The push to reform a key surveillance law before it expires

Summary

Consider This from NPR

Episode: The push to reform a key surveillance law before it expires

Date: June 11, 2026
Host: Ailsa Chang
Featured Guests: Sen. Dick Durbin, Rep. Keith Self, Elizabeth Goytine (Brennan Center for Justice), Stuart Baker

Overview

This episode examines the looming expiration of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)—a law central to U.S. intelligence agencies' ability to intercept electronic communications of foreign nationals overseas. The discussion dives into the law's national security benefits, its controversial use for "backdoor" searches of Americans’ data without a warrant, the push for reforms to protect civil liberties, and the implications if the law lapses.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. What is FISA Section 702 and Why is it Controversial?

• Section 702 authorizes U.S. intelligence to surveil foreign nationals abroad to combat terrorism.
• Originated from a warrantless surveillance program run by the Bush administration post-9/11.
• The core concern: Americans' communications are sometimes swept up and accessed without a warrant, possibly violating constitutional rights.
  • Sen. Dick Durbin (00:40):

    “But there's a fatal flaw at the core of Section 702. This authority is also used for warrantless spying on innocent Americans.”

2. Bipartisan Concerns over Civil Liberties

• Lawmakers across party lines worry Section 702 enables abuse.
  • Rep. Keith Self (01:09):

    “The FBI has abused 702 and that's why we are here today. Let's get 702 reauthorized with constitutional protections.”

• Some intelligence community voices, like former NSA counsel Stuart Baker, object to new warrant requirements, arguing it would impede critical security work.
  • Stuart Baker (01:42):

    “We shouldn't make that mistake with something as important as things like terrorism or espionage.”

3. The Push for Reform

• Congress was close to reauthorizing Section 702 without reforms, but negotiations stalled.
• Elizabeth Goytine (Brennan Center): Details how data collection under 702 creates risk for citizens.
  • Elizabeth Goytine (04:06):

    “Congress was essentially trying to legalize an illegal warrantless wiretapping program ... over time, it has become a rich source of warrantless access to Americans' communications.”

• She notes the law covers vast surveillance: in 2025 alone, nearly 350,000 targets.

4. National Security vs. Privacy

• Supporters: 702 is vital—more than 60% of the president's daily intel originates from it.
• Critics (like Goytine): The main value is in foreign surveillance; there is scant proof that warrantless backdoor searches of Americans’ data are vital for national security.
  • Elizabeth Goytine (05:00):

    “What the government hasn't done is show that there's significant national security value to ... warrantless backdoor searches."

  • Notably, backdoor searches have included members of Congress, journalists, and tens of thousands of protesters.

5. The Proposed Solution: A Warrant Requirement

• Goytine advocates for a simple fix: require a warrant before accessing Americans' data in the FISA database.
  • “For more than a decade, there’s been broad bipartisan support ... requiring the government to get a warrant before accessing Americans' communications ... But in the current reauthorization cycle, Republican leadership isn’t allowing any votes on this reform.” (06:17)
• Counterargument: Requiring a warrant for each search would “break the system.”
  • Goytine disagrees:

    “In the handful of cases where backdoor searches provided value, the government could have gotten a warrant or used exceptions ... This reform should have absolutely no impact on the value of the program.” (07:00)

6. What Happens If Section 702 Expires?

• Misconception: All surveillance would immediately halt.
• Reality: The law's existing certifications remain valid until March 2027, so surveillance operations would continue under current authorizations even if the statute lapses.
  • Elizabeth Goytine (07:50):

    “The law is clear that these certifications remain in force even if the underlying statute expires ... Section 702 surveillance is locked in until March 2027, regardless of what happens tomorrow.”

---

Notable Quotes & Moments

• Sen. Dick Durbin (00:40):

  “This authority is also used for warrantless spying on innocent Americans.”

• Rep. Keith Self (01:09):

  “Let's get 702 reauthorized with constitutional protections.”

• Elizabeth Goytine (05:00):

  “In recent years, FBI agents have conducted searches for the communications of members of Congress, ... journalists ... more than 19,000 congressional campaign donors, and tens of thousands of protesters...”

• Elizabeth Goytine (06:17):

  “For more than a decade, there’s been broad bipartisan support for reforming section 702 by requiring the government to get a warrant before accessing Americans' communications ... Republican leadership isn’t allowing any votes on this reform.”

---

Important Timestamps

• 00:00 – 01:21: Introduction of Section 702, origins, and bipartisan concerns
• 01:42 – 02:01: Stuart Baker’s national security rationale
• 03:27 – 04:40: Background on surveillance scope and legal critique by Elizabeth Goytine
• 04:45 – 05:58: Debate: security value vs. privacy rights
• 06:17 – 07:36: Proposed reforms; arguments for/against warrant requirement
• 07:36 – 08:17: What happens if Section 702 lapses; actual vs. perceived impact

---

Conclusion

The episode provides a concise, multi-perspective analysis of Section 702’s renewal debate, exploring the tension between national security needs and constitutional protections for Americans. The main proposal for reform is a bipartisan-backed warrant requirement to close current privacy loopholes—though legislative gridlock persists. If the law temporarily expires, most surveillance will continue until at least 2027, despite political rhetoric suggesting otherwise.

Transcript

[Ailsa Chang]

It's consider this where every day we go deep on one big news story today, the controversial surveillance law that is due to expire after this week. It has a complicated name, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance act, or FISA, but it is keyed to counterterrorism work. It authorizes U.S. intelligence agencies to intercept the electronic communications of foreign nationals outside

[Dick Durbin]

the US section 702 grew out of a secret warrantless surveillance program conducted by the Bush administration after 9 11.

[Ailsa Chang]

That is Democratic Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois.

[Dick Durbin]

But there's a fatal flaw at the core of Section 702. This authority is also used for warrantless spying on innocent Americans.

[Ailsa Chang]

Durbin's criticism, and by the way it's shared by some Republicans as well, is that foreigners talk to Americans. And that creates a potential loophole for government intelligence agencies to comb through that data and surveil the communications of US citizens without a warrant.

[Keith Self]

The FBI has abused 702 and that's why we are here today. Let's get 702 reauthorized with constitutional protections.

[Ailsa Chang]

And that is Republican Congressman Keith Self of Texas. Now, some in or close to the intelligence community say that requiring a warrant to access Americans data does not make sense in this case. Here's the late Stuart Baker, who used to be general counsel at the National Security Agency, testifying to Congress in January.

[Stuart Baker]

All of the things that we care about for intelligence purposes are also violations of our criminal law. By saying, oh, you need a separate warrant if you've got a separate interest in getting access to information we already collected for intelligence purposes, we shouldn't make that mistake with something as important as things like terrorism or espionage.

[Ailsa Chang]

Congress appeared to be moving towards a deal to reauthorize FISA Section 702 without reforms, but stalled over concerns about President Trump's pick for acting director of National Intelligence. And Congress knows the law is set to lapse after Friday. Consider this how could this crucial intelligence law be amended to address potential privacy violations under the Constitution? And what happens if the law just expires? From npr, I'm Ailsa Chang.

[NPR Sponsor Announcer]

This message comes from NPR sponsor Carvana. You your time is worth more than a waiting game. Carvana gives you a transparent offer for your car in minutes and picks it up from your door. Sell your car [e-mail] pickup fees may apply.

[Keith Self]

The world is a lot, but hearing the right song at the right time can make it all better. This week in the NPR Music podcast, listeners tell us about the songs that help them hit reset songs that lift them up, change their outlook, or even give their whole life a new direction. Listen on All Songs Considered in the NPR music podcast.

[Ailsa Chang]

It's consider this from NPR. Under the authority of FISA Section 702, nearly 350,000 foreign nationals were targeted for surveillance in 2025. That's according to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. That is a lot of intercepted emails, texts and phone calls, some of them with US Citizens. Legal advocates like Elizabeth Goytine of the Brennan center for justice worry that collecting all that data makes it very easy for government agencies to violate the law and lets them access the communications of Americans who are not suspected of any wrongdoing.

[Elizabeth Goytine]

Congress was essentially trying to legalize an illegal warrantless wiretapping program that was conducted by the bush administration after 9 11. So Congress changed the law in 2008 to make it easier to spy on suspected terrorists, foreign terrorists overseas. However, over time, it has become a rich source of warrantless access to Americans communications. And that's why the law is so controversial today.

[Ailsa Chang]

Okay, and we will get to your

[NPR Host/Interviewer]

critique of the law.

[Ailsa Chang]

But the government says section 702 is really important.

[NPR Host/Interviewer]

It helps them gather the intel that makes up something like more than 60%

[Ailsa Chang]

of the president's daily intelligence briefing. So they say section 702 is a

[NPR Host/Interviewer]

vital tool for national security.

[Ailsa Chang]

Is there at least some merit to that claim?

[Elizabeth Goytine]

Sure. The government has actually provided many examples of cases in which actually targeting foreigners and reviewing their communications provided significant national security value. What the government hasn't done is show that there's significant national security value to the practice of warrantless backdoor searches. And that's the practice where agencies search through the communications that they obtain under section 702 for the purpose of finding Americans phone calls and text messages and emails. In recent years, FBI agents have conducted search searches for the communications of members of Congress, multiple US government officials, journalists and political commentators, more than 19,000 congressional campaign donors, and tens of thousands of protesters from across the political spectrum.

[NPR Host/Interviewer]

Okay, so how would you best balance between national security and Privacy? Like, if Section 702 does do important national security work, how do you give Americans protections for their data without potentially impeding that national security work? Like, how would you reform 702? Exactly.

[Elizabeth Goytine]

It's quite simple. For more than a decade, there's been broad bipartisan support for reforming section 702 by requiring the government to get a warrant before accessing Americans communications that are swept up. This reform has actually passed the House twice. But in the current reauthorization cycle, Republican leadership isn't allowing any votes on this reform.

[NPR Host/Interviewer]

Okay, well, on this idea of a warrant, each and every time I could see an intelligence official saying, man, if I need to go get a warrant, if I need to go to court for every search of the FISA database, that would basically break the system, rendering

[Ailsa Chang]

this whole law useless.

[NPR Host/Interviewer]

What is your response to that?

[Elizabeth Goytine]

The value of section 702 overwhelmingly is in collecting and reviewing foreigners communications. So that value continues. It is not affected. And in all of the cases where backdoor searches have actually provided value in the past, and that is just a handful of cases that the government's been able to identify, it appears that the government actually could have gotten a warrant or would have been able to invoke one of the exceptions to the warrant requirement. So this reform should have absolutely no impact on the value of the program.

[NPR Host/Interviewer]

So as we mentioned, there is this reauthorization deadline on Friday, tomorrow. What happens if Congress does not act by the deadline? Like does the surveillance under section 702 just go dark?

[Elizabeth Goytine]

The surveillance does not go dark if the law expires. As some of the members who oppose reform are saying, the law is clear that these certifications remain in force even if the underlying statute expires their grandfathers. The current set of certifications was approved by the FISA court in March of this year. That means Section 702 surveillance is locked in until March 2027, regardless of what happens tomorrow.

[NPR Host/Interviewer]

Elizabeth Goytin, senior director at the Brennan Center's Liberty and National Security Program, thank you very much.

[Elizabeth Goytine]

It was my pleasure.

[Ailsa Chang]

This episode was produced by Vincent Akivino with audio engineering by Ted Mebane. It was edited by Patrick Jaran Watanan. Special thanks to NPR congressional reporter Eric McDaniel. Our interim executive producer is Courtney Dorning. It's consider this from NPR. I'm Ailsa Chang.

[NPR Health Segment Announcer]

Millions of people in the U.S. get their flu shot each year. But a new scientific innovation could turn that routine into a one shot stop a universal flu vaccine which would protect

[Dick Durbin]

not only against seasonal influenza, but also

[Ailsa Chang]

will prevent pandemic influenza.

[NPR Health Segment Announcer]

Learn about the revolution in fighting the flu on shortwave. Listen in the NPR app or wherever you get your podcasts.