Loading summary
Ailsa Chang
Here's how President John F. Kennedy described the risk of nuclear war at the United nations in 1961 Every man, woman.
Mary Louise Kelly
And child lives under a nuclear sword of Damocles, hanging by the slenderest of threads, capable of being cut at any moment by accident or miscalculation or by madness.
Ailsa Chang
Kennedy would kick start a decades long effort to reduce that risk. If the world was dangling by a thread, he he began building what would eventually become a web of painstakingly negotiated treaties to stabilize global nuclear arsenals. The presidents who followed forged new agreements.
Mary Louise Kelly
From Nixon, this joint statement that has.
Commercial Announcer
Been issued today may well be remembered.
Mary Louise Kelly
As the beginning of a new era.
Ailsa Chang
To Reagan, it was a simple proposal.
Mary Louise Kelly
One might say disarmingly simple.
Ailsa Chang
And to Obama and this ceremony is.
Mary Louise Kelly
A testament to the truth that old adversaries can forge new partnerships.
Ailsa Chang
Today that web is in tatters. Last week, the last bilateral nuclear treaty between Russia and the United States expired. Meanwhile, President Trump is shaking up the nuclear status quo in other ways. The US has been pushing Europe to step up its own defense. Last March, Trump said he would not defend NATO countries that don't support spend enough.
Mary Louise Kelly
I think it's common sense, right? If they don't pay, I'm not going to defend them. No, I'm not going to defend them Now.
Ailsa Chang
Europe has clearly taken notice, and in a speech Friday at the Munich Security Conference, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that in an era of great powers, Europe's freedom is no longer a given. He said that he was in talks with the president of France about a European nuclear deterrent. Consider this the world is increasingly unstable. Could that drive more countries towards nuclear arms? From npr, I'm Ailsa Chang.
Commercial Announcer
This message comes from Mint Mobile. This holiday season, stop overpaying for wireless and switch to Mint Shop. 50% off unlimited plans@mintmobile.com Switch limited time offer upfront payment of $45 for three months, $90 for six months or $180 for 12 months. Taxes and fees. Extra initial plan term only above 35 GB. Network may slow when busy Capable device required. Availability, speed and coverage varies. See mintmobile.com this message comes from Mint Mobile. This holiday season, stop overpaying for wireless and switch to Mint Shop. 50% off unlimited plans@mintmobile.com Switch limited time offer upfront payment of 45 DOL for three months, $90 for six months or $180 for 12 months. Taxes and fees. Extra initial plan term only above 35 gigabytes network may slow when busy capable device required availability Speed and coverage varies. See mintmobile.com.
Ailsa Chang
It's Consider this from npr. So my co host, Mary Louise Kelly has been in Munich this week, reporting from that same conference where the German chancellor gave that speech just mentioned. And one of the many big issues that Mary Louise is covering is what to make of this moment in nuclear history. I'll let her pick up the story from here.
Mary Louise Kelly
When I was a kid back in the 80s, my school held emergency drills, fire drills, tornado drills, nuclear drills. The plan for the latter was we were supposed to crouch under our classroom desks, arms crossed over our heads for protection. With the benefit of hindsight, hiding under our desks probably would not have protected us much from an incoming nuclear warhead. Well, fast forward four decades. We seem to be in a new nuclear era. Cold war is over. But the questions how do we secure the nukes? Whether to build more nukes, they're as live as ever. And those questions are on the minds of national security leaders gathering here in Munich. Among them, Christine Wormuth, former Army Secretary, now president and CEO of the Nuclear Threat Initiative. That's a nonpartisan group dedicated to reducing the nuclear threat. Secretary Warmuth, great to see you. Welcome to Munich.
Christine Wormuth
Thank you. It's great to be here. And I did those drills under my desk as well.
Mary Louise Kelly
Yeah, probably would not have done us much good.
Christine Wormuth
Definitely would not have helped us.
Mary Louise Kelly
So to take stock of where we are this moment. The last nuclear arms treaty between the United States and Russia just expired late last month. The bulletin of atomic scientists. Their doomsday clock was set to 85 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been in nearly eight decades of doing it. How dangerous is the current moment?
Christine Wormuth
The current moment is quite dangerous. We are now without any kind of a treaty, putting limits on strategic nuclear weapons. For the first time since 1972, China is rapidly building up its nuclear arsenal. They are expected to have 1,000 nuclear weapons by 2030. So it's a pretty dangerous time.
Mary Louise Kelly
I think the treaty that just expired, new start, it was known as. The Russians actually offered to extend it. Trump administration said, no, we want something better. And so it expired. Now we have nothing. Good idea. Missed opportunity. What do you think?
Christine Wormuth
Well, I think it was a bit of a missed opportunity, but I'm heartened because as I understand it, we were in Abu Dhabi with the Russians just recently talking to them about perhaps some sort of continued limits on our strategic nuke. So I hope that those talks continue because I think it would be very important to try to keep some limits at least in place, even if it's not through a formal treaty.
Mary Louise Kelly
But is any treaty that could be any kind of agreement toothless? If China isn't in it?
Christine Wormuth
No, it's not toothless. I think the idea of a three way treaty is a bridge too far. I think, frankly, the Chinese want to establish parity with Russia and the United States, but I think the possibility of an agreement with each country separately is something to potentially pursue.
Mary Louise Kelly
What about the Europeans? Since we're standing here in Munich, in Germany, the buzz in Europe is all about figuring out how to navigate a world where they may not be able to rely on the US Nuclear umbrella. Can Europe still rely on the US Nuclear umbrella?
Christine Wormuth
I think it's very important that the administration communicate clearly to the Europeans that they can rely on our nuclear umbrella. Because the last thing we need is what is called friendly proliferation. The last thing we want to see is a country like Poland or even Germany thinking about getting its own nuclear weapons. That's not going to be in the interests of the United States.
Mary Louise Kelly
What about where does France fit in? Are they currently. Sounds like you hope for forever that is the only country on the European continent with nuclear weapons.
Christine Wormuth
Well, the French and the UK Nuclear weapons are an important part of the overall umbrella for Europe. So, you know, I wouldn't be surprised if France and Britain are having conversations about what that responsibility looks like if the United States is moving to a more transactional posture relative to Europe.
Mary Louise Kelly
Hmm. So bottom line, to bring us back to where we started, are we looking at a future where school kids are gonna be hiding under their desks again for nuclear drills? And if not literally, I guess, I mean, are we going to be raising children in a generation that feels the peril, that feels the world is getting less safe because of nuclear weapons, then more?
Christine Wormuth
Well, I hope we're not going to be going back to the days of drills underneath desks, but I do think we're in a perilous new era where we could see an arms race.
Mary Louise Kelly
And when you say we may be in a moment of a new nuclear arms race, why? I mean, is that dictated by the fact that countries feel increasingly insecure and like the world is shifting around them?
Christine Wormuth
Yes, I think countries feel more insecure. I think Russia is clearly a revisionist power. You know, we see what they've done in Ukraine, and I think Putin wants to continue to pursue his war in Ukraine. And again, the massive Chinese buildup, the Chinese have not been very transparent about their intentions. So it does feel like we're in a more dangerous, less secure world.
Ailsa Chang
That was Christine Wormuth, former Army secretary, president and CEO of the Nuclear Threat Initiative. She was speaking to my co host, Mary Louise Kelly, at the Munich Security Conference. This episode was produced by Karen Zamora and Connor Donovan, with audio engineering by Ted Mebane. It was edited by Christopher Intagliotta, Brett Neely and Courtney Dorning. Our executive producer is Sami Yeniken. And before we go, a quick thank you to our Consider THIS plus listeners who support the show. Your contribution makes it possible for NPR journalists all around the world to do their jobs. Supporters also get bonus episodes and can hear every episode without messages from sponsors. Learn more at plus.NPR.org It's Consider this from NPR. I'm Ailsa Chang.
Mint Mobile Announcer
This message comes from Mint mobile. Starting at $15 a month, make the switch@mintmobile.com Switch $45 upfront payment for 3 months 5 gigabyte plan equivalent to $15 a month. Taxes and fees Extra first 3 months only. See terms.
Commercial Announcer
This message comes from Mattress Firm Tired of waking up sore? Mattress Firm Sleep experts can match you with a Tempur Pedic Adapt mattress built to relieve pressure. Shop the President's Day Sale and save up to $500 on select Tempur Pedic sets. Restrictions apply.
Mint Mobile Announcer
This message comes from Mint mobile. Starting at $15 a month, make the switch@mintmobile.com Switch $45 upfront payment for 3 months 5 gigabyte plan equivalent to $15 a month Taxes and fees Extra first 3 months only. See terms.
Podcast: Consider This from NPR
Air Date: February 13, 2026
Host: Ailsa Chang, Mary Louise Kelly
Guest: Christine Wormuth, President & CEO of the Nuclear Threat Initiative
This episode delves into the alarming state of global nuclear security in 2026, highlighting the expiration of the last US-Russia nuclear treaty and rising anxieties among world powers. Reporting from the Munich Security Conference, NPR’s Mary Louise Kelly examines whether the erosion of nuclear arm-control agreements could trigger an international arms race and greater instability.
| Timestamp | Segment | |-----------|---------------------------------------------------| | 00:00-01:05 | Historical overview of nuclear weapons risk | | 01:05-02:14 | Erosion of arms control & European concerns | | 03:41-05:08 | Interview setup & state of nuclear treaties | | 05:08-06:09 | How dangerous is this moment? | | 06:09-06:34 | Are new treaties possible without China? | | 06:34-07:19 | Can Europe rely on the US nuclear umbrella? | | 07:40-08:15 | Are we entering a new nuclear arms race? | | 08:15-08:52 | Will the next generation face nuclear dread? |
The episode strikes a sober, urgent, and reflective tone, weaving personal anecdotes, historical context, and urgent policy analysis. Voices remain calm, measured, and deeply concerned about the present instability and uncertain future.
This episode underscores a palpable return of nuclear anxiety, driven by unraveling treaties, global insecurity, and misleading signals among world powers. The uncertainty leaves allies wary, raises the specter of an arms race, and provokes one core question: are we heading back to a time when nuclear dread defined a generation? Christine Wormuth and NPR’s hosts leave listeners with the sense that vigilance and dialogue are more needed than ever.