Transcript
A (0:13)
Hi everyone. Welcome to our show. Chief Change Officer. I'm Vince Chen, your ambitious human host. Our show is a modernist humility for change. Progressives in organizational and human transformation from around the world. Today we are diving into the future of work with George Dream. George is a Harvard mba, a startup founder, and the co author of the book called Employment is Dead. Yes, you hear it right. That is a very bold statement. But he's got a story to back it up. Across this three part series, we'll explore why traditional employment models are failing, how emerging technologies like Web3 and AI are reshaping work, and what companies must do to survive. We'll also go behind the scenes of George's book, how a cold call turned into a major publishing deal and why the old ways of managing people just don't cut it anymore. Whether you are an employee, an employer, or just curious about where work is headed, this series will challenge the way you think. Good morning, Josh. Welcome to Chief Change Officer. It's very early morning for you.
B (2:08)
There it is. It's nice and early, but I'm so grateful to be here. Thanks for having me on the show, Vince.
A (2:14)
Let's dive right in. First of all, who you really are, what you have done in the past. Then we'll deep dive into different elements of your journey.
B (2:27)
Yeah, I appreciate the opportunity and thanks again for having me. My passion is rooted in employee engagement and employee experience. Making sure that we are helping employees have the best experience possible so that they can do their best work possible. It's a very simple solution. And when I was a student we were building a startup out of the Harvard Innovation Labs. We were very interested in this concept of employee engagement. And when we started to look at the landscape, we recognized that there wasn't a lot being done there. A company would unilaterally make decisions about maybe we should bring a ping pong table in, maybe we should have snacks in the break room. And this concept of an employee engagement survey never really sat well with us because the idea is let's ask employees how they're feeling. It's a great concept, but the way that we were doing it was just completely flawed in my mind. It was a once a year survey, long questions. There was no real diving into the culture or the issues at hand. A lot of it seemed profess, formative and employees weren't very trusting of an organization so they weren't being honest on these surveys. Growing up in this generation of social media, we thought we are so used to immediate feedback almost daily from our social posts. And from the feedback that we receive from putting ourselves out into the world. So we started building this startup where we pioneering sentiment analysis in real time. That's a fancy way of saying let's ask more often. Let's create an environment where employees can trust us and let's receive feedback in a way that flows with the day to day activities of an employee so it doesn't feel like they have to stop what they're doing to take an annoying survey. It was quite an interesting venture and we absolutely learned so much. And I think the surprising outcome for us is we didn't really. Some of the assumptions that we were making didn't actually hold to be true. For example, I'll never forget showing my wife the software for the first time. She's a marriage and family therapist and as I was so excited to show her the software that we were working on, she just turned to me and said surveys are the dumbest way to build relationships with people. Why are you focusing on this? Is a very deep thought when you really unpack it. But the biggest thing that we learned, the biggest assumption that was broken for us is that we didn't understand. Most companies don't actually want to know how employees are feeling. We had pilot organizations who either liked the performance or the view that they were interested even though it just felt like they, they were giving lip service to it or they were, they really just wanted to know for their own benefit so that they could push the employees harder or know who to fire. All of the fears that employees have turned out to be fairly real and that just blew our minds. And so I spent a long time trying to understand why are most companies not that interested to know how employees are truly feeling. And what we came up with was that it's not necessarily a people problem, it's not a leadership problem, it's a system problem. The system is designed for short term shareholder value which often neglects employees needs. And it was also established at a time where the industrial age was really catching its strides. Right. Taylorism is this concept where we're checking boxes, we're on the assembly line and we have one task to complete. So management make sure that we are doing our tasks perfectly. And in the age of information we just don't need that style of management anymore. So the bold claim employment is dead comes out of that experience where we believe that traditional models of employment are failing to adapt to the needs of the modern workforce.
