Mark (17:24)
Yeah. So, I mean, there's probably lots of things. So let me just throw out a couple of things and then let's follow whatever you're thinking about or interested in. So, you know, one of the things I see is some people have a reluctance to, or an aversion to the term visionary, so they don't want to refer to themselves using that word. They think it's somehow like braggadocious or, you know, self aggrandizing. You Know, pick, pick some term that goes with that, that they're not, not happy with. And, and that's really not the way that we think about it at all. We think about it as a very natural and necessary function for an entrepreneurial company where, you know, somebody better be looking down the road, somebody better be thinking about new stuff at a high enough velocity that we've got good things to choose from. You know, somebody better be paying attention to these big external relationships that we have. Somebody better be thinking outside the box, wrestling the big interesting puzzles that we have to, to wrestle along the way. And so, so that's really where it comes from. It's not like, hey, you know, you're better or you're special any more than anybody else is special. It's just a real practical term. So, you know, I encourage people to, if they've got hesitance around that, to kind of give, give it a chance, you know, the integrator term. It's funny when, when Gino and I first wrote the book, you know, one of our, our wishes was that people would begin to use these terms as real terms to refer to real roles or seats, as we call them in an accountability chart, but real positions in a business. And it was fascinating to Watch as on LinkedIn, you'd see people change their byline to integrator or visionary, right? And start to do that. And then you'd see people posting for jobs, looking for an integrator. And so that happened. Right now we've seen recruiting firms spring up that specialize in finding integrators, and you've got a whole cottage industry of fractional integrators and all these other things that have kind of popped up around what we're trying to do with that duo in that structure. So that's been interesting to watch. And so I think have really. They've taken to the integrator term more completely and more easily than the visionary term, maybe. And part of that too is the integrator community or population, they never had a thing to call themselves. So they, you know, one of the comments we'd get a lot from them is, ah, now I know what I am and I'm not alone. So we have a workshop or something. They look around and here's a room full of people like them. And they didn't know that there was anybody else out there like them. So that's pretty cool school, right? And so you kind of see why that happened where visionaries, at least they've been calling themselves CEO or president or founder or, you know, whatever. So they've at least had a term and an identity, but there's still an isolation issue with, with them. And, and so they need to know that they're not alone too. And that's where, you know, peer groups like we've been discussing or other communities can, I think, really, really help with that. So on the theme of misconception, Ryan, the other one that I would, I would throw out is, you know, I've, I've preached a lot that visionaries need to let the integrators take their seat at the table with them. And in turn the visionaries need to kind of let go of certain things and let the integrator do their thing. And so that's all good and normal. And I've talked about that because that's not always a natural thing and a lot of times there's resistance to that. So that's why I've hammered that message so hard. But lately what I've watched is, and I don't think there's bad intent here, but it's happened where integrators have sort of taken too much ground and they've sort of stiff armed their visionary a little bit and said, no, you can't come in here, no, you can't participate in that, no, I've got to do this. And they just sort of have taken so much that it leaves the visionary kind of sitting out there off to the side twiddling their thumbs. And that's not the intent, that's not the design. We absolutely want the visionaries to be fully engaged, but it just looks different, their engagement looks different. They're still in, you know, a level 10 meeting, a quarterly meeting, you know, an annual meeting. They're still engaged with the leadership team like that. They're still absolutely, you know, same paging with their, with their integrator and you know, they have, you know, their, whatever is designed in the accountability chart for their seat. That's the stuff they're working on. And then they're helping and supporting the rest of the leaders on the team as they can to execute on the different priorities, the rocks or annual goals that have been set by the leadership team to focus on for a period of time. So that's what we want and it's a collaboration. And so to clear up any misconception there, integrators, please, please, please make sure that you are engaging your visionary and you're pulling them in and you're making sure that you are both happy with where that, that line of of demarcation is in terms of who owns what and that you're absolutely staying in sync and staying on the same page. You should both feel really good about. About how those roles get defined.