
Loading summary
Tom Yamas
Taking over the helm of NBC nightly news, a 75 year old broadcast. It's a great responsibility. Good evening, I'm Tom Yamas. You have to go out there to bring people at home. Closer to the store. Wildfires continue to be a threat. With that massive hurricane comes the massive response. The best reporters in our business know how to listen. And when you listen, you get the truth for NBC News. For NBC News, I'm Tom Galmas. That's what we do every night, NBC.
Jenna Bush Hager
Nightly News with Tom Yamas, evenings on NBC.
Hey everyone, it's Jenna Bush Hager from TODAY with Jenna and Friends, reminding you to check out my podcast, Open Book with Jenna and this week's episode, I Sit down with Ellen Hildebrand live at the Read with Jenna Book Festival to discuss her book adaptations, writing with her daughter and why Nantucket has always been such a special setting for her stories. You can listen to the full conversation now by searching Open Book with Jenna. Wherever you get your podcasts.
Andrea Canning
This is.
On Trial, a special series from DATELINE True Crime Weekly bringing you daily coverage from the Sean Combs racketeering trial. He has pleaded not guilty to all the charges against him. I'm Andrea Canning and it's Monday, June 9th. Just a heads up, in this episode, we're going to be talking about some graphic details and harrowing subject matter. The start to week five of testimony was overshadowed by a dramatic defense motion over the weekend. The defense accused the prosecution of misconduct and asked for a mistrial, but the judge allowed testimony to continue while he waits for the prosecution's response. Back on the stand for her third day of testimony was Jane, the second woman prosecutors allege was a victim of sex trafficking at the hands of Sean Combs. The prosecution has been asking Jane to read aloud text messages she and Combs sent each other during their three year relationship. They've also played voice notes Combs sent to her and we will play some of them for you on the podcast. NBC News correspondent Chloe Meloss joins us now to tell us what it was like to hear Sean Combs voice in the courtroom. Hey, Chloe.
Jenna Bush Hager
Hey, Andrea.
Andrea Canning
Chloe, a lot of Jane's testimony is tough to listen to. These text messages that she's reading and voice notes, you know, between her and Sean Combs that the prosecution is playing. They reveal a very toxic relationship.
Jenna Bush Hager
There are multiple text exchanges. Jane was on the stand today reading between her and Combs in which she says she doesn't want to do this anymore. She's feeling used. She doesn't want to take part in these hotel nights anymore. And at one point during her testimony, she's reading a text exchange in which he's calling her crazy and really diminishing her concerns and her feelings. But, I mean, we all. Well, I won't say all, but I've had boyfriends that have made me feel crazy. And I know that this probably strikes a chord with many women out there.
Andrea Canning
Yeah. I mean, the question is, you know, what is illegal and legal, you know, when you're talking about a bad boyfriend? And we've asked MSNBC legal correspondent Lisa Rubin to join us a little bit later to answer our questions about that. But, Chloe, first, let's talk about these Combs voice notes. They were entered into evidence so we can actually play them for our listeners.
Sean Combs
Girl, girl, girl, I done sent you flowers already. Ain't nobody talk about that in the past. That's what I'm talking about. You don't know how to just move on. How could somebody, like, have a relationship with you, even as a friend, and you don't know how to move on? You go to like. It just goes crazy. Just stop. I'm saying let's move on. And my tone is like this. I'm just waking up.
Andrea Canning
Sean Combs tone seems non threatening. At one point, he says he sounds like that because he just woke up. And he says he sent her flowers.
Jenna Bush Hager
Right. So he actually doesn't sound too intense. And when you're hearing that juxtaposed to Jane's testimony on the stand, I mean, she sounds incredibly emotional. It definitely could raise some questions with the jurors. But because there are several instances, whether it's a text exchange or a voice note in which he's like, okay, fine, you know, you don't have to participate in anything that you don't want to. This was all mutual. You know, we both signed up for some freaky stuff. I think he called it kinky. And that. That's all this was. This was not sex trafficking.
Andrea Canning
There was another voice note, Chloe, that was played that speaks to these, what Jane calls hotel nights. Others have called freak offs.
Sean Combs
Ain't nobody threatening you. And I ain't trying to go back and forth with no woman. Where my life is at right now. I don't have no time for no games, baby girl. Me and you could be mad. I could have a spat. We could have whatever. Then after that, you better get on your job. That's really. That's all it is.
Jenna Bush Hager
So as you can hear in that voice note, Combs is saying, you better get on your job. Right. And I mean, it makes it very transactional. And I'll leave the legal analysis to Lisa later in the episode.
Andrea Canning
Chloe, I just have a question. When he says, you better get on your job. At that point, does the prosecution say he's referring to her doing these hotel nights like that's her job?
Jenna Bush Hager
Yes.
Andrea Canning
Wow.
Jenna Bush Hager
Because she has to uphold her part of the deal. Right. So they had this thing called a Love Contract, where if she participated in these hotel nights, he was going to pay for two years of her rent of her home in Los Angeles.
Andrea Canning
This feels now more like it's, you know, getting to the heart of the charges.
Jenna Bush Hager
Absolutely.
Andrea Canning
The last voice note that we're gonna play you is Combs talking about her really being upset that, you know, he's with other women, even though they're in an open relationship. Let's take a listen.
Sean Combs
I'm not gonna be explaining to you. It don't matter if I just got finished her the other day. I'm single. I could do whatever the I want to, but I didn't. You're straight flipping out on me. And I told you that you had one more time to do this. You're nuts. So be sad, go crazy. Do whatever the you want to do.
Jenna Bush Hager
So I find this to be incredibly interesting. Right. Because jurors could actually take that in a positive way, being like, you know, he's telling her straight. He's not hiding anything. But on the flip side, you could say, well, maybe he's lying and he's gaslighting her and he's making her feel crazy. So there are two ways to look at this, and it's fascinating to get this inside glimpse into what was going on.
Andrea Canning
A big moment in court today was when the prosecution asked Jane what her reaction was to Cassie Ventura's civil lawsuit to remind people Jane and Combs were together from 2021 until he was arrested in September 2024. Cassie filed her lawsuit with the allegations of free coughs In November of 2020 23, Jane got really emotional talking about it.
Jenna Bush Hager
She did, Andrea. And during her testimony, she said that she almost fainted. In fact, I think I did is what she said. When she saw Cassie Ventura's civil suit, she testified that she couldn't sleep, that reading those pages felt like a, quote, nightmare, that she had empathy for Cassie. And it was at that point that there was an objection. And then ultimately, a sidebar between prosecutors and Combs legal team. And then when they came back to her, she testified that she couldn't believe that she was reading her own story. So it was an incredibly powerful moment.
Andrea Canning
Jane testified that she sent Combs a text about her reaction to the lawsuit, which she read aloud today.
Jenna Bush Hager
Yeah, so I'll read you some of that text message. So Jane writes, I feel like I'm reading my own sexual trauma. I'm sick. It's exactly word for word, drug filled days and nights. She goes on to say, you made me feel crazy about the sex trauma is what I was feeling. I feel very violated. This was sexual exploitation. I immediately looked over at the jurors. Some were feverishly writing notes. Others seemed, you know, a bit disinterested.
Andrea Canning
The prosecution asked Jane if she told anyone about how she felt, and she said, no.
Sean Combs
So.
Jenna Bush Hager
So Maureen Comey specifically asked her, were you considering a lawsuit or reporting to law enforcement? And Jane testified, no. I was feeling manipulated and violated. And he was the only person I could vent to because I didn't tell anybody about what we had going on because it was a shameful, dark secret of mine. And that is similar to other testimony that we've heard so far during this trial, Andrea. From individuals saying that they were too scared to tell their friends or family or even go to law enforcement, something.
Andrea Canning
That happened in court today really gives you a glimpse into Sean Combs inner circle during a very difficult time. The prosecution asked Jane about that hotel hallway video that's come up so much with Cassie. And Jane testified that she was with Sean Combs and his team in Miami when the video aired on CNN last spring. What did she say?
Jenna Bush Hager
It is fascinating. So she testified that it was a very eerie day that she saw Combs huddled with his team and his family. And ultimately they invited her to join this sort of power session with the team. And they were trying to come up with a sincere apology post. So this is before he posts that Instagram apology video.
Sean Combs
My behavior on that video is inexcusable.
Andrea Canning
Jane testified that Sean Combs had something to say about what happened in that hallway.
Jenna Bush Hager
That's right. So she testified that he told her that this was the only time that he had had physical violence like that with Cassie. He said that they had some issues, that Cassie would hit him. And when asked by the prosecution, did he say he would hit her? Jane testified, I think so, yes.
Andrea Canning
What a morning. When we come back, Chloe and I will be joined by Lisa Rubin. She's an MSNBC legal correspondent. And we wanted to talk to her about the case the prosecution is trying to make. How solid does it look?
Jenna Bush Hager
Hey, everyone. I'm Jenna Bush Hager from the Today show. And I'M excited to share my podcast Open Book with Jenna. It is back for season two. Each week, celebrities, experts, friends and authors will share candid stories with me about their lives and new projects. Guests like Rebecca Yarros, Kristin Hannah, Ego Wodem and more. Like a good book, you'll leave feeling inspired and entertained. Join me for my podcast Open Book with Jenna. Listen now on Apple Podcast.
Willie Geist
Hey guys, Willie Geist here reminding you to check out the Sunday Sit down podcast. On this week's episode, I get together with Academy Award winner Benicio Del Toro to talk about his lead role in the buzzed about new Wes Anderson movie the Phoenician Scheme and his path from a childhood in Puerto Rico to the heights of Hollywood. You can get our conversation now for free wherever you download your podcasts. Dateline True Crime Weekly Andrea Canning and the Dateline team cover breaking crime news around the country. And now a special series with daily updates from the trial of Sean Combs.
Andrea Canning
I'll be talking to NBC News correspondent Chloe Meloss every day after court about what she's seeing inside the witnesses, the evidence and what it all means.
Willie Geist
Dateline True Crime Weekly Listen now, wherever you get your podcasts foreign.
Andrea Canning
Welcome back, everybody. Hey, Lisa, thank you for joining us.
Hi, guys.
Let's talk about the prosecution's case so far. Last week, Chloe used the words muddy and gray. You, Lisa, have been following this case very closely as well. We're hoping you can help us understand if you agree, you know, does the testimony look kind of muddy from a legal perspective?
It looks less muddy from a legal perspective when you think about what the elements of some of the crimes are here. And I'm going to put aside the racketeering charge, Andrea, for a second and focus on the sex trafficking charge. And I think it's important that we, like sort of identify what it is that it takes to prove sex trafficking. So the crime of sex trafficking has like three elements according to the jury instructions that the government has proposed. Now, I should also note that Sean Combs has his own set of jury instructions that he's proposed to the court. So the three elements are a person has to knowingly recruit or entice the victim. That's pretty much amply met here. Right. Nobody's questioning that Sean Combs knowingly enticed or recruited Cassie or Jane to be involved in these sexual encounters with him. Right. Let me go to the third part next, because that's also relatively easy. You have to show that the defendant's acts were what they call in or affecting interstate or Foreign commerce. And all that really means is that what they were doing was affecting the flow of money. And here the government's done a pretty good job of showing that there was absolutely an impact on the flow of money. Right. And a flow of things of value, not just cash itself, to both Cassie and Jane. But also there's been testimony from people in and around Sean Combs professional world, who were involved in setting up the freak offs, cleaning up after the freak offs. They were paid, too. And they've testified that it was part and parcel of their jobs to be involved in those ways. It's the second piece here that's really the trickiest. So you have to show that the defendant, meaning Sean Combs, knew or recklessly disregarded the fact that force, threats of force, fraud, or coercion, or any combination of all of those things would be used to cause the victim here, Cassie or Jane, to engage in a commercial sex act. And I think the really interesting thing here turns on what it means to coerce somebody. Because the way that the government describes coercion is it doesn't just mean coercion like somebody would believe that they would be caused physical harm. It means you had a scheme or a plan intended to cause them to believe that if they didn't do a particular act, there would be serious harm to them. And yes, maybe he told her at one point, do your job. But will the jury believe that she was coerced into performing particular sex acts with him? Because if she didn't, she would suffer psychological, financial, reputational harm that is sufficiently serious that a reasonable person in the same situation would do the same thing or continue to do the same thing? Yeah, probably.
It feels like this is the kind of case that does not have a smoking gun.
It doesn't. Although I will say that what is the smoking gun here may be the cumulative nature of the commercial sex acts. Because, for example, again, I'm referring to the government's proposed jury instructions. If the jury has been shown that somebody was repeatedly, physically, verbally or emotionally abused by the defendant, that can rise to the sort of serious harm that they thought they would suffer or that they feared if they didn't continue to perform the sex acts.
In the indictment, the prosecutors alleged that Combs knew he was forcing Cassie Ventura and Jane to have sex with these other men. Or at the very least, he was recklessly disregarding the fact that they felt forced. What exactly did they mean by that?
Reckless disregard is like literally putting your head in the sand like an ostrich and just not caring what the impact is. So I'll give you one example of what could be the reckless disregard here. Each of these women has testified that at points in time, during what Jane calls the hotel stays and what Cassie called the freak offs, they're up for like 30 to 40 hours at a time. That's not human. Right. And they are being given ridiculous amounts of drugs to keep them in a state where they can continue to perform for Sean Combs. That's the kind of stuff that the government is saying. You couldn't have possibly thought that somebody would have consented to that under the circumstances in which it transpired.
It seems to me what you're saying is what the prosecution's going for is all the little pieces coming together to create a story for the jury.
Yeah. And I think the combination of the different kinds of harms, I think the government is sort of building it up together so that you don't have to find any one of those things individually. But it's that totality of circumstances that a jury can walk away saying, yeah, these people did feel coerced to participate in the freak offs with him because if they didn't, here's the panoply of different harms they might suffer.
Yeah. These jury instructions are going to be really important.
They're going to be huge.
Complicated. Very complicated. Thank you, Lisa, for your insight and expertise.
Hi, guys.
Thanks and thank you, Chloe. We will see you tomorrow.
Jenna Bush Hager
See you tomorrow.
Andrea Canning
Tomorrow we'll have more of the recordings played during Jane's testimony, including their phone calls right after she read Cassie Ventura's 2023 lawsuit. Thanks for listening. If you want to read the latest developments and analysis from inside the courtroom, check out the NBC newsletter. Diddy on trial go to nbcnews.com diddy to find that. On Trial is produced by Franny Kelly with help from the Dateline True Crime Weekly team. Our senior producers are Alison Orr and Liz Brown Karloff. Original Music by Jesse McGinty. Paul Ryan is executive producer and Liz Cole as senior executive producer of Dateline.
Podcast Information:
On June 10, 2025, Dateline NBC released a gripping episode titled "Sean Combs: Listen to Combs’s Messages to 'Jane,'" delving into the high-stakes trial of renowned entertainer and businessman Sean Combs. Hosted by Andrea Canning, the episode provides a comprehensive overview of the case, focusing on the allegations of sex trafficking and the intense courtroom battles that have captivated the public.
Sean Combs faces serious charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking, stemming from his alleged coercion of two women, including a central figure known as "Jane." Jane has pleaded not guilty to all charges and serves as a pivotal witness in the prosecution's case. The trial has garnered significant media attention, with both sides presenting compelling arguments and evidence.
Jane's testimony is a cornerstone of the prosecution's case, revealing the alleged manipulative and abusive nature of her relationship with Combs. Over three days on the stand, Jane shared harrowing details about their three-year relationship, emphasizing her feelings of exploitation and coercion.
A crucial aspect of the trial involves the presentation of voice notes and text messages between Sean Combs and Jane, which the prosecution argues demonstrate a toxic and controlling relationship.
Voice Note at [03:18]:
Sean Combs: "Girl, girl, girl, I done sent you flowers already. Ain’t nobody talk about that in the past. That's what I’m talking about. You don't know how to just move on. How could somebody, like, have a relationship with you, even as a friend, and you don't know how to move on? You go to like. It just goes crazy. Just stop. I'm saying let's move on. And my tone is like this. I'm just waking up."
Voice Note at [04:36]:
Sean Combs: "Ain't nobody threatening you. And I ain't trying to go back and forth with no woman. Where my life is at right now. I don't have no time for no games, baby girl. Me and you could be mad. I could have a spat. We could have whatever. Then after that, you better get on your job. That's really. That's all it is."
These recordings juxtapose Combs' seemingly non-threatening tone with Jane's emotional testimonies, illustrating the complexities of their interactions and raising questions about consent and coercion.
To provide a deeper understanding of the legal nuances, Andrea Canning welcomes MSNBC legal correspondent Lisa Rubin to discuss the prosecution's case.
Elements of Sex Trafficking:
Cumulative Evidence: Rubin emphasizes that while no single piece of evidence might be a definitive "smoking gun," the combination of testimonies, voice notes, and text messages builds a compelling case against Combs.
Jury Instructions: The instructions provided to the jury regarding the definition of coercion and the elements required to prove sex trafficking are crucial and could significantly impact the trial's outcome.
A pivotal moment occurred when Jane reacted to Cassie Ventura's civil lawsuit against Combs, which accused him of sexual exploitation. Jane testified about her emotional response, stating she felt as though she was "reading her own sexual trauma" ([06:54]). This moment underscored the profound impact of Combs' alleged actions on multiple women.
Jane disclosed a text message she sent to Combs after reading Cassie's lawsuit:
"I feel like I'm reading my own sexual trauma. I'm sick. It's exactly word for word, drug filled days and nights. You made me feel crazy about the sex trauma is what I was feeling. I feel very violated. This was sexual exploitation." ([07:37])
This revelation aimed to demonstrate the pervasive nature of the alleged abuse and its effects on Jane.
The prosecution's approach hinges on demonstrating a pattern of behavior that constitutes sex trafficking. By presenting a series of interactions, including prolonged stays ("hotel nights"), financial incentives (such as housing support), and manipulative communications, they aim to show that Combs exerted undue influence and control over the victims.
While the prosecution paints a picture of coercion and manipulation, the defense suggests that the relationship between Combs and the women was consensual and mutually agreed upon. They argue that the communications, such as the voice notes, indicate a consensual and open relationship rather than one marked by coercion.
The jury's reaction during the trial has been mixed, reflecting the complexity of the case. Some jurors appeared engaged and responsive to Jane's emotional testimony, while others seemed indifferent, highlighting the challenge of presenting a case that relies heavily on circumstantial evidence and personal testimonies.
The Dateline NBC episode "Sean Combs: Listen to Combs’s Messages to 'Jane'" offers an in-depth examination of a highly contentious trial that sits at the intersection of celebrity, power, and law. Through detailed testimonies, critical voice notes, and expert legal analysis, the episode elucidates the multifaceted nature of the charges against Sean Combs. As the trial progresses, the interplay between emotional testimonies and strategic legal arguments continues to shape the narrative, keeping the public and legal experts alike closely engaged.
For those seeking to understand the nuances of high-profile legal battles and the intricate dynamics of personal relationships under scrutiny, this episode provides a compelling and comprehensive overview.