Podcast Summary: Candace Owens – "Justin Baldoni Wins Taylor Swift's Texts | Candace Ep 203"

Release Date: June 19, 2025
Host: Candace Owens
Episode Title: Justin Baldoni Wins Taylor Swift's Texts | Candace Ep 203
Description: This time it's just Candace. Free and unfiltered.

1. Justin Baldoni's Lawsuit Against Blake Lively and The New York Times

Candace Owens dives deep into the legal saga involving Justin Baldoni's lawsuit against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloan, and The New York Times. Initially, Baldoni filed two separate lawsuits: one against The New York Times for $200 million alleging libel and false light, and another against Blake Lively and her associates for $400 million with multiple claims, including defamation and civil extortion.

Key Points:

• Defamation Claims Dropped: Candace highlights that while The New York Times claims the lawsuit was dropped, only the defamation portion was dismissed. She emphasizes that the underlying issues stem from historical ties between The New York Times and the CIA.

  "The lawsuit was dropped against the New York Times, but the defamation portion was entirely removed. This is linked to the NYT's deep-seated connections with the CIA." (05:30)

• Historical Context – Operation Mockingbird: Owens references Operation Mockingbird, a CIA initiative to influence media outlets, asserting that The New York Times has long been an extension of the CIA, thereby making it nearly impossible to win against them in defamation cases.

  "The actual malice standard was created to protect the New York Times. They have been corrupt forever." (12:45)

• Impact of the 'Actual Malice' Standard: She explains how the U.S. Supreme Court established the 'actual malice' standard in New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), making it exceedingly difficult for public figures to win defamation suits unless they can prove that the media acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

  "They created the actual malice standard to ensure publications like the NYT remain untouchable, allowing them to shape public opinion without accountability." (16:20)

2. Judge's Ruling on Taylor Swift's Text Messages

Candace discusses a significant development in Baldoni's lawsuit: the court's decision to allow the discovery of Taylor Swift's text messages. This ruling is seen as a potential turning point that could provide damaging evidence against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds.

Key Points:

• Ruling Explained: The judge determined that Taylor Swift's messages are relevant to proving claims of harassment and retaliation by Blake Lively against Justin Baldoni.

  "Judge Lehman ruled that requests for messages with Swift are reasonably tailored to discover information that would prove or disprove Lively's harassment and retaliation claims." (25:10)

• Implications for Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds: Owens speculates that the content within these messages could reveal unethical or criminal behavior by Lively and Reynolds, potentially unraveling their PR strategies and alliances.

  "Whatever is in those messages, it completely has Blake Lively terrified. So terrified, in fact, that she specifically asked Taylor Swift to delete some messages." (29:50)

• Connection to The New York Times: She reiterates her stance that The New York Times' involvement is part of a broader strategy to protect influential figures and maintain control over public narratives.

3. Tyler Perry's Sexual Assault and Harassment Lawsuit

The episode shifts focus to another high-profile case: actor Derek Dixon's lawsuit against Tyler Perry, alleging sexual assault and harassment.

Key Points:

• Allegations Detailed: Dixon claims that Perry exploited his industry power to coerce him into sexual misconduct, promising career advancements that never materialized.

  "Mr. Perry took his success and power and used his considerable influence... to subject [Dixon] to escalating sexual harassment, assault, and battery." (35:15)

• Candace's Perspective on Hollywood's Culture: Owens critiques the pervasive culture of exploitation in Hollywood, likening it to the infamous 'casting couch' scenario and expressing doubt about the authenticity of Dixon's claims.

  "I find it completely ridiculous that this person's some kind of victim... They want to trade on Tyler Perry's reputation to cash out by suing him." (39:40)

• Speculation on Case Outcome: She anticipates that Tyler Perry will likely settle to avoid negative publicity, questioning the integrity of the entertainment industry's power dynamics.

  "Tyler Perry is not going to want to be dragged through the press. My guess is they did a little leak... They're going to settle." (42:05)

4. Critique of Israel's Actions in Gaza

Candace Owens vents her strong opinions on Israel's military actions in Gaza, particularly criticizing the bombing of hospitals and labeling it as hypocritical compared to condemnations of similar actions by Iran.

Key Points:

• Hypocrisy Highlighted: Owens accuses Israeli leadership of selectively condemning acts of violence, such as bombing hospitals by Iran, while engaging in similar or worse actions themselves.

  "When they bomb hospitals, it's moral. When they invade countries, it's moral. It's the worst, most immoral, most savage thing that could ever happen." (50:30)

• Dispensationalism Critique: She mocks the theological rationale that justifies Israeli actions, arguing that it leads to illogical and inhumane outcomes.

  "If Kim Jong Un drops a nuke in Israel and takes over... then whatever he does, you can't critique because your Bible says you'll be blessed if you bless Kim Jong Un's Israel." (53:20)

• Overall Condemnation: Owens expresses frustration with what she perceives as unchecked power and moral bankruptcy within Israeli policies and leadership.

5. Listener Comments and Interactions

Throughout the episode, Candace engages with listener comments, addressing topics ranging from Taylor Swift's music to broader conspiracy theories.

Key Points:

• Taylor Swift's Image: Listeners discuss Taylor Swift's songs and possible hidden motives behind her actions in the lawsuit, with Candace affirming her support for Swift.

  "I'm very team Taylor Swift on that. That is a dirty, nasty game to play with friends." (60:45)

• Vaccine Concerns: A listener inquires about avoiding vaccine boosters for their child, leading Candace to share strategies for homeschooling and questioning vaccine mandates.

  "Please just go watch my vaccine series available@candaceowens.com." (65:10)

• Conspiracy Theories on Media Control: Another listener delves into the psychological manipulation by elites and the media to control the masses, which Candace elaborates on by referencing historical propaganda efforts.

  "They have always been effective in civil rights movements... It's psychology to impart mass formation psychosis upon the public." (68:25)

• Tory Lanez Case: A listener mentions the ongoing Tory Lanez case against Megan Thee Stallion, prompting Candace to acknowledge her limited knowledge and invite further information.

  "I thought that I had it right, but I'm always happy to be proven wrong with more information." (70:00)

6. Closing Remarks

Candace wraps up the episode by teasing future content, including an upcoming interview with Russell Brand, while emphasizing the importance of justice in high-profile lawsuits.

Notable Quotes:

• "The New York Times is effectively the publishing arm of the CIA, which means that Justin Baldoni just tried to sue the CIA." (11:15)

• "Judge Lehman has ruled yes on the Taylor Swift text messages." (24:50)

• "I am being so serious. And I am being so shocked that Tyler Perry could even be involved in this." (38:30)

• "It's like the casting couch and everybody kind of is, like, in my view in Hollywood, like, a pimp or a prostitute." (44:10)

• "They have thought through. And it is always to empower the government." (67:45)

This episode of "Candace" offers a critical examination of high-profile legal battles involving celebrities, intertwining discussions on media corruption, systemic injustices, and the dark underbelly of Hollywood. Candace Owens maintains her unapologetic stance, linking historical events to present-day controversies and encouraging listeners to question established narratives.