B (80:29)
Too many dollars have been invested in detecting your existence and figuring out what your behavior implies for you to defeat it in that regard. Guard. And so my suggestion would be, at least for those of us who might be targeted, because we have influence, the Likelihood that an incognito window allows you to check these things I think is pretty low. So suffice it to say, my feed that tells me what's going on in the Middle east is beyond terrifying. And I don't know what to make of it because I know that the psyop never sleeps. So part of me feels like that terrifying thing is actually my ability to use my own theoretical evolutionary toolkit to make sense of a world that's hard to make sense of. I know I'm trying to do that, but I'm making sense of a data set that isn't a data set data set, it's selective. And so anyway, I'm hoping that what I'm seeing is not true. That said, the impression that I have from my side of the screen is that what most people are seeing is not true and that there are hints of what is actually true. And when you peer under that rock, the truth is terrifying. So what I wanted to do is say a little bit about. I'm not telling you that my understanding of what's going on in the Middle east is insight. It may well be a psyop acting on me, presumably to get to you. Right. Or it may be that I am able to see something that others, that most others are not seeing and a small number of others are seeing because I'm, you know, I'm not seeing primary sources for the most part. I'm seeing a selection of the things available, mostly on X. And in any case, the picture that is being painted for me, whether it is targeted at me specifically or not, is that we have been lured into a war. And many people took me to task the last time I said the attack on Iran was a war. It's not a war. Well, I think it's close enough to a war that that term applies, that we have been lured into a war. Either the timing of our entry or the fact of our entry are the result of a long standing plan to get the United States to attack Iran. The ostensible reason is because it is in our interest, in the world's interest for us to do this. But narrowly speaking, because it is in Israel's interest, or at least the interest of the Israeli regime, that it perceives this war as in its interest and that we, the United States, have been lured into a war. War on false pretenses, that we cannot and will not win. Some of this I think I know from before there was social media, right? The fact that the neocons have had Iran on their agenda and that, you know, I've been saying, I've got a tweet out there from a month or two ago where I said, look, in the case of Iran, we are not going to be given a choice. We will be going to war with Iran and there's nothing that we are able to do to stop it because it's on the agenda of people who will. Who have a lot of power and will not take no for an answer. And that. That's a tragedy. So that part I think I know. It's been on the agenda and somehow we find ourselves at war in Iran. And the question is, is this a mirror of the recent limited engagement where we dropped some very powerful bombs on what we were told is a nuclear facility inside of a mountain? We are told we destroyed, disabled the facility and it was a success. No boots on the ground. You know, see, it worked out great. Well, or as I said last time, was that the equivalent of Gulf War One, which caused us to become complacent about the idea of war with Iran because it seems like a walk in the park. And we've been lured in that specifically. Again, this is what my feed is suggesting to me, that the presence of President has been lured into a war that is spectacularly not in our interest, spectacularly not in his interest, because there's no way out. And further, again, this is my feed and it may be misleading me. The implication is that the President is surrounded by people who are controlling his effective feed, that his information about how well the war is going and what to expect in the coming weeks is inaccurate, causing him to do damage that he would not do on his own. Now, even more frightening is the implications that the battle so far has revealed, the inverse of what the strike in was it June on the nuclear facility revealed, in other words, that in spite of having decapitated the Iranian regime and we can come back to the decapitation and whether or not we paid an immense price the way that happened. But the decapitation of the regime, which appears to be real, did not result in the destruction of command and control of the Iranian military. Much to the contrary, that we are actually seeing ferocious capability on the part of that military that is in a position to exhaust what supplies we have have for this conflict. Now, again, because what you've been saying
