
Loading summary
A
1963, two years after President John F. Kennedy told Congress he wanted to put a man on the moon, he came to them with a challenge that would prove even mental illness.
B
It has troubled our national conscience, but only as a problem unpleasant to mention, easy to postpone, and despairing of solution.
A
Kennedy's proposed law would fund research into the causes of mental disabilities. It would also change the way the country treated people with serious mental illness.
B
Our chief aim is to get people out of state custodial institutions and back into their communities and homes without hardship or danger.
A
At the time, more than half a million people were confined to state run psychiatric hospitals, many involuntarily. Conditions in these facilities were often abysmal, as Kennedy laid out.
B
Nearly half of the 530,000 persons in our state mental hospitals are in institutions with over 3,000 patients getting little or no individual treatment. Many of these institutions have less than half of the professional staff required. 45% of them have been hospitalized for 10 years or more.
A
The Community Mental Health act would be the final bill Kennedy signed into law just a few weeks before his assassination. The idea was that people with mental illness could live independently in their communities and receive care at local health centers. And in its wake, the number of people in large psychiatric hospitals did decline dramatically. The law was one factor. So were advances in treatments and court decisions that made it harder to confine mentally ill people against their will. But the new system was underfunded, and today many people with severe mental illness end up in hospital emergency rooms, in jail or on the streets.
B
We're making many suffer for the whims of a deeply unwell few. And they are unwell indeed.
A
President Trump campaigned on a promise to clear homeless people from the streets, including by pushing people with mental illnesses into hospitals.
B
For those who are severely mentally ill and deeply disturbed, we will bring them back to mental institutions where they belong, with the goal of reintegrating them back into society once they are well enough to manage.
A
And now he has a new executive order aiming to do it. Consider this Trump's plan could force homeless people into treatment against their will. We'll go to a state where that is already happening. From npr, I'm Juana Summers. This message comes from Saatva, official mattress and restorative sleep provider for Team USA, who won 231 total medals at the Olympic and Paralympic Games, Paris 2024.
B
But could they have done even better.
A
If they were getting deeper restorative sleep? Ron Rudson, Saatva CEO, was determined to find out. So Saatva will provide mattresses for the LA28 Olympic and Paralympic Games. You can get deep restorative sleep, too. Visit saatva.com NPR and save $200 on.
B
$1,000 or more on the Throughline podcast from NPR. Immigration enforcement might be more visible now, but this moment didn't begin with President Trump's second inaug, even his first, a series from Throughline about how immigration became political and a cash cow. Listen to Throughline in the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.
A
One quick thing before we get back to the show. These days, a lot of listeners are asking how they can help support the show. And there is a super easy, totally free thing you can do and it takes literally two minutes. Go into the podcast app where you're listening to this right now and rate and review this show. That is it. Doing that helps other people find. Consider this and it helps keep us going. Thank you. It's Consider this from npr. President Trump's executive order calls for, quote, shifting homeless individuals into long term institutional settings for humane treatment. The tool to do this, forcing people into treatment for addiction or mental illness is called civil commitment. Criminal critics say Trump's policy raises big concerns about civil liberties and cost. But civil commitment is gaining traction with some Democratic leaders. Brian Mann dug into it.
B
I meet David on a busy corner in downtown Portland, Oregon. He's 35, living on the streets, carrying his belongings in garbage bags. He seems disoriented, and when I ask about his situation, he says he's afraid of the government. They put me in a concentration camp. They put me in a concentration camp here, he says. David gives NPR permission to use his full name and says he doesn't use drugs or experience mental illness. But because David seems to be struggling and at times confused, we're identifying him only by his first name. I ask if he's getting any kind of help, and David shakes his head. He tells me he fears being abducted. Well, they're human trafficking him through the drug addiction and treatment. It's no good. David isn't threatening or frightening, but this kind of encounter with vulnerable homeless people, many mentally ill or addicted to drugs like fentanyl, is common in the US People here in Portland's downtown tell me they want this problem solved. Logan Whelan runs a barbershop. I'm gay, very much a liberal Democrat, but compassion fatigue is a big thing. Whelan says public safety has improved a lot here since the darkest days of the COVID pandemic, when tent encampments were more widespread. But he still deals with homeless people daily, often passed out on sidewalks or using drugs openly. You just blew fentanyl smoke in my face. Like, you know, like, I'm, like, I'm tired of it. I don't want to walk in the street. I want to walk on the sidewalk. I've come to Portland in part because this is one of the cities President Trump singled out as a hotspot for homelessness, drug use and crime problems he promises to eradicate quickly. When Trump declared a crime emergency last month in Washington, D.C. he he described Americans living on the streets as a threat, drugged out maniacs and homeless people. And we're not going to let it happen anymore. We're not going to take it. Trump said he wants homeless camps purged nationwide. One part of his plan, laid out in an executive order, urges state and local governments to expand use of a policy known as civil commitment. The idea is that judges should have broader authority to mandate care for homeless Americans diagnosed with mental illness and addiction. Trump's executive orders has putting people in what he describes as long term institutional settings would help restore public order. That idea alarms many experts, including Morgan Godvin. We are talking about using a sledgehammer, removing people's freedom in total institutions, in facilities which don't even exist. We don't even have the capacity for that. Godvin is a drug policy researcher who spent years addicted to heroin on the streets here in Portland. She was pressured by a drug court to accept addiction treatment against her will, a process similar to civil commitment, and says that experience actually slowed her recovery, making her more fearful of care providers, more resistant to public health services. Like many experts interviewed by npr, Godvin thinks civil commitment is a valid tool, but only in rare cases when homeless people pose an immediate danger to themselves or others. She thinks the best answer for most homeless people is affordable housing and affordable voluntary health care. Why don't we start with the cheapest and most available thing first? Why are we going to the most expensive, most disruptive, and the thing that is most concerning for people's civil liberties? But despite concern over personal freedoms and cost, Trump isn't alone pushing for wider use of civil commitment. This is the other big reason I've come to Portland. Oregon is one of a growing number of blue states governed by Democrats, including California and New York, that are already making it easier to force people off the streets into medical care. Oregon Democratic State Representative Jason Krupp says he embraced this idea after a lot of soul searching. How do you balance helping people in crisis who aren't able to help themselves with not abusing that ability to over into institutionalize people. Krupp says the law he sponsored, which was enacted last month, means a more modest expansion of civil commitment than envisioned by Trump. For one thing, the Oregon measure actually discourages long term institutionalization. He thinks Oregon found the right balance between personal freedom and public safety. I asked Krupp about the other issue, the price tag, and he agrees that's a big concern. It's the question everybody should be asking if we're gonna change the standard, do we have the ability to execute on that standard and make sure people get the services they need? Oregon is already investing an additional 65 million taxpayer dollars in new residential facilities. But Emily Cooper, with a group called Disability Rights Oregon, says costs could spiral out of control. It cost $321,000 to commit one person at the state hospital for six months. Cooper says Oregon's health care system is already straining to help people who seek care for addiction and mental illness. She is skeptical lawmakers will spend enough money as more people are taken off the streets. There's nowhere to put individuals. There's literally not the bed capacity in Oregon, and then the cost to build it would be astronomical. Many experts on homelessness and public health told NPR this question cost needs to be answered before Trump's executive order is implemented. A spokesperson for the White House declined to be interviewed on tape. But speaking on background, they said institutionalization of homeless people can be expanded by state and local governments without a big new taxpayer investment. They said that could be achieved by shifting dollars, including federal grants from other programs, and spending money more efficiently. But Dr. Kenneth Minkoff, a national expert on civil commitment and institutional care, disagrees. Moving resources from things that some people think don't work. It sounds like a good sound bite, but we need more resources as it is. Remember, the federal government says there are more than a quarter million people living on US streets on any given day. Minkoff and others say caring for even a small fraction of that population in institutional settings would be expensive if done right. Meanwhile, Republicans have actually cut funding for Medicaid. That's the government insurance program that funds most addiction and mental health care in the U.S. again, Kenneth Minkoff, what we don't want is simply to look at these folks as they're annoying. They're on the street. Let's just lock them up and put them somewhere where nobody can ever see them again. That's not okay. Here in Oregon, it's too soon to know how many more homeless people will be forced into care because of the new state law. And how much that will cost. Back on the street in Portland, two people huddle in a doorway next to Logan Whelan's barbershop. They're getting high. I ask Whelan if he's impatient enough for a fix to this problem to want homeless people swept off the streets? Hell no.
A
Because where do they go?
B
Where? Are they gonna put him in jail? No, that won't help at all. They need to stop cutting mental health funding. Homeless advocates say they'll be watching closely to see how expanded civil commitment policies are implemented here in Oregon and around the country. Will people get the help some desperately need, or will this push to clean up streets quickly force homeless Americans out of their communities and out of sight?
A
That was NPR's Brian Mann in Portland, Oregon. This episode was produced by Connor Donovan and Erica Ryan. It was edited by Andrea De Leon and Courtney Dorning. Our executive producer is Sammy Yanigan. It's Consider this from npr. I'm Juana Summers. Sources and Methods, the crown jewels of the intelligence community. Shorthand for how do we know what's real?
B
Who told us? If you have those answers, you're on the inside and NPR wants to bring you there. From the Pentagon to the State Department to spy agencies, listen to understand what's.
A
Really happening and what it means for you.
B
Sources and Methods, the new National Security Podcast from npr.
A
The Trump administration has canceled billions in federal research funding at major universities.
B
We feel like collateral damage.
A
They've also clamped down on visas for international students. Was the visa process hard? Oh, don't ask me about was off Trump's war on higher ed. Listen now to the Sunday story on the Up First Podcast from npr. Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks?
B
Amazon prime members can listen to Consider.
A
This sponsor free through Amazon Music, or.
B
You can also support NPR's vital journalism.
A
And get consider this plus@plus.NPR.org that's plus.NPR.org.
Podcast: Consider This from NPR
Date: September 23, 2025
Host: Juana Summers (NPR)
Reporter: Brian Mann
This episode of Consider This explores former President Donald Trump's executive order to remove homeless people from the streets—potentially via forced treatment and institutionalization—and the civil liberties concerns it raises. Through reportage from Portland, Oregon, a city central to this debate and a state already expanding civil commitment, NPR examines the history, political responses, public opinions, and practical obstacles to Trump's plan, placing it in the context of broader national debates about homelessness, mental health, and social policy.
The episode maintains an urgent yet balanced tone, weaving expert analysis, first-hand accounts from the street, and direct policy debate. It privileges the voices of those directly affected, policymakers, and advocates, moving between empathy for the suffering and critical scrutiny of proposed solutions.
This episode underscores the complexity—moral, practical, and financial—of balancing public order, civil rights, and humane care in the ongoing crisis of homelessness and mental illness in America.