Transcript
A (0:01)
Reggie, I just sold my car online.
B (0:03)
Let's go, Grandpa. Wait, you did?
A (0:05)
Yep, On Carvana. Just put in the license plate, answered a few questions, got an offer in minutes. Easier than setting up that new digital picture frame.
B (0:13)
You don't say.
A (0:14)
Yeah, they're even picking it up tomorrow. Talk about fast.
B (0:17)
Wow.
A (0:18)
Way to go.
B (0:19)
So, about that picture frame.
A (0:21)
Ah, forget about it. Until Carvana makes one, I'm not interested.
C (0:24)
Car selling made easy on Carvana. Pickup fees may apply. Shopping is hard. I can never find anything in my size.
B (0:35)
I don't even know my size.
C (0:36)
I buy my clothes the same place I buy my groceries.
B (0:39)
There's a better way. Make it easy with Stitch Fix. Just share your size, style, budget and done. Your personal stylist sends pieces picked just for you.
C (0:48)
That was easy.
B (0:51)
Stitch Fix online. Personal styling for everyone. Free shipping and returns. No subscription required. Get started today@stitchfix.com. Hello everyone. I'm Matthew Remsky. This is Conspirituality, where we investigate the roots and intersections of conspiracy theories and spiritual influence to uncover cults, pseudoscience and authoritarian extremism. You can follow myself, Derek and Julian on Blue sky, and the podcast is on Instagram and threads under its own handle, conspiritualitypod. You can. You can also support our Patreon and you can also find me personally on YouTube and TikTok. NTIFascistdad. So I've long been of the opinion that if there's a conspirituality zeitgeist out there, there must be a pro spirituality tendency as well. If there are religious communities and leaders who justify the status quo and accelerate fascism through fantasy and spiritual bypassing, there will be a response to that. So my understanding of religion is dialectical in that way. It's a space of material struggle expressed in metaphysical terms where one movement is always being responded to by another. So today I'm going to speedrun through three positive religion stories from 2025 that I predict will continue to respond to the rise of global fascism, as well as as threats to labor from AI and climate disaster. I'm combining a number of enormous hyper object themes here because as old William James put it, religion is a person's total reaction upon life. Part 1 Judaism within days of the October 7 attack, Israeli leaders, media and influencers mobilized religious texts and apocalyptic rhetoric to justify military revenge in Gaza. Netanyahu invoked the biblical command to blot out Amalek, casting Hamas as a modern incarnation of an ancient enemy to rationalize total destruction. He framed the war as A metaphysical struggle between the sons of light and the sons of darkness. Chief Rabbi David Lau dedicated artillery shells with verses from Psalm 79 calling for sevenfold revenge for spilled blood. The very name of the operation Iron Swords mirrors language found in certain biblical translations, signaling a biblical war. To the Israeli public media, rabbis and military personnel also circulated the story of the massacre of Shechem by Jacob sons Simeon and Levi as revenge for what they believed was the rape of their sister Dinah. But we need some background on this to unpack the ironies. Jacob had settled with his family in an area around present day Nablus in the West Bank. So that's irony one, which was then ruled by a local prince named Shechem. Now. Now in one Genesis passage, it says that Shechem, enamored of Dinah, abducted her by force. But then other passengers talk of him clinging to her soul and loving her with tender speech. And so there's a feminist reading of this encounter as actually a consensual love affair across cultural boundaries, and that the claim of assault is used to justify the collective punishment that follows when. When Simeon and Levi concoct a ruse and tell Shechem and his men that he can marry their sister if they are all circumcised. And so they agree to that. But while they are recovering from the surgery, they are slaughtered by Simeon and Levi and their goons because they're obviously in a weakened state. So in Israel after October 7, the hasbara machine used this story to provide a biblical precedent for disproportionate revenge and deterrence. Soldiers inscribed graffiti on Gazan Edit. Soldiers inscribed graffiti on Gazan walls, quoting the brothers justification for the massacre. Should he have treated our sister like a prostitute? Whole units incorporated religious imagery and described themselves as war anointed priests, while commanders said that their sacred work was akin to the deeds of Simeon and Levi. Now, the second irony here is that IDF soldiers and commanders identifying with Simeon and Levi verges on, you know, blaspheming the original story because Jacob rebukes his sons in Genesis 34:30 for exactly this behavior. And Jacob said to Simeon and Levi, ye have troubled me to make me to stink among the inhabitants of the land, among the Canaanites and the Perizzites, and I being few in number, they shall gather themselves together against me and slay me, and I shall be destroyed, I and my house. So in fact, the original story presents the actions of Simeon and Levi as a cautionary tale against committing genocide. So imagine that a one to one disconnection between the point of a story and its usage. And I personally think it's an example of a kind of movie mindset in which the spectacle of an action scene takes precedence over its moral valence. I think it's what we see today in the White House Social Feed with footage of the illegal attack on Caracas, running over the anti Vietnam rock anthem Fortunate Son by Credence Clearwater Revival. Now, in response to this absolute garbage, there has also been an upsurge of Jewish religious resistance to Likud's brand of violent ethnonationalism. Some of the strongest anti war language has come from US rabbis. Now, some are politically centrist in a kind of All Lives Matter mode, like Dania Rutenberg and Jill Jacobs, who tend to frame the violence as being a matter of mutual responsibility, and in so doing they avoid the language of settler colonialism. But then there are other American rabbis like Alyssa Weiss, who concentrate on the clear power differential. And also Brandt Rosen, who minces no words about the reality of forced starvation and other brutalities in Gaza, or while framing solidarity with Palestinians as a spiritual obligation. Wise and Rosen are clear with their use of the term genocide. But one of the most visible and poignant instances of public grappling with Jewish religious response to the actions of Israel comes from Peter Beinart's new book on being Jewish After Gaza. It's all the more extraordinary in my opinion, because of how much and how transparently his positions have changed over the decades. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, he was editor of the New Republic and all in on a confident post Cold war liberalism and US global hegemony. He backed the 2003 invasion of Iraq. But by the 2010s, Beinart had repudiated that position and was challenging US militarism and liberal exceptionalism while also emerging because it's all tied together as an influential internal critic of of mainstream American Zionism. And that too had a developmental arc. He initially identified as a liberal Zionist, arguing that the problem with the method of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories was that it was eroding democratic norms and moral legitimacy. But that position didn't survive his unusually open self reflection. So by the early 2000s he'd concluded that the two state solution was no longer viable and publicly endorsed a single democratic state with equal rights for Jews and Palestinians. And that brings us to his book, in which Beinar focuses on Jewish ethics and prophetic responsibility. And he argues that unconditional support for Israeli state power is incompatible with Jewish moral traditions. He tracks his own ideological shift in tandem with his evolving Jewish identity from a kind of, as he describes it, tribal familial solidarity to spotlighting aspects of Jewish theology that seek universal justice. And part of this education came through his family's residence in South Africa, where he saw that cultural and ethnic separatism was built on notions of supremacy. Part of it also came through examining, as Naomi Klein did in Doppelganger, the weaponization of what he calls virtuous victimhood, or the idea that the historical oppression of the Jewish people made the culture impervious to sin and incapable of irrational violence. One of Beinart's guiding lights has been the Russian born Yeshayahu Leibovitz, who lived from 1903-94, who immigrated to Israel in 1935 to become one of the nation's most formidable and controversial intellectuals. He's been dubbed by some as the conscience of Israel and as an Orthodox Jewish theologian and philosopher of science and a chemist and a moral critic of Jewish state power. His work resonates through to the present day, and it's very strong in Beinart's work now. Beinart's reflections on Leibovitz focus on his deconstructions of Jewish exceptionalism. Quote For Leibowitz, it was essential that being chosen by God did not make Jews better than anyone else. It meant they had a special set of obligations to follow the Torah's commands, not a special set of virtues. Finally, Beinart also leans into an ancient Jewish taboo. Jewish tradition has a term for investing supreme value in things other than God. It is avodah zara, commonly translated as idolatry. It was considered idolatrous to worship a Jewish state, to elevate its value beyond that of the human beings under its control. Part 2 Islam.
