MURDERED: Melanie Howell

Summary

Crime Junkie — MURDERED: Melanie Howell

Crime Junkie, Audiochuck — April 23, 2026
Host: Ashley Flowers
Co-Host: Brit Prawat

---

Episode Overview

In this gripping episode, Ashley and Brit unravel the 1976 murder of 22-year-old Melanie Howell, a case that remained unsolved for nearly 40 years. The story traces Melanie's harrowing last days, the original failed investigation, and the mysterious resolution decades later through new forensic technology. The hosts delve into how Melanie's murder was ultimately linked to another cold case, the slaying of Elizabeth Wolf, and finally unmask her killer: Paul Bustamante—a man with a hidden criminal legacy. This is an episode about obsession, missed justice, and the double-edged sword of forensic breakthroughs.

---

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. A Cold Case Unlike Any Other

• [00:32–01:00] Ashley introduces the unusual state of Melanie Howell’s case: A detective admits it's "solved" but refuses to disclose who did it.
  • Notable quote (Ashley, 00:57):
    “He couldn’t tell us who did it—which made no sense to me. Police departments normally want to shout it from the rooftops if they solve a cold case.”
• The episode begins with the puzzle: How could a case be solved but the killer remain unnamed, even internally?

2. Melanie Howell’s Final Days

• [01:00–04:49] Detailed recount of Melanie's last two days:
  • Stalked by an unknown man outside her window.
  • Her boyfriend, Dale, describes chasing the shadowy figure but losing him in the dark.
  • Melanie was preparing to move, planning to leave her apartment in two days.
  • On April 23, 1976, a neighbor hears Melanie talking calmly with a man, then, moments later, a violent struggle, screams, and the sound of glass breaking.
  • The neighbor’s husband finds Melanie gravely wounded, wrists bound, after the attacker flees with a black briefcase.
• [04:49–06:35] Victimology and brutality:
  • Melanie was stabbed 47 times, had defensive wounds, but no sexual assault.
  • The attacker’s intent is debated: Was it a murder plan gone wrong or something more opportunistic?

3. The Investigation Stalls

• [06:35–07:50] The only physical evidence: a single bloody fingerprint on the doorknob.
• [07:53–09:00] Eyewitness description:
  • Man, 20s, white or Latino, about 6 feet tall, dark hair—a “pretty basic” composite.
  • No link to Melanie’s acquaintances; Dale is cleared by alibi and forensic evidence.
• Intimidation and stonewalling:
  • Dale and others feel stonewalled by police and even warned to stop asking questions.
  • Despite extensive interviews and efforts, all leads dry up and the case goes cold.

4. Parallel Murders and the Cold Case Revival

• [11:43–14:30] Decades later, revisiting dusty evidence:
  • In 2014, advances in fingerprint technology identify the owner of the bloody doorknob print: Paul Bustamante.
  • Discovery comes too late—Bustamante has been dead since 2006.
  • Melanie’s sister reveals Bustamante also killed another woman: Elizabeth Wolf, a year after Melanie, in Davis, CA.
  • Both victims were in life transition (moving in or out), both stabbed during daylight, and both cases yield matching fingerprints.
• [14:36–15:24] Previous mishandling:
  • Elizabeth’s murder wrongly attributed (like many others) to serial confessor Henry Lee Lucas.
  • Only in 2011 do her fingerprints get retested, closing that case as well.

5. Who Was Paul Bustamante?

• [19:04–25:47] Piecing together Bustamante’s identity:
  • Not previously suspected in either homicide.
  • Born in 1946, raised (likely adopted) in LA, army veteran with overseas service (Germany, 1966–68).
  • Married a PhD student at UC Davis; divorced just before Melanie’s murder.
  • Criminal record dating to 1968: armed robbery, theft, burglary, and more.
  • At time of the murders, moved between Northern and Southern California.
  • Possible military tattoo; military background may explain physical prowess observed by Dale.
  • Hosts attempt to track down and contact people who knew him, including his ex-wife, without success.

6. Open Questions & Unanswered Justice

• The hosts and former detectives suspect there may be more victims.
• The lack of DNA (Bustamante’s body cremated after going unclaimed) hinders efforts to connect him to further crimes.
  • Notable quote (Det. Moharo, paraphrased by Ashley, 17:45):
    “He thinks the only reason investigators haven’t connected him to other cases is they don’t have that DNA.”
• Lapses in police protocol and communication are exposed:
  • Declining to circulate the killer’s name even within the department or to the file—“to protect the family’s privacy”—is described by the hosts as unprecedented and “odd.”
  • Notable quote (Ashley, 18:55):
    “Again, it feels odd to me. I’ve never heard of that.”

7. Community and Closure

• Ashley calls for listeners, investigators, and anyone who knew Bustamante to come forward if they can connect similar unsolved cases or have relevant information.
• [26:01–27:35] Posthumous recognition:
  • Elizabeth Wolf’s family honors her legacy with the creation of the Elizabeth Mary Wolf Environmental Learning Center at UC Davis.

---

Memorable Quotes

• Ashley [00:57]: “He couldn’t tell us who did it—which made no sense to me. Police departments normally want to shout it from the rooftops if they solve a cold case.”
• Ashley [04:49]: “There was blood throughout the apartment, but Melanie was in her bedroom, fully clothed, wrists bound, barely alive, bleeding badly from multiple stab wounds.”
• Brit [07:01]: “...then it makes me wonder how long he had been watching her... waiting for her to come back because she hadn’t been there for, like, a couple of days.”
• Ashley [17:45]: “He thinks the only reason investigators haven’t connected him to other cases is they don’t have that DNA.”
• Ashley [24:30]: “I am dying to talk to this woman... if she or anyone who knows her is listening, we would love to have any kind of conversation.”
• Ashley [26:01]: “So I wonder if there are more cases out there. And listen, this has worked when we’ve done it before, so why not try it again?”

---

Timestamps for Key Segments

• 00:32–01:00: The bizarre “solved but not solved” status of the case
• 01:00–06:35: Melanie’s final days and attack
• 07:50–09:00: Forensic details and the dead-end investigation
• 11:43–14:30: Forensic breakthrough; identification of Paul Bustamante
• 14:36–15:24: Linking the Wolf murder, Henry Lee Lucas’s false confession
• 19:04–25:47: Exploring Bustamante’s background and possible connections
• 26:01–27:35: Ongoing call for tips and highlighting memorial for Elizabeth Wolf

---

Conclusion

This episode stands as a compelling portrait of how justice can be delayed for decades by human error, limited science, and bureaucratic hurdles. Through forensic advancements and persistent reporting, Crime Junkie brings long-suppressed answers to light, providing closure for some and inspiring hope for others with unresolved cases. The call to action for listeners to examine similar cold cases is a testament to the ongoing quest for truth and justice in true crime.

---

For information on memorials or to report related cases, visit crimejunkie.com or email [e-mail].

Transcript

[A]

Every year, millions of people head into the wilderness, searching for peace, beauty and adventure. But hidden in those same scenic landscapes are stories of violence, survival, and lives cut short. I'm Delia d', Ambra, and on my podcast, Park Predators, I uncover the true crimes that happened in the most amazing places on Earth. Listen to Park Predators wherever you get your podcasts. Hi, crime junkies. I'm your host, Ashley Flowers.

[B]

And I'm Brit.

[A]

And Brit, in all my years of not just making true crime stories, but consuming them as well, I have never heard a story that starts like this. One of our reporters reached out to an LAPD cold case guy to ask him about an unsolved case from the 70s. And he's like, oh, that case, that case is actually solved. But he couldn't tell us who did it.

[B]

What do you mean he couldn't, he couldn't tell you?

[A]

Same reaction. So we pressed him, like, how can it be solved if you don't know who committed the crime? And he said, well, the detective who worked the case when it was solved wouldn't tell him the killer's name, which made no sense to me. Police departments normally want to shout it from the rooftops if they solve a cold case. I mean, it's usually even a matter of public record, but they, but not here. Here. It's not even an internal record. So we set out to answer the one question that this detective couldn't. And if you stick with me, I am proud to tell you that at the end of this episode, you'll be one of the first to know who killed Melanie. How. Before 22 year old Melanie Howell was found stabbed to death inside her apartment, something weird had been going on. Her boyfriend at the time, who I'm going to call Dale, told us that Melanie had been really scared in the days leading up to her death. Just two nights before she was killed. Dale says that she called him late at night from her apartment where she lived alone. And she was terrified because there was a man that she caught watching her through her window. He told her to call the police. And when he rushed over from his place, which wasn't far, he actually saw a man coming out of the bushes across the street. And without a second thought, this dude just takes off after him like her boyfriend. Now, Melanie's med school boyfriend was also a runner, by the way, but somehow he says that this man still outran him. And because it was so dark out, he never got a good look at this guy. And he couldn't really describe him to police when they Arrived shortly after. Now, Melanie was already planning on moving out of that apartment. She only had two more days left there before she was set to move into a new place with some people that she was going to nursing school with. So she and Dale decided that it would probably be best if she just stayed with him until then. But in those last two days, Melanie still had to finish packing up for her move, right? So on Friday, April 23, 1976, she left Dale's place in the morning and went back to hers. And Dale told us that neither of them were concerned about her being there during the day. I mean, the apartment was right by the UCLA campus, which, if you don't know that area, it's pretty nice, pretty safe. So back then, there are no cameras or anything digital that could tell us when she got to the apartment. But they do end up locating a neighbor who says that around 10am she heard Melanie talking with a man at her front door. Now, the conversation sounded calm. She could tell that the man left. But then, minutes later, the neighbor heard this man come back. And that is when she heard a struggle and then screams and glass breaking. And when the noises got louder, the neighbor looked through, like, the little peephole. And she said that she saw a man leaving Melanie's apartment carrying a black attache case, like a briefcase. Now, she sent her husband to go check on Melanie. The front door had been fully kicked in, and what he found inside was gruesome. There was blood throughout the apartment, but Melanie was in her bedroom, fully clothed, wrists bound, barely alive, bleeding badly from multiple stab wounds.

[B]

Oh, my God.

[A]

Now, even though this guy, this husband, called police, by the time they got to the scene, it was too late, and Melanie had died.

[B]

And this all happened within, like, minutes, it sounds like.

[A]

Oh, this dude did not spend much time in her apartment. Now, is that because his only goal was to come in and kill her and then get out as fast as possible, or did his real plan go awry because, like, she put up too much of a fight or something? I mean, even though he's gotten her wrist bound at one point, I know she has defensive wounds to her left hand. And there was broken glass scattered in the apartment from a smashed window, likely from her trying to escape or fight back. Now, the guy ended up still stabbing her 47 times. Oh, my God. So even though she hadn't been sexually assaulted, maybe that was the plan and he just underestimated Melanie. Like, once glass is breaking and she's screaming, he might know that they're drawing attention. This is the Middle of the day, and so he, like, takes off and what's the point?

[B]

Briefcase about is that something that he brought with him or. Or took from her place?

[A]

They assume it's his because there wasn't anything missing from Melanie's place. And that might have been what he brought the weapon that he used in, because they never found a knife at the crime scene. So I think the briefcase potentially served two purposes. One, I think maybe, like I said, he had all this stuff that he planned to use.

[B]

It was a kit.

[A]

Yeah. Handcuffs, knife, like, whatever. Two, I think that it might have made him look like a door to door salesman. Like, it makes me wonder if he pretended to be a salesman or something. Someone harmless. And they have this interaction, right, that the neighbor hears and then he leaves, like, maybe probably putting Melanie's guard down, making her think everything seems fine, and then he comes back and catches her off guard.

[B]

But if that's the case, I would guess this isn't the same guy that Melanie saw watching her, like, a couple nights before, or she wouldn't have opened the door.

[A]

Right. I don't know that, though, because I don't think she actually got a good look at the guy. I mean, remember, it was dark when that happened. And her boyfriend told us when we talked to him that she never described the guy to him, which I think she would have done if she could have. So, honestly, to me, the idea that it's not the same guy feels like it would be a wild coincidence.

[B]

Well, and if that's the case, then it makes me wonder how long he had been watching her, like, stalking her out, waiting for her to come back because she hadn't been there for, like a couple of days. Like, at least overnight.

[A]

That's the thing. Like this dude, if it was the same guy, had to have been, like, lying in wait. Middle of the day is not the best time to attack. But he might have been waiting for, who knows, hours, days for her to come back. And he felt like it was now or never. And to me, that doesn't feel like a guy who's like, this is his first time doing something like this. Now, because this guy spent such little time in her place, there wasn't much physical evidence that he left behind except a single bloody fingerprint on the inside doorknob of the front door that I assume he likely left when he was leaving.

[B]

And did the neighbor get a good look at him at any point in time?

[A]

So the only thing the neighbor could say was she kind of looked at him. She said that he Looked like he was in his 20s. He was either white or Latino, like 6ft tall with dark hair. And, I mean, they get enough of a description that police do make a composite sketch, which we have. But, like, to me, it's pretty basic. Like, there aren't too many details. It just looks like a dark haired guy. And it doesn't seem to match anyone that Melanie knew, including her boyfriend, Dale, who was a redhead. And speaking of Dale, at the time Melanie was killed, he was at school, sitting in the UCLA cafeteria with witnesses all around him. He told us that he found out that she was dead when a classmate called and told him that police were looking for him. And he had no problem going to speak with them. And he was easy to rule out. I mean, beyond his airtight alibi, his prints didn't match the one that they had in Melanie's blood. But even though they had asked him a lot of questions about himself and about Melanie, about the days leading up to her death, they weren't willing to answer any of his questions in return, which made him think that they still kind of suspected him. He even told us that a friend of his who, like, kept up with Melanie's case said that a detective warned that person to stop asking questions or he would become a suspect, too. And honestly, it seems like everyone was a little suspect until they could rule them out, probably with that print. But one by one, neighbors, classmates, friends, exes, even people they had to go out of state to chase down, none of them are their mystery man. So despite tons of work, the case stalled and went cold. And, like, listen, there wasn't even much hope being held out for this one. At one point, a detective told a friend of Dale's that the case wasn't solvable, which you don't hear that very often. And the trauma of that stuck with Melanie's boyfriend. He said he felt like the world was exploding around him. And in some ways, it did. I mean, he tried to put on a brave face, but he was so traumatized, he almost failed out of med school. And his grief was so intense that decades later, he still describes the feeling as like nothing he had ever experienced, even after a long career as a trauma surgeon. And one thought that he kept grappling with all those years, was this. Was this just a random attack? And if so, could there be other victims? Well, little did he know the answer to that was yes. And yes,

[B]

we've all been there. You're asleep and hear a bump in the night. It's the worst feeling of vulnerability when you're not protected. Simplisafe is an easily customizable system that ships right to your door in a few days. Their app guided setup is a breeze. You can install and arm your system by yourself in under an hour. No waiting around for a technician. And Simplisafe is more than just a camera. It's a comprehensive ecosystem of sensors, cameras for inside and out and 24. 7 professional monitoring. In the event of a break in fire or flood, Simplisafe's agents are ready to take action. No lock in long term contracts or hidden cancellation FEES. Its affordable 24.7monitorning for a fraction of what the traditional brands charge. A few weeks ago I was in my house by myself for the first time in forever. And I truly have never been so thankful for the confidence I have in Simplisafe. Knowing that I'm safe and protected by SimpliSafe24.7 helped me sleep soundly then and really every single night. I want you to experience the same peace of mind I do. Which is why I've partnered with Simplisafe to offer an exclusive discount to my listeners. Right now you can get 50% off your new system by visiting SimpliSafe.com crimejunkie that's half [e-mail] crimejunkie there's no safe like SimpliSafe.

[A]

In 2014, almost 40 years after Melanie's murder, new fingerprint technology changed everything. Martin Moharo, the cold case detective working Melanie's murder at that time, looked back through cases where fingerprints had been run before 2010. Before that was when LAPD's labs weren't as sophisticated. And he came across that bloody fingerprint from the doorknob. And it was the exact kind of thing that could be rerun all these years later and provide new results. And wouldn't you know it, he got a hit. So in his mind, case closed. Now couldn't prosecute the guy because by 2014, that guy was already dead. So he, he just marked the case closed, told the family, and then told the former detective who worked the case. That's Detective Shepard, who we started the story with. But for some reason, no one would tell shepherd the guy's name who did it. Which is why we were so excited to be able to tell Shepard over 10 years later. The killer's name was Paul Bustamante. We first learned it from Melanie's sister. But then she told us something even more shocking. Paul Bustamante had killed a second woman, a teacher named Ms. Wolf. Now, she didn't have Melanie's case records handy anymore. And all Detective Shepard could remember about this other case was that it happened in Fresno or maybe Sacramento, somewhere in Northern California. So our reporter Malika Dhaliwal, scoured old newspapers for anything about a woman with the last name Wolf, and she was able to find her. 27 year old Elizabeth Wolf was killed more than a year after Melanie, 400 miles away from LA in Davis, California, which, interestingly, is the location of another UC campus. UC Davis. And just like Melanie, Elizabeth was in the throes of relocation. She had just moved back to Davis, where she had graduated from college a few years earlier because she got a job teaching at a local school for deaf children. But she never even made it to her first day of school, because after just two days at her new apartment, she was murdered.

[B]

Is. Is that how he picked his victims?

[A]

I have no idea. I mean, Melanie was moving out, Elizabeth was just moving in. But to me, it seems like too much of a coincidence to ignore.

[B]

Right? Especially if you consider, like, Melanie was being stalked. Like he's peering into a window, there's just boxes in empty rooms.

[A]

Yeah, it's like that. Same telltale. Yeah, same telltale signs. And he could have realized that, like, someone in the middle of a move might be more distracted. Like, doors are open a lot as you're coming and going more frequently.

[B]

But why, though? Like, now we know it wasn't someone that knew Melanie. Or at least I'm assuming he didn't.

[A]

No. Correct. As far as we can tell, Melanie Howell did not know Paul Bustamante, and neither did Elizabeth Wolf. It seems like he just targeted these women out of the blue, but I don't have a great answer for why. Because our reporter got Elizabeth's records from Davis pd and she was attacked almost the same way. It seems like she answered the door to someone. And pretty quickly after that, the guy stabbed her 14 times. No sexual assault. Then the guy runs, leaving fingerprints both on the inside and outside of Elizabeth's front door. Now, in Elizabeth's case, it seems like he did take her purse, but I don't know if we can say that this was the motive for the attack, because it seems like he could have gotten her purse without what he did to her. And now that we know he did the same thing as before.

[B]

Yeah, I doubt that was his motivation. But how did they end up linking Paul?

[A]

Well, it took a long time, and actually, for years, a lot of people considered Elizabeth's case closed because they believed that serial killer Henry Lee Lucas was responsible. I know so, like he did with so many.

[B]

I can tell you why they thought that he confessed to her murder. And they believed him.

[A]

Exactly. And apparently there was enough said that made him convincing in 1983. Sure, that was his M.O. but as time went on and as people started seeing Lucas for what he was, a liar, doubts started creeping in. So in 1990, quietly, without much public attention, a Davis police detective looked back at the evidence, and they found enough issues with Lucas's confession to actually rule him out. But that detective couldn't find anyone else at the time to rule in. So it wasn't until 2011 that her case got a fresh look. And that's when they sent the fingerprint cards that they had to the California doj and boom, Paul Bustamante.

[B]

And what were his prints in the system for? Because, like, they were there when comparing

[A]

for both Elizabeth and Melanie, and Melanie didn't get compared to, like, 2014 or something like that. I don't know which thing that, like, exactly got his print put into the system, but he had a rap sheet going back to, like, 1968. I mean, armed robbery, disorderly conduct, obstructing or delaying a police officer, theft, burglary. Like, it goes on and on. Like, they probably had his prints for decades. But here's the thing. Earlier, I was talking about Melanie's case. That 2010 marker, the DOJ database that they had for comparing this stuff was fairly new. So, like, old evidence cards that they would have with prints on them, like, from crime scenes or from, like, when someone was arrested. Like, those had to be, like, put into the system.

[B]

Right.

[A]

So while, like, before we had the system, before the prints in Elizabeth's case were running, dude was just out there that whole time as a free man, or at least he was up until 2006, because that is when he died. Which is five years before they even ran Prince in Elizabeth's case, in eight years before the ones in Melanie's case got run.

[B]

So he just got away with these

[A]

murders and maybe more, because after three years of his body being unclaimed, it ended up getting cremated. So by the time people realized that this is a guy they wish they could have a DNA sample to compare to cold cases for, it was too late. It was too late. And we did get Detective Moharo, the one who originally closed Melanie's case. We got him to answer a question for us. Do you think Paul Bustamante is a serial killer? And he told us yes. He thinks the only reason investigators haven't connected him to other cases Is. Is because they don't have that DNA.

[B]

Okay, but my question for him is, why wouldn't he tell the other detective Paul's name? Like, why hasn't this been reported before?

[A]

So he told us that there was no big reason. He's like, I just don't go out of my way to publicize or share details about cases that get solved in general unless the chief asks, like, asked me to. And he said he wanted to protect Melanie's family's privacy by not sharing the info with anyone, including Detective Shepard, which, again, it feels odd to me. I've never heard of that.

[B]

But, like, well, and like, you also said it wasn't even in, like, the case file. Like, the information wasn't there to get right.

[A]

Dude, I don't know.

[B]

Okay, again, more questions, but continue.

[A]

Paul Bustamante isn't a suspect in any other LAPD cases. And listen, Mojaro couldn't do a deep dive into the sky or go looking for other old homicides that he might be connected to because his case got closed. And every day in la, they were being thrown new homicides to work. I mean, like, I get that, but that's where we come in. Today's show is sponsored by Strawberry Me. You know what most successful people have in common? They didn't get there alone. They've had mentors and coaches guiding them along the way. And I can attest to the transformative power that a great mentor and supportive team can have. And Strawberry Me career coaching can help you. Career coaching provides clarity, strategy, and accountability to realize your goals. Whether it's advancing your current career or pivoting to a new field, no matter your trajectory, you don't have to figure it out alone. Strawberry Me career coaching is here to help. Their expert guidance helps identify obstacles that hold you back and develop action plans from there. All while having a dedicated coach by your side every step of the way, instead of relying on guesswork or waiting for the right time. Strawberry Me professional coaching helps you take control of your career trajectory, ensuring intentional moves toward word success. Go to Strawberry Me Crimejunkie and get 50% off your first coaching session. That's Strawberry Me Crimejunkie. It's like therapy for your career. Listen, I love looking for a deal, but there are some things in my home that I will only use certain name brands for. And when it comes to washing my clothes, it's Tide, baby. And that's why I'm excited to partner with Tide Evo. Tide Evo isn't a liquid or a pod. It is A lightweight tile that almost feels like fabric, but it is not. One of those detergent sheets that you've seen. I've seen those. Those are old news. This is magic. I mean, really, it's science. They developed a new patented process with over like 50 patents to get here, but to me, it's magic. It's made with tens of thousands of tiny fibers spun together and embedded with a powder that will change the way you do laundry. Cause this is all your laundry steps in one. It has scrubbers, pre treaters, brighteners and fresheners. You just toss load clean and it delivers that powerful Tide clean that I love. Even on the tough stains. And don't worry, whatever your wash situation is, this works. Tidevo works with all machines, all size loads, any kind of water. Try tideevo and experience real laundry magic. Warmer weather means spring is here. It's a gorgeous time of the year. But it also comes with itchy eyes, stuffy noses and scratchy throats. But you can stop allergy season in its tracks and save big on seasonal allergy meds for you and the whole family. Even your pets too. With GoodRx. GoodRx is free and easy to use. All you gotta do is search for your prescription on the website or the app, compare prices, and then you'll get a free coupon. To show your pharmacist you can use Goodrx to save at over 70,000 pharmacies nationwide. You guys, we're talking Walmart, Walgreens, CVS, Publix, Kroger and many more. Goodrx is not insurance, but it works whether you have insurance or not. And honestly, even if you have insurance or Medicare, Goodrx may beat your co pay price. So don't let allergies slow you down. Save time and money on your prescriptions with GoodRx. Go to GoodRx.com CrimeJunkie that's GoodRx.com Crimejunkie. So Paul Bustamante was never a suspect during the investigations of either of these cases. Which means when our reporter Malika started trying to deep dive into this guy, there was nothing to go off of. Like, none of the stuff we normally have, interviews, statements, background on this guy. All we had was his name, two locations, and Detective Moharo's memory that he might have had some kind of military tattoo. Good luck. Now, luckily, these days you can learn a lot from a name. More than you would think. And here's what we found. Paul was born in LA in 1946. We don't know much about his early life. But from census records, it looks like that he may have been adopted and then raised by an aunt and uncle. And he went to high school in the LA area, too. Now, the men Paul likely knew as his dad and his brother both served in the military. And from military records, we learned that Paul did, too. He joined the army in 1966, served overseas in Germany as a rifleman and a radio operator until he was discharged in 1968. And honestly, this kind of clicked for Melanie's boyfriend, because if Paul was also the stalker that he saw in the bushes, that would explain how he was able to outrun him because of his military training. Now, marriage records show that in 1960, 1972, Paul got married to a woman who was a PhD student at UC Davis, studying sociology. Now, I don't know if he met her after he moved north or if he moved north, like, because he met her, whatever reason. But this is kind of an interesting side note. So while this woman was getting her PhD, she taught classes to inmates at a women's prison, and she authored a paper called the Nature of Female Criminality.

[B]

So she's basically an expert on criminal behavior.

[A]

I am dying to talk to this woman.

[B]

This is a silly question. Did we reach out to her?

[A]

Of course we reached out to her, but she didn't even respond to our request for an interview. But I am so interested in hearing what she has to say honestly about

[B]

anything, but specifically about this, truly.

[A]

So if she or anyone who knows her is listening, we would love to have any kind of conversation.

[B]

So did she go to UC Davis with Elizabeth?

[A]

So they were there at the same time, but Elizabeth was an undergrad, and, I mean, it is a big school. All I know is that whatever their relationship was, it didn't last long because they divorced three years later in 1975, and then it's just a year later that Melanie is murdered in la. So at some point, he had to have made his way back down to la, but I don't know if that was to live and he moved, if this was just a visit or what. And as far as I can tell, he wouldn't have had any ties to the school that Melanie was going to. So I doubt that they crossed paths there. But Melanie did volunteer at a free clinic, and the detectives that we spoke to wondered if maybe that could have been a va, which was, and still is, close to the apartment that she lived in. And because Paul was a vet, maybe he was one of her patients, or maybe he at least saw her there. But that's literally just everyone taking a wild guess.

[B]

So he murdered Melanie in 76 and Elizabeth in 77. What was he doing between 77 and 2006?

[A]

That's the big question. I know. In 77 he reenlisted in the Army Reserves out of Sacramento. And then he kept committing petty crimes until he died. And the rest of his life he bounced back and forth between Northern and Southern California. So I wonder if there are more cases out there. And listen, this has worked when we've done it before, so why not try it again? If any investigators are out there listening and you have a cold case that sounds similar to this, email us. Or if you know a local case from your hometown where a young woman maybe just made a move, like within a couple of days, and then she was stabbed inside her apartment, but there was no sexual assault, contact me. The email is tipsoudiochuck.com and I'm also looking for anyone out there who knew Paul Bustamante. Neighbors, co workers, army buddies, acquaintances, anyone who may still be alive today. Again, email me tipsoudiochuck.com. Foreign. Died. Her parents established the Elizabeth Mary Wolf Environmental Learning center out of UC Davis. And so in honor of her and Melanie, we've made a donation and we're going to have a link to that and all of our source material for this episode on our website, crimejunkie.com and

[B]

you can follow us on Instagram at Crime Junkie Podcast.

[A]

Crime Junkie is an audio Chuck production. I think Chuck would approve. Some cases fade from headlines, some never made it there to begin with. I'm Ashley Flowers, and on my podcast the Deck, I tell you the stories of cold cases featured on playing cards distributed in prisons designed to spark new leads and bring long overdue justice. Because these stories deserve to be heard and the loved ones of these victims still deserve answers. Are you ready to be dealt in? Listen to the Deck now. Wherever you get your podcasts,