Transcript
A (0:00)
Foreign. Welcome to Currents, the Norton Rose Fulbright podcast. Today we're speaking with Adrian Pinsard, the CEO of Telus Energy, which is a Carlyle portfolio company. Telus is a European green energy investment platform. Adrian, welcome to the podcast.
B (0:19)
Thanks for having me.
A (0:20)
All right, so first, green energy investment platform. What really is that? You know what, what's the vision behind the company and how'd you get started and what are you guys actually up to?
B (0:31)
Yeah, sure. So I'll start with a short intro. I'm Adrian Pinsard, I'm the CEO and founder of Telis Energy Group. Before starting up Telis three years ago, I was the CEO of Zero Generation. That's a Macquarie backed platform covering renewable in Europe. And before that I spent 14 years at Platina Partners making investments into projects, renewable energy developers across Europe. So the thought process was looking back at these 20 years or so of renewable energy investment experience, looking at what works and taking the best bits and really building on a Carlyle mantra of build, not buy a platform. So really building a platform in the way you want to see it. We've set up Telis 3 years ago very organically and one of our differentiating factor is the way we set up. We're very decentralized, so we've got a relatively lean team at group level, commercial people. And then we've got four dedicated subsidiaries, one per market. So we cover four markets. Those are the four largest European power markets. We've got Germany, France, UK and Italy. And the way we're set up, we've got a subsidiary and then we've got a local CEO for that subsidiary. So every time we have a subsidiary led by someone that has 20 years plus of experience, that is local to the market and really understands what works and what doesn't work for the local communities in which we operate, someone that has a vision for that market as to what the energy transition needs to deliver. And at group level, we really see ourselves as that bridge between a large US infrastructure investor, Carlyle, and then the local subsidiary people that really understand how to do that Win Win project. So that's how we've set up from the get go. We set ourselves an ambitious target. So we've come out with a target of 10 gigawatt of pipeline by 2030. And that's how we've set up and we're on our way to get there.
A (3:20)
Are you actually developing the projects through your team or are you providing local developers with capital to develop their projects?
B (3:30)
So our approach has been very organic. So we've got Our own development team, those are teams that take a step back and say four, that country, this is the type of project we need. They look for the best location, secure the land, apply for planning and then deliver a project. So that organic approach, what it translates into, and that's a big competitive advantage for us, is a fairly competitive cost per megawatt developed because we've got our own teams, they develop our own projects. So we've had this very organic approach to development from the get go with our own teams that we control. I suppose one thing that's interesting in comparison to when we started where the market was very, very hot three years ago when we started, we were very much into bubble territory for valuations for anything renewable. And our build not buy approach that I talked about, that was really a reflection on where we were in that cycle and those very high valuations. We felt that the best way to create value was to have that organic approach, have our own development team, have a competitive cost per megawatt developed and really see that value creation between that competitive cost per megawatt and then the value of the projects once they are developed. That's been our story. Now, I'd say some six to 12 months ago we did see valuations coming to a more rational point and what we've done in the last six to 12 months is add MNA to what we do. So although originally we were spending zero time on looking at acquisition opportunities because we didn't really see value at the valuations that we saw three years ago, we think that the valuations now are a lot more rational. So we've been building an M and A effort. What it does is really look opportunistically at buying late stage projects in the four countries in which we operate, so Germany, France, uk, Italy, and complement our pipeline, accelerator or platform through acquisition. So I'd say yes, originally very organic. And that continues to be the engine. We've added that second leg to the strategy just because we see that, you know, we're just at a different point in the cycle and we just, we just see value around acquisitions. And yeah, that also plays to our model. You know, at group level you've got set of commercial people with commercial skills that work very, you know, very hand in hand with local development teams at country level that are super good at due diligencing opportunities because that's very much what they do day in, day out. Looking at land planning grid, what are the things to avoid? So it's a pretty good combination between group level team and country level team around due diligence and obviously we typically tend to position ourselves on acquisitions where we can continue to create value longer term by using, by using our local teams.
