Podcast Summary: Candace Ep 152 – "STOP EVERYTHING. They FINALLY Mentioned ME In The Blake Lively Lawsuit!"
Release Date: February 26, 2025
Host: Candace Owens
Description: This time it's just Candace. Free and unfiltered.
1. Introduction to the Lawsuit Mention
[00:30] Unnamed Co-Host:
Candace Owens kicks off the episode with exhilarating news. After a brief hiatus, she reveals that she has been name-checked in the high-profile lawsuit involving Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds against Justin Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios. Expressing immense joy, she thanks her supporters for believing in her persistence.
"I did it. I made it. I can now retire. All of the haters out there who doubted me are now asking for forgiveness."
— Unnamed Co-Host [00:30]
2. Personal Turmoil and Emotional Response
Candace candidly shares a personal moment of emotional distress during her pregnancy. She recounts a phone conversation that left her deeply upset, leading her to take a day off from her show to regain composure.
"Pregnancy does do this to people. And so, yeah, yesterday I got a phone call and it just sent me on a war path."
— Candace Owens [Timestamp Unspecified]
She humorously refers to her emotional state as turning into "Suge Knight," highlighting her vulnerability during this period.
3. Detailed Analysis of the Lawsuit
Candace delves into the specifics of the lawsuit, providing an in-depth analysis of the legal maneuvers involved.
a. Protective Orders and "Attorney's Eyes Only" (AEO) Clauses
She explains that Judge Lehman instructed both parties to submit proposed protective orders by March 10 to safeguard confidential information. While the initial agreement was for a standard model protective order, Blake Lively's team sought to include an "Attorney's Eyes Only" designation.
"Attorney's Eyes Only is essentially a request for documents that could indeed be extremely relevant to the case. They're saying they only want this to be shared between the attorneys, not even with the parties to the suit."
— Candace Owens [Timestamp Unspecified]
Candace introduces the concept of the "Taylor Swift clause," critiquing its potential misuse to protect third parties from public scrutiny.
b. Opposition's Response to the AEO Filing
Justin Baldoni's attorneys respond by accusing Lively's team of seeking to prevent public access to relevant evidence despite their active media presence.
"Given how actively the Lively parties have publicized and litigated Ms. Lively's claims in the media, we are surprised to now learn how vehemently she wants to prevent the public from accessing material and relevant evidence."
— Justin Baldoni's Attorneys [Timestamp Unspecified]
Candace mocks this stance, pointing out the contradiction between seeking confidentiality while aggressively promoting the case in public forums.
4. Candace's Rebuttal to Opposing Arguments
Candace systematically dismantles the opposing side's arguments, emphasizing the inconsistencies and potential ulterior motives behind the protective order.
"It's ridiculous for her to pretend that she was trying to protect these women. She was desperately trying to signal to the public by dropping not even Easter egg pointed blanket statements like that."
— Candace Owens [Timestamp Unspecified]
She highlights specific points from Lively's filings to expose the underlying intent to protect high-profile individuals like Taylor Swift, rather than addressing genuine concerns about sexual harassment.
5. Media Involvement and Public Narrative
Candace criticizes the media's role in amplifying the lawsuit, arguing that the opposing side deliberately leaks information to shape public perception while simultaneously seeking to limit transparency through legal channels.
"Their entire lawsuit is just filled with contradictions... they're pretending that the nature of these filings has anything to do with sexual harassment or sexual abuse."
— Candace Owens [Timestamp Unspecified]
She also addresses her unintended mention in the lawsuit, expressing frustration over being dragged into the narrative despite her lack of direct involvement.
6. Transition to Political Commentary: Dan Crenshaw
Shifting gears, Candace discusses recent behaviors of Congressman Dan Crenshaw, critiquing his interactions and public demeanor.
a. Crenshaw's Public Outbursts
She recounts instances where Crenshaw responded aggressively during public engagements, notably during a town hall where he reacted sharply to a teenager's question about his views on hero archetypes.
"As you are allowed to do at town halls, you're supposed to ask politicians questions... but he's been snapping and calling people names angry."
— Candace Owens [Timestamp Unspecified]
b. The Hot Mic Incident
Candace references a controversial moment where Crenshaw appeared to threaten Tucker Carlson on a hot mic during an interview, which he later claimed was humorous but was perceived as a serious threat.
"Dan Crenshaw's response makes you comfortable. He just freaking slams her."
— Candace Owens [28:26]
c. Crenshaw's Public Image Decline
She laments the shift in Crenshaw's behavior from a promising, relatable figure to someone she describes as "volatile" and "sinister," questioning his suitability for leadership.
"Dan Crenshaw cannot be a congressman again. He just can't. It's just too insulting."
— Theo Von [34:29] (Quoted by Candace)
7. Interaction with Comedian Theo Von
Candace includes snippets of comedian Theo Von's critique of Dan Crenshaw, reinforcing her stance on Crenshaw's declining public persona.
"Dan Crenshaw apparently still a member of Congress... he's the most liberal left wing person I've ever met."
— Theo Von [35:10]
Candace supports Von's perspective, aligning it with her own observations about Crenshaw's behavior and political alignment.
8. Conclusion and Final Thoughts
Candace wraps up by reaffirming her commitment to addressing the lawsuit and her ongoing efforts to uncover the truth. She encourages her listeners to stay engaged and informed, emphasizing her determination to remain a persistent figure in the unfolding legal battle.
"I'm not going to let go. I'm like a pit bull, okay? I'm onto you. I see what's happening."
— Candace Owens [Timestamp Unspecified]
She also hints at future episodes and investigations, promising to keep her audience updated on both the lawsuit and her political commentaries.
Notable Quotes with Timestamps
-
Candace Owens:
"Pregnancy does do this to people. And so, yeah, yesterday I got a phone call and it just sent me on a war path."
[Timestamp Unspecified] -
Unnamed Co-Host:
"I did it. I made it. I can now retire. All of the haters out there who doubted me are now asking for forgiveness."
[00:30] -
Theo Von:
"Dan Crenshaw cannot be a congressman again. He just can't. It's just too insulting."
[34:29]
Conclusion
In this episode, Candace Owens provides a thorough examination of her unexpected mention in the Blake Lively lawsuit, dissecting the legal strategies and media dynamics at play. Transitioning smoothly, she offers a sharp critique of Congressman Dan Crenshaw's recent actions, supported by comedic insights from Theo Von. Throughout, Candace maintains her characteristic candor, blending personal anecdotes with incisive political commentary to deliver an engaging and informative episode.