A new executive order tackles causes of homelessness. Why are some advocates worried?

Summary

Consider This from NPR: Summary of "A new executive order tackles causes of homelessness. Why are some advocates worried?"

Release Date: July 29, 2025
Host: NPR
Podcast: Consider This

---

Introduction to the Executive Order

In the July 29, 2025 episode of NPR's Consider This, host Ailsa Chang delves into President Donald Trump's newly signed executive order aimed at addressing homelessness in the United States. This policy marks a significant shift from previous approaches, focusing more on mental health and addiction treatment rather than the widely endorsed "Housing First" model.

Conservative Support and Policy Perspective

The executive order finds backing among conservative circles, particularly those advocating for stringent measures to manage homelessness. Devin Kurtz, a policy director with the conservative Cicero Institute think tank, voices support for the administration's stance:

“For years, either because of the long-standing lack of medication or certain disorders that make them unable to help themselves. This is really that crucial safety net at the bottom to make sure that they don't continue to fall through the cracks and die on the street.”
— Devin Kurtz (00:40)

Kurtz emphasizes the importance of the executive order in providing a safety net for individuals who are unable to secure help due to systemic deficiencies.

Criticism from Homelessness Advocates

Despite conservative support, the executive order faces significant opposition from homelessness advocates. Jesse Rabinowitz of the National Homelessness Law Center criticizes the policy for neglecting the essential issue of affordable housing:

“Right now there aren't enough services. So many people want to get help, but they can't afford it or the wait lists are too long. This executive order does nothing to address that.”
— Jesse Rabinowitz (01:10)

Further dissent comes from Mayor Aliyah Gaskins of Alexandria, Virginia, who strongly opposes the directive:

“It requires states and cities like mine to demonstrate aggressive enforcement. It ends support for housing first policies. It encourages the expanded use of law enforcement all at a time when we know that the criminalization of homelessness doesn't work.”
— Mayor Aliyah Gaskins (01:49)

Gaskins argues that the executive order undermines effective strategies by prioritizing enforcement over compassionate solutions, potentially jeopardizing federal funding essential for successful local programs.

In-Depth Analysis with Ann Oliva

Post-break, the episode features a comprehensive interview with Ann Oliva, CEO of the National Alliance to End Homelessness. Oliva provides a critical perspective on the executive order, highlighting several concerns:

1. Attacking Evidence-Based Approaches:

   “The executive order attacks evidence-based approaches and specifically the approach that's called Housing First, that has been in use by homeless services providers and the federal government for many years.”
   — Ann Oliva (04:50)

2. Forced Institutionalization and Public Safety:

   “The second very alarming item is basically a call for forced institutionalization under a guise of sort of promoting public safety.”
   — Ann Oliva (04:50)

3. Elimination of Privacy Protections:

   “It would require recipients of federal funding to collect personal health-related information and share that with law enforcement.”
   — Ann Oliva (04:50)

Oliva underscores that the executive order deviates from proven methods by not addressing the root causes of homelessness and instead promoting measures that could exacerbate the situation.

Housing First vs. Executive Order Approach

The discussion shifts to the effectiveness of the "Housing First" model versus the administration's new approach. Oliva argues that evidence overwhelmingly supports the Housing First strategy:

“Evidence tells us that when we couple safe and affordable housing with the services that people want and need to maintain stability, that folks can keep that housing over the long term.”
— Ann Oliva (06:22)

She questions the feasibility of the executive order's approach, especially concerning the lack of facilities to accommodate those forcibly moved or confined:

“What is this executive order trying to do? ... what does that mean? And I think we're talking about camps, and we've already seen that happen on the immigration front.”
— Ann Oliva (07:01)

Broader Implications and Partisan Shifts

Oliva comments on the increasing visibility of homelessness and its politicization across both conservative and Democratic-led cities:

“Elected leaders across the country are making decisions that are largely political rather than strategic.”
— Ann Oliva (07:50)

This bipartisan shift towards enforcement over supportive measures reflects a broader trend of neglecting necessary investments in affordable housing and health care, further complicating efforts to address homelessness effectively.

Conclusion: The Path Forward

Despite the bipartisan consensus on the need to address homelessness, the executive order represents a contentious departure from established, evidence-based practices. Oliva advocates for continued investment in Housing First and scalable support services to genuinely mitigate homelessness. She criticizes the administration's approach as "cruel and dehumanizing," emphasizing the importance of compassionate, strategic interventions backed by robust evidence.

“If we were serious about ending homelessness, rather than just removing people from public view, we would invest in approaches that have an evidence-based and we would make those investments at the scale we need to address the issue nationwide and see if that works.”
— Ann Oliva (09:00)

Oliva draws a positive comparison to the successful reduction of veteran homelessness, demonstrating the potential of effective policy when properly implemented.

Final Thoughts

The episode concludes by highlighting the ongoing debate between enforcement-based policies and supportive, evidence-backed strategies in combating homelessness. As cities nationwide grapple with rising homelessness rates, the effectiveness and ethical implications of the Trump administration's executive order remain points of intense scrutiny and discussion.

---

This summary was produced based on the transcript and information provided from the NPR Consider This podcast episode aired on July 29, 2025.

Transcript

[Ailsa Chang]

Clearing out homeless encampments was a recurring feature of then candidate Donald Trump's 2024 campaign.

[Donald Trump]

Our once great cities have become unlivable, unsanitary nightmares surrendered to the homeless, the drug addicted, and the violent and dangerously deranged.

[Ailsa Chang]

Now President Trump is aiming to fundamentally shift how this country manages homelessness. He signed a new executive order last week that calls for changes that would make it easier for states and cities to move people living on the streets into treatment for mental illness or addiction. It's something that conservatives have been lobbying.

[Devin Kurtz]

For for years, either because of the long standing lack of medication or certain disorders that make them unable to help themselves. This is really that crucial safety net at the bottom to make sure that they don't continue to fall through the cracks and die on the street.

[Ailsa Chang]

That's Devin Kurtz, a policy director with the conservative Cicero Institute think tank. But other advocates who focus on homelessness, even those who agree that access to treatment is a good thing, say that forcing people into treatment may not be realistic.

[Devin Kurtz]

Right now there aren't enough services. So many people want to get help, but they can't afford it or the wait lists are too long. This executive order does nothing to address that.

[Ailsa Chang]

That is Jesse Rabinowitz of the National Homelessness Law Center. He and other advocates say addressing an ongo shortage of affordable housing is the best way to tackle homelessness. Rabinowitz says the new executive order does nothing to address the housing shortage, and at least one local leader has an even sharper critique of the order. In an interview with NPR's Morning Edition, Mayor Aliyah Gaskins of Alexandria, Virginia, called it a quote, callous command and control approach.

[Aliyah Gaskins]

It requires states and cities like mine to demonstrate aggressive enforcement. It ends support for housing first policies. It encourages the expanded use of law enforcement all at a time when we know that the criminalization of homelessness doesn't work.

[Ailsa Chang]

Gaskins says putting money towards housing first, along with investments in mental health services, has helped ease homelessness in her city. But because the executive order calls for money to go to local governments that prioritize crackdowns on illegal drug use and urban camping, among other things, instead of places that prioritize affordable housing, Gaskins also says this.

[Aliyah Gaskins]

It makes the control of how pursue homelessness and how we work to end homelessness in our community, it puts federal funding at risk. We might lose the funding to be able to do what is actually working in our community and that people who are on the streets, who we have been working to build relationships with who we are in the process of getting them the support they need could potentially be arrested.

[Ailsa Chang]

Consider this. The Trump administration says the federal government has spent tens of billions of dollars on housing without addressing the root causes of homeless. But critics worry that this new executive order will not solve those root causes either. After the break, we'll explore the potential impacts of this policy shift. From npr, I'm Ailsa Chang.

[Catherine Marr]

This message comes from Sattva. What does it take to be the goat for athletes? It's more than just talent and dedication. It takes the quality sleep necessary for recovery sleep, which has also been proven to improve athletic abilities and increase energy. Every Saatva is designed for that kind of sleep, which is why they were named Best luxury mattress by sleepfoundation.org save $200 on $1,000 or [e-mail] NPR hi.

It'S Catherine Marr, CEO of NPR. Federal funding for public media has been eliminated. That means that the NPR network is moving forward in an uncharted future. But our commitment to you will never waver. Please give today to support the kind of journalism that democracy relies upon. Make your [e-mail] thank you.

[Ailsa Chang]

It's Consider this from NPR. President Trump's executive order last week marks a fundamental shift on the approach to homelessness. It moves away from Housing first programs and towards mental health and attention, addiction treatment, including involuntary civil commitment for people deemed to be a risk to themselves or others. Ann Oliva is CEO of the national alliance to End Homelessness. I spoke with her about the consequences of the president's executive order and I asked her what kind of policy changes we might see at local levels.

[Ann Oliva]

The executive order attacks evidence based approaches and specifically the approach that's called Housing first, that has been in use by homeless services providers and the federal government for many years. And really what that does is ensure that folks have access to housing as the first step towards ending instability and homelessness for people. And once they have access to housing, then services like health care, mental health care, addiction treatment, job training or other supports are provided so that they can maintain that housing in the long run. The second very alarming item is basically a call for forced institutionalization under a guise of sort of promoting public safety. And the third is that it eliminates fundamental privacy protections for people who are experiencing homelessness in that it would require recipients of federal funding to collect personal health related information and share that with law enforcement.

[Ailsa Chang]

I want to return to the first point that you made, that this executive order attacks evidence based approaches. What does the evidence say about what approaches Work. When it comes to homeless populations, the.

[Ann Oliva]

Evidence is really clear on what works to end homelessness. The common denominator among everyone experiencing homelessness is that they can't afford a safe place to live.

[Ailsa Chang]

Right.

[Ann Oliva]

Evidence tells us that when we couple safe and affordable housing with the services that people want and need to maintain stability, that folks can keep that housing over the long term. It's one of the most studied interventions, this idea of coupling housing and services.

[Ailsa Chang]

Well, let me ask you, if the federal government expands efforts to force hundreds of thousands of people off the streets into some kind of civil confinement, I mean, where would the government even send these people? Are they, are there even enough shelters or care facilities for so many individuals?

[Ann Oliva]

I think we really have to ask ourselves, what is this executive order trying to do? And as it looks to expand civil commitment, and we know we don't have enough shelter beds in almost any community across the country, what does that mean? And I think we're talking about camps, and we've already seen that happen on the immigration front.

[Ailsa Chang]

Can we talk about what's happening across the country, though? Because more than 100 cities have passed or have strengthened bans on outdoor encampments. This is, I'm talking about across both conservative and Democratic led parts of the country, including Democratic led cities like San Francisco. What do you think has led to this broader shift? Even across partisan lines?

[Ann Oliva]

The issue of homelessness is becoming more and more more visible to housed people. And it is becoming a political issue in ways that maybe it hadn't been 10 or 15 years ago. And elected leaders across the country are making decisions that are largely political rather than strategic. And what I mean by that is that from the national level all the way down to the local level, we are not seeing the kinds of investments that we need in affordable housing, in treatment and health care. As a matter of fact, we're seeing, at least at the federal level, a retreat from being able to provide the health care that people want and need in this country.

[Ailsa Chang]

You have talked a lot about how much you believe in the housing first approach to homelessness. And yeah, for two decades, there has been a bipartisan housing first approach, but homelessness has continued to rise, I mean, to record numbers across much of this country. So I guess I ask you, why not try the Trump administration's approach to.

[Ann Oliva]

See what happens first? This approach is cruel and dehumanizing to the human beings who are experiencing incredibly traumatic situations in their lives. The second thing that I would say to that question is that the evidence is so strong as to what works to end homelessness. And if we were serious about ending homelessness, rather than just removing people from public view, we would invest in approaches that have an evidence based and we would make those investments at the scale we need to address the issue nationwide and see if that works. And if we could do that, I think that we would see incredible progress, like the progress that we've made on ending veteran homelessness. We've cut veteran homelessness by more than 50% since 2010. That's evidence.

[Ailsa Chang]

Anne Oliva of the national alliance to End Homelessness, thank you very much.

[Ann Oliva]

Thank you so much for having me.

[Ailsa Chang]

This episode was produced by Elena Burnett and Janaki Mehta. It was edited by Ashley Brown and Jeanette Woods. This episode also featured reporting by Jennifer Ludding. Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun. It's Consider this from npr. I'm Ailsa Chang.

[Planet Money Host]

This summer on Planet Money Summer School, we're learning about political economy. We're getting into the nitty gritty of what government does with things like trade, taxes, immigration and healthcare.

[Donald Trump]

So politics and economics, which are taught separately, they shouldn't be separated at all. I think you have to understand one to really appreciate the other.

[Planet Money Host]

So what is the right amount of government in our lives? Tune into Planet Money Summer School from npr.

Wherever you get your podcasts at Planet Money, we know that economic jargon can sometimes feel like speaking another language.

Yeah, like arbitrage, Alpha, Otarchy.

That's just what's in the news these days. There's also absolute advantage, aggregate demand, aggregate supply.

And this is just the A's.

Oh, animal spirits.

That's a pretty good one. Planet Money from npr. We help you translate the economy so you can understand the world. World wherever you get your podcasts.

[Catherine Marr]

Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks? Amazon prime members can listen to Consider this sponsor free through Amazon Music. Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get Consider this +@ +npr.org. that's +npr.org.