Podcast
Communication Breakdown
Hosted by Observatory on Corporate Reputation LLC · EN
Communication Breakdown is a postgame show for PR pros. In each episode, hosts Craig Carroll (Founder of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation, Editor of the SAGE Encyclopedia of Corporate Reputation, Lecturer at Rice University’s Jesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business) and Steve Dowling (former head of communications at OpenAI and Apple) discuss the strategies and tactics companies are using in high-visibility crises and PR initiatives, giving listeners unique insight into how key decisions are made.
The podcast offers two unique perspectives on communications theory and practice, drawing on Craig’s research and teaching on reputation at USC Annenberg, UNC Chapel Hill, and universities worldwide, and Steve’s two decades of experience as a comms leader at some of the world’s most influential companies.
Whether you’re a PR professional, marketing executive, or just curious about how companies make key communications decisions, you’ll find these discussions insightful and valuable.
The podcast offers two unique perspectives on communications theory and practice, drawing on Craig’s research and teaching on reputation at USC Annenberg, UNC Chapel Hill, and universities worldwide, and Steve’s two decades of experience as a comms leader at some of the world’s most influential companies.
Whether you’re a PR professional, marketing executive, or just curious about how companies make key communications decisions, you’ll find these discussions insightful and valuable.
41episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Full Court Press
1w ago00:33:17Tap to summarizeIn this episode of Communication Breakdown, Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll examine how the WNBA has become the latest battleground in America's broader cultural debate after Indiana Fever player Sophie Cunningham's comments about transgender athletes ignited national controversy. Rather than debating the underlying political issue, the hosts focus on the league's communications challenge, exploring how outside groups can redirect public attention and force organizations into conversations they did not initiate. They introduce concepts like "narrative arbitrage," attention management, and governance infrastructure, offering a thoughtful framework for how organizations can maintain focus when external controversies threaten to redefine their identity.TakeawaysSilence is not always inaction. Strategic restraint can prevent organizations from amplifying controversies beyond their proper scope.Public goodwill creates stakeholder expectations, making it critical to clarify the difference between organizational values and organizational policy.Leaders can lower the temperature of contentious debates by reframing where discussions belong Topics MentionedWNBA, Sophie Cunningham, Caitlin Clark, transgender athletes, sports communications, corporate reputation, stakeholder expectations, narrative arbitrage, governance, crisis communications, organizational boundaries, public trust, culture wars, attention management, leadership communication, framing, media strategyCompanies MentionedWNBA, Indiana Fever, ESPN, White House, NCAA, Seattle Storm, Minnesota Lynx, SiriusXMEpisode Hashtags#WNBA #IndianaFever #ESPN #WhiteHouse #NCAA #SeattleStorm #MinnesotaLynx #SiriusXM #CorporateCommunications #PublicRelations #CorporateReputation #CrisisCommunication #Leadership #StakeholderManagement #NarrativeStrategy #SportsBusiness #MediaRelations #ReputationManagement #StrategicCommunications #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetworkCommunication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling.Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and Shawn P Neal.For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com
Transcribe →Off the Menu
2w ago00:33:17Tap to summarizeIn this episode of Communication Breakdown, Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll examine two very different corporate communications challenges. First, they explore why Cracker Barrel's business appeared to be recovering while CEO Julie Masino's leadership did not, unpacking the difference between repairing operational performance and repairing executive credibility. They then turn to Taco Bell's response to the largest Cyclospora outbreak in U.S. history, contrasting its measured crisis response with Taylor Farms' increasingly defensive communications strategy. Along the way, they introduce concepts like return on mission, attention cost, category contamination, and the difference between operational containment and communicative containment, offering practical lessons for communications leaders navigating reputation under pressure.TakeawaysA company's operational recovery does not automatically restore confidence in the executive associated with the original crisis.Crisis communications should evolve beyond apology into a credible recovery narrative that demonstrates learning, progress, and continued leadership.Operational containment protects the business, but communicative containment helps restore public confidence and reduce uncertainty.Topics MentionedCorporate reputation, CEO credibility, executive communications, crisis communications, return on mission, return on investment, operational containment, communicative containment, category contamination, food safety, product recalls, corporate governance, customer trust, recovery narratives, stakeholder communications, media strategy, board governance, leadership visibilityCompanies MentionedCracker Barrel, Taco Bell, CNN, Glenn Beck, CCO Dispatch, Taylor Farms, FDA, McDonald'sEpisode Hashtags#CrackerBarrel #TacoBell #TaylorFarms #McDonalds #CorporateCommunications #PublicRelations #CrisisCommunications #CorporateReputation #ExecutiveCommunications #Leadership #CEO #FoodSafety #ProductRecall #StakeholderTrust #BrandReputation #CorporateGovernance #IssuesManagement #RiskCommunication #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetworkCommunication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling.Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and Shawn P Neal.For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com
Transcribe →A Midsummer Night’s Clip Show
3w ago00:34:30Tap to summarizeIn this special summer edition of Communication Breakdown, Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll revisit three of the season's most impactful conversations, each offering enduring lessons for corporate communicators. From eBay's decisive rejection of GameStop's acquisition bid, to Standard Chartered CEO Bill Winters' AI communications misstep, to a broader discussion about why communications teams often operate in the wrong sequence, the episode explores how judgment, credibility, and organizational influence shape corporate reputation. Together, these conversations reinforce a central theme, that effective communication is less about saying more and more about saying the right thing at the right moment.TakeawayseBay demonstrated that brevity carries authority when it is backed by clear business judgment and disciplined messaging.Executive comments about AI and workforce changes require empathy first, because audiences interpret language through existing fears and uncertainty.Communications teams create greater strategic value when they participate before decisions are finalized rather than simply explaining them afterward.Topics MentionedCorporate communications, corporate reputation, mergers and acquisitions, executive communication, AI communications, workforce automation, crisis communication, strategic communications, organizational alignment, governance, leadership credibility, stakeholder trust, narrative control, communications strategy, communications function, business judgmentCompanies MentionedGameStop, eBay, CNBC, Standard Chartered, NVIDIA, Boeing, Alaska Airlines, Shell, GreenpeaceEpisode Hashtags#GameStop #eBay #CNBC #StandardChartered #NVIDIA #Boeing #AlaskaAirlines #Shell #Greenpeace #CorporateCommunications #CorporateReputation #PublicRelations #ExecutiveCommunications #CrisisCommunications #ArtificialIntelligence #Leadership #Governance #StakeholderTrust #NarrativeControl #StrategicCommunications #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetworkCommunication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling.Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and Shawn P Neal.For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com
Transcribe →Defenestration
4w ago00:33:12Tap to summarizeIn this episode of Communication Breakdown, Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll examine how Ryanair reduced a terrifying in-flight emergency to the language of a routine scheduling disruption. They compare the airline’s statement with the more human responses from Boeing and CFM International, exploring the difference between legal accuracy and narrative adequacy, and what executive presence signals during a crisis. Then, they turn to Meta’s short-lived Muse Image feature, which allowed users to generate AI content from public Instagram photos without affirmative consent or notification. The discussion reveals how passive language, product design, default permissions, and organized stakeholder power can expose the governing logic behind a company’s communications.TakeawaysA statement can remain technically accurate while presenting an account that is materially smaller than the event people experienced.Crisis communicators must balance speed and factual certainty without using caution as a reason to minimize human consequences.Words such as “dislodged,” “landed normally,” and “requested medical assistance” can weaken credibility when they understate the severity of an incident.Topics MentionedCrisis communication, narrative adequacy, factual compression, narrative distortion, corporate responsibility, passenger safety, executive visibility, leadership communication, stakeholder trust, legal accuracy, passive language, institutional legitimacy, operating permission, artificial intelligence, image rights, affirmative consent, opt-in systems, privacy settings, product governance, claims perception and reality, user control, stakeholder power, organized advocacy, reputation management, Friday news releasesCompanies MentionedRyanair, Boeing, CFM International, GE, Meta, Facebook, WhatsApp, Instagram, TikTok, SAG-AFTRA, OpenAI, CAA, PuckEpisode Hashtags#Ryanair #Boeing #CFMInternational #GE #Meta #Facebook #WhatsApp #Instagram #TikTok #SAGAFTRA #OpenAI #CAA #Puck #CrisisCommunication #CorporateCommunications #PublicRelations #CorporateReputation #NarrativeAdequacy #ReputationManagement #ExecutiveCommunications #LeadershipCommunication #StakeholderManagement #StakeholderTrust #ArtificialIntelligence #AI #DataPrivacy #DigitalConsent #ProductGovernance #ImageRights #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetworkCommunication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling.Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and Shawn P Neal.For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com
Transcribe →I Do / Undo
Jul 900:28:22Tap to summarizeIn this episode of Communication Breakdown, Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll examine two very different reputation plays: Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s highly controlled wedding event in New York, and Ford’s media blitz around quality, American workers, and a course correction on AI. The conversation explores how controlled visibility can build cultural power when audiences trust the intent behind the control. Steve and Craig also break down Ford’s use of third-party validation, veteran engineers, and a strong American manufacturing message to turn a quality problem into a comeback narrative. For PR and communications professionals, this episode is a sharp look at attention governance, proof points, and the reputational weight needed to keep big stories from tipping into spectacle or spin.TakeawaysTaylor Swift’s wedding became a masterclass in controlled visibility, giving the public proximity without full access.Ford turned a quality problem and AI overreach story into a human judgment comeback narrative.Third-party validation, like the JD Power ranking, can strengthen a corporate message, but it does not erase longer-term performance tests.Topics MentionedTaylor Swift, Travis Kelce, controlled access, attention governance, celebrity communications, audience trust, secrecy, authenticity, reputational ballast, charitable giving, cultural events, Ford, artificial intelligence, veteran engineers, graybeard engineers, JD Power, product quality, warranty costs, recalls, American manufacturing, third-party validation, executive messaging, media strategy, narrative control, human judgment, automation riskCompanies MentionedMadison Square Garden, Empire State Building, Macy’s, Instagram, People, Us Weekly, Albertsons, Ford Motor Company, Bloomberg, JD Power, Toyota, Hyundai, CNN, Fox News, CNBCEpisode Hashtags#TaylorSwift #TravisKelce #MadisonSquareGarden #EmpireStateBuilding #Macys #Instagram #People #UsWeekly #Albertsons #Ford #Bloomberg #JDPower #Toyota #Hyundai #CNN #FoxNews #CNBC #CorporateCommunications #PublicRelations #ReputationManagement #AttentionGovernance #NarrativeControl #CrisisCommunications #ExecutiveMessaging #MediaStrategy #BrandReputation #ArtificialIntelligence #HumanJudgment #Manufacturing #ThirdPartyValidation #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetworkCommunication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling.Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and Shawn P Neal.For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com
Transcribe →…and the home of the brave
Jul 200:39:11Tap to summarizeIn this episode of Communication Breakdown, Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll examine why America’s 250th birthday feels smaller, flatter, and more complicated than a milestone this large should feel. They look at how companies are approaching the anniversary through nostalgia, patriotic packaging, official sponsorships, and, in a few stronger cases, civic contribution. The conversation explores why patriotic language now carries reputational risk, how the split between America 250 and Freedom 250 has muddled the national moment, and why companies need more than flags and slogans to show up credibly. For PR, communications, and corporate reputation leaders, this episode is a sharp case study in authenticity, civic usefulness, and the limits of safe messaging.TakeawaysAmerica 250 should be a major national milestone, but polarization, distraction, and weak organizing have kept it from becoming a shared civic moment.Companies are cautious because words like freedom, patriotism, founders, and American values no longer land in one shared place.The split between America 250 and Freedom 250 has created a signaling problem for sponsors trying to avoid partisan alignment.Topics MentionedAmerica 250, Fourth of July, corporate patriotism, civic patriotism, symbolic patriotism, access patriotism, nationalism, hospitality, political polarization, shared meaning, corporate reputation, patriotic branding, nostalgia, strategic ambiguity, civic contribution, stakeholder trust, government sponsorship, Freedom 250, America 250 Commission, DEI backlash, ESG backlash, corporate values, authenticity, local service, veterans housing, emergency water, childhood hunger, public trust, civic institutions, hope, American identity, historical progress, rights rollbacks, corporate communications, public relationsCompanies MentionedGallup, NPR, Marist, Coca-Cola, Chevy, Budweiser, Jeep, HBO, UFC, Home Depot, Anheuser-Busch, Albertsons, Safeway, Jewel-Osco, The Wall Street JournalEpisode Hashtags#America250 #Freedom250 #FourthOfJuly #CorporatePatriotism #CivicPatriotism #SymbolicPatriotism #AccessPatriotism #CorporateCommunications #PublicRelations #CorporateReputation #BrandReputation #StakeholderTrust #StrategicCommunications #PatrioticBranding #CivicEngagement #CorporateResponsibility #Authenticity #Gallup #NPR #Marist #CocaCola #Chevy #Budweiser #Jeep #HBO #UFC #HomeDepot #AnheuserBusch #Albertsons #Safeway #JewelOsco #WallStreetJournal #ShawnPNeal #AdvocastLeadershipAdvisory #OCRNetwork Communication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling.Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and Shawn P Neal.For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com
Transcribe →Comms on Three Continents
Jun 2500:28:21Tap to summarizeIn this episode of Communication Breakdown, hosts Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll move across three communication flashpoints on three continents: the evolving influence economy at Cannes Lions, Lululemon’s cultural misstep at the Great Wall of China, and the San Francisco Giants’ mishandling of Pride Night controversy. They examine how influence is no longer contained inside advertising, PR, marketing, or customer experience silos, especially as creators, algorithms, AI summaries, and political actors reshape reputation in real time. The conversation sharpens around two major lessons for communications leaders: cultural accuracy has to happen before spectacle, and values questions need institutional answers, not evasive talking points. For PR, corporate affairs, and leadership teams, this episode is a reminder that operational clarity, cultural fluency, and prepared governance now determine whether a brand controls the story or gets corrected by the public.TakeawaysCannes Lions now reflects a broader shift from advertising as a discipline to influence as an operating system.Lululemon’s Great Wall mistake shows that brands cannot borrow cultural authority without first proving cultural accuracy.The San Francisco Giants’ Pride Night controversy shows how local values issues can quickly become national political stories.Topics MentionedCannes Lions, influence, advertising, corporate communications, public affairs, creators, AI, algorithms, media fragmentation, authenticity, purpose, cultural credibility, Lululemon China, Great Wall of China, cultural accuracy, cultural review, apology strategy, Weibo, social media virality in China, market access, operational integrity, Pride Month, San Francisco Giants, Major League Baseball, LGBTQ fans, religious expression, culture wars, internal communication, values communication, communicative governance, stakeholder interpretationCompanies MentionedLululemon, Bloomberg, Weibo, China Daily, San Francisco Giants, Major League Baseball, Fox NewsEpisode Hashtags#CannesLions #Lululemon #Bloomberg #Weibo #ChinaDaily #SanFranciscoGiants #MajorLeagueBaseball #FoxNews #CorporateCommunications #PublicRelations #CrisisCommunication #ReputationManagement #CorporateAffairs #CulturalFluency #BrandReputation #StakeholderTrust #ValuesCommunication #InfluenceStrategy #PrideMonth #CultureWars #InternalCommunications #LeadershipCommunication #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetworkCommunication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling.Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and Shawn P Neal.For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com
Transcribe →Beast Mode
Jun 1800:30:50Tap to summarizeIn this episode of Communication Breakdown, Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll examine MrBeast’s 500 million YouTube subscriber milestone and the reputation challenges that come with creator scale. They look at how Jimmy Donaldson managed a live-stream moment when fans playfully subscribed and unsubscribed to delay the milestone, and what that revealed about his relationship with his audience. The conversation also explores the tension between authenticity, institutional scrutiny, crisis management, and the growing communications function around one of the world’s most successful individual creators. For PR and communications leaders, the episode is a sharp case study in what happens when a personal brand becomes a global enterprise.TakeawaysMrBeast’s 500 million subscriber milestone marks a shift from creator success story to institutional reputation challenge.Founder-led brands need communications counsel that protects authenticity while translating business realities for broader audiences.The “negative money” comment illustrates how internal explanations can land poorly when different audiences interpret the same message through different lenses.Topics MentionedMrBeast, Jimmy Donaldson, YouTube creators, subscriber milestones, live streams, audience behavior, creator economy, personal brand, founder-led companies, reputation management, crisis communications, media training, narrative expansion, authenticity, audience trust, institutional scrutiny, online safety, teen audiences, stakeholder expectations, communications counselCompanies MentionedMrBeast, YouTube, TikTok, LinkedIn, HBO, Amazon, Wall Street Journal, Reddit, T-Series, Y CombinatorEpisode Hashtags#MrBeast #YouTube #TikTok #LinkedIn #HBO #Amazon #WallStreetJournal #Reddit #TSeries #YCombinator #JimmyDonaldson #CreatorEconomy #CorporateCommunications #PublicRelations #ReputationManagement #CrisisCommunications #MediaTraining #PersonalBrand #FounderLedBrands #AudienceTrust #NarrativeStrategy #OnlineSafety #StakeholderTrust #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetworkCommunication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling.Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and Shawn P Neal.For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com
Transcribe →Missives You Might’ve Missed
Jun 1100:34:41Tap to summarizeIn this episode of Communication Breakdown, hosts Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll revisit recent essays from Craig and Steve on corporate communications, media scrutiny, and the strategic role of the comms function. Craig breaks down his argument that many communications teams are doing valuable work in the wrong order, adding tools, reports, and activity before clearing out low-value work and building repeatable strategic access. Steve then pushes into the risks of bypassing the press, the value of editorial scrutiny, and why Pope Leo’s communication style offers a timely lesson in speed, authenticity, and disciplined message control. For PR and corporate reputation professionals, the episode is a sharp reminder that credibility depends on sequence, scrutiny, and sustained alignment between what an organization says and what it can actually support.TakeawaysCommunications teams cannot earn strategic influence by simply adding more dashboards, reports, tools, or meetings.The real opportunity is moving from high effort and low impact toward work that creates judgment, access, and organizational influence.Boeing shows the risk of a widening gap between public claims and operating reality, especially when communications enters only after the crisis forms.Episode Hashtags#ProvokeMedia #Boeing #AlaskaAirlines #Shell #Greenpeace #Axios #Meta #DoorDash #GameStop #CNBC #Pfizer #Amazon #Wirecutter #NewYorkTimes #RealMadrid #CorporateCommunications #PublicRelations #CorporateAffairs #MediaRelations #CrisisCommunication #ReputationManagement #StakeholderEngagement #LeadershipCommunication #StrategicCommunications #MediaScrutiny #GoDirect #PopeLeo #VaticanCommunications #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetworkCommunication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling.Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and Shawn P Neal.For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com
Transcribe →bp’s Big Problem
Jun 400:22:43Tap to summarizeIn this episode of Communication Breakdown, hosts Steve Dowling and Craig Carroll return to BP’s boardroom battle with former chairman Albert Manifold. After being dismissed over governance, oversight, and conduct concerns, Manifold fires back with a nearly 800-word statement accusing BP of mischaracterizing his behavior and framing himself as a disciplined reformer focused on shareholder value. Steve and Craig examine how Manifold is trying mto prevent BP’s version of events from becoming the only version, while BP’s restrained response risks leaving a narrative vacuum. The conversation also brings in Craig’s justice framework, including distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice, to unpack why this dispute is no longer just about conduct. It is now about credibility, process, power, and who gets to define the storyTakeawaysManifold’s statement shifts the communication problem from an executive departure to a battle over competing narrativesThe strongest and riskiest claim in Manifold’s statement is that no one raised conduct concerns with him during his tenureFor BP, the danger is that unanswered claims could harden into conventional wisdom before the company speaks again.Topics MentionedBP, Albert Manifold, executive departures, corporate governance, board communication, reputation defense, counter-narrative, shareholder activism, cost discipline, crisis communication, image rehabilitation, conduct allegations, narrative vacuum, board legitimacy, procedural justice, distributive justice, interpersonal justice, informational justice, stakeholder trust, media strategy, leadership communicationCompanies MentionedBP, Bloomberg, Financial Times, Wall Street JournalEpisode Hashtags#BP #Bloomberg #FinancialTimes #WallStreetJournal #CorporateCommunications #PublicRelations #CorporateReputation #CrisisCommunication #BoardGovernance #ExecutiveLeadership #LeadershipCommunication #StakeholderTrust #NarrativeStrategy #ReputationManagement #ShareholderValue #CorporateGovernance #MediaStrategy #ShawnPNeal #AdvoCast #OCRNetworkCommunication Breakdown is a production of the Observatory on Corporate Reputation.Hosted by Craig Carroll and Steve Dowling.Produced in partnership with Advocast Leadership Advisory and Shawn P Neal.For questions, feedback, or episode suggestions, reach out at podcasts@ocrnetwork.com
Transcribe →