Transcript
A (0:03)
Hey everybody, this is a bonus episode called Anti Fascist Autistic Christianity. Simone Weil. It's part two, Part one dropped on Saturday on the main feed. I'm Matthew Remsky. This is Conspirituality. On this podcast we investigate the intersections of conspiracy theories and spiritual influence to uncover cults, pseudoscience and authoritarian extremism. You, you can follow myself, Derek and Julian on bluesky. The podcast is on Instagram and threads. And please support our Patreon. Unless of course you're hearing this on Patreon, in which case, thank you so much. We really couldn't do this work without your support. So this is the second of a two part series I'm doing on Simone Veil. And along with the episodes on Dietrich Bonhoeffer, it all fits into the Anti Fascist Woodshed series where I collect a bunch of useful stories and resources for this very shitty time. Okay, brief recap. In part one, I suggested that Simon Weil was a spiritual auntie to Greta Thunberg as I framed their life and work through the lens of autism, anti fascism and resistance to capitalist norms. Now, Thunbere doesn't echo Ve's overt obsession with religion, although Thunbere is openly enraptured by the more than human world, just as we was. Both show uncompromising honesty and intolerance to contradiction. These are traits that are often linked with autistic perception. Thunberg's journey from burnout and masking to climate justice advocacy mirrors Ve's lifelong refusal to paper over suffering, whether it's by refusing sugar and solidarity with soldiers at the age of five, finding solidarity with workers on farms, or with workers on the Renault assembly line, or fighting with anarchists against Spanish fascists. Veille's life was marked by physical challenges, relentless activism and a disgust for hypocrisy, whether it was shown by fascists, by communists who couldn't admit their own inner fascistic tendencies or their own countrymen. In France, Vey joined the resistance, proposed radical solidarity plans, and embodied anti fascism through constant personal sacrifice. Now, their writings, posthumously published, were not a professional project. I went into that in great detail in part one. These were hypergraphic notebooks that she left behind through which she processed the overstimulation of life as she simply survived. Now central to their thought is attention as a form of generosity, the priority of obligations over rights, and the term that she coined de creation, which is a kind of stripping down of ego to make space for the other. They emphasized rootedness as a human need, but carefully distinguished it from fascist nationalism, and they warned that capitalism's uprooting drives despair and authoritarianism right from the jump. Here I want to reiterate and elaborate a little bit on what I believe is Vey's strongest contribution to anti fascism, at least in terms of their writing. This is their deceptively simple definition of love, which I only really understood after reading this great book called the Communism of Love An Inquiry into the Poverty of Exchange Value by Richard Gilman Opalsky. So that book is in the notes. Here's the definition. Belief in the existence of other human beings as such is love. Gilman Opalski unpacks this to say that love is not merely recognizing other human beings, but that it demands belief in them as they really are. And this means rejecting the imaginary beings produced by projection or longing. In fact, they says that loving an imaginary being in the place of an actual being is more terrible than death.
