Title Lock to offer you all a chance to make sure that you're not already a victim. If you use my promo code, Candice, at hometitlelock.com, you'll get 30 days of free protection and a free title history report to lock in your peace of mind. And be sure you check out the million dollar triple lock protection details when you get there. Link below. And that's the hometitle lock.com promo code, Candace. All right. Also American Financing, because I know there's a lot of Americans who are carrying high credit card balances that charge 20% or more every month. And it is time to take control of your debt. So if you are a homeowner and you've been waiting to figure out how to get your finances in order, then you should call my friends at American Financing today. American Financing's salary based mortgage consultants are helping homeowners just like you tap into their home's equity get out of high interest debt. They're saving their average, on average the customers are saving $800 a month by doing this. And that's the kind of money that makes a huge difference. It should make the decision really easy because all it takes is a 10 minute, no cost, no obligation phone call to find out how much money you could be saving. And if you start today, you may be able to delay two mortgage payments. So call American Financing today. The number is 800-795-1-2, 1, 0. Again, that's 800-795-1210. Or you can visit American financing.net Owens Again, that's American financing.net Owens. Okay, now I want to get into psychology. Just I. Because I love psychology. I think that's also what has been so compelling about this case for so many women is that it feels like we are watching idtv. There's something about it. Why are women drawn to criminal shows where we get to learn things? It's because we're constantly thinking about our safety, and there's something about this story that kind of violates our safety in a way of feeling like people were nice and then realizing. Realizing that they were totally behaving like psychopaths and were doing something so far, taking it so far as Ryan Reynolds did. So anyways, we are learning some new things about Blake and Ryan because the Internet just keeps on digging and just keeps on finding stuff. And there was an interview that many of you tagged me in that resurfaced a couple of days ago. It's Blake Lively speaking at the Forbes Women Women's Summit. And this is from 2022. And she's just sort of casually discussing how so, you know, she lies and she takes over movies. Take a listen.