Podcast Summary: "TRUMP IS A LAME DUCK NOW – AND THE (LATEST) OLIVIA NUZZI STORY"
Countdown with Keith Olbermann | iHeartPodcasts | November 20, 2025
Main Theme and Purpose
This episode centers on two headline topics:
- The sudden, dramatic weakening of Donald Trump's influence within the Republican Party and American politics, particularly following the "Epstein files" debacle and a wave of mainstream media labeling him a "lame duck."
- The unfolding media and personal drama surrounding journalist Olivia Nuzzi's new book excerpt, her past relationships with Olbermann and others, and the biting intra-media spectacle that has ensued.
Keith Olbermann delivers his signature sharp political analysis (with comedic jabs) and inserts himself directly into the Olivia Nuzzi affair, offering unique insight, context, and personal anecdotes while skewering Trump, media cliches, and competitors alike. The tone alternates between sardonic and confessional, with a clear through-line of media criticism and political commentary.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Donald Trump’s "Lame Duck" Era Begins
[02:36 – 19:20]
- Media & Political Shift:
Trump’s grip on the Republican Party and broader political narrative is described as drastically fractured post-Epstein vote. Mainstream and conservative outlets—NBC, Politico, Wall Street Journal, Semaphore, National Review—now use "lame duck" in headlines, signaling a new low for Trump. - Caucus Rebellion:
GOP figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) and Thomas Massie lead a rare intra-party rebuke on the Epstein files. Olbermann:"The Republican House caucus rebelling against him, handing him a rebuke so powerful so that he not only gave up, but he did a 180 and he made the speaker of the House do a 180 with him."
(03:10) - Polling Data:
Polls show Americans overwhelmingly believe Trump knew about Epstein’s actions (60%), and only 20% approve of his handling of the case."These are way worse than a disastrous new poll about the measly midterms... the generic Democrat in next year’s House election, 55%; generic Republican, 41%. And the Democrats are favored by 2 to 1 among independents."
(07:16) - Strategic Blunders:
Trump’s political response—flip-flopping, blaming others, stalling full Epstein file release, blaming ongoing investigations—is dissected as a ploy to delay and obfuscate, one that only deepens public suspicion.- Result: The endless headlines and speculation fuel more conspiracy theories harmful to Trump.
- Quotable Moment:
"He could probably have made political hay by being the hero to MAGA who released everything. And now instead, the number of Trumpstein conspiracy theories will increase daily and exponentially."
(10:41) - MTG and Internal MAGA Divides:
Greene reportedly laments that the Epstein fight has "ripped MAGA apart." Olbermann gleefully riffs:“Rip them, mother of rippers. Rip them ripping. Rip suckers like the ripping players right downtown and print it.”
(13:01) – Citing both old baseball lore and current right-wing schisms. - Foreign Policy and Missteps:
- Trump's remarks at the US-Saudi Investment Summit—suggesting thousands of Saudis would work at new Arizona factories, dismissing concerns from his base, and exonerating MBS in the Khashoggi murder.
- His “solution” for Ukraine is simply Russia winning, betraying the “vibe” and substance of US policy.
2. Congressional Warning Video to Active Military
[19:20 – 20:42]
- Segment Overview:
Olbermann spotlights a video featuring six Democratic lawmakers (all military/intelligence veterans) warning active service members to refuse illegal orders—framing this as a response to the atmosphere of Trump’s threatened return to absolute executive power. - Core Message:
“Our laws are clear. You can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders. No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution.” (20:06–20:15)
The segment is direct, urgent, and unprecedented—a bellwether of “how bad things have gotten.” - Olbermann’s Take:
He questions what triggered the video, speculating on covert threats and the general paranoia that Trump could use the military for illegal/anti-democratic ends.
3. Olivia Nuzzi, Ryan Lizza, and The Media Spectacle
[23:37 – 65:36]
- Background:
Olivia Nuzzi’s new book excerpt and the surrounding reactions open a floodgate of media, personal, and professional drama—much of which connects directly to Olbermann himself (as her ex) and journalist Ryan Lizza. - The Players:
- Olivia Nuzzi: Former prodigy, now ridiculed for style over substance, embroiled in personal controversy, accused of romantic entanglements with sources, unreliable narration, and missteps.
- Keith Olbermann: Offers personal anecdotes, details their relationship, and fact-checks both Nuzzi’s book and Lizza’s public response.
- Ryan Lizza: Nuzzi’s other ex, publishes a “rebuttal” to Nuzzi’s narrative, provides his own perceived “inside story,” is critiqued openly by Olbermann.
- Key Takeaways:
- Nuzzi’s Writing Critiqued:
Olbermann sharply critiques her "forced style," citing unintentionally funny or overwrought book excerpts.“She used to be as sharp and natural a writer as anybody I had ever [met]... and now she has written a book in which she appears to be attempting to make phone sex into Wuthering Heights...”
(26:34) - Dysfunction and Recriminations:
Olbermann accuses Nuzzi of telling her boyfriends that one another was a “stalker,” describes the end of their relationship, and disputes Lizza’s version of events, all with brutal candor. - Media Critique:
The whole Nuzzi-Lizza affair is framed as “access journalism gone wild,” with Nuzzi’s career as case study for how personal entanglements and style-over-substance have undermined credibility in political media.“Under his tutelage, Olivia gradually crumbled from the most gifted, young, critical, but not cynical writer in American politics to just another Access journalist who never for a moment understood that the point of what she was writing was to inform, not to complete a great paragraph.”
(53:45) - Memorable Moment:
Olbermann deploys comedic asides, references to classic media, and self-effacing humor—playfully mocking himself for being part of the drama (“That’s me, I’m the red herring who gets shot and killed in the first scene” – 28:40). - Vanity Fair’s Dilemma:
He openly questions whether Vanity Fair can keep Nuzzi in her editorial post after these revelations, suggesting her comeback is already undermined.
- Nuzzi’s Writing Critiqued:
4. "Worst Persons in the World" Segment
[67:19 – 77:49]
- Bronze: Trump, for inventing a new conspiracy theory about the 2020 Census being rigged—against himself.
- Runner-Up: Bill O’Reilly, for repeatedly claiming on TV that Epstein was convicted during the Biden administration, even after being corrected—exposing habitual right-wing misinformation.
- Winner: Bill Maher, for declaring he’s done with live stand-up due to political “division,” with Olbermann mocking Maher’s claimed dangers as well as his comedic chops:
"Did you know Bill Maher does comedy? ...The only people Bill is twice as funny as who sell twice as many tickets as him are the New York Jets.” (73:12)
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
-
On Trump’s Media Fallout:
“Lame duck will follow Trump to his last minutes in office, hopefully all the way to next week sometime.” (05:47)
-
On the Politico ‘lame duck’ listicle:
“A lame duck listicle with bad puns. Oh my God. Trump might as well resign and flee for Argentina right effing now. Quack, quack.” (06:09)
-
On Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Influence:
“Watching this actually turn into a fight has ripped MAGA apart. Yes, please rip away... rip them mother of rippers!” (13:01)
-
On the Democratic Veterans’ Video:
“You must refuse illegal orders... No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution.” (20:10–20:15)
-
On Nuzzi’s Book Style:
“She has written a book in which she appears to be attempting to make phone sex into Wuthering Heights.” (26:34)
-
On the exes’ disputes:
“Bottom line here is while Olivia was claiming to Lizza that I was stalking her, she was claiming to me that Lizza was stalking her. It’s a big tent.” (53:20)
-
On Vanity Fair’s Editorial Dilemma:
“This was her comeback. Now she’s gonna need an entirely new comeback back from her comeback.” (65:40)
-
On Bill Maher:
“First off, did you know Bill Maher does comedy? When I’d love to see that.” (73:12)
Noteworthy Timestamps
| Timestamp | Segment | Description | |-----------|---------|-------------| | 02:36 | Trump Analysis | Trump’s “lame duck” era begins, media shift, and Republican rebellion discussed | | 06:09 | Media listicles | Political media cliches ("lame duck") and their impact | | 07:16 | Polling | Poll numbers show collapsing support for Trump | | 10:41 | Strategic blunders | Trump’s handling of the Epstein files | | 13:01 | MTG’s comment | "Rip MAGA apart" - Olbermann’s gleeful riffing | | 19:20 | Veterans’ video | Direct message to military about refusing illegal orders | | 26:34 | Olivia Nuzzi | First assessment and critique of Nuzzi’s book excerpt | | 53:20 | Ex “stalking” claims | The tangled web of accusations among Olbermann, Nuzzi, Lizza | | 65:40 | Vanity Fair | Nuzzi’s job and comeback in peril | | 67:19 | Worst Persons | Segment begins – Trump, O’Reilly, then Maher “wins” | | 73:12 | Maher roasting | Olbermann’s comedic evisceration of Bill Maher’s stand-up |
Structure and Tone
Olbermann’s style is trademarked: rapid, sardonic, occasionally profane, deeply personal, and unfiltered. He balances sharp political critique with playful meta-commentary and self-referential humor.
For Listeners Who Missed the Episode:
This summary offers both a guide to the critical news and an inside look at media and personal dynamics shaping those headlines, with enough direct quotes, context, and color to capture the episode’s unique flavor. The Trump segment provides insight into his collapsing support and the wider party/media reaction; the Olivia Nuzzi saga is both media analysis and personal confession; and “Worst Persons” rounds out the show with Olbermann’s irreverent, pointed wit.
Further Listening or Reading
- For full context on the Olivia Nuzzi book excerpt and Ryan Lizza’s response, search for their original pieces, as Olbermann references but does not quote them in full.
- Olbermann’s references to polling and mainstream media headlines can be traced to November 2025 coverage of the Epstein files and Trump’s sagging political standing.
