
Loading summary
A
Time to make a decision and take action. But we're not making that decision unilaterally. Right. We're still trying to work with our.
B
Co parent and will require a compromise, no doubt, I'm sure.
A
What suggestions do you have for us in taking this last step to, to get whatever compromise we can and then to figure out what action we're going to take?
B
I think in order to really compromise, you do have to know what your co parent wants and especially what they feel is not fair. Because I know we hear that all the time from people, but it's not fair that I don't get enough time with my children or, you know, that I have to do this or that. And so that also usually means that they feel disrespected in the situation. And so in what way are they feeling disrespected? Is that coming from something the court ordered or something I as the co parent are still doing to them that makes them feel less than in some way?
A
I know all of us are tempted at times to say they're an adult, they can deal with it. But that's not the most helpful way to think about it. Because what you're trying to do is to reach a resolution that's going to create some stability so you don't have to keep revisiting the same thing over and over again. And leaving one party feeling disrespected is just a recipe for disasters. It's a recipe for you to have to revisit the same scenario again and again.
B
Disrespect is there whether you're talking about co parents or gang members. The book we've both read about high conflict, there's a lot in there about gang members and how many people in a community have lost their lives because of disrespect going back and forth on, on either side of the fence. It's that same kind of thing. I think at the root of it, I think you can probably quote the Nelson Mandela quote about humiliation.
A
There's no person more dangerous than a person who's been humiliated, even if they were rightfully humiliated, even if you're right.
B
When you're trying to make a compromise here or find a resolution, even if your side is right, right, at what cost are you and have you disrespected or humiliated your co parent in the process? And that's the part they're going to remember.
A
They may give in on this one because of tactical considerations, but if you haven't addressed the root issue, it's just going to creep back up or even.
B
If they think you're right, which they might, are they ever going to let you know that if you humiliated them.
A
In some way and if you give them ground to save face, yes, then you're much more likely to get what it is that you're looking for and let them feel as if they've maintained.
B
Their self respect so much better to address the concern, the feeling, validate that I can understand where this just would not feel fair and I'd like to try such and such to help it be more fair to you, but especially to our child.
A
And a lot of times what you'll get, especially if you say that to a guy, a lot of times what a guy will say to that is yeah, you're right, but it's okay and we can figure it out. Like just acknowledging that you recognize that it's not fair. Women have a tendency to do this when they're really mad. They know where to getcha, they get you in the get in place. And that get in place is your sense of being a man of self esteem and self respect. And they just know how to get at your sense of self worth so quickly. And men do for women as well. And that's just one of the more cool things that we do to each other.
B
And at the bottom of the fairness bucket, it seems like there's always this I have to give something up that's really important to me and maybe it is just the baseline of my respect for myself and your respect for me and the court's respect for me or that kind of thing. But I think if you can suggest a compromise that means that you don't have to give up something that is just really a line in the sand for you and your co parent doesn't have to. But more often, more than anything, what keeps your child from having to give up as little as possible. And there are so many times, especially, I don't know, I'm more struck by this at the holiday season when the child is giving up important family time with extended family on either side because there's an arbitrary rule about where they're supposed to be, when and one side or maybe both of the family don't even get together at that particular arbitrary time. And of all things, a child ought to be able to be at both sides and both sides of the family would adore having the child there and getting to see them. It might be the only time a year they get to see them.
A
Right.
B
And those kinds of things are so important to me when, when There is some illness or a death or family rituals of some sort that the child should be a part of. It just hurts my heart for the child that they are not allowed to be there because it's not that parent's time.
A
That's exactly right. And talking about how to reach these compromises. I do a lot of mediation as the mediator and also with my clients going to mediation. And what I tell my clients getting prepared for mediation is I ask them to prepare for me. Three lists. The first list is everything that they would get if they got everything they wanted. What does their 100% perfect outcome look like? The second list is the things that they could live with. They wouldn't be happy about it. They might be mad at me, call me some names under their breath, but they would walk away and make a deal that day if they could get those things. And then the third list is a list of items, any one of which would be a deal breaker. If that's in the deal, there is no deal. And that helps crystallize for people.
B
Sure.
A
What matters and what really works is making your list of deal breakers.
B
Right.
A
Because once you've identified those deal breakers, and I know them, then they're confident that I'm going to talk with them and remind them that it was a deal breaker to them. And if it's not on that list, it's not something to throw the mediation over.
B
Plus, if you're going back and forth between the two rooms where they are, which is usually the way mediation's done around here, before you even go into that other room, what's the deal breaker? And if somebody proposes that in the other room, you know better than to take that information back to the other.
A
Right. Or try to, or see what you have authority to say and work on. And even when you've made that list of deal breakers, sometimes just getting it out on a piece of paper as a deal breaker and then sleeping on it makes you realize it wasn't a deal breaker. Oh, so just putting it out there and understanding it. And then the other thing that I do is I tried to help my clients quantify the actual cost of the litigation in hours of their labor. Because I tend to know how much they make. And if I can say, hey, this is going to cost you 100, 200, 300 hours of your work before taxes, if we take this to trial, are you willing to spend $20,000 to get this thing? And if you wouldn't put $20,000 today on the table to get this thing, then let's not go to trial over it because that's what it's going to cost you. And so taking. And the reason I'm bringing this up is if you're a co parent trying on your own to work with the co parent and reach a compromise position, ask yourself how many hours would I work at my job pre tax to be to win this point? And it may start to seem a lot less important to you.
B
And I do hear a whole lot of people say that they're, they're not happy about having to do mediation before one of the court proceedings because they just want the judge to hear everything. And they really are not calculating how much that is going to cost them. So the judge can hear that.
A
And what they're saying is they want someone to tell me that I'm not crazy.
B
Right.
A
That I deserve to be heard even if they disagree with me. I just want the authority to have.
B
Heard my concerns and maybe respect them, the parent.
A
And so what if we can short circuit that?
B
Yes.
A
What if we can get an acknowledgment from the other party? That is a legitimate concern. And I do respect your position as the parent and I do happen to disagree and I am asking for this compromise.
B
Right.
A
But I'm validating your concerns.
B
Right.
A
In a real way, not just lip service. That could be really helpful.
B
And I think it's too very important that the outcome that you're both wanting needs to be what's in the child's best interest.
A
Right. Thank you for bringing that back. Because that's.
B
And so many times it's hard to even identify what the child's best interest is. And I think we've tried in calling it the, their safety, their security and their happiness and long term happiness, not just a short term something.
A
Their ability to make their full potential, to reach their full potential.
B
And I know sometimes it's hard to take yourself out of the way to really see what is best for the child.
A
And sometimes that honestly may not be what you want.
B
Right.
A
You want to take that trip or you want to do this or you want to do that. And it's perfectly okay as an individual to want those things, but that doesn't mean that it's what's best for your kid.
B
One of the main just across the board ways I see this all the time is there's an event, many different flavors that could come in. There's an event that the child is going to be a part of and maybe one of the parents has pushed it in terms of it's at their church or it's their choice of a sports team or something. But they're not happy that it's even that is happening. It's why does the child need the other side there? Why does the child need that other parent or some extended family there to observe the celebration or the event? And that just boggles my mind every time. Because the child deserves that and the child needs that and that is what makes the child the happiest.
A
And what we're saying there is to bring it all back around to your child's best interest is distinct from your own. Sometimes times, yes. And that's what you have to focus on when you're making a decision and taking an action.
B
Now, you might not be happy that child is running across the room to greet the other side as they got there, but be so happy that you provided, if it's your thing, that you provided a venue for that to happen and that you did include the other.
A
Side for that moment of happiness for your child.
B
You bet.
A
And for your child to see that you invited the other parent. How big is that? Yeah, exactly.
B
But then you dump cold water on it when you tell the child, I can't go over there and greet the other side.
A
And then as you're making this decision and you're taking action, just make sure that you really thought through these things from these different angles. Don't make rush, snap decisions. Always look for a compromise. Try to salvage the other party's self respect for them. Try not to humiliate them. Don't look for a victory over them. Look for something that you really need to do that is how you want to spend sort of your political capital with your co parent.
B
Right.
A
And if you're choosing litigation, make sure that you're quantifying how much it's going to be. And in my experience, if it's any real litigation that's going to have discovery and hearings and all of that witnesses being heard, it's no less than $10,000. It's probably closer to 20. It's got to be a pretty short list of things that you'd be willing to spend $20,000 on if you put these steps into place. Hopefully what you're going to find, and we're pretty confident that you will, is that you are going to be making better decisions for yourself. You're going to understand both yourself and your co parent a whole lot better. You can save yourself thousands and thousands of dollars in unnecessary litigation expenses and you can have a child whose life is free from a lot of really unnecessary conflict, which we know from personal experience and from all of the research is incredibly damaging to them.
B
Yes.
A
So hopefully you'll listen to this and go through it again if you need to. But this is a huge piece of making your life and your child's life just a whole lot better.
B
Thanks for listening. If you'd like to leave questions, comments or concerns, please email podcastoparentacademy.com and please remember to rate, review and subscribe to Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, or wherever you listen.
Hosts: Linda VanValkenburg & Ron Gore
Date: June 23, 2025
This episode explores the critical final step in co-parenting conflict: moving beyond disputes to find workable compromises that protect both parents' dignity and, above all, serve the child’s best interests. Linda and Ron dissect practical strategies around fair negotiation, the necessity of respect, and the high emotional and financial costs of unresolved conflict. The conversation is rich with empathy and concrete tools for parents navigating challenging situations.
Joint Decision-Making: Major parenting decisions should not be made unilaterally, even when a quick resolution is needed. Involving the co-parent, even when it’s difficult, leads to more stable agreements.
(00:00–00:12)
Understanding What Hurts: Effective compromise starts with understanding what the other parent feels is unfair or disrespectful. Emotional concerns, not just legal or logistical ones, are at the heart of most disputes.
(00:20–01:03)
“...you do have to know what your co parent wants and especially what they feel is not fair.”
—Linda (B) (00:20)
Value of Respect: Both personal dignity and mutual respect are emphasized as crucial for long-term resolution. Leaving a parent feeling disrespected almost guarantees ongoing conflict.
(01:03–02:56)
“Leaving one party feeling disrespected is just a recipe for disasters ... a recipe for you to have to revisit the same scenario again and again.”
—Ron (A) (01:03)
The Dangers of Humiliation: The hosts highlight how humiliation (even when unintended or justified) can make a person “dangerous” and less likely to cooperate, referencing both coparenting and high-conflict situations.
(02:03–02:44)
“There’s no person more dangerous than a person who’s been humiliated, even if they were rightfully humiliated, even if you’re right.”
—Ron (A) (02:03)
Face-Saving for Cooperation: When compromising, allowing the other parent to “save face” often leads to more durable and peaceful solutions.
(02:44–02:56)
Validation Works: Genuine acknowledgment of the other party’s feelings (“I can understand where this just would not feel fair”) often diffuses tension and opens up pathways to agreement.
(02:56–03:19)
Self-Esteem Dynamics: Both men and women in co-parenting situations have emotional triggers related to respect and self-worth, and conflicts often get personal fast.
(03:19–04:01)
Redefining Compromise: The most valuable outcome is one where the child sacrifices least, especially with family events and holidays. Arbitrary schedules can be detrimental to the child’s relationships.
(04:01–05:28)
“Of all things, a child ought to be able to be at both sides and both sides of the family would adore having the child there...”
—Linda (B) (04:43)
Notable Emotional Moments: Both hosts express sadness about children missing crucial family rituals due to rigid parenting time—reminding listeners that child well-being should eclipse parental convenience.
(05:28–05:50)
Three Lists for Mediation Preparation:
(05:50–07:01)
“The first list is everything that they would get if they got everything they wanted...the second list is things they could live with...the third list is deal breakers.”
—Ron (A) (05:50)
Quantifying the Cost of Conflict: Calculate what litigation will actually cost in terms of work hours and money. If you wouldn’t pay that now for a victory, it’s probably not worth fighting over.
(07:20–08:41)
“Ask yourself, how many hours would I work at my job pre tax to win this point? And it may start to seem a lot less important to you.”
—Ron (A) (08:23)
Craving Validation: Many parents go to court or mediation simply seeking to be heard and validated, not just to win.
(09:03–09:19)
“What they’re saying is they want someone to tell me that I’m not crazy.”
—Ron (A) (09:03)
Short-circuiting Court Battles: Acknowledgement and respect from a co-parent can satisfy this need without litigation.
(09:19–09:43)
Defining Best Interest: Safety, security, happiness (especially long-term), and enabling the child’s full potential should guide all decisions.
(09:55–10:26)
Putting the Child First: Recognizing that a parent’s wishes may not align with what’s best for the child. Key is separating personal desires from the child’s well-being.
(10:26–10:54)
“And sometimes that honestly may not be what you want.”
—Ron (A) (10:37)
Inclusive Celebrations: Both sides of the family, and both parents’ presence at milestones, are fundamental for the child’s happiness—regardless of which parent initiated the event.
(10:54–12:29)
Deliberate Decision-Making: Avoid snap judgments. Always prioritize compromise and mutual respect over “winning.”
(12:34–13:01)
Litigation as Last Resort: Realistically, litigation costs (often $10,000–$20,000) should only be invested in matters of extreme importance.
(13:02–14:01)
Bigger Picture: Fair, respectful compromises lead not only to financial and emotional savings but also to significant improvements in the child’s experience and development.
(14:01–End)
“You can save yourself thousands and thousands of dollars in unnecessary litigation expenses and you can have a child whose life is free from a lot of really unnecessary conflict, which...is incredibly damaging to them.”
—Ron (A) (13:46)
Linda and Ron’s conversation is a masterclass in mindful, respectful co-parenting. Their advice is grounded in empathy, practical strategy, and a relentless focus on the child’s well-being—making this episode essential for anyone navigating post-separation parenting.