Loading summary
Transcript23 lines
- [00:02]
A
Hi listeners, it's Vanessa. Before we get into today's episode, I want to tell you about another show I think you'll love. Hidden history with Dr. Harini Bhat. Every Monday, Dr. Bhat goes where history gets mysterious. Vanished civilizations, doomsday prophecies, paranormal phenomena and events that science still can't fully explain. Dr. Bot treats these moments like open case files. Not myths, not superstition, just incomplete explanations waiting for a closer look. Hidden History drops every Monday. Follow now on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen, so you never miss a mystery.
- [00:52]
B
This is Crime House.
- [00:56]
A
All right friends, it's time for your daily true crime rundown. Grab your coffee, settle in. Let's talk about the cases everyone's going to be discussing discussing today. We're starting with the biggest one. A New York judge just handed down a ruling that could decide whether jurors in the Luigi Mangione trial ever see the Gun and the Notebook where he may have spelled out exactly why he pulled the trigger. This is crime house 24 7, your non stop source for the biggest crime cases developing right now. Make sure to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Vanessa Richardson and we have quite a lineup for you today. Here's what you need to know. Lately I've been trying to take the stress out of getting dressed. Just focusing on pieces that feel easy, comfortable and still put together without a lot of effort. That's really what's been pulling me toward quints. Their stuff just fits that effortless everyday vibe. I love their fabrics, linens, cottons, cashmere. They're all the highest quality and they feel so good. Their design is also simple in the best way. Clean silhouettes, neutral tones, and pieces that don't require a ton of styling to feel finished. I've been reaching for their staples a lot because they make it easy to get out the door quickly while still feeling like everything's intentional. And the fit tends to feel really natural, like the clothes are made to actually be lived in. I grabbed a few things, thinking they'd be just basic fill ins, but they've ended up becoming some of the most worn pieces in my rotation. Refresh your everyday with luxury you'll actually use. Head to quince.com crimehouse247 for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns now available in Canada too. That's q I n c.com Crime House 247 for free shipping and 365 day returns. Quint.com Crime House 247 On Monday, May 18, the New York State Supreme Court Justice Gregory Caro issued a ruling that the Mangione case has been building toward for months. He decided what jurors will and will not be allowed to see when 28 year old Luigi Mangione stands trial for the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. And the decision is a split one, which means both sides are claiming some version of a win and both sides are right. But before we get into what the judge said, let's take a step back, because if you've been following this case since the beginning, you know it has never been just a murder case. It became something bigger than that almost immediately. A referendum on the American health care system, a Rorschach test for how people feel about corporate power and accountability, and one of the most polarizing true crime stories in years. Some people called Brian Brian Thompson's killer a hero. Others called it what it was, a murder. The tension between those two camps has never really gone away and is going to be hanging over every moment of this trial when it begins in September. So here's where it started. December 4, 2024. It's early morning in midtown Manhattan, and Brian Thompson is walking toward the entrance of a Hilton hotel on West 54th street where United Healthcare is holding an investor conference. He never makes it inside. A masked gunman approaches him from behind and shoots him. Thompson, who was 50 years old, dies from his injuries. The shooter disappears, first on foot, then on a bicycle, and vanishes into the city. What follows is a five day manhunt that captures the country's attention in a way few things had in years. The shooter left behind a water bottle, a granola bar wrapper and a cell phone near the crime scene. Investigators recover DNA and fingerprints from all of it. Surveillance footage shows the gunman, but his face is covered. Tips flood in. The Internet becomes its own kind of investigative unit, circulating photos and theories around the clock. And then on December 9, 2024, five days after the shooting, a McDonald's manager in Altoona, Pennsylvania, picks up the phone and calls 91 1. One of the customers in the corner of the restaurant, she says, looks an awful lot like the man they've been seeing on the news. Officers arrive and approach him. He has a black backpack sitting on the floor near his feet. They ask for id. He hands them a fake New Jersey driver's license with the name Mark Rosario on it. The same alias prosecutors would later say that the shooter had used to check into a Manhattan hostel in the days before the killing. Officers warn him about providing a false identity. About 20 minutes later, he gives them his real name. Luigi Mangione, 26 years old, Ivy League graduate from a prominent Maryland family. And according to prosecutors, the man who had just shot and killed one of the most powerful health care executives in the country on a busy New York City sidewalk. From the moment of his arrest, the legal fight over this case has been fierce. And a big part of that fight has been about what was in that backpack. When officers started searching through Mangione's bag at the McDonald's, here's what they found. A loaded magazine wrapped inside a pair of underwear and a Faraday bag. That's a signal blocking pouch containing a path passport, a phone, and a wallet. Later that night, after transporting the bag to the Altoona police station, they went through it again. That second search turned up a 3D printed handgun and a silencer and a red notebook. That notebook is what prosecutors have been calling a manifesto. Inside, Mangione had written entries dated as far back as August 2024 in which he described making a decision he felt confident and justified about and named UnitedHealthcare specific. According to court filings, he wrote, quote, the target is insurance. It checks every box, end quote. He wrote that he finally felt no doubt about whether what he was planning was right. The defense has been fighting to keep all of it out. Their argument. Well, police searched that backpack multiple times before they ever obtained a warrant. And because the bag was sitting on the floor and not on Mangione's person, those searches were illegal. Throw it all out, every last item. Let the jury decide the case. Without any of that potential evidence, prosecutors pushed back hard, arguing the searches were routine and legal and that a warrant obtained later that same evening, about seven hours after the search provides an independent legal basis to admit everything anyway. What followed was a nine day suppression hearing in December 2025, featuring hours of body camera footage, testimony from multiple officers, and arguments on both sides that stretched across the better part of two weeks. And on May 18, Judge Caro Final weighed in. His ruling acknowledges that the initial search of the McDonald's, the one that turned up the magazine, the phone, the passport and the wallet, was improper because the backpack was not within Mangione's immediate reach when he was arrested. It didn't meet the legal standard for a warrantless search. Those items are suppressed. Jurors will not see them. But the gun, the notebook, those stay in. Think about what that means for a jury. You walk into that courtroom and prosecutors show you a 3D printed ghost gun, they say ballistically matches evidence from the crime scene. And then they hand you a notebook where the defendant wrote in his own hand about planning to target the insurance industry, about united healthcare, checking every box, about feeling no doubt that what he was doing was right. That is a powerful combination of physical evidence and alleged motive. The defense still has arguments. They'll argue the searches were flawed and the cases tainted. They also scored a significant legal legal win earlier in this case, getting the top charges in both the state and federal cases dismissed, which removed the death penalty from the federal prosecution. And it's worth noting this same suppression argument failed in federal court. Back in January 2026, U. S. District Court judge Margaret garnett denied the defense's motion, finding that the entire contents of the backpack fell within exceptions to the warrant requirement. So the two judges landed in different places on the McDonald's search. But. But both allowed the most critical evidence in. Even without the suppressed items, prosecutors say they have DNA and fingerprints tying mangione to items discarded near the crime scene. The case is not thin. As things stand right now, Mangione's New York state trial is set to begin in September 2026. His federal trial follows in October with opening statements expected sometime between October 26 and November 2. He faces second degree murder and eight other charges in the state case. He's pleaded not guilty to everything. His attorneys, Mark agnefillo, Jacob Kaplan and tenny garagos are juggling a lot. Those same lawyers recently took on Harvey weinstein as a client, which contributed to the state trial being pushed from June to September. The Harvey weinstein case ended in a mistrial last Friday. So September is the next major milestone. Between now and then, both sides will continue preparing for what's shaping up to be one of the watched trials in years. One that will force a courtroom to grapple not just with the question of what Luigi mangione did, but why and what that means. And on that note, we're heading up to Massachusetts because the Karen Reed case is back in the news this week. Trying to lose weight can feel like a full time job. And even then, the results don't always match the effort. That's why weight loss by hers is built to actually work with your life, not against it. Hers now offers access to FDA approved GLP1 medications including the wegovy pill and the wegovy pen. Wegovi helps regulate your appetite so you feel fuller, longer, making it easier to eat less and maintain results over time. Everything happens online. You'll connect with a licensed provider who will create a plan tailored to you and if prescribed, your medication arrives right at your door. They also offer a range of affordable options plus ongoing support like nutrition guidance, fitness content, and unlimited adjustments to your plan as needed. Ready to reach your goals? Visit forhers.com crimehouse to get personalized, affordable care that gets you that's F o r h E-R-S.com crimehouse for hers.com crimehouse Weight loss by hers is not available in all 50 states. Wegovy is the registered trademark of Novo Nordisk as To get started and learn more, including important safety information, WeGovy clinical study information, and restrictions, visit forhers.com debt
- [11:55]
C
doesn't usually happen all at once. It creeps in quietly. A charge here, a larger balance there. It builds bill by bill, statement by statement, until it becomes too much. If you have $10,000 or more in credit card or personal loan debt, National Debt Relief can reduce the amount you owe and give you an easier way forward. Their team of experts takes over the hard part, negotiating with your creditors, breaking down everything for you clearly, and building a plan that fits your budget. National Debt Relief has helped over 1 million people with their debt and they can help you too. Because when you understand your options and have someone in your corner, debt doesn't feel so heavy anymore. It's quick, free and easy to apply. To see if you're eligible, just visit startndr.com today. If debt's been hanging over you, now's the time to take control. Visit startndr.com today.
- [12:55]
A
Okay, picture this. It's Thursday, May 14th. A crowd of people is gathered at an auction house called Monzi Appraisers in Woburn, Massachusetts. They've come to watch and maybe bid on a black Lexus suv. That's not just any suv. This specific car is one of the most talked talked about vehicles in recent true crime history. Except the auction never actually happened. About 30 minutes before the bidding was set to begin, auctioneer Justin Manning stepped up and addressed the crowd. He told them the owner of the car, Bill Brussard, had been approached with a private offer ahead of the sale and with only single digit registered bidders in the room, Brusser decided to take it. Just like that, the auction was called off. The Lexus got quietly sold to an unknown group and the crowd that had gathered to witness a moment went home having witnessed a non event. Instead, Manning told attendees the deal went through, but declined to say who the buyer was or what they planned to do with the car. The Alcatraz East Crime Museum in Pigeon Forge, Tennessee had reportedly been in talks to acquire it at one point, but had passed in part because the SUV had already been repaired and restored for a crime museum. A fixed up car is a much harder sell than the original. So why does any of this matter? Why would a crowd of people show up to an auction house in Woburn on a Thursday to watch a used Lexus get sold? And why does the buyer's identity feel like a mystery worth tracking? Well, to answer that, we have to go back to January 29, 2022, and to a snowstorm in Canton, Massachusetts that set off one of the most divisive true crime cases this country has seen in years. That night, then 41 year old Karen Reed drove her boyfriend, 46 year old Boston Police Officer John O', Keefe to a house on Fairview Road. That home belonged to Brian Albert, another Boston police officer and his wife Nicole. O' Keefe had been drinking with a group of friends, including Reed, earlier in the evening. Reed says she dropped him off at the Alberts home and left. The next morning o' Keefe was found unresponsive in the snow outside the house. He did not survive. Prosecutors later charged reed in 2022 with second degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter while intoxicated and leaving the scene of an accident. Their theory? After a night of heavy drinking, Reed had struck o' Keefe with her black Lexus SUV during the snowstorm and left him to die. Fragments of a tail light were found near his body which they said came from her car. That car was the centerpiece of their case. Reid's defense had a completely different story. They argued she was being framed, that o' Keefe had actually been killed inside the Albert home, that his body had been moved outside afterward, and that a network of law enforcement connections and loyalties had conspired to pin his death on an innocent woman. It was a theory that caught fire. Supporters rallied behind Reed in enormous numbers. The case stopped being just about what happened to John o' Keefe and became a flashpoint about whether the justice system could be trusted to pursue the truth. Its own people were implicated. Reed's first trial in 2024 ended in a mistrial. The jury couldn't reach a unanimous verdict. Her retrial ran through 2025 and ended with a split decision. Not guilty of second degree murder, not guilty of vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, not guilty of leaving the scene of an accident. She was found guilty of operating during the influence and she received one year of probation. And the far more consequential development came a few weeks earlier. In April 2026, four witnesses who testified during Reed's two trials filed a defamation lawsuit against Reid and Aiden Carney, the blogger known as Turtle Boy, who became one of the most prominent voices pushing the theory that Reid had been framed. The plaintiffs are Jennifer McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert, and Brian Higgins. These four names will be familiar to anyone who followed the trials closely. McCabe, a friend of Reed's, was actually with her when they found o' Keefe's body that morning. Brian Albert is the Boston police officer whose home o' Keefe was found outside of. His nephew Colin was also connected to the events of that night. And Brian Higgins is a federal ATF agent who had exchanged flirtatious texts with Reed before o' Keefe's death, something that came up repeatedly during the trials. Reed's defense team pointed to all four of them as part of the alleged cover up narrative. And as that narrative spread, amplified by Turtle Boy's blog and social media, McCabe, the Alberts, and Higgins say their lives were turned upside down. The lawsuit claims that Reed and Carney did not just accidentally spread misinformation. They actively worked together to construct and amplify a false narrative designed to place blame for o' Keeffe's death on these four people so that Reid could escape accountability. And that's really where things get complicated, because these civil cases operate on a lower burden of proof than the criminal trial did. You don't need to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt in civil court. And Reid is not just facing this defamation suit. She's also a defendant in a wrongful death lawsuit filed by John o' Keefe's family, which is working through the courts separately. A judge is now overseeing both lawsuits simultaneously, which could affect how both cases unfold. On top of all that, Reid has been pushing for records from the town of Canton related to a police sergeant who's reportedly under internal investigation. Records she says are relevant to her ongoing civil fight. She reached a deal with Canton over the production of those records earlier this month, which means that chapter is still open, too. The Karen Reed case was supposed to have reached something like resolution when that retrial jury came back with its verdict in 2025. And in a criminal sense, it did. But civil courts are a different arena, and there's still a lot of fighting left to do. A defamation suit, a wrongful death case, a records battle with the town of Canton, and a Lexus SUV now in the hands of an anonymous buyer somewhere out there. Whatever you thought about this case, whatever side you were on, whatever you believed happened to John o' Keefe in the snow outside that Canton house. This story is not finished yet.
- [19:23]
B
You're listening to this podcast, so I know you've got a curious mind. Here's a helpful fact you might not know yet. Drivers who switch and save with Progressive save over $900 on average. They make it super simple. Pop over to progressive.com, answer some questions and you'll get a quick quote with coverage options tailored to your choices. Plus you'll see which discounts you may qualify for, like the online quote discount or savings for paying in full. In fact, 99% of Progressive Auto customers earn at least one discount. See if you could save when you switch to Progressive. You'll feel good about making a savvy choice. Visit progressive.com and see if you can enjoy a little extra cash back Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates national average 12 month savings of $946 by new customers surveyed who saved with Progressive between June 2024 and May 2025. Potential savings will vary.
- [20:13]
D
Zootopia 2 has come home to Disney. Let's go get ready for a new case.
- [20:18]
E
We're gonna crack this case and prove we're victorious partners of all time.
- [20:21]
D
New friends.
- [20:22]
E
You are Gary the Snake and your last name? Desnake.
- [20:27]
A
Dream Team New Habitats Zootopia has a secret reptile population.
- [20:33]
D
You can watch the record breaking phenomenon at home.
- [20:35]
A
You're clearly working at Zootopia 2.
- [20:39]
D
Now available on Disney. Rated PG.
- [20:43]
A
Hi crime house Community, It's Vanessa. Are you interested in the mysterious parts of history? Like when in 1518 an entire European city couldn't stop dancing? Or in 1908 when something flattened over 800 square miles of Siberian forest in an instant? I'm excited to tell you about a new show, hidden history with Dr. Harini Bach. Dr. Bott has spent her entire career demanding evidence and asking why. Now every Monday on Hidden History, she goes where history touches the unknown. Vanished civilizations, doomsday prophecies, paranormal phenomena and events that science still can't fully explain. Dr. Bott treats these moments like open case files. Not myths, not superstition, just incomplete explanations waiting for a closer look.
- [21:32]
E
Look.
- [21:33]
A
At the end of every episode, she'll tell you exactly what she thinks happened and ask what if it happened today? Hidden History drops every Monday. Follow now on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen. So you never miss a mystery. Okay, before I let you go, you know we can't end without giving you a little something extra. Over on America's Most Infamous Crimes. Today, Katie is covering part one of Eileen Warn Us, the story behind America's most feared Phoenix female killer. Before Eileen Wuornos became what she became, she was a 13 year old girl who was assaulted and impregnated by a stranger, gave birth completely alone, and came home to a family that blamed her. In the first of three episodes on Eileen Wuornos, Katie Ring traces the story of a woman the world expected to be a victim and how a lifetime of abandonment, abuse and betrayal set her on a path no one tried to redirect. From a childhood in Michigan to the Florida highways where it all came to an end. This is the story of how Eileen Warnos was made. This episode contains descriptions of physical and sexual assault, abuse and murder. Please listen with care. We grabbed a clip from today's episode. Take a listen and if you like what you hear, don't forget to follow America's Most Infamous Crimes
- [22:58]
E
like so many stories about serial killers, if you want to understand Eileen Warnock, you have to start at the very beginning. Because almost nothing about her life from the very first day was stable or safe or kind. The world that greeted Eileen when she was born was already stacked against her, and it never really stopped being that way. Every time there was an opportunity for something to go right, something went wrong. Instead, every time there was a chance for someone to intervene and change the course of what was coming, they either failed to act, act or actively made things worse. Eileen was born on a leap day on February 29, 1956 in Rochester, Michigan. Her mother, Diane, would always remember how difficult the birth was. She later even wondered if complications during labor might have left Eileen with some form of brain damage. Either way, the circumstances Eileen was born into were already complicated enough on their own, and they only got more complex. Diane was only 16 years old when Eileen came into the world. She already had one child, Eileen's older brother, Keith, who'd been born just the year before. And as if being a teenage mother of two wasn't already an overwhelming situation, Diane's husband had abandoned her. Before Eileen was even born. She was a teenager, alone with two babies under the age of two. Not only was raising two kids as a teenager hard enough on its own own, it also came with a ton of social stigma. For a while, Diane tried to make it work, but after about six months, she reached a breaking point. She couldn't handle raising two very young kids on her own, so she made the decision to send Eileen and Keith to live with her parents, Lowry and Britta Warnos, in the suburban town of Troy, Michigan. Lowry and Brita took Eileen and Keith and raised them as their own children alongside their two biological kids. A son named Barry, who was around 10 at the time, and a younger daughter named Lori. Growing up, Eileen, Keith and Laurie all believed they were full siblings. Barry was old enough to know the truth about the family arrangement, but he kept the secret out of respect for his parents wishes. But in a small, close knit town like Troy, secrets have a way of getting out. Word gets around, people talk. And by the time eileen was around 10 years old, she learned the truth. That the people she'd always believed were her parents were actually her grandparents. This kind of revelation can have different impacts on children depending on their environment. For Ted Bundy, it created a gulf between him and his mom that could never be crossed. For Eileen, though, it didn't destroy the relationship entirely. Even after learning the truth, she always considered Lowry and Brita to be her real parents in every way that mattered. And they considered her their daughter. But it did change how she understood her place in the family. She felt like Lowry and Brita had a deeper, more unconditional love for their biological children than they did for her and Keith. Sometimes she even felt like she and Keith were punished more severely than the others for breaking the same rules. And that perception wasn't completely off. By multiple accounts, Lowry was extremely strict. He would physically punish the children whenever he felt they'd misbehaved. And Eileen later claimed he frequently beat her with his belt. There is some dispute over the full extent of his violence. Some family members have different stories. But Eileen's account of being physically abused in that household never wavered throughout her life. To cope with what was happening at home, Eileen started using drugs by the time she was 12 years old. Marijuana, acid, cocaine. She turned to all of them looking for something that would dull the edges of the life that had already become very hard. And it seemed like physical abuse wasn't the only thing she was trying to escape. According to some accounts, Eileen was also being sexually abused. She suggested the abuse started around the same time as her drug use. And some reports have pointed to members of her own family as possible perpetrators, including her grandfather Lowry and her once brother, but actual uncle Barry. There are also allegations of an incestuous relationship with her brother Keith. Every person in Eileen's family denied these claims and notably so did Eileen herself at various points in her life. Life, even when admitting to them might have served her legal interests. The full truth of what happened inside that household will probably never be known. But there is one tragedy from Eileen's childhood that nobody disputes and that no one has ever attempted to minimize or explain away. In 1969, when Eileen was 13, she was walking through her neighborhood in the rain when a stranger offered her a ride. Under normal circumstances, she might have said no. But the weather was miserable, and the man told her he knew her grandfather, Lowry. But it was a trap. Once Eileen was in the car, the man raped her. She was 13 years old, a child, and when she returned home, pregnant and traumatized and in desperate need of support, nobody believed her. Instead of offering her compassion, getting enraged on her behalf, or getting her help, Eileen's family shamed her for what happened. They treated her assault as evidence of promiscuity rather than as the crime it was. And instead of getting her support, her grandparents sent her to a home for unwed mothers in Detroit. She was there for only a month or two before she gave birth. At 13 years old, completely alone, the labor lasted an entire day. Eileen made the decision to give her son up for adoption, and when she came home after that, she was a different person. The combination of being raped, becoming a mother at 13, giving up her child, and then being disbelieved and judged by the people who were supposed to protect her took a toll that Eileen would carry with her the rest of her life. Her counselors at school noticed something was wrong and tried to intervene. They prescribed her sedatives, but the medication didn't make any meaningful difference. When they recommended therapy, the suggestion went nowhere. And at that time, without family support, a 13 year old girl couldn't pursue it on her own own. So Eileen continued to deteriorate and attempted to take her own life. Things only kept getting worse for Eileen from there. Her classmates bullied her relentlessly, adding daily cruelty to an already unbearable situation, and she eventually dropped out of school altogether. The one real friend she had during this period was a girl named Dawn Botkins, who showed up for Eileen when essentially no one else would would. Dawn was genuinely there for her, steady, loyal, and caring in a way that almost no one else in Eileen's world managed to be. But dawn was young, too, and there was only so much a teenager could do for a friend drowning in circumstances neither of them were equipped to handle. By the time Eileen was 15, she was largely fending for herself. She'd developed a habit of running away from home and spending time at a place the neighborhood kids called the pit, A patch of woods that served as a hangout spot for teenagers who wanted to drink, use drugs and escape their own lives for a few hours. For Eileen, it wasn't just rebellion. It was the only version of freedom available to her. Lowry and Britta's patience for her disappearances quickly reached its limits, though. And in 1971, they made a decision that would change everything when 15 year old Eileen ran away. This time, Lowry and Britta did something they hadn't done before. They filed a runaway child report with the police. They wanted her to face formal legal consequences for her behavior and wanted the system to do what they apparently felt like they couldn't do themselves. But before any of that could play out, something happened that Eileen never saw coming. She had no idea her grandmother Britta had been sick. And while Eileen was hiding from the police, Brita died of cirrhosis of the liver at only 54 years old.
- [30:48]
A
Old.
- [30:49]
E
For all of the complexity and pain of that household, Eileen had considered Brita her mother. And now, without warning, she was gone. While Eileen was sleeping in the woods, police allowed Eileen to attend the funeral. But that was all. There was no invitation to come home. Lowry made it clear that Eileen was not welcome back under his roof. The day after the funeral, Eileen was arrested and sent to an all girls juvenile detention facility in a neighboring town. Town. She wasn't there long before she spotted an opportunity to escape during a field trip out to the country and she took it. The escape was short lived though, and when she was brought to court on the runaway charge, Lowry appeared before the judge and stated plainly that Eileen would never be allowed to return to his home. She was only 15 years old. She had just buried the woman who raised her and she had been formally cast out by the only family she had ever, ever known.
- [31:47]
A
That was Katie Ring, host of America's Most Infamous Crimes. And that's just a taste. Part 1 on Eileen Wuornos is out right now on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Just search America's most infamous crimes and make sure you follow so you don't miss parts two and three. You've been listening to Crime House 247 bringing you breaking crime news. I'm Vanessa Richardson and we'll be back tomorrow morning with more developing stories. Stay safe and thanks for listening.
- [32:22]
E
I'm Katie Ring, host of America's Most Infamous Crimes. Each week I take on one of the most notorious criminal cases in American history. Listen to and follow America's most infamous crimes. Available now wherever you get your podcasts.
- [32:37]
A
Looking for your next listen, check out Hidden History with Dr. Harini Bhatt Every Monday, Dr. Bot goes where history gets mysterious vanished civilizations, doomsday prophecies, and events that science still can't fully explain. Follow Hidden History now on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen.