A week into the shutdown, federal workers are stuck in limbo

Summary

Podcast Summary: Consider This from NPR

Episode: A week into the shutdown, federal workers are stuck in limbo
Date: October 8, 2025
Host: Scott Detrow
Guests: Andrea Hsu (NPR Labor Correspondent), Stephen Fowler (NPR Political Reporter)

---

Overview

This episode examines the impacts of the ongoing federal government shutdown, focusing on federal workers who are furloughed and face uncertainty about back pay and job security. NPR reporters provide crucial context around legal, political, and social developments, examining the Trump administration’s actions, reactions from workers and unions, and the political chess match in Congress.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Federal Shutdown’s Immediate Effects on Workers

• Federal workers in limbo: Many employees are furloughed, unsure about job security and pay.
• Presidential comments: President Trump raises the specter that workers might not receive back pay; this claim is walked back by Press Secretary Caroline Levitt, who clarifies that employees are “staying home” rather than being fired.
  Notable moment:
  • Andrea Hsu impersonates President Trump, quoting: “The Democrats are causing the loss of a lot of jobs, but they're it's a shutdown. It's their shutdown, not our shutdown.” (00:11)

2. Legal Guarantees and Political Maneuvers Regarding Back Pay

• Law passed in 2019: Ensures furloughed workers historically receive back pay after a shutdown.
  • Stephen Fowler: “There's a law in the books that says after a shutdown, federal employees… get back pay. That law was signed in 2019 after the record 35-day funding lapse by then President Trump.” (03:24)
  • Trump (archive): “I will make sure that all employees receive their back pay very quickly or as soon as possible...It’ll happen fast.” (03:45–03:53)
• Changing interpretations:
  • The Office of Management and Budget removes FAQ references to back pay, and an internal draft memo circulates that suggests Congress must now explicitly authorize it (03:58).
• Union and expert reactions: Workers and experts call this a scare tactic and possibly illegal.
  • Monica Gorman (NASA; union member): “I think it's ridiculous. It's obviously illegal. The law is very clear. I think they're just making up threats to try to intimidate us.” (00:49)
  • Sarah Cobran (National Cancer Institute): “I believe this administration is behaving in a lawless way...am I certain I'm going to be paid back? No, because they're not following the law. But I am certain that is the law.” (05:00–05:27)

3. Broader Political Context

• Shutdown as a negotiation tactic: Democrats want to extend health care subsidies; Republicans lack Senate votes to reopen the government.
• Trump’s agenda:
  • His second term aims to reduce federal government size, employing shutdown-related threats and actions (grant cuts, delayed projects, threatening layoffs).
• Critics say: The administration is misrepresenting legal realities around layoffs and shutdowns.
  • Jessica Riedel (Manhattan Institute): “Reduction in force decisions should be made based on long-term agency needs, not in response to a temporary shutdown.” (05:57)
• Little actual change so far:
  • Andrea Hsu: “There have been layoffs last week at the US Patent and Trademark Office, but those had already been in the works...Whatever layoffs happen now are really just an extension of what's been happening since Trump came back to office and launched his Department of Government Efficiency.” (06:23)

4. Workers’ Experiences and Frustrations

• Federal employees’ voices:
  • Monica Gorman appreciates the increased attention but faces job risk (00:57–01:16).
  • Alexis Goldstein (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau): Despite her funding source, her agency is “very hamstrung or like frozen in an ice cube,” with the CFPB’s regulatory role diminished (06:23–07:41).

5. Administration’s Position

• Official response: Trump administration defends its actions as carrying out the elected agenda, accusing resistant workers of acting “against the American people.” (07:41)

---

Memorable Quotes & Moments

• Monica Gorman (NASA; on threat of losing back pay):
  “I think it's ridiculous. It's obviously illegal. The law is very clear. I think they're just making up threats to try to intimidate us.” (00:49)
• Sarah Cobran (National Cancer Institute):
  “I believe this administration is behaving in a lawless way. …But I am certain that is the law.” (05:00)
• Jessica Riedel (Manhattan Institute):
  “Reduction in force decisions should be made based on long-term agency needs, not in response to a temporary shutdown.” (05:57)
• Alexis Goldstein (CFPB):
  “We're just very hamstrung or like frozen in an ice cube.” (06:23)

---

Timestamps for Major Segments

• 00:00–01:23: How the shutdown began, confusion over workers’ job security and pay
• 03:15–04:31: Legal history and evolving interpretations of back pay
• 04:31–06:14: Workers’ and union reactions; expert analysis
• 06:14–07:41: Layoffs context, agency impacts, and administration response
• 07:41–08:40: Update on congressional negotiations and political dynamics

---

Tone & Style

Consistently analytic, empathetic to federal workers’ predicaments, and foregrounding legal/political nuance without inflammatory language. Both guests and host maintain a measured, fact-based approach, letting workers’ direct voices add urgency and reality to the reporting.

---

Conclusion

This episode provides a clear look at how the shutdown is affecting federal employees, clarifies the legal landscape regarding back pay, and explores the motives and strategies in play on Capitol Hill and at the White House. Worker anxiety and confusion mingle with broader questions of legal authority, political brinkmanship, and the evolving role of the federal government under Trump’s second term.

---

For listeners wanting a concise update on the shutdown’s impact—especially federal workers’ experiences—this episode offers a thorough, empathetic, and well-sourced overview.

Transcript

[Scott Detrow]

A week into a federal government shutdown, many government employees feel like they're twisting in the wind. On Sunday, President Trump suggested federal workers were being fired because of the shutdown.

[Andrea Hsu]

The Democrats are causing the loss of a lot of jobs, but they're it's a shutdown. It's their shutdown, not our shutdown.

[Scott Detrow]

The next day, White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt walked back that claim.

[Andrea Hsu]

The president was referring to the hundreds of thousands of federal workers who have been furloughed as a result of this federal government shutdown. Both here at the White House and across the entire federal government government at agencies across the board, there are federal workers who are staying home.

[Scott Detrow]

And then yesterday, Trump and other top Republicans raised doubts about whether furloughed workers would get back pay when the government reopens. Stuck in the middle of all of these threats, like no back pay for furloughed workers, are those employees?

[Andrea Hsu]

I think it's ridiculous. It's obviously illegal. The law is very clear. I think they're just making up threats to try to intimidate us.

[Scott Detrow]

Monica Gorman is one of the many federal workers who aren't working right now. She's employed at NASA and is a member of the IFPTE Local 29, the employee union there. She spoke with NPR in her personal capacity and said even though her job may be at stake, she is glad the shutdown is focusing attention on federal workers.

[Andrea Hsu]

To see people in Congress taking a harder line. I feel like we're finally being heard now in a way that we weren't before.

[Scott Detrow]

Consider this. The federal government shut down a week ago, and there is no sign it will reopen anytime soon. Will federal workers pay the price? From npr, I'm Scott Detrow.

[Andrea Hsu]

Sea levels around the world have been rising for years, and now they're starting to rise faster. Here's the thing, though. It really depends on your individual location. Like Seattle will see less sea level rise than Annapolis, which will see less sea level rise than New Orleans. On Shortwave, NPR's science podcast we get into why. Listen in the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Scott Detrow]

On the Throughline podcast from npr, immigration enforcement might be more visible now, but this moment didn't begin with President Trump's second inauguration or even his first, a series from Throughline about how immigration became political and a cash cow. Listen to Throughline in the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts. Taylor Swift is once again taking over the Internet.

[Andrea Hsu]

Her new album touches on her relationship with fiance Travis Kelce, as well as a simmering beef with a fellow pop star. We're delving into the life of a showgirl and unpacking all the joyful bangers. Listen to Pop Culture Happy Hour on the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.

[Scott Detrow]

It's consider this from npr, the federal government shutdown. Who's responsible? How long will it go? And who will suffer the consequences if it continues? These are questions a lot of people have right now. And it just so happens that NPR labor correspondent Andrea Hsu and political reporter Stephen Fowler are two people with some answers. Welcome.

[Andrea Hsu]

Hi, Scott.

[Scott Detrow]

Hi there, Stephen. I want to start with you. And let's start with this idea that some federal workers would not get back pay once the shutdown ends. Where does this come from?

[Stephen Fowler]

So, Scott, there's a law in the books that says after a shutdown, federal employees who were forced to work without pay and forced to not work because Congress couldn't fund the government, these employees get back pay. That law was signed in 2019 after the record 35 day funding lapse by then President Trump. And here's what he said at the time.

[Andrea Hsu]

I will make sure that all employees receive their back pay very quickly or as soon as possible.

[Stephen Fowler]

It'll happen fast.

[Scott Detrow]

Okay. That was then. He signed the bill into law. What's changed?

[Stephen Fowler]

Well, Trump's second term has been all about finding different ways to have less federal government and fewer people working for it. So after the shutdown started last week, the Office of Management and Budget removed a line from its Frequently Asked Questions that that noted this back pay provision and an internal draft memo was circulated with a contradictory view of the law. Now, this draft memo argues that the hundreds of thousands of furloughed employees who aren't deemed essential to the government functioning aren't guaranteed their paychecks either, unless Congress explicitly says so.

[Scott Detrow]

Andrea, what are you hearing from workers and unions about this back pay issue?

[Andrea Hsu]

Well, they're not buying this interpretation of the law. Many of these workers were around in 2019 when Congress passed the law and they fully expect to get paid. And they tell me this is just.

[Scott Detrow]

Another a scare tactic to get Democrats to concede in the shutdown. Is that the thinking? Yeah.

[Andrea Hsu]

And I spoke with Sarah Cobran about this. She's a longtime employee of the National Cancer Institute. And to be clear, she spoke with me in her personal capacity, not on behalf of the government. She believes the Trump administration is just going to do what it wants, shut down or not. In fact, her agency has already gone through mass layoffs. Grants that she was overseeing have been cut and this has happened even as lower court judges have found those moves illegal. So here's what she had to say about the new threat over back pay. I believe this administration is behaving in a lawless way. So when I spoke to my husband before it happened, I said, am I certain I'm going to be paid back? No, because they're not following the law. But I am certain that is the law.

[Stephen Fowler]

And Scott, it's not just federal workers and Democrats who are saying this. I mean, several budget experts I've spoken with say that the questions around back pay and some of the other proposals the White House is tying to the shutdown are misleading at best. Like Jessica Riedel with the Center Right Manhattan Institute. She says as one example, the constant threat of mass layoffs because of the shutdown just doesn't reflect the reality of how these reductions in force actually have to work or who ultimately makes those decisions.

[Andrea Hsu]

It may be the case that we have more government employees at certain agencies than is necessary, but reduction in force decisions should be made based on long term agency needs, not in response to a temporary shutdown.

[Scott Detrow]

So, Andrea, just to be clear, since we have been talking about this in so many different ways about a week in, have there been any layoffs tied to the shutdown at this point?

[Andrea Hsu]

Actually, no. Not connected to the lapse in funding anyway. There have been layoffs last week at the US Patent and Trademark Office, but those had already been in the works. And federal employees have used this moment to point out that whatever layoffs happen now are really just an extension of what's been happening since Trump came back to office and launched his Department of Government Efficiency. I talk with Alexis Goldstein about this. She's with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and a member of the employees union there. She also spoke to me in her personal capacity. She is still working, still getting paid because her agency's funding does not come through annual appropriations from Congress. She says very little work is actually being done. And it's been like that since early this year when the Trump administration first tried to dismantle the cfpb. You know, for example, the agency is not monitoring the banks, which is what Congress created the CFPB to do after the 2008 financial crisis. Here's how she put were just very hamstrung or like frozen in an ice cube. And Scott, we have asked the Trump administration for a response to this kind of criticism coming from federal employees. The White House spokeswoman, Abigail Jackson sent a statement saying President Trump was elected by a resounding majority of Americans to carry out the agenda he is implementing. And she said federal workers who are resisting the Trump agenda are working against the American people.

[Scott Detrow]

All right. So we're hearing all of these people who feel like their paychecks or their future employment has been tied up as negotiating tactics. Stephen, where do those negotiations actually stand? What, if anything, is happening right now?

[Stephen Fowler]

Well, Republicans in Congress don't have enough votes in the Senate to reopen the government. They're not willing to negotiate with the Democrats so far who want Republicans to extend health care subsidies for millions of Americans. Meanwhile, Trump and his Office of Management and Budget director Russ Vogt have been trying a lot of different things over the last few weeks and have sent mixed messaging about their purpose. Some interpret it as a pressure campaign, while the administration says they're simply taking steps to mitigate spending in a shutdown. Those are things like terminating energy grants in places that didn't vote for Trump, holding up transit funding in Chicago and New York, and the constant threats to fireworkers and or not pay them, which so far, none of these things have panned out or moved the needle in this shutdown fight.

[Scott Detrow]

NPR's Stephen Fowler and Andrea Hsu. Thanks to both of you.

[Stephen Fowler]

Thank you.

[Andrea Hsu]

You're welcome.

[Scott Detrow]

This episode was produced by Michael Levitt. It was edited by Courtney Dorning, Padma Rama, and Emily Kopp. Our executive producer is Sammy Yenigan. It's Consider this from npr. I'm Scott Detrow. Crime looks different than it used to. A loophole in a crypto wallet could yield a billion dollars. A deepfake of your voice could be used to steal money from your bank.

[Andrea Hsu]

We have PhDs in our team and they can't tell the difference themselves. AI has gotten that good.

[Scott Detrow]

The Indicator from Planet Money is digging into the evolving business of crime. And listen in the NPR app or wherever you get podcasts. We all wonder about life's big questions. Why are we here? What are we to do? And how to make sense of it all? On Ye Gods with Scott Carter, I talk with politicos, priests, actors and atheists on how they wrestle with life's mysteries. Their stories will spark reflection, challenge assumptions, and maybe even bring you some clarity on your own journey. Listen to Yeekons, part of the NPR Network, wherever you get your podcasts.

[Andrea Hsu]

Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks? Amazon prime members can listen to Consider this sponsor free through Amazon Music. Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get consider this [e-mail] that's plus.NPR.org.