Critical Magic Theory: An Analytical Harry Potter Podcast

Episode: WTF is Hogwarts doing???

Host: Prof. Julian Wamble
Date: October 29, 2025

Overview

In this bonus episode of Critical Magic Theory, Professor Julian Wamble invites listeners to step back from the usual scrutiny of Hogwarts’ most prominent figures and instead turn a critical lens on Hogwarts itself as an educational institution. With tongue-in-cheek humor and personal anecdotes, Wamble challenges the nostalgic, magical perception many fans have of the school and interrogates what Hogwarts actually teaches, the social structures it fosters, and its complicity in upholding problematic ideals within the wizarding world. This episode sets the stage for upcoming discussions about Dumbledore, urging listeners to consider the institution he curated and deferred more intense character-focused debate.

Key Discussion Points & Insights

1. Nostalgia vs. Critical Reading: Re-examining Hogwarts

• [02:17] Wamble reflects on the childlike awe of discovering Hogwarts, describing it as “the ultimate dream” for outsiders and “giving very much New Year, new me vibes…but with magic.”
• As adults and educators, listeners are encouraged to ask not just what Hogwarts is, but who it is for, and what it prepares its students to become.

2. Hogwarts as a Pipeline, Not a Place of Possibility

• [04:15] Early excitement about Hogwarts gives way to skepticism:

  “Hogwarts begins to look a lot less whimsical and a lot more like a pipeline…the Hogwarts to Ministry of Magic pipeline.”

• Wamble highlights the narrow scope of the curriculum, geared primarily toward Ministry positions, offering little on practical life skills, civic engagement, or magical theory.
• Muggle-born and Muggle-raised students face added hurdles, as they're given no orientation into magical society and cannot practice magic at home:

  “You can’t learn it at home if you’re Muggle-born or Muggle-raised because you can’t do magic there. So…you are SOL.” [08:53]

3. The House System: Siloing, Competition, and Socialization

• [13:50] The house structure at Hogwarts:

  “They end up being more silos than conduits for conversation…You are not just living with your housemates, you are competing with other houses…rarely encouraged to form friendships outside of it.”

• Wamble compares this to the Olympics—contrasting intense, house-based loyalty with national unity seen in real-world sports events.
• The lasting impact: students internalize separation, leading to “siloing continuing” into adulthood and professional life.

4. Lack of Exposure to Magical Diversity & Global Perspectives

• [19:42] Wamble points out the insularity of Hogwarts:

  “Hogwarts operates…as if it’s the only magical school, because it is the only magical school in the UK…Students are rarely led to believe there are other schools.”

• Even the Triwizard Tournament fails to foster unity, with students still divided by house identity.
• The curriculum emphasizes house pride and British magical supremacy, rarely educating students about international wizarding communities or perspectives.

5. Curriculum, Oppression, and Systemic Prejudice

• [24:58] Wamble discusses the perpetuation of pure-blood supremacy and magical hierarchy:

  “There’s so much at Hogwarts that's left unsaid, entire systems of magical oppression that are never explained or even acknowledged…The werewolf registry, the house elf enslavement, the disappearance of giants, the marginalizations of centaurs—these are not topics of study.”

• Werewolf registry, house-elf labor, and marginalization of non-human magical beings are ignored, allowing prejudices to persist unchallenged—both blatantly and by omission.
• Even the so-called progressive leadership of Dumbledore makes no changes to address these systemic flaws.
• Example:

  “[Dumbledore] doesn't make Muggle studies mandatory for all students… He pours his energy into Defense Against the Dark Arts…which…is still a class about protecting the magical world from internal threats. It's not about understanding systems. It's not about change.” [30:11]

6. Practical Skills—Or Lack Thereof

• [36:22] Students are unprepared for daily life and survival:

  “There is very little education about Muggles, about magical theory, or even practical life skills… None of them know how to cook. None of them know how to do much of anything magically.”

• Survival skills are learned only “on the fly” (e.g., during the Horcrux hunt or in the DA), not instilled by Hogwarts:

  “Harry, Ron, and Hermione survived, not because of Hogwarts, but in spite of it.” [38:11]

7. Complicity in Prejudice and Power Structures

• The status quo is maintained, with Hogwarts “actively regressive…It doesn’t evolve.”
• Discrimination (e.g., Malfoy using slurs, the targeting of Muggle-borns) is left unaddressed.
• The education system fosters ignorance and a sense of magical superiority, exemplified in the casual erasure of Muggles’ agency (e.g., memory charms, altered perceptions):

  “Hogwarts really does kind of socialize the students to believe that asserting magical power over Muggles is not only acceptable but expected” [46:33]

8. The Opaqueness of Magical Governance

• Harry and other students are unprepared for navigating magical bureaucracy or law:

  "Harry does not know what an Auror is until fourth year. He admits that he never thought about life after Hogwarts. If you are a Muggle-born or Muggle-raised person, you have no idea what your future looks like. And Hogwarts does little to change that." [51:11]

• Wamble draws a real-world parallel:

  “…in our own world, we know what happens when the populace is uninformed…Hogwarts creates a generation of magical people who believe in a system without truly, fully understanding it…”

9. What Would “Good” Magical Education Look Like?

• Wamble proposes a more just Hogwarts:

  “It would look like choice. It would look like civics, it would look like ethics, like understanding the Statute of Secrecy not just as a law but as an ideology…Teaching magical students to live in a world that includes and does not fear non-magical people.” [55:18]

• True magical education would encompass justice, ethics, and real-world application—not just magical prowess.

10. The Problem with the “Happily Ever After”

• [58:12] The episode ends with a sharp critique of the series' conclusion:

  “One of the biggest pitfalls of these books is that at the very end, Voldemort is vanquished yet again. And Harry says, I think I'm just gonna have Kreacher bring me up a sandwich. And I thought, nothing changed. But why would it when nothing in his orbit…was problematized in any meaningful way?”

Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments

• [03:02] “There is something so deeply enchanting about the idea of leaving the world behind through platform nine and three-quarters and arriving somewhere where you could learn to be the best version of yourself.”
• [09:46] “The curriculum is not focused on community. It’s not focused on civic engagement or ethics or understanding global magic systems.”
• [16:12] “No one at Hogwarts is teaching them the system. Nobody is telling them what the rules are, what the laws are, and more importantly, why.”
• [21:15] “The house system kind of undermines the notion of magical unity by creating spaces for students to only go into the places they want to be because they believe those are the best places. It's high key, like social media—the echo chambers.”
• [38:26] “The Golden Trio becomes proficient not because of the curriculum, but because they are forced to teach themselves in order to survive a war. Most of their real learning happens extracurricularly.”
• [46:33] “Hogwarts really does kind of socialize the students to believe that asserting magical power over Muggles is not only acceptable but expected in the name of protection or secrecy or out of necessity.”
• [58:12] “At the very end…Harry says, I think I'm just gonna have Kreacher bring me up a sandwich. And I thought nothing changed. But why would it when nothing in his orbit…was problematized in any meaningful way?”

Important Segment Timestamps

• 00:03 – Introduction and intent of bonus episode
• 02:17 – Personal nostalgia and first impressions of Hogwarts
• 04:15 – Questioning Hogwarts’ actual purpose as an institution
• 08:53 – Structural issues for Muggle-born students
• 13:50 – Critical look at the house system’s impact
• 19:42 – Hogwarts’ insularity and impact on worldview
• 24:58 – Complicity in oppression and magical prejudice
• 30:11 – Dumbledore’s failure to reform the curriculum in meaningful ways
• 36:22 – The lack of practical education
• 38:11 – Survival comes despite, not because of, Hogwarts education
• 46:33 – Socialization of magical superiority
• 51:11 – Lack of information about magical governance and future paths
• 55:18 – Imagining a better magical education
• 58:12 – The unchanging status quo at the end of the series

Tone & Style

The episode balances academic critique with warmth, humor, and empathy, aiming to foster honest but loving re-examination of a cherished fictional world. Wamble’s language is colloquial, witty, and deeply personal, inviting listeners to both “bop” (dance) and think critically—underscoring the show’s motif: “Because loving something doesn’t mean we can’t be critical of it.”

Summary

Professor Julian Wamble’s bonus episode asks “WTF is Hogwarts doing???” and answers with a sweeping, incisive critique of the school’s structure, curriculum, and implicit values. While acknowledging the allure and emotional refuge Hogwarts offers, Wamble spotlights major failings: lack of practical education, perpetuation of prejudices, absence of systemic or ethical instruction, and the dangers of unexamined tradition. Ultimate change, he argues, requires not just more spells, but a Hogwarts—and a fandom—willing to imagine a better magical world.

For more discussions and to join the post-episode chat, listeners are encouraged to visit the podcast’s Patreon and socials.