
Loading summary
Matthew Remsky
Hello everyone. Welcome to Conspirituality, where we investigate the intersection of conspiracy theories and spiritual influence to uncover cults, pseudoscience and authoritarian extremism. I'm Matthew Remsky. We are on Instagram and threads conspiritualitypod and you can access all of our episodes ad free, plus our Monday bonus episodes, of which this is one on Patreon or just our bonus episodes via Apple Subscriptions subscription. So this bonus episode is a continuation of the anti fascist Woodshed series and it's also part two of Beyond Violence and Nonviolence with Muay Thai professional and street rebellion scholar Ben Case, who joined me this past Saturday to break the spine on this whole mess of defining violence versus nonviolence both in the public sphere and and in the academic literature. So today we're going to go back into that scholarship to examine how Gandhi's idea of satyagraha became a secularized yet still spiritual demand. That we imagine resisting colonialism and fascism as a technocratic exercise devoid of emotion, devoid of political passion, and devoid of the volatility of one action leading to another, will track the career of Gene Sharp, the patron saint of strategic nonviolence, through to the rock star academic status of Erica Chenoweth, who, along with Maria Steffen, claimed to have empirically validated Sharpe's instinct that only nonviolence, though he poorly defined it, could work. They didn't actually validate it. But now there's a whole civil resistance industry out there that thinks that they did. And more than that, we'll look at the sources of institutional funding for this work and its ties to US Foreign and domestic policy interests. Benjamin Case is a retired professional Muay Thai fighter, an organizer, educator and writer. He's a researcher at the center for Work and Democracy and a fellow at the Resistance Studies Initiative. Case is based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Here's part part two of our conversation, Beyond Violence and Nonviolence. Ben Case, welcome back to Conspirituality podcast.
Ben Case
Thanks. Happy to be back.
Matthew Remsky
Okay, so we know from last time that Gandhian non violence has been a core influence in liberal and liberal left thought for about 75 years now. In its spirituality mode. It was very influential in certain civil rights circles and anti Vietnam protest movements. But at a certain point there was a movement to make the metaphysical principle, the spiritual principle of satyagraha empirical and to kind of divorce it from its metaphysical commitments and show that it was superior strategically to any other form of resistance. And there's one main guy at the center of all of that. So I want to just start with you giving us a 101 on Gene Sharp.
Ben Case
Okay? So Gene Sharp is the sort of, you might think of as the father of modern nonviolence. And he got his start as a Gandhi scholar. He wrote a biography of Gandhi and he wrote a very influential three volume work called the Politics of Nonviolent Action, which came out of his dissertation in political theory at Oxford. And the sort of main intervention that is important to know about Sharp is that he's distinguishing via studying Gandhi, which we talked about a little bit last time, right? He's sort of distinguishing between the nonviolent spirituality or principle aspect of Gandhi and the nonviolent strategy of Gandhi. And so he's saying, let's leave aside for the moment the belief that nonviolence is a more righteous way to be in the world, can make you a better person. Let's leave all that aside for the moment and let's actually just look at how Gandhi mobilized nonviolent action to, to create leverage against the British military. And so that's really his most important intervention. And so he takes from that, that, okay, well, if Gandhi could overthrow British occupation using nonviolent struggle, we should be able to formulate a theory of nonviolent action that can allow us to do that elsewhere. And so he comes up with this again, this theory that he publishes in this book and elsewhere. And the sort of main idea here is that, you know, political authority is ultimately reliant on people's willingness to go along with being ruled. Right? It relies on the consent of the governed. Right. And this is not something that is like unique to Sharpe. A lot of people have realized this, but it's important and Sharpe articulates it in a particularly kind of simple and accessible way. You've been listening to a conspirituality bonus episode sample. To continue listening, please head over to patreon.com conspirituality where you can access all of our main feed episodes ad free, as well as four years of bonus content that we've been producing. You can also subscribe to our bonus episodes via Apple subscriptions. As independent media creators, we really appreciate your support.
Advertisement Voice
You just realized your business needed to hire someone yesterday. How can you find amazing candidates Fast? Easy. Just use Indeed. Stop struggling to get your job post seen on other job sites with Indeed sponsored Jobs. Your post jumps to the top of the page for your relevant candidates so you can reach the people you want faster. According to Indeed data, sponsored jobs posted directly on Indeed have 45% more applications than non sponsored jobs. Don't wait any longer. Speed up your hiring right now with Indeed and listeners of this show will get a $75 sponsored job credit. To get your jobs more visibility@ Indeed.com Arts, just go to Indeed.com Arts right now and support our show by saying you heard about Indeed on this podcast. Terms and conditions apply. Hiring Indeed is all you need.
Conspirituality Podcast: Bonus Sample – Beyond Violence and Nonviolence (Part 2) Summary
Release Date: May 19, 2025
Hosts: Derek Beres, Matthew Remski, Julian Walker
Guests: Benjamin Case
In this bonus episode of Conspirituality, hosts Derek Beres, Matthew Remsky, and Julian Walker delve deeper into the complexities of nonviolence and its role within contemporary movements. This episode, titled "Beyond Violence and Nonviolence (Part 2)," continues the anti-fascist Woodshed series, featuring an insightful conversation with Benjamin Case, a retired professional Muay Thai fighter and street rebellion scholar.
Matthew Remsky introduces the episode by outlining the focus on Gandhi’s concept of satyagraha and its evolution into a secularized strategy detached from its original spiritual underpinnings.
Matthew Remsky [00:03]: "We are on Instagram and threads conspiritualitypod and you can access all of our episodes ad free..."
He sets the stage for analyzing how nonviolence has been reinterpreted in modern times, particularly emphasizing its application in resisting colonialism and fascism as a technocratic maneuver devoid of deeper emotional and political engagements.
Benjamin Case provides a foundational understanding of Gene Sharp's contributions to the theory of nonviolent action. He highlights Sharp's role in transforming Gandhi's spiritual philosophy into a strategic framework for political resistance.
Benjamin Case [03:13]: "Gene Sharp is the sort of, you might think of as the father of modern nonviolence... he distinguishes between the nonviolent spirituality or principle aspect of Gandhi and the nonviolent strategy of Gandhi."
Case explains that Sharp's primary innovation was separating the ethical and spiritual motivations of nonviolence from its practical application as a tool for political change. This distinction allows nonviolent resistance to be framed as a strategic option rather than a moral imperative.
The discussion progresses to how Gene Sharp modeled his theories on Gandhi’s efforts to overthrow British colonial rule in India without resorting to violence. Sharp's work, especially his three-volume series "The Politics of Nonviolent Action," is portrayed as pivotal in shaping modern civil resistance movements.
Benjamin Case [03:13]: "...if Gandhi could overthrow British occupation using nonviolent struggle, we should be able to formulate a theory of nonviolent action that can allow us to do that elsewhere."
Case emphasizes that Sharp's core idea revolves around the notion that political authority depends on the consent of the governed, a principle not unique to Sharp but articulated in a particularly accessible manner through his work.
The conversation transitions to the influence of scholars like Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan, who attempted to empirically validate Sharp's theories. While their work was intended to support the efficacy of nonviolence, Case argues that their conclusions have been misinterpreted and overextended within the civil resistance industry.
Benjamin Case [03:13]: "They didn't actually validate it. But now there's a whole civil resistance industry out there that thinks that they did."
Case critiques the institutional funding behind these theories, suggesting that both U.S. foreign and domestic policy interests have leveraged nonviolent strategies to further their agendas, often sidelining the original spiritual and ethical dimensions of movements like satyagraha.
As the episode progresses, the hosts and guests examine the broader implications of transforming spiritual movements into strategic, often technocratic frameworks. By distancing nonviolence from its emotional and spiritual roots, there is a risk of undermining the very passion and volatility that drive effective resistance movements.
The conversation calls for a critical reassessment of how nonviolence is conceptualized and applied in contemporary activism, urging listeners to recognize the nuanced interplay between spirituality, strategy, and political effectiveness.
Matthew Remsky [05:37]: [Advertisement begins, content skipped]
This episode of Conspirituality offers a thought-provoking analysis of nonviolence's evolution from a deeply spiritual practice to a strategic framework utilized in modern political movements. By engaging with scholars like Benjamin Case, the podcast challenges listeners to reconsider the foundations and implications of nonviolent resistance in today's socio-political landscape.