
Loading summary
Vanessa Richardson
On the Crime House Original podcast Serial Killers and Murderous Minds, we're diving into the psychology of the world's most complex murder cases.
Dr. Tristan Ingalls
From serial killers to cult leaders, deadly exes and spree killers, we're examining not just how they killed, but why.
Vanessa Richardson
Is it uncontrollable rage? Overwhelming fear? Or is it something deeper? Serial Killers and Murderous Minds is a Crime House Studios Original new episodes drop every Monday and Thursday Friday Follow wherever you get your podcasts. This is Crime House. Good morning everyone. We have multiple breaking true crime cases this morning that you need to know about, and we're starting with the biggest one. More than three decades after Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain was found dead in his Seattle home, A newly published for forensic report is urging authorities to reopen the 1994 investigation, challenging the long standing ruling that his death was a suicide. This is crime house 24 7, your non stop source for the biggest crime cases developing right now. Make sure to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Vanessa Richardson and we have quite a lineup for you today. Here's what you need to know.
Dr. Tristan Ingalls
A year from today. What would your dream private practice look like? Would you spend less time chasing claims or only working with clients who value your skill set? What if you had a network to reach out to for questions or free continuing education? What if you had more time for yourself? ALMA empowers you to confidently accept insurance backed by an all in one EHR that simplifies scheduling, documentation and day to day practice operations. With a network of engaged providers and free CE resources, ALMA makes it easy for you to build the practice of your dreams on your terms. ALMA believes that when therapists get the support they need, mental health care gets better for everyone. Learn more About Alma@helloalma.com GetStarted your dream practice is closer than you think. Get started now@helloalma.com getstarted foreign.
Vanessa Richardson
February 16, 2026 renewed debate over the death of Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain intensified after a group of independent forensic scientists publicly urged authorities to reopen the 1994 investigation, arguing that new analysis raises questions about the long standing ruling of suicide. 27 year old Cobain was found dead in April 1990 in a greenhouse above the garage of his Seattle home. While toxicology showed a high level of heroin in his system, the King county medical examiner ruled his death a suicide, concluding that Cobain died from a self inflicted gunshot wound. The Seattle Police Department confirmed that conclusion and maintained the case was closed. But earlier this month, a private team led by forensic specialist Brian Burnett and researcher Michelle Wilkins published a peer reviewed report asserting that several elements of the original EV evidence contradict the suicide ruling. According to them, the organ trauma and blood evidence are consistent with a lengthy overdose on heroin and conflict with the profile of a rapid death from a firearm wound. Some team members went so far as to call the evidence homicidal, saying that the scene may have been staged to look like suicide. The new review highlights several anomalies the scientists say deserve scrutiny, including the clean condition of Cobain's hands near the shotgun, the neat arrangement of drug paraphernalia and questions about how the weapon could have been fired if the singer were incapacitated. The report also revisits debates about the suicide note and differences in handwriting style, which some say have never been fully explained. Despite that authorities have reaffirmed the original findings, the King County Medical Examiner's office issued a statement saying it, quote, worked with the local law enforcement agency, conducted a full autopsy and followed all of its procedures, end quote, in determining the manner of death as suicide, and noted that it has not seen credible new evidence to justify reopening the case. Seattle police echoed that position, saying the suicide conclusion remains unchanged. The debate is not new. For decades, various books, documentaries and conspiracy theories have challenged the official account. Titles like who Killed Kurt Cobain? And Soaked in Bleach have explored alternate theories, some implicating people close to Cobain, including disputes involving his former wife and lead singer of Pole, Courtney Love. While those works sparked controversy when released decades ago, this is the first major forensic report of its kind to be published in a peer reviewed scientific journal. Not surprisingly, Courtney Love responded sharply to the latest report. Love dismissed the new claims as conspiracy driven and damaging to Cobain's legacy. She has repeatedly defended the official ruling and has argued that speculation about foul play only causes unnecessary pain for Cobain's loved ones. Sources close to Love says she views the controversy as exploitative and unhelpful to Cobain's memory. The renewed attention has also sparked fresh online debate. Social media platforms and fan forums lit up in the days after the report's release, with some users supporting a reinvestigation and others pointing out that decades of official reviews have repeatedly upheld the suicide determination. Analysts note that the emotional resonance of Cobain's music and the tragic nature of his death have kept public interest alive far longer than most crime cases of similar vintage. Experts not affiliated with the new report have also weighed in. Some forensic and medical professionals cited by outlets such as Newsweek emphasize that high heroin tolerance and other biological variables can complicate toxicology interpretations and that blood splatter and crime scene analysis conducted in the original investigation were consistent with the suicide ruling. They argue that when questions persist in popular discussion, the evidence does not overturn the long standing conclusion. Cobain's death came at the height of his fame and placed him in the so called 27 Club, a group of influential artists who died at the same age under tragic circumstances, including Jimi Hendrix, Janis Joplin and Amy Winehouse. The label has taken on almost mythic status in popular culture, but in Cobain's case, the timing intensified the shock. He was a Grammy winning musician, a new father and one of the most recognizable figures in rock music when he died. The enduring debate over the circumstances of his death underscores the lasting cultural weight Cobain still carries more than three decades later. For now, more than three decades after Cobain's passing, the official record remains unchanged. Authorities say they have no plans to reopen the case, even as independent scientists continue to press their arguments and call for greater transparency. Whether this latest forensic forensic challenge gains traction with law enforcement or remains part of public debate is an open question. But the discussion has clearly reignited interest in one of rock music's most enduring mysteries. As the controversy over Kurt Cobain's death lingers, another high stakes legal drama is unfolding far from the music world. The trial of a climber accused in the death of his girlfriend during an alpine expedition on one of Europe's highest peaks. A climber accused of leaving his girlfriend to die while hiking Austria's highest mountain is set to stand trial on Thursday, February 19th. Prosecutors allege that on January 18th, 2025, 37 year old Thomas Plomberger abandoned his partner, 33 year old Kirsten Gortner, just below the summit of Gross Glockner, leaving her unprotected and hypothermic in worsening winter conditions. After 17 hour ascent, Goertner died of hypothermia about 50 meters below the summit of the mountain. Prosecutors are now charging Plomburger with gross negligent manslaughter. Gross Glockner rises more than 12,000ft above sea level in the Austrian Alps and is considered one of the country's most challenging climbs, particularly in winter due to the high altitude and the mountain's narrow ridge. Winter ascents require specialized equipment and careful planning, even for seasoned climbers. According to authorities, the couple had set out together on a high altitude alpine tour despite Gortner having less climbing experience than her partner. Plomberger's lawyer Kurt Yellinek claims the couple reached a place known as the breakfast spot at around 1.30pm on January 18, a section climbers consider a point of no return on the route. But neither of them were that exhausted, so they continued. Investigators say the pair were nearing the summit when conditions deteriorated and Gner began to struggle. Prosecutors allege that at a point approximately 50 meters, or about 164ft from the top of the mountain, Plomberger left Gortner behind and descended to get help. Prosecutors say the couple became stranded at about 8:50pm and alleged that Plomberger did not call police or signal for help when a police helicopter flew overhead roughly two hours later at around 10:50pm but according to the defense, the situation changed abruptly and Gartner, quote, suddenly showed increased signs of exhaustion, end quote. Gner was too exhausted to move, so Plomberger allegedly left her to find help. According to prosecutors, Plomberger left Gortner on the mountain at around 2am and did not contact emergency services until approximately 3:30am Though there are differing accounts about exactly when those calls were made. Authorities say Goertner was left exposed to extreme winter temperatures at high altitude in a state described by prosecutors as exhausted, hypothermic and disoriented. By the time emergency crews reached her, she had died. State prosecutors claim Plumberger made nine critical mistakes, including starting the climb two hours late in the morning, failing to signal for help from a circling rescue helicopter, and leaving Gortner exposed in the cold without the blankets or the windproof shelter they had brought with them. In a press release from last year, the prosecutor's office said he attempted the trip even though his girlfriend had, quote, never undertaken an alpine tour of this length, difficulty and altitude, and despite the challenging winter conditions, end quote. The statement added that Plumberger allowed Gortner to use a split board and snowboard boots, gear that was unsuitable for a high alpine tour in mixed terrain. Plumberger has denied criminal wrongdoing. In a statement, his lawyers said they requested that the criminal investigation be abandoned and argued that Gortner's death was a tragic accident. His defense lawyer continued that the couple had planned the tour together and, quote, both considered themselves to be sufficiently experienced, adequately prepared and well equipped, end quote. The central question at trial will be whether Plomberger had a legal duty to remain with Gorner and assist her dissent once it became clear she could not not continue safely, and whether leaving her in those conditions directly contributed to her death. The trial comes just over a year after the fatal climb and underscores the inherent dangers of alpine mountaineering, particularly in winter, and whether someone can or should be held liable when high risk adventure turns deadly. As that trial gets underway in Austria, we turn back to the States, where a new arrest is bringing renewed attention to a 2024 murder investigation in Nashvill.
Commercial Announcer
Confronting high credit card debt can feel scary, but the good news is if you owe $10,000 or more in credit card debt, financial relief options are now available. National Debt Relief is currently offering debt relief designed to reduce what you owe and put you on the fast track to becoming debt free. If you qualify for debt relief, you may be able to pay back less than what you owe and save thousands of dollars just visit nationaldebtrelief.com Imagine only paying one low monthly program payment you can afford and saving money as you become debt free. National Debt Relief has already helped bring debt relief to over 550,000 US consumers, earning thousands of five star reviews and an A rating with the Better Business Bureau. You're stronger than your credit card debt. Let today be the day you start turning things around. Take the first step and visit nationaldebtrelief.com to see what debt relief you may qualify for. That's national debt relief.com taxact can think.
Vanessa Richardson
Of a million things more fun than filing taxes TaxAct is going to name some now. Sitting in traffic folding a fitted bedsheet, listening to your co worker talk about his fantasy team digging a hole. Digging an even larger hole next to that original hole. Unfortunately, Tax Act's filing software can't make taxes function, but TaxAct can help you get them done. Tax act let's get them over with on the night of February 17th, Deputy U.S. marshals arrested 32 year old Trayvon Palmer in Las Vegas, marking the third arrest in connection to the 2024 killing of Los Angeles rapper Christopher Cheeks, known professionally as Chris King, a Los Angeles rapper with a growing national profile outside a midtown Nashville recording studio. Palmer has been on the run for nearly two years. According to authorities. He was taken into custody after investigators received a tip about his whereabouts. His return to Nashville is pending, where he faces charges tied to Cheeks death. Police have said from the beginning that the shooting involved multiple suspects. Investigators say that on April 20, 2024, 32 year old cheeks was outside a recording studio on Hay street when three men attempted to rob the group he was with. During that confrontation, gunf erupted. Cheeks was fatally shot. A second man was wounded but survived. In the months that followed, Palmer was publicly identified as a wanted suspect. Late last year, investigators said they believed he may have been in the Los Angeles area and asked for the public's help locating him. A multi count indictment charged him with first degree murder, robbery and gun offenses. The broader case has unfolded over nearly two years. On February 26, 2025, Metro Nashville Police arrested 19 year old Amir Carroll in connection with the shooting. Authorities said Carroll was present during the attempted robbery and subsequent gunfire. He was indicted on charges including first degree premeditated murder and especially aggravated robbery. Three months later, on May 28, 2025, a second suspect, 20 year old Adrian Cameron Jr. Was arrested in Los Angeles. Police said. Cameron Jr. Was also indicted in Cheek's killing. Court records show the case continuing to move through the Tennessee judicial system as prosecutors work to establish each defendant's alleged role. Throughout the investigation, detectives have maintained that Cheek's killing was not random but stemmed from a robbery attempt involving multiple participants. Police have not publicly detailed what led to the encounter outside the studio beyond describing it as an attempted robbery that escalated to deadly violence. Now, with Palmer's arrest in Nevada, all three men charged in the case are now in custody. As of Wednesday, Nashville officials have not announced a court date for Palmer. He remains jailed in Las Vegas awaiting the next procedural step in a case that began on a Nashville sidewalk and ultimately stretched across state lines. And while that homicide case advances through the courts in Tennessee, a very different arrest unfolded during Mardi Gras in New Orleans, where actor Shia LaBeouf was taken in into custody and charged with two counts of simple battery. 39 year old actor Shia LaBeouf was arrested early February 17, 2026 in New Orleans after an alleged altercation during Mardi Gras festivities, marking the latest chapter in the actor's long history of public controversies. According to the New Orleans Police Department, officers responded just before 12:45am to reports of a disturbance outside a Royal street establishment in the French Quarter. Police say Le Buff became increasingly aggressive after being asked to leave and allegedly struck one man multiple times before returning to hit him again, then punched a second man in the nose. A video published by TMZ appears to show LaBeouf on the ground during the altercation. As he struggles to get back to his feet, a man can be heard warning him to stay down before delivering two forceful blows to his face. Bystanders reportedly restrained LaBeouf until officers arrived. He was transported to a hospital for treatment of minor injuries and later booked on two misdemeanor counts of simple battery. He was released on his own recognizance and is due back in court March 19. The incident adds to a pattern of legal troubles that have followed LaBeouf since his early fame. He first rose to prominence as a child star on Disney Channel's Even Stevens before transitioning into blockbuster roles, roles in the Transformers franchise and Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. But alongside professional success came repeated run ins with law enforcement, including a 2017 arrest in Georgia for public intoxication and disorderly conduct. In 2020, singer FKA Twigs filed a civil lawsuit accusing LaBeouf of sexual battery, assault and emotional distress during their relationship. The case was later settled privately and LaBeouf denied the allegations. While acknowledgin past struggles with addiction and behavior. Now, as he faces new charges stemming from Mardi Gras, the actor once again finds his off screen actions eclipsing his career.
Commercial Announcer
Your little one grew three inches overnight. Adorable. Also expensive. Sell their pint sized pieces on Depop and list them in minutes with no selling fees because somewhere a dad refuses to pay full price for the clothes his kids will outgrow tomorrow and he's ready to buy your son's entire wardrobe right now. Consider your future growth bird budget secured. Start selling on Depop where taste recognizes taste. Payment processing fees and boosting fees still apply. See website for details.
Vanessa Richardson
What drives a person to kill? Is it uncontrollable rage? Overwhelming fear? Unbearable jealousy? Or is it something deeper? Something in the darkest corners of our psyche?
Dr. Tristan Ingalls
Every Monday and Thursday, the Crime House Original Podcast, Serial Killers and Murderous Minds dives deep into the minds of history's most chilling murderers. From infamous serial killers to ruthless cult leaders, deadly exes and terrifying spree killers, I'm Dr. Tristan Ingalls, a licensed forensic psychologist, along with Vanessa Richards. Immersive storytelling full of high stakes twists and turns. In every episode of Serial Killers and Murderous Minds, I'll be providing expert analysis of the people involved, not just how they killed, but why.
Vanessa Richardson
Serial Killers and Murderous Minds is a Crime House Studios original. New episodes drop every Monday and Thursday. Follow wherever you get your podcasts. Before you go, let me tell you about what else is happening at Crime House. Today's crossover episode of murder True crime stories and conspiracy theories, Cults and crimes digs into not just a killing, but the institutional dynamics that surround it. The murder of Sherry Rasmussen is one of the most chilling examples of how proximity to power can warp an investigation. When law enforcement authority and personal motive, intersection justice can stall for years. Some murders are horrifying because of the violence. Others are horrifying because of who gets protected. To understand how dangerous corruption inside investigative systems can be, here are five infamous cases where law enforcement or fire officials abused their authority, concealed crimes, or manipulated the justice process. Number one John Burge and the Chicago Police Torture Scandal for decades, allegations circulated around Chicago police Commander John Burge and detectives under his command. Beginning in the 1970s and continuing into the early 1990s, numerous suspects claimed they'd been tortured into confessions. The allegations were not minor. Victims described electric shocks, suffocation with plastic bags, mock executions and severe beatings. Many of those coerced confessions led to convictions, some of which resulted in death sentences. Internal complaints were repeatedly dismissed or minimized. It took years of legal battles, investigative journalism, and community pressure before the scale of the abuse was acknowledged. Eventually, Burge was convicted in federal court not for torture itself, but for perjury and obstruction of justice related to denying the abuse. The scandal exposed how deeply misconduct can take root when oversight fails. Confessions were treated as victories rather than scrutinized as potential products of coercion. Entire cases collapsed once the truth came to light. When law enforcement officials manipulate evidence through violence, they do more than convict the innocent. They undermine every legitimate case that follows. Number two the Rampart Division scandal. In the late 1990s, Los Angeles faced one of the largest police corruption scandals in its history. Officers in the LAPD's Rampart Division Anti gang unit were found to have engaged in widespread misconduct. The crimes included planting evidence, fabricating reports, unprovoked shootings, and framing suspects. Some officers were accused of stealing narcotics and reselling them. Others falsified testimony in court to secure convictions. The scandal came to light after one officer, Raphael Perez. Raphael Perez was caught stealing cocaine from evidence lockers and began cooperating with investigators. What followed was a cascade of revelations. More than 100 convictions were overturned. The city paid out tens of millions of dollars in settlements. Public trust plummeted. Rampart demonstrated how corruption can evolve from isolated misconduct into a subculture protected by silence. When officers protect each other rather than the law, accountability becomes nearly impossible from the outside. Number three the Baltimore Gun Trace Task Force in Baltimore, a police unit assigned to remove illegal firearms from the streets, became a criminal enterprise operating under official authority. The Gun Trace Task Force was exposed in 2017 after a federal investigation revealed that members of the unit had been robbing civilians, planting evidence, falsifying overtime records, and conducting illegal searches. Officers would stop individuals without probable cause, seize money or property, and file false reports to justify the encounters. Some resold confiscated narcotics. Others pocketed cash from crime scenes. The corruption was brazen. It was organized. It operated for years before collapsing under federal scrutiny. The case highlighted a disturbing dynamic. When a specialized unit operates with minimal oversight and high autonomy, misconduct can flourish. The badge became a shield not just from criminals, but from internal accountability. Multiple officers were convicted in federal court. The damage to community trust, however, proved harder to repair. Number four Paul Berg and law enforcement corruption from the prosecutor's side Corruption is not limited to patrol officers. It can extend into the prosecutorial system as well. Paul Bergrin was a former federal prosecutor and defense attorney who used his legal expertise to aid violent criminals. He was convicted in 2013 on multiple charges, including racketeering and conspiracy to murder witnesses. Berg was accused of warning drug dealers about cooperating witnesses and facilitating crimes to protect his clients. In one case, he allegedly told associates that a witness needed to be eliminated. His conviction exposed how devastating corruption can be when it originates from someone deeply embedded in the justice system. A prosecutor understands the machinery of the better than almost anyone. When that knowledge is weaponized, it can shield violent offenders and obstruct justice at the highest levels. Berg's case is a reminder that corruption isn't always about patrol misconduct. Sometimes it's about influence, access and the manipulation of legal authority. Number five Gerald a.m. ryne and the Fire Investigation Misconduct Problem Fire investigators hold extraordinary power in arson cases. Their conclusions can determine whether a tragedy is ruled accidental or criminal. When that authority is abused or based on flawed science, lives can be destroyed. In the case of Gerald Am In Missouri, he was convicted of murdering a fellow inmate in 1985 based largely on testimony later determined to be unreliable. Although not strictly a fire case, his wrongful conviction became part of broader scrutiny into how investigative conclusions, including those made by forensic specialists, can be accepted without sufficient scientific grounding. More directly, nationwide reviews of arson convictions in the 1990s and early 2000s uncovered cases where fire investigators relied on outdated or debunked indicators of arson, such as certain burn patterns or glass behavior that were later proven scientifically unreliable. The most infamous example is Cameron Todd Willingham, executed in Texas in 2004 for allegedly setting a fire that killed his children. Subsequent forensic reviews raised serious doubts about the ORIG fire investigations conclusions. These cases illustrate how investigative authority, when combined with flawed methodology and institutional defensiveness, can produce catastrophic outcomes. When forensic or fire officials resist updated science or shield questionable conclusions, the consequences can be irreversible. It's also important to recognize that corruption rarely exists in isolation. It thrives in environments where misconduct is minimized, where whistleblowers are punished, and where institutions prioritize reputation over transparency. In many of these cases, the most chilling element is not only what was done but what was allowed to continue. Torture persisted because supervisors looked away. Evidence planting spread because officers believed results mattered more than process. Bad forensic science endured because admitting error would unravel convictions and expose failures for victims and families. That kind of institutional betrayal becomes its own trauma. The crime is one wound. The system's refusal to confront itself becomes another. These stories are reminders that accountability is not automatic. It has to be demanded, enforced, and revisited, especially when the accused hold positions of authority. And when an investigation is compromised by the very people entrusted to pursue justice, the ripple effects extend far beyond one case. Communities lose trust. Innocent people can be punished. Guilty people can remain protected. That's why cases like Rasmussen are so essential to examine not as anomalies but as warnings. Corruption inside law enforcement and investigative systems is uniquely disturbing because it erodes the foundation of justice itself when the people tasked with uncovering truth distort it. The damage extends far beyond a single case. From coerced confessions in Chicago to planted evidence in Los Angeles, from task force corruption in Baltimore to prosecutorial betrayal and flawed forensic conclusions, these cases show how power can be misused behind the scenes. That's what makes the Sherry Rasmussen case so gripping. It forces us to confront what happens when authority and personal motive collide. For the full story and a deep examination of how justice was delayed for decades, listen to today's cross episode of Murder True crime Stories and Conspiracy Theories, Cults and crimes. We'll see you there. You've been listening to crime house 24 7, bringing you breaking crime news. I'm Vanessa Richardson. We'll be back tomorrow morning with more developing stories. Stay safe and thanks for listening. What drives a person to murder? Find out from a licensed forensic psychologist on serial Killers and Murderous Minds, A Crime House Original Podcast. New episodes drop every Monday and Thursday. Follow wherever you get your podcasts.
Host: Vanessa Richardson
Date: February 19, 2026
This episode of Crime House 24/7 (daytime edition with Vanessa Richardson) delivers breaking crime news, with major focus on a new forensic report challenging the official 1994 suicide ruling in the death of Nirvana frontman Kurt Cobain. The episode also covers developments in several other high-profile cases, including the trial of an Austrian climber for negligent manslaughter and updates on the murder of rapper Chris King and Shia LaBeouf’s latest legal trouble. In the latter segment, Vanessa delves into systemic corruption in law enforcement with a focus on the Sherry Rasmussen murder case and several infamous scandals.
"Several elements of the original evidence contradict the suicide ruling. ...the organ trauma and blood evidence are consistent with a lengthy overdose on heroin and conflict with the profile of a rapid death from a firearm wound."
(Vanessa Richardson, 03:21)
“The enduring debate over the circumstances of his death underscores the lasting cultural weight Cobain still carries more than three decades later.”
(Vanessa Richardson, 07:36)
“Whether this latest forensic challenge gains traction with law enforcement or remains part of public debate is an open question.”
(Vanessa Richardson, 08:02)
“The central question at trial will be whether Plomberger had a legal duty to remain with Gortner and assist her descent once it became clear she could not continue safely...”
(Vanessa Richardson, 11:19)
(Vanessa Richardson, 15:37)
(20:45 onward, lead-in to cross-podcast feature on murder and institutional failure)
The Murder of Sherry Rasmussen:
Five Infamous Scandals:
Institutional Culture:
“When law enforcement officials manipulate evidence through violence, they do more than convict the innocent. They undermine every legitimate case that follows.”
(Vanessa Richardson, 21:54)
Thematic Conclusion:
“The system’s refusal to confront itself becomes another [wound]. The crime is one wound. The system’s refusal to confront itself becomes another.”
(Vanessa Richardson, 23:40)
“The clean condition of Cobain’s hands near the shotgun, the neat arrangement of drug paraphernalia...conflict with the rapid death profile.” (04:31)
“The emotional resonance of Cobain’s music and the tragic nature of his death have kept public interest alive far longer than most crime cases of similar vintage.” (06:01)
“Accountability is not automatic. It has to be demanded, enforced, and revisited, especially when the accused hold positions of authority.” (24:44)
As always, Vanessa Richardson’s delivery is clear, systematic, and concise, yet empathetic—balancing factual reporting with thoughtful summary and expert perspectives. The tone remains serious and investigative, with the podcast aiming to explain both the details of ongoing cases and their wider implications for justice and truth in society.