DOGE work could 'cross extreme ethical and legal lines,' says former employee

Summary

Consider This from NPR: DOGE Work Could 'Cross Extreme Ethical and Legal Lines,' Says Former Employee

Release Date: February 27, 2025
Host: NPR

---

Introduction

In this compelling episode of NPR's Consider This, listeners are taken behind the scenes of a significant shift within the U.S. Digital Service (USDS) following a dramatic reorganization under the newly inaugurated President Trump. Titled "DOGE work could 'cross extreme ethical and legal lines,' says former employee," the episode delves into the controversial changes introduced by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), formerly the USDS, and the ethical concerns raised by its former staff.

---

Background: The U.S. Digital Service and Its Transformation

The U.S. Digital Service, established a decade ago, was renowned for its mission to enhance government systems through technology, employing hundreds of skilled professionals. DK (using initials to protect her identity) shared her transition from the private sector, expressing a strong desire to "dedicate myself to using my skills to help people and help the American."

However, on January 20, 2025, a pivotal change occurred when President Trump signed an executive order transforming the USDS into the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This rebranding marked the beginning of a sweeping overhaul of federal digital operations.

---

DOGE's Aggressive Reforms and Leadership

Elon Musk, appointed as DOGE's leader, initiated drastic measures aimed at reducing government expenditure. At DOGE’s inaugural press conference on January 20, Musk stated, “Billions and billions of dollars in waste, fraud and abuse,” highlighting the agency's mission to eliminate inefficiencies within federal departments.

A month into DOGE’s operations, Musk reflected on the organization’s accomplishments, emphasizing cost-saving initiatives and workforce reductions. During a cabinet meeting, he mentioned, “We won't be perfect, but when we make a mistake, we'll fix it very quickly” (01:24). Despite these assurances, the aggressive approach led to significant turmoil within the agency.

---

Mass Resignation of DOGE Staff

By Tuesday, DOGE had witnessed the resignation of 21 staff members, including DK, who were pivotal to its operations. These individuals were not merely employees; they were top-tier technologists who had left lucrative private sector positions to serve the public.

In an unsigned joint letter, the resigning staffers declared, “We will not use our skills as technologists to compromise core government systems, jeopardize American sensitive data or dismantle critical public services, they wrote” (02:06). This mass exodus was a direct response to DOGE’s methods and Musk’s leadership style, which the employees found ethically and legally questionable.

---

Ethical and Legal Concerns Raised by Former Employees

DK recounted the environment post-reorganization, highlighting the uncertainty and lack of clear leadership within DOGE. “On January 21, we were all required to attend 15-minute interviews with people who only identified themselves as Doge and their first names,” she explained (04:29). This lack of transparency fostered an atmosphere of isolation and confusion.

One of the critical issues raised was DOGE’s handling of sensitive data. DK pointed out, “Access to [Social Security Administration] data … makes all of that data and all of the American people's data very insecure” (05:48). The misuse and improper access to such data not only violated privacy standards but also posed significant risks of data breaches and unauthorized utilization.

Moreover, DK expressed severe apprehensions about DOGE’s potential for misusing government systems: “There is a high risk of the American people's data being exposed or being utilized for nefarious means” (08:46). These actions, she argued, were crossing ethical and legal boundaries, undermining the foundational principles of public service.

---

Reactions and Institutional Response

Elon Musk controversially responded to the resignations by suggesting that the staffers would have been terminated had they not chosen to resign. In contrast, White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt dismissed the resignations, advising the departing employees, “don’t let the door kick you on the way out” (02:06).

DK countered criticisms labeling the resigning employees as “disaffected Democrats,” asserting, “That is a gross mischaracterization of the United States Digital Service as a whole” (06:39). She emphasized the nonpartisan and constitutional commitment of USDS staff, distancing their actions from political motivations.

---

Personal Account and Decision to Resign

DK detailed her journey leading to resignation, citing specific incidents that shattered her trust in DOGE’s mission. The first tipping point was witnessing the abrupt termination of high-performing colleagues, which signaled instability and lack of respect for dedicated professionals. The second was the realization that DOGE’s activities were fundamentally misaligned with the original mission of the USDS.

She stated, “To do the most good for the most amount of people… I realized that my actions would, if I stayed, would just further legitimize DOGE and potentially cross extreme ethical and legal lines” (07:28). This moral dilemma compelled her to leave, prioritizing ethical integrity over remaining within a compromised system.

---

Conclusion

The episode underscores the tumultuous transition from the U.S. Digital Service to DOGE under President Trump's administration and Elon Musk’s leadership. The mass resignation of skilled technologists like DK reflects deep-seated ethical and legal concerns about DOGE’s direction and practices. As DOGE continues its efforts to overhaul federal digital operations, the episode highlights the critical importance of maintaining transparency, ethical standards, and respect for public service values within government initiatives.

---

Note: This summary is intended to provide an overview of the episode "DOGE work could 'cross extreme ethical and legal lines,' says former employee." For a more in-depth understanding, listening to the full episode is recommended.

Transcript

[Unnamed Former US Digital Service Employee]

I had been in the private sector for quite a while, actually for all my career previously, and I really wanted to dedicate myself to using my skills to help people and help the American.

[Unnamed NPR Reporter]

People that someone will identify. Using her first and middle initials, dk. We're not using her full name because she fears retaliation for speaking out.

[Unnamed Former US Digital Service Employee]

I worked on everything from how to implement AI in the government after the previous administration's executive orders. I worked on projects to help improve the benefit delivery system and improve the timeliness of benefit systems across the United States.

[Unnamed NPR Reporter]

This work was at the US Digital Service. It had been around for a decade and had hundreds of employees. On January 20, everything changed when the newly inaugurated President Trump signed an order changing the U.S. digital service to the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.

[Elon Musk]

And we're going to be signing a very important deal today. It's doge, and I'm going to ask Elon to tell you a little bit about it and some of the things that we found which are shocking. Billions and billions of dollars in waste, fraud and abuse.

[Unnamed NPR Reporter]

DOGE began its march through government agencies that very day. And one month later, its leader, Elon Musk, reflected on what they had accomplished so far.

[Unnamed DOGE Leader]

I actually just call myself a humble tech support here because this is.

[Unnamed NPR Reporter]

Musk spoke Wednesday at Trump's first cabinet meeting. He talked about his team's elimination of thousands of jobs in the name of saving taxpayers money.

[Unnamed DOGE Leader]

We won't be perfect, but when we make mistake, we'll fix it very quickly. So for example, with usaid, one of the things we accidentally canceled very briefly was Ebola. Ebola prevention. I think we all want Ebola prevention, so we restored the Ebola prevention immediately and there was no interruption. But we do need to move quickly if we are to achieve a trillion dollar deficit reduction in financial year 2026.

[Unnamed NPR Reporter]

DK's job wasn't one of the thousands eliminated, but on Tuesday, she was one of 21 Doge staffers who quit. Most had left high paying private sector jobs for public service. And in an unsigned joint letter of resignation from Doge, the engineers, data scientists and product managers wrote, we will not use our skills as technologists to compromise core government systems, jeopardize American sensitive data or dismantle critical public services, they wrote. We will not lend our expertise to carry out or legitimize doge's actions on the Platform X. Musk suggested that the staffers would have been fired had they not resigned. And White House press secretary Caroline Levitt responded to the mask resignation in a statement saying, quote, don't let the door kick you on the way out. As Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency work to remake the federal government, some of the people tasked with executing his vision have serious concerns about what the changes will do. From npr, I'm Ari Shapiro.

[Carvana Ad Voice]

This message comes from Carvana. Sell your car the convenient way, enter your license plate or vin, answer a few questions, and get a real offer in seconds. Go to Carvana.com today.

[Unnamed NPR Reporter]

It'S Consider this from NPR. There was a time when federal government work was shorthand for a safe and predictable job. Not anymore. Today, federal government employees face drama, uncertainty and conflict coming largely from the Department of Government Efficiency, or doge. President Trump and DOGE leader Elon Musk are trying to shrink the size and scope of the federal workforce. And on Tuesday, 21 Doge employees resigned in protest, writing, we swore to serve the American people and uphold our oath to the Constitution. Across presidential administrations, however, it has become clear that we can no longer honor those commitments at the United States DOGE Service. Well, our next guest is one of those people. DK told me everything changed the day after the inauguration.

[Unnamed Former US Digital Service Employee]

On January 21, we were all required to attend 15 minute interviews with people who only identified themselves as Doge and their first names. At that point, it was unclear if these were government employees or not. And after those interviews, we got the response of no comment on whether our projects should change. And so it was a time of extreme uncertainty, but we tried to stay focused on the projects and I know for me, try and just continue the work for as long as I could.

[Unnamed NPR Interviewer]

Was it clear to you who was in charge?

[Unnamed Former US Digital Service Employee]

No. It was completely uncertain. And U.S. digital Service, or the organization formerly known as such, tried many different avenues to get any clarity on who our bosses were, who we were reporting to, who we could even ask for a simple HR question. It left us very isolated.

[Unnamed NPR Interviewer]

So this resignation letter says people who arrived with DOGE fired technical experts, mishandled sensitive data, and broke critical systems.

[Unnamed NPR Reporter]

Can you give us an example of.

[Unnamed NPR Interviewer]

An instance you saw that happen?

[Unnamed Former US Digital Service Employee]

Yeah, there are quite a few. One of the big ones, and there has been information that has come out that is incorrect is in regards to the Social Security Administration, the access to that data. That data contains all the information on any person who has ever been eligible for Social Security. It doesn't mean that it's somebody who is actively receiving Social Security. And perhaps it could be somebody who passed away quite a long time ago. That data, not only is it being utilized incorrectly, but the access to it and the feeding it into other systems makes all of that data and all of the American people's data very insecure.

[Unnamed NPR Interviewer]

How would you respond to people who say, well, these are disaffected Democrats who are heading for the exits?

[Unnamed Former US Digital Service Employee]

I would say that is a gross mischaracterization of the United States Digital Service as a whole. While we were founded during the Obama administration, United States Digital Service still operated during the first Trump administration and was able to do good work during that time. We cover the gambit as far as our political leanings and part of being an EOP employee and the oath that we swear to the Constitution when we start is to operate in a nonpartisan, non political way. We are here to serve the American people. It is not a political issue.

[Unnamed NPR Interviewer]

You could have chosen to stay and try to work within the system.

[Unnamed NPR Reporter]

What was the tipping point that made.

[Unnamed NPR Interviewer]

You decide leaving was the best choice?

[Unnamed Former US Digital Service Employee]

The first real tipping point came when many of my colleagues were fired for seemingly no reason when they had been performing exceptionally at their jobs and were dedicated to serving this country and to help improve this country's governmental systems. The second tipping point came when it became clear that the former United States Digital Service would be asked to become more involved with doge's activities. And those activities are the antithesis of what United States Digital Service was founded upon and what the mission has been. To do the most good for the most amount of people, to go where the work is, and to hire and empower great people, which means supporting our agency partners and uplifting the federal servants. I realized that my actions would, if I stayed, would just further legitimize DOGE and potentially cross extreme ethical and legal lines.

[Unnamed NPR Reporter]

Cross ethical and legal lines?

[Unnamed NPR Interviewer]

How?

[Unnamed Former US Digital Service Employee]

Some of the activities that do DOGE has currently been focused on are gaining access to government systems that house the American people's data. And with that, it is unclear whether they are upholding privacy and security standards that are regularly practiced throughout the government before the new administration came in. There is a high risk of the American people's data being exposed or being utilized for nefarious means. And it also creates the opportunity for potential foreign actors to come in and get access to that data as well. That is completely across the line, both legally and ethically, and something I realized I could no longer do good from the inside and that I must leave.

[Unnamed NPR Interviewer]

DK was, until earlier this week, an employee at the Department of Government Efficiency. She, along with 20 of her colleagues, left Doge in protest. Thank you for speaking with us.

[Mia Venkat]

Thank you.

[Unnamed NPR Reporter]

This episode was produced by Mia Venkat it was edited by Natalie Winston, Ben Swayze, Courtney Dorning, and Nadia Lancy, with audio engineering by Ted Mebane. Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun. It's Consider this from npr. I'm Ari Shapiro.

[Mia Venkat]

It's Oscar season, and we watched the nominated movies, so you don't have to. We are making some bold predictions for Hollywood's biggest night, and we may help you win your Oscars pool. Listen to the Pop Culture Happy Hour podcast from npr.

[Unnamed NPR Sponsor Voice]

Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks? Amazon prime members can listen to Consider this sponsor free through Amazon Music. Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get consider this [e-mail] that's plus.NPR.org.