
Loading summary
Advertiser 1
BetterHelp online therapy bought this 30 second ad to remind you right now, wherever you are, to unclench your jaw, relax your shoulders, take a deep breath in and out. Feels better, right? That's 15 seconds of self care. Imagine what you could do with more visit betterhelp.com randompodcast for 10% off your first month of therapy. No pressure, just help. But for now, just relax.
Advertiser 2
If you're running a business, you know that every time you miss a call, you're leaving money on the table. When every customer conversation matters, you need a phone system that keeps up and helps you stay connected 24 7. That's why you need OpenPhone. OpenPhone is the number one business phone system that streamlines and scales your customer communications. It works through an app on your phone or computer, so no more carrying two phones or using a landline. Plus say goodbye to voicemail. Their AI agent can be set up in minutes to handle calls after hours, answer questions and capture leads so you never miss a customer. OpenPhone is offering our listeners 20% off of your first six months at openphone.com business get that's O P E N P-H-O-N-E.com business and if you have existing numbers with another service, OpenPhone will port them over at no extra charge. OpenPhone no missed calls, no missed customers.
Advertiser 3
Epic views, waterfall, mists, summit, sunsets. It's all better outside and with alltrails you can discover the best of nature. With over 450,000 trails around the world. D Download the free app today and find your next adventure.
Dan Snow
Hi everyone. Welcome to Dan Snow's history. An entire province of the Empire almost torn from the mighty grasp of Rome. A legion destroyed. The eagles humiliated. Roman towns wiped off the map. Roman settlers massacred. Roman historians tell us the name of the rebel leader, the woman responsible for this destruction, a British Queen, Boudicca. One historian, Tastus, even recounts rousing speeches that she gave to her furious followers. But there is a nagging problem with all of this. How much can we trust these these few sources that have survived? Was Boudicca real? What really happened in that great uprising in Roman Britain in the first century AD to talk about what we know and what we can only guess at. How far we can trust these Roman sources? I've gone to the brilliant Dr. Shushma Malik. She's a lecturer at the University of Cambridge. She's the author of of the Nero Antichrist. She has got answers. Or at least she's gonna tell me one of the best questions to ask this Is Dan Snow's history hit? And we're talking all about the Great Budokan Uprising. Enjoy.
Dr. Shushma Malik
T minus 10 atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. God save the King. No black white unity till there is.
Advertiser 2
First some black unity.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Never to go to war with one another again. And liftoff.
Darina
And the shuttle has cleared the tow.
Dan Snow
Shushma. Thanks so much for coming on the podcast.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Hi, Dan, Lovely to be here.
Dan Snow
This is one of the big moments of British history, isn't it? Tell me, what is the state of Britain in 60 AD, before this revolt breaks out? Where are we?
Dr. Shushma Malik
So Britain has been part of the Roman Empire, sort of more formally, I suppose, since about 43 AD. So that's Claudius. So we've got the formal annexation of Britain in that stage. But actually Britain has had relationships, trading relationships, all sorts of things with Rome before that. So we know Julius Caesar, of course, crossed the Channel and went over. But also since sort of Augustus, there's been continuing relationships between Britain and Rome. So this isn't sort of entirely an unknown territory or an unknown place. Certainly not. And you get in Britain, in terms of sort of its organisation itself, there are different regions, so different places, and there are different people in ruling those places. So kings in charge of kingdoms, I suppose, and a lot of that stays in place under Claudius. And that's where we get to in around 60 AD, when one of the kings in East Anglia dies.
Dan Snow
So even though we like painting the map red in our neat little modern way, actually the Roman conquest often just meant arriving in an area, meeting the local king or the local elite and going, can we do business? We'll leave you in charge as long as you pay us some tax and sort of pay homage to us. And so it would have felt for locals not necessarily like a big sort of jack booted conquest.
Dr. Shushma Malik
I think that's right. But what's interesting about particularly the story of Boudicca is that what we have in that area is veteran colonies. So one of the things that the Romans did was settle veterans in land of the Iceni. So in East Anglia, so there is a bit more of. You can see the difference that that's made. In particular because these veterans, one of our sources say that's one of the reasons for the war, because they were behaving very badly or the revolt. We also see sort of, you know, some architectural differences, that kind of thing. So we've got a temple to Claudius at this point as well. So there are changes, but it's not necessarily that you kind of get an overhauling of the Political system, for example.
Dan Snow
So the Romans arrive in East Angia at some Stage in the 40s A.D. yeah, might have been a bit of a battle, might have been bloody. Or does the local king immediately go, okay, fine, you guys are like pretty tough opposition. I'm going to sort of submit to you if I can stay in power in my little area.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah. So you have battles. Normally you would imagine battles when the Romans and the indigenous people, whoever they might be, come into contact. So normally a bit closer to the coast, but then once the fighting carries on, I guess it's difficult because there's not necessarily one answer to that for different places. But you would imagine perhaps a bit of submission depending on how far you're through the war and what you imagine. But also I think there is a clear violence to this as well.
Dan Snow
Okay, so it might be that what you get is of other empires, you might get a local king resists Romans, give him the chop and put his little brother, brother on the throne or something like that.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, you sometimes get those sorts of things. I mean, you can see examples of that in Egypt. It's a similar time period. This is Julius Caesar as well, and the way that they were sort of intervening in politics in Egypt. So Julius Caesar starts to play the diplomat between Cleopatra and her brother, but then also gets involved in much more difficult ways. And then also when you get Antony and Cleopatra and her sister arguing Arsinoe, Antony is very involved in the death of Cleopatra's sister. So there's intervention there as well. And certainly, you know, it's one of the things the Romans used as a sort of model of imperialism.
Dan Snow
By 60 AD you've got a sort of patchwork quill. You've got the Romans advancing across Britain. You've got some local kings that still sort of have a bit of autonomy, but basically are obeying the Roman command. And they're pushing into Cornwall, Wales, even up into the north of what is now the north of England as well. So they're sort of expanding Roman rule in Britain.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah. So of course this is a process and it sort of takes time. And eventually there are going to be Romans stationed at particularly strategic parts of Britain as we go into the later first century. And of course then we get sort of Hadrian's Wall and those sorts of areas, settlements tend to be more in border places rather than necessarily spread throughout the entirety of the island or, you know, in other places as well. So the Romans were quite strategic about where they stationed legions and where they had military presence versus other types of presence. Like colonies and other ways of integrating.
Dan Snow
So these are colonies of veterans, troops who've promised, like, well done, you've served the Roman army very loyally. Here's some free land. And even though you might be from Croatia, you're going to get some land in Essex and there'll be a little colony and a little town and a bit of Roman ness and temples and things, and then farms for veterans all around there.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, exactly. So that kind of settlement we see in various parts of the Roman Empire. And certainly one of the things that Augustus was grappling with, if we sort of go back to the earlier Julio Claudian period, was making sure that veterans had good land to be settled on so that they felt like they were getting their due recompense for all of the war and all of the, you know, particularly if we think coming out of a period of civil war as well. For Augustus, all of those sorts of loyalties were properly paid and properly rewarded.
Dan Snow
Soldiers have fought for the land in their heads. They want to see some benefit, I suppose.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Well, yes, and that's an interesting point because historically, when we think about the way that the Roman Empire sort of understood itself and how Rome understood the purpose of empire, I suppose, was that that land was part of the res publica. So res publica is where we get the word republic from, but it means sort of the people's. So the land and the empire that's commonly shared by the Roman people. But actually, you know, what we kind of see as we get later on in the republic and then into the imperial period is the reality that a lot of this land is not being shared equally. And in particular, it's very important once we get the professionalization of the army in the late Republican period as well, for payment to be much more formalised.
Dan Snow
Okay, so we then get a situation in 62 Roman historians tell us about this.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yes. So in terms of what happens In Britain in 1661, we've got one historian called Cassius Dio who's writing in the late second, early third century. He's a Roman senator, but he himself is from Bithynia, so modern day Turkey. But he's quite integrated into Roman politics. He's a consul as well as part of his career. And the other source we have is Tacitus. And generally speaking, people sometimes think Tacitus is more reliable because he's a bit closer to the time, he's late first, early second century ad, but also because his father in law was actually in Britain, probably not in the time of the Boudican revolt, but a little bit later. So Agricola, who would go on to.
Dan Snow
Become a great general.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Exactly, precisely.
Dan Snow
And would have served alongside people who would have served in that period.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, quite possibly. Exactly. And would have had a much closer connection. So we get actually an account of Boudicca and with the Boudiccan revolt in. In two of Tacitus's works. So the Agricola, which he wrote earlier, which was a sort of biography of his father in law, and then his later work, which is the Annals, which is his history of essentially the Julio Claudian period from Tiberius to Nero, where he sort of revisits these themes and gives us a bit more narrative as well.
Dan Snow
Okay, so what do they say happens?
Dr. Shushma Malik
So depends who you ask. I focus on the Annals and Cassius Dio as the two different versions. So according to Tacitus, they're in the Annals. It's about the death of Prasutagus. So that's the husband of Boudicca.
Dan Snow
He's a local king in what's now Norfolk.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, precisely. Yeah, yeah, in Norfolk and East Anglia. And when he dies, he leaves half of his kingdom to Rome, which, you know, makes sense as someone who was probably allied, an allied king to Rome to Nero specifically. And he leaves the other half to his family. So to. To Boudicca and. And their daughters. But the Romans, the veterans, these settled veterans, decide that actually the fact that half of it was left to Nero means. Can take advantage of this. And according to Tacitus, they start to sort of attack the house and also assault Boudicca's daughters. Boudicca and Boudicca's daughters. So it's a much more sort of personalized tale. One of the things that Boudicca uses when she's sort of talking to the troops and thinking about the reasons why they should go and revolt against the Romans is this sort of personal, really quite horrific violent acts against. Against her and her family. And that emblematises, I suppose, the idea of what these Romans are doing to these women as well is, you know, partly the fact that these are women. So that's one story. The other story from Cassius Dio is much less personal. It's not personal at all, really. In fact, he talks about the fact that the certain Romans, including one of Nero's closest advisors, Seneca, has made these, you know, huge loans that no one asked for to the Britons and is now recalling those loans. And also that taxation is very high, that there are all of these different financial problems and economic problems and taxation in Particular is seen as a big driver for him, as the cause of the revolt. So that's a very different way of thinking about it and understanding it. And when he has Boudicca sort of address her troops, it's about the Romans and the fact that they are not worthy to be ruling over the Britons. The Britons have, you know, far more masculinity, Boudicca included, than these sort of Romans, who are very decadent.
Dan Snow
Their spreadsheets and their interest rates.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Well, exactly. And their bread, actually, bread is one of the things that she talks about. Bread, wine and oil. That's the. The symbolism of decadence. Whereas, you know, they can find their bread in any root that they find in the soil. So it's a really interesting difference, I think, between the two sources and how they want to understand these problems. For Cassius Dio, it's much more about this kind of idea that the barbarism, if we want to use that word of the west, and how they have kept up these old characteristics versus the decadence of Nero's Rome. Whereas for Tacitus, it's sort of personalised, much more. And I think also has more to do with Boudicca's role as a wife and a mother as well.
Dan Snow
But we sort of know what happens next, and partly because of the archaeology, which I'd like to ask you about. But Boudicca appears to have rallied her tribe and perhaps others, and marched on this nest of Roman veterans, particularly Camulodunum Norm Colchester, which we think was totally destroyed.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, absolutely. So, again, our sources give us numbers, but we have to be very wary when they do give us numbers. Cause most of the time they're sort of exaggerating or rounding up quite significantly. So Cassius Dario says 80,000 Romans. So these are Romans living in Britain. And allies to the Romans living in Britain, were killed while there was this sort of destruction of these cities that Boudicca did before she was stopped by the Romans. So there was clearly quite a lot of a huge impact on the southeast of England in terms of what she did. And again, the archaeology sort of bears that out as well. But Boudicca, too, and the army, what they're also taking advantage of is the fact that the sort of governor, the person who was in charge in Britain at this stage, was off in Angleson.
Dan Snow
Yes. Suspiciously good timing.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, well, I mean, not suspicious, like strategic timing.
Dan Snow
Yes, very strategic. Sorry. Yeah. Suspicious in that it seems that perhaps it could have been coordinated because the Romans are off in Anglesey.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, absolutely. And this is Another thing of why we have a bit of a problem dating exactly when this happened, because our sources talk about it as probably being 61, but then actually what happens means that it takes place in a longer time period. So it probably started in 16 to 61, we're not quite sure, but it wasn't a very, very quick sort of succession of seems to have been a campaign that's taken a while.
Dan Snow
So we think Boudicca March on Modern London, Mon Albans are the three that's often talked about. And you mentioned archaeology. It seems if you dig down in any of those settlements today, you hit a Boudicca destruction horizon.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yes, absolutely. So there is, yeah, like you say, a burn layer in the stratigraphy that indicates, you know, something clearly happened there in the mid first century. The interesting thing about that, then, is that we called this the Boudican Revolt, and clearly there was a revolt in Britain. And we have these two historical sources who, you know, name her in various ways, different spellings, but it's clearly the same person that talk about this being led by this woman who was the wife of the king who died. But actually we have very little evidence of Boudicca. We have a lot of evidence for the revolt archaeologically, but we have very, very little evidence for Boudicca herself, mainly just these histories. So the bit that's famous about all of this is often her. And that makes for some very, very interesting kind of views of history and views of women and views of leadership. But in evidential terms, the Boudican Revolt is a little bit more difficult.
Dan Snow
Eventually, this army, we think, according to the sources, they march up Watling street, the modern A5, the Roman governor is sort of somewhere in the Midlands with his legions. There's a huge battle. We don't exactly know where. Yes, lots of people can tell us in the comments where they think it is. It's a lively topic of discussion. I've looked for a few myself. And there's this massive battle that the British appear to lose.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, absolutely, yeah. So this is the battle that. That our sources are very interested in. Suddenly the action becomes very vivid. We get these speeches, we get pairs of speeches. So Boudicca giving a speech and then Suetonius Paulinus on the. The Roman side giving a speech, whipping up their troops and giving everyone a reason to go into battle. But it is catastrophic for the Britons. They'd been going along, they hadn't faced much resistance. You know, the burning of all of these cities was one thing, but when they actually came face to face with the Roman army, even though they had more people, it was a fairly brutal outcome. And Boudicca herself, you know, in our sources is there giving the speeches. But also we get very different accounts of her death between our two sources as well. So Tacitus says that they were defeated, she did what she would do, which is take her own life, and she poisoned herself. Whereas Cassius Dio is actually a bit more optimistic, I suppose, in that he says, actually, yes, this was a great defeat, it was catastrophic. But there were still, you know, a core group of people who were willing to cut of start again and bring the battle again. But then Boudicca got ill and she died of her illness. And that then was the deciding moment where they accepted their defeat. If Boudicca hadn't got ill, he's sort of insinuating, who knows whether they could have carried on. But her death through illness rather than her own act was the decisive bit.
Dan Snow
And did this shake Rome? I mean, Britain was right on the edge of the world. It was quite expensive to maintain. It wasn't super abundant in resource. I mean, it's useful. But there was a kind of cost benefit analysis, wasn't there?
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah.
Dan Snow
Do you think this risked prizing the province from Rome's grip, or would they always have come back? They couldn't take the humiliation of abandoning it.
Dr. Shushma Malik
I mean, it's not presented as something in our sources, at least, that seems to have worried anyone in Rome, if that makes sense. I was rereading Cassius Dio this morning and it's sort of, you know, it's quite striking that you get this account of Nero's Juvenalia, which is the games he instigates to celebrate his own coming of age kind of thing where he shaves off the his first beard. And so you've got that account and it's all about Nero and, you know, his decadence and the fact that he doesn't understand kind of, you know, what the protocol is of hierarchies and games and all sorts of things. Then we go to Britain and Cassius D sort of gives Boudicca this great speech where he says the Romans are all effeminate. Look at Nero. And he feminizes Nero's name, so Domitia Nero instead of Domitius Nero. So he's making this really clear point that the Britons are sort of the archetype of masculinity and all of these Romans are the archetype of femininity. And even Boudicca as a woman is more masculine than this. Feminized Nero. So it's all playing into what we've been talking about before in Cassius Dio. And then after we get the count of her death, he then goes on to what Nero's doing with his wives, so Octavia and the fact that he wants to divorce the woman that he's married to. So all of this is sort of wrapped up in this story of Nero's goings on in Rome, particularly in relation to these questions of gender, you know, masculinity and femininity and so forth.
Dan Snow
You're listening to Dan Snow's history here. There's more to come.
Advertiser 1
Better Help Online therapy bought this 30 second ad to remind you right now, wherever you are, to unclench your chop, relax your shoulders, take a deep breath in and out. Feels better, right? That's 15 seconds of self care. Imagine what you could do with more visit betterhelp.com randompodcast for 10% off your first month of therapy. No pressure, just help. But for now, just relax.
Advertiser 3
Out here, we feel things the sore calves that lead to epic views, the cool waterfall mist during a hot hike, and the breeze that hits just right at the summit. But hey, don't just listen to us. Experience it for yourself. Alltrails makes it easy to discover the best of the outdoors with more than 450,000 trails around the world, points of interest along the trail, and offline maps for always on navigation. Download the free app today and find your next outdoor adventure.
Darina
Hi, I'm Darina, co founder of OpenPhone. My dad is a business owner and growing up I'll never forget his old ringtone. He made it as loud as it could go because he could not afford to miss a single customer call. That stuck with me. When we started OpenPhone, our mission was to help businesses not just stay in touch touch, but make every customer feel valued, no matter when they might call. OpenPhone gives your team business phone numbers to call and text customers all through an app on your phone or computer. Your calls, messages and contacts live in one workspace so your team can stay fully aligned and reply faster. And with our AI agent answering 24 7, you'll really never miss a customer. Over 60,000 businesses use Open Phone. Try it now and get 20% off your first six months@openphone.com business and we can port your existing numbers over for free. OpenPhone no missed calls, no missed customers.
Podcast Host
Land a Viking longship on island shores, scramble over the dunes of ancient Egypt, and avoid the Poisoner's cup in Renaissance Florence. Each week on Echoes of History, we uncover the epic stories that inspire Assassin's Creed. We're stepping into feudal Japan in our special series, Chasing Shadows, where samurai warlords and shinobi spies teach us the tactics and skills needed not only to survive, but to conquer. Whether you're preparing for Assassin's Creed Shadows or fascinated by history and great stories, listen to Echoes of History, a Ubisoft podcast brought to you by History Hits. There are new episodes every week.
Dan Snow
Before we get into what you really think, who Boudicca might have been or if she existed, just remind me, which is so fascinating. Queen Elizabeth I, for example, had never heard of Boudicca. Like, we lost Boudicca and she was rediscovered. Tell me about that.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, that's true. So Boudicca has a fascinating reception history that she seems to go in and out of fashion. So. Well, she disappears, like you say, for a bit and then comes back again. We've got these sort of ancient accounts and then there's sort of some early medieval period accounts. But like you say, she disappears a bit from our literary records because we.
Dan Snow
Have lost that book of Tacitus and Cassius Die, for example.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, well, Tacitus in particular, he gets lost and found again, quite significantly at different points. It's difficult when you do have a manuscript edition that you're playing with. That means bits are better known and worse known at different points. Cassius Dio is writing in Greek. So there's also a question then of what sources people are using and what they're reading. Certainly in the Byzantine Empire, you know, we'd get a very different story. But in the west, there's a different sort of language tradition as well. So we do get lots of these stories, very different takes on them. I mean, for a long time before Tacitus's books on Nero were rediscovered, Tiberius was the ultimate tyrant. Right. That's as bad as you can get. Like, look what he does. And then Nero comes back again and you get all of the popular response to that. And similarly, with Boudicca, you get different periods where she works and even when she does come back, how she's operating within political culture and popular culture and how people want to identify her and who they want to identify her with is quite problematic and quite a complex picture.
Dan Snow
Yeah. Because she comes back in the early modern period, everyone's like, hang on, are we celebrating this person who rebels against a mighty empire now that the Brits have conquering a mighty empire? Or we.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Well, exactly. I mean, who is she? She's a British queen, on the one hand, so we've got some good parall.
Dan Snow
But we also really like the Romans.
Dr. Shushma Malik
But we also like the Romans, but then we don't like Nero. So she works also very well because she is of the Neronian period. So there's this nice kind of, well, Nero is the Roman who's not really Roman because he's a bit too, you know, Eastern. And he actually aligns in tropes of slander. Exactly, precisely. Which aligns quite well with what the British are doing in Empire as well. And then you've got Boudicca, who is, you know, the strong British queen. But on the other hand, she rebels against an empire which is very difficult to get away from. So particularly the mid 19th century, there's a lot of contestation about what to do with Boudicca. On the one hand, she can symbolize the Indian uprising of 1857. On the other hand, Albert wants to make her a sort of ancestor of Queen Victoria. So how you negotiate those things is quite difficult.
Dan Snow
And now she is squarely in the lively publishing tradition of girlboss. Like, I cannot walk around my house without stumbling across some of my daughter's books or playing cards or top trumps or whatever, featuring kind of Boudicca wrecking shop.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Well, maybe that's how we should do it. I think that sounds like a good place to settle.
Dan Snow
But we. Except you also do have to deal with the fact that accorded taste is like monstrous, monstrous crimes that perpetrated under.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Well, yeah, yeah, absolutely.
Dan Snow
Against the civilian population.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Mass slaughter, according to some of our sources.
Dan Snow
Difficult. Okay, so I was this many years old before I realized that brilliant academics like you are actually thinking, well, maybe Boudicca didn't really kind of exist in the way that these Roman historians. I mean, that's blown my mind. Is there now a question mark about whether Boudicca was actually a thing?
Dr. Shushma Malik
Clearly the revolt happened, and clearly there would have been a leader. I think what there's a difficulty with is sort of disentangling the reception history of Boudicca from what we actually know of the time. So I think most historians now would say, look, clearly there was, you know, some sort of figure here that was leading the revolt. Someone perhaps. Boudicca was an honorific title, but actually a lot of the imagination around her. So, like you say in the books, there'll be a very particular image of this woman and the fact that she was a queen as well. I mean, our sources don't use the word queen about her, but it's become really important that she's a sort of ancestress queen, specifically of Britain. Really, what historians mean when they try to do that is that the Boudicca of Tacitus and Cassius Dio is not necessarily something we should think of as, you know, pure historical representation. Unfortunately, you know, if we were to look at someone like Agrippina or someone like Messalina, now we've got the literary tradition, we've got what Tacitus says, we've got what Suetonius and Cassius Dio say, and we tend to take that with a bit of a pinch of salt because they're thinking about very particular things when they're talking about them. But we've got inscriptions, we've got statues, we've got coins. Right. We've got all of this other material evidence that, yeah, needs a lot of interpretation as well, but can give us a bit of a different way of thinking about the role of these women in Roman society. Right. With Boudicca, we don't have that. We don't have that material layer to draw on as well. We're stuck with the literature and that makes it quite difficult.
Dan Snow
Before you're coming on, I got to thinking, is there also something about women as rebels to Roman rule in a way that you do see it in other traditions, other parts of history, but there's something about, you know, we've got Boudicca, we got Cleopatra, who's an ambiguous figure in terms of rebellion against Roman rule, but certainly a sort of powerful woman who challenges nature parts of Roman rule. We've got Cartimanjewa, this northern chieftain in Britain, who does another rebellion as well. And then is it Zenobia and Palmyra?
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, Zenobia and Palmira.
Dan Snow
Is that just luck and whatever or is. Are Roman historians, is there almost a trope, a tradition of saying, look, when things are bad in the Roman Empire, even women are able to. Is there something going on there?
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, it's a really good question. I think there are probably a few different answers. I think on the one hand we should stop thinking that women don't rule in antiquity, because clearly they do. By which I don't mean to say that there were lines of succession, but things happen where husbands die, sons are very young. You know, that's the case with Zenobia, certainly Cleopatra co ruling with her brothers. That sort of mechanism obviously can exist and has existed. And we think of it perhaps as an anomaly. But whether we should think of it as an anomaly is, I think, a different question. And I think also our sources are interested in that because in Rome, you know, women holding this kind of power is really difficult going from the Republic into the imperial period for people to, to understand. So in the Republic you've had the senatorial class and yes, there are sort of women around that and involved in conversations. We've got women that we hear about, like Brutus's mother Savilia and others who clearly are quite important political, I'm going to say players, but in political conversations in and of their own right, because of who they are, but obviously because of who their male relatives are. But in the imperial period, we see that like emphasized in the imperial family even more suddenly you've got, you know, all of women who can be the wife of an emperor, the mother of an emperor, the, you know, the sister of an emperor and all sorts of things. So in Rome they're still kind of dealing with that even in the late second century ce, still dealing with those kinds of ideas. And then when these women elsewhere are coming up, it's perhaps unsurprising that they want to talk about them. So someone like Cleopatra, someone like Zenobia, someone like Boudicca, and they think about them as women because they're women, but also because this is a sort of paradigm of leadership that perhaps is there, but also can be part of military activity in a rebellion as well.
Dan Snow
And there is a later rebellion in Britain as well, isn't there?
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, so this is later in the time of Agricola, when Tacitus's father in law is in Britain. And again, we get these great speeches and these great accounts of what's happening. And also the Romans are sort of pushing their territory further north at this point as well.
Dan Snow
And that provokes a potentially female led rebellion as well, or sort of resistance anyway. So Boudicca's meant different things, different people. She's been received in so many different ways.
Dr. Shushma Malik
I mean, it's fascinating about historical figures, I think, full stop, there are lots of different ways of taking historical figures and using them in the bounds of kind of, you know, other political cultures to say particular things. But because Boudicca is who she is, and because of the relationship between sort of rebellion and empire and the fact that she's there when Nero is there there, makes her, you know, doubly triply complicated, I think, because there isn't this kind of straightforward story like you get with Cleopatra of the seductress and, you know, Julius Caesar and Mark Antony, these great generals who are enslaved to her kind of charm or whatever we want to say about that. But Boudicca is completely different. The sort of dynamics there, because Nero is the one who's sort of always weak, not weak because it's anything to do with her, but just a weak emperor. And she sort of, you know, in our sources, particularly in Cassius Dio, is making these points about embodying kind of the traditional sort of British value of hard work and being able to be militarily successful because you don't rely on decadent luxuries because you're very close to the earth and the ground and the place where you live and those sorts of things. So later on, when Britain is the empire and you get expansion and colonies in India and various things, and then uprisings again against Britain as an empire, it can become very complicated. But actually, even before that, we see Boudicca in domestic political culture, away from empire, actually. So one of the interesting things, I think, actually, about the way that Boudicca comes into political culture of the early 19th century is via Queen Caroline, George IV's wife. Exactly.
Dan Snow
And he has the air of Nerobaton, doesn't he?
Dr. Shushma Malik
He does. According to. According to the radical press, he does, yeah.
Dan Snow
But you're right, sort of dissolution, has an artistic bent.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, absolutely not.
Dan Snow
Rugged, simple, manly, virile sort of kind of thing.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Terrible to women.
Dan Snow
Terrible to his mother and women.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Exactly. And countless mistresses as well.
Dan Snow
Yeah. How interesting. So Queen Caroline as Boudicca, one of.
Dr. Shushma Malik
The really interesting years. Queen Caroline is 18, 20, when she's actually put on trial through the House of Lords for, ironically, and this was sort of seen as that, I think, by some anyway, for adultery, despite the fact George IV was, you know, clearly doing this, which is why it couldn't go to trial through the courts, it had to go through the House of Lords. She is represented in. We see in some caricatures, so in the press, as a sort of Boudicca figure. So one of the ways, you know, is that she is against George IV and his decadence. She's symbolizing a kind of old British value, the values of being a queen. Because what they wanted to do, the outcome of this trial, would be to strip her of the title of queen, to take away her queenship. So she is fighting to keep that, or her lawyers are fighting to keep that, and she herself, she writes to the House of Lords as well. But it's interesting that sort of in the press, that's how. Or in the radical press, that's how she's represented. Whereas on the other side, Rome still comes into the picture, but she's messalina instead. So she is like the ultimate kind of, you know, adulterous woman again, pulling strings. Precisely, Exactly. Yeah. But someone who cannot control the. Their sexual appetite. That's the thing about Messalina, that's sort of probably the most famous and was very well known in that period, as well as a sort of anecdote about her that she essentially, you know, our sources say, prostituted herself. And that was the argument that the anti radicals were trying to make about Queen Caroline at the same time as another faction were trying to figure her as Boudicca. And yeah, so it's really interesting how you get this sort of backwards and forwards with this woman who is being so variously kind of pulled around these different ancient representations that Boudicca is there as this figure. So this is before Victoria, of course, but as this figure of kind of old British values of queenship and victory. And here she's having a victory over sort of the Lords.
Dan Snow
Just another brilliant example of how we reach into the past and tell stories and histories because they satisfy some purpose that we have in the present.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Yeah, absolutely. And because these figures, you know, have become. They instantly say something. You can instantly sum up something. If you say Nero Vidal by Rob Burns, you know what that means? If you say this person is a Messalina type, you know what that means? This woman, this queen is like Boudicca. You know what that means?
Dan Snow
Girl boss.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Exactly. It's a very quick way to fundamentally sort of capture the essence of something because these stories are so well known.
Dan Snow
And yet there may only be a shred of truth within them.
Dr. Shushma Malik
Well, and maybe truth isn't the point.
Dan Snow
Oh, brilliant. Well, listen, thank you very much, Shushma, for coming on, talking all about Boudicca and even discussing whether or not she did in fact exist, which has blown my mind. I love this story. I've been to sites across Britain, connected with it, and looked at all the archaeology as well. So you can actually check that out on history hit. Whether it's podcasts like the Ancients or my feed on our YouTube channel, and on our subscription channel as well, we've got lots and lots of Boudicca and indeed Roman content. See you next time. Thanks very much for listening, everyone. Before you go, I'll tell you that ever at the cutting edge, the bleeding edge of what's new and exciting, after 10 years of the podcast, you can finally watch on YouTube. We are moving fast and breaking things here, folks. Our Friday episodes each week will be available to watch on YouTube. And you can see me, you can see what we're talking about. I'd love it if you could subscribe to that channel over there. Just click the link link in the show notes below and you can watch it on your phone, your tablet, or even a tv. Or even a giant cinema movie screen if you have one in your underground lair. See you next time folks.
Advertiser 2
Hey Tinsley, why don't we use Ezkater to order food for staff lunches?
Advertiser 3
Because my 46 page acronym system is so easy. I just have to salad, stay alert to late arriving deliveries, pie, put in expenses and gugapie. Go out and get everyone's preferences and allergy information.
Advertiser 2
That's supposed to be simple.
Advertiser 3
No, simple is Stephen, Irma and Margie prefer lasagna and empanadas.
Dan Snow
Omg.
Advertiser 3
No need to make work life more complicated. Just use EasyCater, the easy way to.
AI Media Planner
Get food for work. Looking for the perfect podcast to sponsor? Meet Smart Recommendations, your AI powered media planner. Just describe your target audience in your own words and Acast Smart Recommendations will pinpoint the perfect podcast in seconds. Want to reach women aged 25 to 35 interested in film? No problem. Millennials living in big cities who love true crime. We've got you covered. Get started now@go.acast.com ad.
Podcast Information:
Dan Snow opens the episode by setting the stage for an exploration into one of Britain's most legendary figures, Boudicca. He introduces the central question: "Was Boudicca real? What really happened in that great uprising in Roman Britain in the first century AD?" To navigate these questions, Snow brings in Dr. Shushma Malik, a lecturer at the University of Cambridge and author of "Nero Antichrist."
Quote:
"Historian Dan Snow investigates the 'how' and 'why' of history's defining moments." [Dan Snow, 01:58]
Dr. Malik provides a detailed overview of Britain under Roman rule circa 60 AD. Britain had been officially part of the Roman Empire since Emperor Claudius's annexation in 43 AD, although interactions and trade had existed even before this formal conquest, dating back to Julius Caesar's expeditions.
Dr. Malik explains the Roman strategy of integrating local kings and elites, allowing a degree of autonomy in exchange for taxes and loyalty. The region was divided into various kingdoms, each governed by local rulers who maintained their positions as long as they adhered to Roman directives.
Quote:
"So Britain has been part of the Roman Empire, sort of more formally, I suppose, since about 43 AD. But actually Britain has had relationships, trading relationships, all sorts of things with Rome before that." [Dr. Shushma Malik, 04:15]
A significant portion of the discussion focuses on the primary historical sources that document Boudicca's uprising: Tacitus and Cassius Dio.
Tacitus, writing closer to the events, offers a more personalized account, emphasizing the personal grievances that spurred the revolt, such as the mistreatment of Boudicca and her daughters by Roman officials.
Cassius Dio, writing later, attributes the revolt to economic factors like high taxation and the revocation of loans extended to the Britons, portraying the rebellion as a response to Roman decadence and financial exploitation.
These differing perspectives highlight the challenges historians face in reconstructing accurate historical narratives from biased or incomplete sources.
Quote:
"According to Tacitus, they're in the Annals... Boudicca and Boudicca's daughters... is a much more personalized tale." [Dr. Shushma Malik, 11:05]
Dr. Malik discusses the archaeological findings that support the historical accounts of widespread destruction during Boudicca's revolt. Evidence such as burn layers in key Roman settlements like Camulodunum (Colchester), Londinium (London), and Verulamium (St Albans) corroborate the accounts of massive destruction and loss of life.
However, despite extensive archaeological evidence of the revolt itself, there is a stark lack of material evidence directly related to Boudicca, making her historical existence more reliant on literary sources.
Quote:
"We have a lot of evidence for the revolt archaeologically, but we have very, very little evidence for Boudicca herself, mainly just these histories." [Dr. Shushma Malik, 15:23]
The conversation shifts to how Boudicca has been perceived and reinterpreted throughout history. From her initial mention in ancient texts to her resurgence in modern popular culture, Boudicca's image has been fluid, shaped by contemporary societal values and political climates.
Notably, during the early 19th century, Boudicca was co-opted as a symbol of British resilience and national identity, especially during times of political unrest. This period saw her represented in art and literature as embodying "old British values of queenship and victory," contrasting the decadence attributed to Roman figures like Nero.
Quote:
"She is being so variously kind of pulled around these different ancient representations that Boudicca is there as this figure." [Dr. Shushma Malik, 25:34]
Dr. Malik draws parallels between Boudicca and other powerful women in history, such as Cleopatra, Zenobia, and Messalina. These figures are often depicted as strong female leaders who either aligned with or rebelled against Roman authority, embodying a trope where powerful women are central to significant political and military upheavals.
This comparison raises questions about the portrayal of female leaders in historical narratives and the extent to which their stories are shaped by the biases of contemporary sources.
Quote:
"It's a really quick way to fundamentally sort of capture the essence of something because these stories are so well known." [Dr. Shushma Malik, 34:47]
Dan Snow and Dr. Malik conclude by reflecting on the blend of myth and historical fact in the story of Boudicca. While the revolt and its impact are well-supported by both literary and archaeological evidence, the figure of Boudicca herself remains shrouded in legend, influenced by the narratives constructed by those who recorded and later interpreted her story.
They emphasize the importance of critically examining sources and recognizing the role of cultural narratives in shaping historical memory.
Quote:
"But maybe truth isn't the point." [Dr. Shushma Malik, 34:58]
Dan Snow: "Was Boudicca real? What really happened in that great uprising in Roman Britain in the first century AD?" [01:58]
Dr. Shushma Malik: "So Britain has been part of the Roman Empire, sort of more formally, I suppose, since about 43 AD..." [04:15]
Dr. Shushma Malik: "According to Tacitus, they're in the Annals... Boudicca and Boudicca's daughters... is a much more personalized tale." [11:05]
Dr. Shushma Malik: "We have a lot of evidence for the revolt archaeologically, but we have very, very little evidence for Boudicca herself..." [15:23]
Dr. Shushma Malik: "She is being so variously kind of pulled around these different ancient representations that Boudicca is there as this figure." [25:34]
Dan Snow: "Girl boss." [34:48]
Dr. Shushma Malik: "It's a very quick way to fundamentally sort of capture the essence of something because these stories are so well known." [34:47]
"Boudicca: Myths vs Reality" is a compelling dive into the complexities of historical interpretation, the interplay between archaeological evidence and literary sources, and the enduring legacy of one of Britain's most formidable figures. Through engaging dialogue and expert analysis, Dan Snow and Dr. Shushma Malik illuminate the blurred lines between history and myth, offering listeners a nuanced understanding of Boudicca's place in both ancient and modern narratives.
For more detailed explorations of history's pivotal moments and figures, subscribe to Dan Snow's History Hit and explore their extensive library of podcasts and documentaries.