Loading summary
Scott Detrow
A lot of people who work in artificial intelligence are talking about February of
Connor Donovan
2020, because in February 2020, normal life was about to end. The COVID 19 pandemic response would shut down schools and businesses and travel. At that point, very few of us had an inkling of what was to come. But the crisis that would upend American society for years had really been underway for weeks.
Martha Gimble
Chinese health officials are trying to identify what's causing a pneumonia outbreak in a southern city.
Scott Detrow
NPR's Amy Chang reports.
Connor Donovan
And a lot of people, tech industry are saying that moment for Covid is this moment for generative AI. The world is shifting and we just don't fully appreciate or understand how much it's happening. They're excited, they're also worried.
Scott Detrow
Take a listen to Dario Amadei, CEO
Connor Donovan
of the AI company Anthropic, talking about his own company's product.
Scott Detrow
It's possible it'll all be okay, but I think that's, I think that's too sanguine an approach. I think we do need to be raising the alarm. That is.
Connor Donovan
From an interview with CNN, Amadei predicts AI may result in 10 to 20% unemployment soon. Like single digit years from now.
Scott Detrow
Soon.
Connor Donovan
Mustafa Suleiman was even more blunt in an interview with the Financial Times. He is the chief executive of Microsoft AI.
Mustafa Suleiman
I think that we're going to have a human level performance on most, if not all professional tasks. So white collar work where you're sitting down at a computer, either being a lawyer or an accountant or a project manager or a marketing person, most of those tasks will be fully automated by an AI within the next 12 to 18 months.
Scott Detrow
Consider this.
Connor Donovan
All of a sudden everybody is freaking out about AI job loss. We'll unpack whether and how you should be worried.
Scott Detrow
From npr, I'm Scott Detrow.
Mint Mobile Announcer
This message comes from Mint Mobile. This holiday season, stop overpaying for wireless and switch To Mint Shop 50% off unlimited plans@mintmobile.com Switch Limited Time Offer upfront payment of $45 for three months, $90 for six months or $180 for 12 months. Taxes and fees extra initial plan term only above 35 GB. Network may slow when busy. Capable device required. Availability speed varies. See mintmobile.com this message comes from Ollie Offering their daily women's multivitamin to help support your immune system, heart, bone, health and more. It's that easy. Just two gummies a day. Go to o l l y.com to learn more. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This Product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
This message comes from Mint mobile. Starting at $15 a month, make the switch@mintmobile.com Switch $45 upfront payment for 3 months 5 gigabyte plan equivalent to $15 a month Taxes and fees Extra first 3 months only. See terms.
Connor Donovan
It's consider this from NPR. AI CEOs talk a lot about the
Scott Detrow
potential of AI to cure diseases, generate
Connor Donovan
enormous wealth, solve some of humanity's most vexing problems. But as you heard earlier, they're also surprisingly direct in talking about the potential downsides. And a big one, one that we're all of the sudden hearing a lot more about is what it could mean for our jobs. It is easy to panic when you start reading about computers replacing humans. So we wanted some perspective from people who are watching AI's impact on the economy closely. I called up Kelsey Piper, a staff writer at the Argument, and Martha Gimble, executive director of the Yale Budget Lab, to get a sense of this AI moment and some possible AI futures. Let's start with that.
Scott Detrow
It feels like in the past few weeks this conversation about AI job loss has bubbled out of the tech world and into the mainstream. I mean, I for one have gotten like a half dozen texts from freaked out friends sending stuff around like, what's going on here, Martha?
Connor Donovan
Why do you think this is happening right now?
Martha Gimble
I think part of it is that there legitimately has been an acceleration in what the technology can do over just the last couple of months. I think there's also a broader issue which is that people are just incredibly anxious about the economy right now and where it's going. If you look at, you know, whether people think they're going to lose their job in six months relative to where the unemployment rate currently is, they're really negative. And then of course, when people are piling on saying that we aren't going to have any jobs in two years, that's not going to help.
Scott Detrow
That that does create some anxiety. Kelsey, you have been covering AI since, you know, since ChatGPT was a twinkle in Sam Altman's eye.
Connor Donovan
Can you explain to us some specific examples of what these models can do
Scott Detrow
now that they couldn't do a year ago? Six months ago?
Kelsey Piper
Yeah. So the biggest launch in the last six months has been the wide launch of agent models, which are, instead of just responding to you in a chat screen, they go out and do things. The biggest thing they do is code. They are really remarkably good at writing code. A year ago I was hearing from people. It's nice because you can, like, ask it some questions and it will speed up your coding. Six months ago I was hearing from people. It's kind of like having a grad student that you can ask to run some analyses for you. Now I'm hearing from programmers. I don't really write code anymore. I just write a spec and then the AI builds the code that I asked them to build.
Scott Detrow
So this is a specific thing that gets better and better and more and more autonomous. And that is a real trend that is happening.
Kelsey Piper
Very much so.
Scott Detrow
Okay. So, Martha, a lot of jobs are theoretically at risk, but I want to start by looking at what we actually know. Already you and your colleagues at the
Connor Donovan
Budget Lab have been looking at the actual data. What does it show so far, at
Scott Detrow
least about AI related job loss?
Martha Gimble
That there really isn't any. Certainly at the macroeconomic level, you can look at the technology and you can see the potential to. But you need to remember that technological related labor market disruption is not instantaneous. It happens in the context of IT policies, company concerns about liability, broader economic growth trends.
Kelsey Piper
And so I think it's really important
Martha Gimble
to keep all of those things in mind when talking about what jobs are going away, becoming more popular, and how fast this may happen.
Connor Donovan
That is what is happening now.
Scott Detrow
That is what has been happening over the past year.
Connor Donovan
That doesn't mean things couldn't change going forward.
Scott Detrow
And I know you and your colleagues
Connor Donovan
have compared this in many ways to the Industrial Revolution.
Scott Detrow
Why is that a good way to think about this?
Martha Gimble
I think the thing about the Industrial Revolution is you did see a really big shock to labor. I think sometimes you hear economists talk and we will say at the end of technological change, living standards are higher. We are always better off. I do want to emphasize the period of disruption can be really, really hard for people. I am very grateful that I have a job that is more highly paid and I have higher living standards than the weavers did. I also would not have wanted to be a weaver during that time period. You know, their lives became really, really hard. And I do think we need to think about is our social safety net prepared for the type of disruption that could possibly be coming.
Scott Detrow
And Kelsey, I know you spend a lot of time, you know, really optimistically thinking about worst case scenarios of AI.
Kelsey Piper
Yep.
Scott Detrow
Where does the Industrial Revolution type scenario fit there? Like, do you think that is the high end worst case scenario? Or how are you thinking about this right now when you think about what could happen over the next five to 10 years?
Kelsey Piper
Yes. So I think Martha is entirely right that we have not yet seen significant AI associated job loss. I think almost everybody who's worried about this, what they're doing is not so much, oh, I've already lost my job to AI. Most of what people are saying is, all right, imagine that we learned the new class of students entering the workforce in 2028 was going to be 10 million people, 100 million people, and all of them are willing to work for pennies. You know, maybe in the long run, the economy will end up being much wealthier because of this huge influx of productive labor. But as people who will be competing with that productive labor, we are not necessarily thrilled. So if you think that that's is going millions and millions of AI agents that will work basically for free, then I think people are completely right to be scared of that. You know, that will probably, in the absence of very decisive policy action, make your life worse.
Connor Donovan
Both of you are saying in different
Scott Detrow
ways, a lot of the outcome will depend on policies. Federal government policy, state government policy. Are you seeing those policies being carried out? Serious conversations in any way, shape or form right now?
Kelsey Piper
I think that right now the government is being caught very flat footed. But one thing that we saw with COVID was that if a shock does hit very suddenly and affect a huge share of the American public, Congress can move into action very fast. But that's not the only way this is guaranteed to happen. And if instead you have much more creeping job loss and disruptions, I think it's very easy to imagine Congress not getting their act together.
Scott Detrow
I want to end with this tsunami of Internet takes that started this conversation. A lot of them kind of ended with, here's what you can do as an individual. And I personally veer between like, okay, I need to learn a lot more about how these large language model programs work and incorporate into my job. Or I want to go entirely analog. I hate this all and I'm just going to get offline. Both of you think about this a lot more than most people. What is like one thing you would say to somebody in the job market right now, Martha?
Martha Gimble
I mean, one thing, frankly, I would say is to take some of the takes that are circulating out there with a grain of salt. People are not thinking enough about what are the barriers to get things established and going in companies, how long it takes for companies and workers to figure things out. There's also a question of what people want. I'm sure that at some point in the future someone could build maybe a robot that could raise my child. For me, I'm not having a robot raise my toddler. And I think that's a pretty common reaction. And so we have to see how consumers respond as well.
Scott Detrow
What about you, Kelsey?
Kelsey Piper
Yeah, I think it is worth keeping in mind that it is both true that AI is a really big deal. And at the same time, a lot of takes are hysterical. A lot of takes are selling you something. Anybody in particular who's like, you have only a few years to become a millionaire or you're like consigned to permanent poverty? I don't think that's true. Often when you into it, they're trying to convince you to gamble, which is one of those ways to, in fact, make sure you end up in poverty. There is certainly a ton of nonsense out there.
Scott Detrow
That is Kelsey Piper, staff writer for the Argument, and Martha Gimble, executive director and co founder of the Yale Budget Lab, two very smart human beings. Thank you so much to both of you for talking to us about this.
Martha Gimble
Thank you for having me.
Kelsey Piper
Yeah. Thanks so much.
Connor Donovan
This episode was produced by Connor Donovan. It was edited by Courtney Dorning.
Scott Detrow
Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun.
Connor Donovan
It's consider this from npr.
Scott Detrow
I'm Scott Detrow.
Mint Mobile Announcer
This message comes from Mint mobile. Starting at $15 a month, make the switch@mintmobile.com Switch $45 upfront payment for 3 months. 5 gigabyte plan equivalent to $15 a month. Taxes and fees Extra first 3 months
only Terms this message comes from ebay. The worst part about loving cars might just be buying them and all the parts from Toyotas to Aston Martins. Ebay has thousands of cars and the largest online selection of vehicle parts and accessories. Ebay things people love.
This message comes from Mint mobile. Starting at $15 a month, make the switch@mintmobile.com Switch $45 upfront payment for 3 months 5 gigabyte plan equivalent to $15 a month Taxes and fees Extra first 3 months only. See terms.
Date: February 23, 2026
Host: Scott Detrow
Guests:
This episode examines growing concerns about AI's impact on jobs, particularly white-collar professions. As industry leaders issue dire warnings about automation and mass unemployment, NPR's Scott Detrow speaks with economic and technology experts to explore what is really happening, how fast the AI job threat is approaching, and whether panic is warranted. The conversation also explores historical parallels, current labor data, and practical advice for individuals navigating the evolving employment landscape.
“It’s possible it’ll all be okay, but I think that’s too sanguine an approach. I think we do need to be raising the alarm.” (00:50)
“I think that we’re going to have human level performance on most, if not all, professional tasks ... most of those tasks will be fully automated by an AI within the next 12 to 18 months.” (01:14)
“All of a sudden, everybody is freaking out about AI job loss.” (01:39)
“There legitimately has been an acceleration in what the technology can do over just the last couple of months. … People are just incredibly anxious about the economy right now and where it’s going.” (04:08)
“The biggest launch in the last six months has been the wide launch of agent models... they go out and do things. The biggest thing they do is code. … Now I’m hearing from programmers: I don’t really write code anymore. I just write a spec, and then the AI builds the code that I asked them to build.” (04:58–05:37)
“[T]here really isn’t any... Certainly at the macroeconomic level, you can look at the technology and see the potential to. But you need to remember that technological related labor market disruption is not instantaneous.” (05:58)
“It’s really important to keep all of those things in mind when talking about what jobs are going away ... and how fast this may happen.” (06:20)
“You did see a really big shock to labor... I’m very grateful that I have a job that is more highly paid and I have higher living standards than the weavers did. I also would not have wanted to be a weaver during that time period.” (06:43)
“Most of what people are saying is, all right, imagine that we learned the new class of students entering the workforce in 2028 was going to be 10 million people, 100 million people... and all of them are willing to work for pennies. … If you think that that’s going to be millions and millions of AI agents that will work basically for free, then I think people are completely right to be scared of that.” (07:50)
“I think that right now the government is being caught very flat footed. But one thing that we saw with COVID was that if a shock does hit very suddenly … Congress can move into action very fast. … [But] if ... you have much more creeping job loss, I think it’s very easy to imagine Congress not getting their act together.” (09:02)
Martha Gimble:
“I would say is to take some of the takes that are circulating out there with a grain of salt. People are not thinking enough about what are the barriers to get things established and going in companies, how long it takes for companies and workers to figure things out. … I’m not having a robot raise my toddler. And I think that’s a pretty common reaction.” (09:56)
Kelsey Piper:
“It is worth keeping in mind that it is both true that AI is a really big deal. And at the same time, a lot of takes are hysterical. … Anybody ... who’s like, you have only a few years to become a millionaire or you’re ... consigned to permanent poverty? I don’t think that’s true. ... Often when you into it, they’re trying to convince you to gamble, which is one of those ways to, in fact, make sure you end up in poverty. There is certainly a ton of nonsense out there.” (10:34)