Podcast
Criminal Adaptations
Hosted by Criminal Adaptations · EN
Criminal Adaptations is a True Crime/Movie Review Podcast discussing some of your favorite films, and the true crime stories that inspired them. With hosts Remi, who spent over a decade working in the film and television industry, and Ashley, a clinical psychologist and forensic evaluator. They discuss a new movie each week and compare the film to the real life events that the film is based on.
15episodes
Episodes
Newest firstAll episodes
Reality / Winner
Mar 202:20:27Tap to summarizeTwo films, one real-life National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower, and a story that blurs the line between truth and fiction. In part two of our season finale, we dive into two very different films: Reality (2023), the HBO American crime drama directed by Tina Sater and staring Sydney Sweeney, and Winner (2024), the black comedy directed by Susanna Fogel, staring Emilia Jones, Connie Britton, and Zach Galifianakis. The films offer two very different cinematic interpretations of the life and arrest of Reality Winner, a former US Air Force linguist turned NSA contractor who leaked top-secret documents about Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. We unpack how each film portrays Winner’s character, choices, and the forces that brought her from military service to a leak that made national headlines. Next, we contrast those portrayals with the real events – from the NSA leak and Federal Bureau of Intelligence (FBI) investigation to her 2018 guilty plea and five-year sentence under the Espionage Act, the longest such punishment for unauthorized media disclosure in recent history. Whether you’ve seen the movies, followed the headlines, or are just curious about the real woman behind both scripts, this episode peels back Hollywood’s layers to reveal the truth beneath.Primary Sources:Howley, Kerry. Bottoms Up and the Devil Laughs: A Journey Through the Deep State. Knopf (2023).Winner, Reality. I Am Not Your Enemy: A Memoir. Spiegel & Grau (2025).NSA Document Instagram: @CriminalAdaptationsEmail us: criminaladaptations@gmail.comTikTok: @criminaladaptationsYouTube: @criminaladaptationsX: x.com/CriminalAdaptTheme: DARKNESS (feat. EdKara) by Ghost148
Transcribe →Snowden
Feb 1602:13:53Tap to summarizeThe movie Snowden (2016) presents the protagonist as a reluctant whistleblower who sacrifices everything to expose government surveillance – but how closely does the film match the real man and case? In part one of our two-part season finale, we break down Oliver Stone’s biopic, staring Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Shailene Woodley, alongside the true story of Edward Snowden, the former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor whose leaked documents revealed the scope of mass surveillance in the United States and beyond. We examine Snowden’s background, motivations, and personal relationships as portrayed on screen, then compare them to the documented timeline of events – from his work inside the intelligence community to the moment he decided to go public. We also look at what the movie emphasizes for emotional impact, what it simplifies or leaves out, and how political beliefs shape the way this story is told. Ultimately, this episode asks whether Snowden (2016) is a faithful retelling, a political statement, or something in between – and why the real-world consequences of the case continue to matter today. Primary Sources:Washington Post (2014)New York Times (2015)The Times (2015)Snowden, Edward. Permanent Record. Picador Paper (2019).United States of America v. Edward Snowden (2019) Instagram: @CriminalAdaptationsEmail us: criminaladaptations@gmail.comTikTok: @criminaladaptationsYouTube: @criminaladaptationsX: x.com/CriminalAdaptTheme: DARKNESS (feat. EdKara) by Ghost148
Transcribe →Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri
Feb 201:26:38Tap to summarizeIf the rage, grief, and unanswered questions at the heart of Martin McDonagh’s Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri (2017) felt almost too real – that’s because they were. In this episode we start by discussing McDonagh’s critically acclaimed and Oscar winning film, which also happens to be one of co-host Ashley’s favorite movies. Next, we compare the case to the still-unsolved 1991 murder of Kathy Page, a case that has haunted her family and the community for decades. We break down the sticking parallels between the movie and Kathy Page’s story: a parent’s public protest, law enforcement failures, billboards demanding a resolution, and the emotional toll of living without justice. We also explore where the film diverges from reality, how fiction reshapes trauma, and what the movies leaves out about the long-term impact on victims’ families. Ultimately, this episode asks a difficult question – when a case goes cold, what does justice actually look like, and who gets to decide when the story is over?If you or anyone you know has information about the murder of Kathy Page, visit the following websites: Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Rangers Cold Case, or Texas Crime Stoppers. Anonymous tips can also be placed by calling 1-800-252-TIPS (8477) or 1-800-346-3243. Primary Sources:Unsolved Mysteries (1997)Cold Justice (2018)ABC 12 News (2018)American Press (2021)Crime Junkie Podcast (2022)Beaumont Enterprise (2022)FKDM (2024)Unsolved Mysteries Instagram: @CriminalAdaptationsEmail us: criminaladaptations@gmail.comTikTok: @criminaladaptationsYouTube: @criminaladaptationsX: x.com/CriminalAdaptTheme: DARKNESS (feat. EdKara) by Ghost148
Transcribe →Loving
Jan 1901:49:57Tap to summarizeIn 2016, Jeff Nichols’ Loving, staring Ruth Negga and Joel Edgerton, brought the quiet, intimate story of Richard and Mildred Loving to the big screen – but just how closely does the film reflect the real case that changed American history? In this episode, we compare Loving (2016) to the true events of Loving v. Virginia, the landmark 1967 Supreme Court decision that struck down laws banning interracial marriage. We explore who Richard and Mildred Loving were, what life was like for them in 1950s Virginia, and how their private desire to live as a married couple turned into a constitutional battle. From the film’s restrained storytelling and emotional tone to the legal realities, timelines, and historical context left on the margin, we break down what the movie gets right, what it simplifies, and why the real story remains just as powerful, if not more so, than its Hollywood portrayal. Primary Sources:Loving v. Virginia, 388 US 1 (1967)The Loving Story (2012)Brimner, Larry. Finding a Way Home: Mildred and Richard Loving and the Fight for Marriage Equality. Calkins Creek (2020). Instagram: @CriminalAdaptationsEmail us: criminaladaptations@gmail.comTikTok: @criminaladaptationsYouTube: @criminaladaptationsX: x.com/CriminalAdaptTheme: DARKNESS (feat. EdKara) by Ghost148
Transcribe →Bronson
Jan 502:01:45Tap to summarizeIn this episode we dive into the wild, chaotic world of Bronson (2008), the stylized film starring Tom Hardy, and unravel how it compares to the real-life story of Michael Gordon Peterson, better known as Charles Bronson. We break down what the movie got right, what it exaggerated, and what was left out entirely. From Bronson’s early life and first arrests, to the decades he spent in solitary conferment, to his transformation into an underground celebrity. Join us as we discuss how “Britain’s most violent prisoner” became a myth with a life story worthy of the silver screen. Primary Source:Bronson, Charles. Bronson. 2009. Instagram: @CriminalAdaptationsEmail us: criminaladaptations@gmail.comTikTok: @criminaladaptationsYouTube: @criminaladaptationsX: x.com/CriminalAdaptTheme: DARKNESS (feat. EdKara) by Ghost148
Transcribe →