Transcript
A (0:03)
Seventeen year old Brandy Amy Sullivan was used to coming and going. She was restless, independent and always in motion. So when she didn't come home in the summer of 1996, her family tried not to panic. But this time was different. Weeks later, Amy was found dead in the woods behind a warehouse in suburban Massachusetts. What followed was an investigation plagued by missing time, withheld details, and a crucial lie that shifted the timeline of her final days. There were people who saw Amy after she was reported missing, people who didn't come forward. Why? Nearly three decades later, no one has been held accountable for Amy's murder. It's time to change that. I'm Kylie Lowe and this is the case of Brandy Amy Sullivan on Dark Down East. The last time Brandi Sullivan's parents saw her was in the early morning hours of June 6, 1996. Their 17 year old daughter, who was known as Amy, called her mother, Barbara Sullivan sometime before 1:30am from the Oakdale Mall, asking for a ride. Barbara went to get her and brought her back to the family's house on Water street in Tewksbury, Massachusetts. Alexandra Mayor Hodel reports for the Lowell sun that Amy didn't seem like herself that night. She said she wasn't feeling well and the mother and daughter talked quietly about making a doctor's appointment before heading to her room. Amy told her mother she was going to make something to eat and then go to bed. Later that night, Amy reportedly made a phone call to someone whose identity has never been publicly confirmed, and then she tucked into bed. The last words her mother remembers saying to her were simple and I love you. By morning, Amy was gone again. Several days went by without any sign of her. At first, her absence didn't immediately register as alarming. According to reporting by Ellen o' Brien for the Boston Globe, Amy had a history of leaving home for days or even weeks at a time. Still, there was a pattern. Amy always called. She might have let her parents know where she was going or at least checked in periodically so they wouldn't worry. This time there was nothing. Amy's father, Dennis Sullivan, believed there was an explanation that fit what they knew of their daughter. He thought Amy might have argued with her boyfriend and left to clear her head, needing some space before coming home again. An Associated Press report in the North Adams Transcript suggests that the pair were known to have their disagreements. So the Sullivans waited. They checked in quietly, trying not to assume the worst. Dennis is quoted by Joe Heaney and Jason B. Johnson in the Boston Herald saying that he didn't want to cause a panic if Amy was simply staying somewhere else. After several days with no word, they began searching more actively. Posters went up in grocery stores asking for information about Amy's whereabouts. Her two brothers looked too, checking the places she usually spent time. Friends were contacted, but one by one, each possibility fell away. Amy wasn't staying with anyone they knew. On June 25, 1996, nearly three weeks after she was last seen, Dennis and Barbara Sullivan reported their daughter missing to Tewksbury police. Even then, the picture remained unclear. Tewksbury police investigated her disappearance but found no signs of foul play, nothing to suggest she had been abducted or seriously harmed. Friends even claimed they had seen Amy around town in late June, after the missing persons report had been filed. In the weeks that followed, hope lingered alongside fear. Dennis knew his daughter's dream of going to California. As the days turned into five long weeks without contact, he allowed himself to believe that maybe Amy had done what she'd always talked about, found a way west, chasing the life she imagined and would eventually get in touch. Her family waited for a phone call, a sighting that would lead somewhere certain, a sign that she was still moving through the world on her own terms. Instead, the next answer came without warning and without mercy. On August 7, 1996, an employee at an IRS storage warehouse at 377 Ballardvale Road in North Wilmington, Massachusetts, noticed pieces of clothing in a wooded area behind the building just beyond the parking lot. The employee felt it concerning enough to report the discovery, and Wilmington police responded to the scene. At approximately 9:20am an officer located skeletal human remains. The wooded area sat close to everyday routines. Cars were coming and going, people arriving for work. Yet the remains had gone unseen for weeks. Investigators secured the area as they began the careful work of documenting the scene. The remains were left in place for roughly a day so a forensic anthropologist could examine the site and recover evidence without disturbing its context. Through dental records, authorities confirmed what the Sullivan family had been dreading since the day she disappeared. The remains belonged to Amy. With that identification, the search for Amy ended. But the questions were only beginning. Brandy Amy Jean Sullivan was born on St. Patrick's Day, March 17. She would have turned 18 in 1997. Most people knew her as Amy Sullivan. According to reporting by Simon Pristol for the Boston Herald, In December of 1995, Amy's legal name changed to Brandy after her mother's husband, Dennis, formally adopted her and her brothers. So the paperwork said Brandy, but her friends still said Amy. Her path through adolescence was not an easy one. Amy stopped attending high school during her sophomore year. But leaving the classroom did not mean abandoning her ambitions. She planned to earn her high school equivalency diploma and had her sights set on welding school. She was reportedly just two weeks away from completing her GED at the time of her disappearance. Now welding appealed to her not just as a trade, but as an art form. She liked the idea of shaping metal, of making something expressive and permanent with her hands, and she even talked about opening a welding studio of her own someday. Around age 13, Amy began using substances while spending time with an older, rougher crowd. Dan Sufert reports for the Lowell sun that in the summer of 1995, she entered a women's recovery center in Falmouth for treatment related to cocaine and alcohol use. She stayed for about seven months before the restlessness took over and sparked an impulsive decision. She wanted to go somewhere. Amy left the treatment program, and she and her boyfriend tried to hitchhike across the country to California to visit Jim Morrison's memorial site, only to be picked up by police in Colorado for hitchhiking. On that occasion, her parents had reported her missing, and Amy eventually resurfaced. She moved through the world constantly. Amy was known for hitchhiking, for showing up and disappearing again, for living in motion. But it was only part of her story, not the whole of who she was. Those who love Amy describe someone far bigger than her turbulent early adolescence. Amy's parents said she was a social butterfly, Surrounded by friends and intelligent, with a heart of gold. She drew people in, easily curious about the world and the people moving through it alongside her. In the weeks before she vanished, Amy was on the verge of a new chapter. Closing the door on one life and reaching for another. She had begun to imagine more clearly. But Amy's life, her plans, the momentum she had been building, all of it stopped in the woods behind that warehouse building in Wilmington. Investigators determined that Amy's cause of death was blunt force trauma to the head. Based on the condition of her remains, they believed she had been at the site for at least a month, a conclusion that was later confirmed by autopsy findings in showing she had been dead for a minimum of four weeks, but put a pin in that time frame for a second because it gets less clear later on. We'll get there from the start. Key details were withheld from the public. Police would not say whether Amy had been killed, where she was found, or if her body had been placed there after her death. They also declined to disclose whether there was any evidence of sexual assault. Even basic information, such as whether Amy was found wearing. Clothing was not publicly clarified despite the IRS employee who first alerted authorities reporting women's clothing in the wooded area. Later reporting by Jordana Hart for the Boston Globe adds some clarity to this question, though. Police stated that Amy's clothing had been strewn nearby, but there's nothing in the source material I have access to that provides any context for this, like, for example, if the clothing was dumped there or if animal activity at the scene may have contributed to it being strewn about. I do know that a pair of jeans, sneakers and a jacket recovered from the scene were returned to Amy's parents. Dennis and Barbara said they did not recognize the jacket, but the jeans and shoes were either Amy's or consistent with what she was known to wear. Investigators also acknowledged finding an object at the scene, though they would not identify it or say whether it was consistent with Amy's injuries. In one single article from 1996 written by Dan Suefert for the Lowell Sun, Amy's family said that police told them she had been killed with a large rock. I haven't been able to independently verify this, but the detail is out there. The location itself raised difficult questions. The area behind the IRS storage facility was heavily wooded, offering cover and seclusion, but it was not isolated. Several paths cut through the landscape, suggesting regular foot traffic and the possibility that someone could have entered or exited the area without drawing attention. As the days passed, the investigation expanded. Wilmington and Tewksbury police worked jointly with the Middlesex County District Attorney's office. Two weeks after Amy was found, authorities told the public that while no arrests had been made, the case was moving forward and progress was being made behind the scenes for Amy's family. The waiting returned, this time without hope for a different ending. Only the need for answers that refused to come quickly and the few that did turned out to be false. I'm going to read you the exact stream of text messages I sent my best friend the other day. Okay, so after lots of market research, Quint's wide leg jeans are officially my new favorite jeans ever. End quote. I thought I'd never be able to participate in the trend because other wide leg jeans were too long, too stiff and too bulky on me. But Quints made my fashion choices relevant again with their Bella Stretch wide leg jeans, available in three different lengths. And let me just say, I'm so glad that stretch is back in our jeans. No more hard pants, please. That's the thing about quints. They have all the staples covered, from stretchy jeans to soft Mongolian cashmere sweaters that feel like designer pieces without the markup to 100% silk tops and skirts for easy dressing up. Their wardrobe essentials are crafted to last season after season. Refresh your wardrobe with quince. Don't wait. Go to quint.com downeast for free shipping on your order and 365 day returns. That's Q-U-I-N-C-E.com downeast to get free shipping and 365 day returns. Quints.com downeast. By the end of the summer, investigators were still searching for clarity about Amy's final weeks, her movements and the people she spent time with after she disappeared. But instead of answers, they uncovered deception. On August 21, 1996, a 36 year old man named Neil Clough was indicted on perjury charges relating to Amy's case. Prosecutors accused him of lying to the grand jury investigating her murder. Neil was part of Amy's circle. He owned Black and Blue Salvage, a scrap metal yard in Tewksbury, and Amy and her boyfriend had reportedly worked there at one point. He was also described as a friend of both Amy and her boyfriend, which is part of why he had been called to testify, according to reporting by Joe Bartolotta for the Lowell Sun. Under oath, Neal told the grand jury that he hadn't seen Amy since June of 1996, but police already knew that wasn't true. More than a month after Amy was last seen by her parents on July 17, 1996, Neil parked his beat up black and red van in a fire lane at the Chelmsford Mall. A police officer approached the vehicle and found a young woman inside. She identified herself as Amy Sullivan. The officer asked her to move the van, but she said she couldn't because she didn't have a driver's license. When the officer ran her information, nothing came back, even though Amy was listed as a missing person at the time. One report later suggested the officer may not have completed the database check before Neil returned to the van. If that's the case, the officer never realized he had just come face to face with a teenage girl whose parents had been searching for her for more than a month. But there was no reason to detain Neil, so he simply moved the van out of the illegal parking spot and drove away. Despite record of this interaction with police in July, Neel told investigators something else. According to reporting by Lisa Redmond for the Lowell Sun, Neil claimed that he saw Amy on June 6, which was also the same day her parents last saw her. When he, Amy and her boyfriend went camping together. He Also said he saw the couple Once more on June 12th behind a church in Tewksbury, but not after that. Neil testified that he did not see Amy in July and did not drive her anywhere in his van. When confronted about his grand jury testimony that conflicted with the testimony from the officers who saw Amy in his van that day in July, Neil said he had simply forgotten that he'd been with Amy and her boyfriend then. He maintained that he last saw Amy in June, which is why that's what he told the grand jury. Neil pleaded not guilty to the perjury charges. His bail was initially set at $1,000, which he posted about a month later. He was scheduled to appear in court for a pretrial hearing on January 7, 19, 1997, but he didn't show up. Neil was arrested again, and his Bail increased to $5,000, which he was unable to post. Neil's attorney said his client had once again confused dates and believed the hearing was on the 27th, not the 7th. He also argued that the perjury charge itself was a pressure tactic, an attempt to squeeze Neel into offering information about Amy's murder. But according to the defense, Neil had nothing else to offer. Despite the charges, investigators said that Neil was not considered a suspect in Amy's murder at the time. One investigator pointed out something that continued to trouble law enforcement about all of this. Neil knew people were looking for Amy. He knew her parents were searching for her. He even said he felt sorry for her mother. Yet he never came forward to say he had seen her after she was reported missing. Amy's body was found 20 days later. The initial date of death estimate, based on the condition of her body was stated as at least four weeks earlier. But we know Amy was alive on July 17th. She couldn't have been much longer if she was reduced to skeletal remains 20 days later. So it's conceivable that Neil was among the last people to see her before she died. Had Neil spoken up in July, had he said out loud that Amy was still alive more than a month after she left her parents home, the trajectory of the investigation would have changed entirely. But that's not the only what if I'm stuck on? Had Amy's name and missing persons report popped up on the officer's computer screen that day, if the database check was completed before Neil got back to the van, maybe we wouldn't be talking about Amy right now at all. As the months stretched on, the investigation began to stall. Many of Amy's friends refused to talk to police for untold reasons, and without their cooperation, progress slowed even further. Authorities released very little new information publicly. What they did say was limited but telling. William Sinagra reports for the Lowell sun that investigators did not believe Amy's murder was random, and they believed whoever killed her was familiar with the Wilmington and Tewksbury area. Nearly a year after Amy was first reported missing, attention returned to Neil Clough. This time in a courtroom. In 1997, he went to trial on the perjury charge stemming from his grand jury testimony. Prosecutors had to prove that Neil intentionally lied about when he last saw Amy. Neil's defense rested on a simple explanation that he had mixed up the dates and genuinely misremembered when he last saw her. His attorney argued that the process itself was unfair. Other grand jury witnesses, he claimed, were allowed to review reports beforehand to refresh their memories. Neal wasn't given that opportunity and instead faced what the defense described as vague leading questions from the prosecutor. The lawyer also suggested Neil had a reason to stay quiet about July 17th. Not because he was hiding anything related to Amy's death, but because he didn't want police to know he, Amy and her boyfriend had actually been out riding around trying to buy pot. When confronted at trial with testimony from the officers who found his van parked in a fire lane at the Chelmsford Mall, Neil changed his story. He acknowledged that he did remember seeing Amy that day after all, and said he had dropped her off in Tewksbury with her boyfriend. He acknowledged they'd been driving around looking for drugs. After about three hours of deliberation, the jury returned a guilty verdict. They concluded that Neil had deliberately lied about seeing Amy in July of 1996. He was later sentenced to five to seven years in state prison on the perjury charge. Only after that conviction did police publicly confirm something they had previously denied. Neil Clough was in fact a suspect in Amy's murder. As the case stalled, attention narrowed not toward a single clear suspect, but toward a small group of people whose proximity to Amy in her final weeks raised unavoidable questions. One of them was, of course, Neil Clough. By 1997, he had been convicted of perjury for lying about the last time he was with Amy. His false testimony altered the timeline of Amy's disappearance and delayed investigators understanding of her movements in July of 96. While his conviction confirmed deception, it did not establish responsibility for her death. Still, his name remained tethered to the case. Another central figure was Amy's 18 year old boyfriend at the time she disappeared. On the day Amy's body was discovered. Detectives reportedly interviewed her boyfriend for approximately five hours. After that, he retained an attorney and did not speak with police again. In a piece by Ed Hannon for the Lowell sun, police described the boyfriend as a key piece to the puzzle, citing his reluctance to further cooperate with the investigation. Amy and this boyfriend had been together for four or five years, according to her father, which made them middle school, high school sweethearts. A friend later told Matt Wickenheiser for the Lowell sun that the boyfriend talked about marrying Amy when she turned 18, but from what I've read, their relationship was strained. Her parents characterized their daughter's boyfriend as obsessive and abusive. There had been at least one documented incident of violence involving police. In December of 1995, a neighbor called authorities during an altercation between the couple. The witness reported seeing the boyfriend allegedly hit Amy several times as they walked down Elm Street. Both Amy and her boyfriend denied that this occurred, but he was arrested, charged with assault and battery, and placed on probation. The case reportedly did not go to court. Amy's boyfriend has never really spoken publicly about the case in almost 30 years, but he agreed to speak with me for this story.
