Blaine Alexander (3:50)

You know, they had affairs, as things often do. I wonder about the reception. How were you, how was our team received when you were shooting in the area? Because, I mean, we often talk about, obviously small community. A lot of people knew what was going on. Just kind of give us a feel of what it felt like.

Keith Morrison (4:09)

His friends were only too eager to talk to us. And as you could see in the story, they all assembled repeatedly to have conversations with us, tell us all they knew about John and all they knew about what happened. They all followed this investigation so carefully, so did we. So, interestingly, this is something that will interest you perhaps, although maybe not the people, most of the people listening. But this was the last story I was able to complete with Vince Sterla, producer I've worked with for many, many years here at Dayline. He's retired, so we went off to Hawaii to do this story together. But he was there for months beforehand working on this story before I ever joined him, and covering the trial, covering all the twists and turns of the story. And as we approached the time to film, the authorities pulled back, didn't want to take part in it. And we thought, well, that might make it too difficult for us to do this story. But in the end we decided to because it was the kind of story that we felt we could tell and tell well. But also, there were other ways to do it. And so that's why you met Liz Thompson, the investigator we brought on board.

Blaine Alexander (5:25)

I thought that was a brilliant pivot, and she did a fantastic job. It took only a few minutes, though, for me to realize, okay, we had to do this in a different way than we typically do our Dateline stories. Right. Like, we didn't hear from his direct family, from his immediate family. We didn't hear from law enforcement or the investigators who worked the case. And typically, those are two very integral building blocks when it comes to telling our stories on Dateline.

Keith Morrison (5:48)

Precisely. And I think John's mother was just. She was not ready to go on television and talk about her son. It's just she's feeling kind of broken.

Blaine Alexander (5:57)

It just broke my heart to know that his mother was the one who found him, who discovered him. And just seeing her sitting there in the front session.

Keith Morrison (6:05)

Yeah, terrible, terrible. And I found myself wondering what it was like for her as she. As the hours went by, and she knew there was something wrong and she was holding off to go see him because he didn't want to be too much of an interfering mother. But then finally, she felt she had to and found him there. It was tough. There was some video of her in her car being, you know, responding to initial police questions. And you could tell that she was just so broken that I wanted to give her some space.

Blaine Alexander (6:39)

Of course. Of course. So in the absence of those, you know, folks that we typically hear from, of course, you had Liz Thompson. But really, the camera, the mini camera angles also became kind of the main voice in this story in a way that you don't typically see.

Keith Morrison (6:53)

Sure, sure. And that was something Liz could help us with and tell us how that all worked. What happened, of course, was in real time. Was it Some junior member of the Honolulu Police Department was assigned to go through all the cctv, everything that could be found that was in the vicinity of John Tokuhara's clinic at the time that he was killed. And this didn't. You know, you just don't automatically encounter what happened. He would go through hours and hours and hours and hours and hours and hours of videotape before finally saying, hey, wait a minute. That guy in the strange costume. Way too much clothing for Hawaii. And a bucket hat is appeared on this camera. Now he's appearing on that camera. And then you could follow him all the way down several blocks on the route to the acupuncture clinic, and then see where he disappeared just before, you know, right outside the door of the clinic was the last we saw him. Then the murder occurred within a minute or so of that, and then he reappeared a minute or two after. So there was very little better evidence to show this man, whoever he was, must have committed the murder.

Blaine Alexander (8:06)

It felt like we were going on a journey. I guess I'll say that it didn't feel like evidence was being presented, but it almost felt like we were going on a journey with law enforcement as they kind of, you know, figured this out. When I was watching this, I thought this, Keith, When I was in my very first market as a reporter, Augusta, Georgia, someone told me there, okay, if you go through a day and you have an assignment turning a daily news story and you can't get officials or you can't get somebody to talk to you, then just do a story taking the viewer through your day. Right. Like we called the city. They put us on hold for two hours. Then we called, we knocked on the store. So let's just go through the process and we're gonna kind of give a peek behind the curtain of what that felt like. So I thought it was very effective. I loved it.

Keith Morrison (8:45)

Good. Thank you.

Blaine Alexander (8:47)

When we come back, you'll hear more from Keith's interview with a juror who had plenty to say about this case, including what they thought about Eric Thomps and about the woman whose affair set this whole thing in motion. I'm Julio Vaqueiro, anchor of Noticias Telemundo. You can watch Dateline, the hit true crime series on Telemundo. And now you can listen to Dateline as a podcast.

Keith Morrison (9:10)

Stories of love and betrayal, of secrets.

Blaine Alexander (9:13)

Revealed of the men and women who stand between evil and justice. Every twist and turn can now be heard in Spanish with new mysteries arriving every week. Just search Dateline en Espanol wherever you get your podcasts and start listening.

Keith Morrison (9:29)

Hey, guys, Willie Geist here reminding you.

Blaine Alexander (9:31)

To check out the Sunday sit Down podcast. On this week's episode, I get together with Oscar winner Cillian Murphy to discuss.

Keith Morrison (9:38)

The impact of the billion dollar Oppenheimer movie on his life and his extraordinary new Netflix film. Steve, you can get our conversation for free wherever you download your podcasts.

Blaine Alexander (9:54)

Let's talk about this investigation because it became very clear one, you introduced kind of some of the people, the ladies in John's life. And so you're thinking immediately, love triangle. Anybody who watches Dateline, you're thinking, okay, love triangle. But there are a couple of different options that come out immediately. I thought that was interesting.

Keith Morrison (10:11)

Well, yes, and so did the police. That's why they looked into those relationships fairly carefully, because he had had other relationships before. What was interesting about him was he could have an intense romantic relationship with a woman, then it would either peter out or they'd break up, but remain friends and then pick it up again maybe a decade later and have another affair. And sometimes even after the husband or significant other in that woman's life was aware of what had been going on. It was unusual because we do see a lot of those love triangles, and there's an awful lot of emotion and anger that has built into them, but seemed to be less in this situation, except for one obvious exception, and that was what they eventually got to. The relationship that the Thompsons had was fascinating to me. The backstory was fascinating in that he discovered she had had an affair with John Tokohara and that she'd been seeing a psychic, and the psychic had somehow given her what she thought was permission or at least, yeah, you know, if you need to have an affair, have an affair. And so this arrangement they made this post nuptial agreement that he made, he discovers this. She stops seeing John Tokohara. She'd already stopped seeing him, actually. But he discovers that there was an affair and makes her sign a deal where if the marriage breaks up for any reason at all, even if he just walks out, says, I'm done with you, and kicks her out of the house, then he gets the house and he gets custody of their child, and under any circumstances.

Blaine Alexander (11:55)

That was the most unbelievable document I had ever heard of in my life. I mean, she is.

Keith Morrison (12:01)

She simply signed it. Just signed it.

Blaine Alexander (12:03)

She just signed it.

Keith Morrison (12:04)

Yes.

Blaine Alexander (12:05)

And I was stunned that on the stand he brought forward, he basically said, oh, it was her idea. She was basically like, no, no, no, I'm never gonna do this again. In fact, I promise you that I'm never gonna do this again. So here, this is my offer to you. And I love that. The prosecutor came back and said, basically, you trapped her. You then controlled every aspect of her life. There was no way she could leave that marriage, otherwise she would lose her child. And to me, that was, if I was waffling before, of like, hey, where does this stand? Or which way will this go? That is beyond controlling behavior. Like, there's so much.

Keith Morrison (12:37)

It was kind of a clue about that relationship, wasn't it?

Blaine Alexander (12:40)

Yes, exactly. Exactly, exactly.

Keith Morrison (12:42)

That.

Blaine Alexander (12:43)

Also her silence, I thought. I mean, she was there, but she was quiet the whole time. That said a lot.

Keith Morrison (12:48)

It was very strange. But Then, you know, part of that post nuptial was that she would never go back and see a psychic again, but she did, and I guess thought that he wouldn't find out. And the psychic, I don't think the second time there was any encouragement to continue the affair with Tokohara, but she picked it up again briefly. But interestingly enough, they signed the post nuptial agreement at the end of December 29, I think, of December. Twelve days later is when the man in the bucket hat walks across the street and John Tokohara is killed.

Blaine Alexander (13:24)

So was the thought, and I don't know if prosecutors laid this out, but was the thought that, okay, signed the post nuptial agreement, she goes back, she sees the psychic anyway, and, you know, he's thinking, okay, obviously that post nuptial agreement didn't work. She may just blunt that and decide to go pick up this affair anyway. I need to go a step further and actually take care of this man. I was trying to make that connection.

Keith Morrison (13:46)

I know. And it's. There's a lot of speculation here that can't be backed up, some of which we asked the prosecutors and other people involved in the case about. You know, Vince certainly poked around a lot in that area to try to find out what he could. And I don't think the investigation even went to some of these places, like the paternity of the child, the questions of some of the more intimate questions of that relationship and what happened.

Blaine Alexander (14:13)

I got the sense, again, this is blame the viewer. I got the sense that this was a type of person that does not like to lose. That. Yes. Even though he had the postnuptial agreement that was signed, even though he knew he got everything, if there were, he was just really upset that his wife chose another man, however temporarily, over him, and he didn't like to lose. I also think, you know, the conversation around psychics and everything, and this was kind of an undertone in what you discussed. There's a very good possibility that she was dealing with some sort of postpartum depression, postpartum anxiety. I mean, going through having a child. Right. Like, he talked about how, you know, maybe she wasn't as excited as he thought that she would be after giving birth. That, to me, immediately speaks postpartum depression. Right. A lot of mothers have a hard time transitioning into motherhood. You have hormones all over the place. And so who knows what type of a role that could have possibly played in that as well.

Keith Morrison (15:06)

Well, exactly. Sure.

Blaine Alexander (15:08)

Let's. Let's talk about this bucket hat that turned out to be. And it's funny, you know, I think our viewers know by now, but the titles of our Dateline episodes, Keith, you and I don't think those up ourselves. We're not doing a story. And then we say this should be called the bucket hat mystery. No, that's something that usually. I know, at least for me, we don't find out until the week of air. Usually that.

Keith Morrison (15:30)

And I have made suggestions before and others. So have others. And they call them something else anyway.

Blaine Alexander (15:37)

Exactly, exactly. Exactly. So this bucket hat was really kind of a linchpin to this whole thing. Right. And the journeys of said hat.

Keith Morrison (15:46)

Right. The killer of John Tokuhara was going to great lengths to try to get away with it. And had it not been for those carefully placed cameras and the fact that his bucket hat fell off in the middle of the street, there's some question whether or not this ever would have been solved. You know, it's harder and harder to commit a crime these days because there are cameras everywhere. There certainly are, even in neighborhoods where you wouldn't expect them to be.

Blaine Alexander (16:11)

Arguably, had you just gone out there maybe in some clothes that didn't look so crazy, in this bucket hat that didn't stand out as much, might you have been spotted? Or, you know.

Keith Morrison (16:20)

Yeah, you raise a good point. And, you know, as you know, there were two trials. In the first trial, there was a hung jury, partly because of the difficulties with DNA evidence, partly because of various other things. But there, the evidence was just not enough for the first jury. And there was some concern that there wouldn't be enough for the second jury either.

Blaine Alexander (16:47)

You know, I have to say that when I saw the trial, when we went to the trial so early in the Dateline episode, I said, ooh, something else is coming. You've got about three more different twists for us because we never go to a trial that early. Right. Usually it's in, you know, part 11, part 12, act 11 or 12, when you're about to wrap it up, then there's the trial and you get on with it. So I said, okay, there's going to be something here that doesn't work. And then came the mistrial. I'm curious, in your experience, Keith, I mean, does a mistrial usually, does that usually spell good news or bad news for the defendant?

Keith Morrison (17:18)

The defendants will take it as good news always, because it's not a conviction. And so there's at least a chance that the prosecutor will decide, okay, I can't find anything better. So I'm just not Going to bring it again. And there's also a chance that a second jury will say the same thing in this case. They doubled down and, you know, got what else they could and it worked out. But as you saw in the story from the representative of the jury, there was still a lot of discussion, still a lot of argument about whether or not the man was guilty. And that could have led to, you know, another mistrial, another hung jury.

Blaine Alexander (17:56)

You spoke with one of those jurors who didn't want to be identified, but kind of gave some really interesting details about what it was like in that deliberation room. Let's listen to a little extra snippet from that interview. Sure. Yeah.

Keith Morrison (18:07)

He was a fascinating guy. Actually felt very sorry for Eric, for John, of course, who was murdered. His family, his mother who testified, who almost lost her mind because of it. She could hardly even speak. She broke down in tears. I feel sorry for his wife because she was. She was there, right? Yeah. What did you think of the fact that she was there? She seemed to be supporting him. She. I think she has to put on a face so that he doesn't go to prison. Did you see. Did it seem to you that she was putting on an act during the trial? Not necessarily. I can't say that, no. I don't know. I don't know if she even knew he was the murderer or she didn't know. We don't know. The jurors talked about that afterwards. We don't know.

Blaine Alexander (18:55)

Interesting.

Keith Morrison (18:56)

Yeah.

Blaine Alexander (18:56)

So in the end, he was sentenced. Eric was sentenced to 15 to life with the possibility of parole. How did John's family take that? How did all of his friends take that sentence?

Keith Morrison (19:08)

Well, you know, they. In a variety of ways, some of them were, you know, wish there could be more retribution than that, but, you know, essentially they were glad he was convicted, glad that it was done. There is something about the completion of a case where. And it's not so much that, like, okay, everything's going to be okay now, but that portion of it isn't weighing down on you all the time. It isn't something that you think about constantly and worry about what's going to happen or whether justice will be done one way or another. Justice was done, or at least justice as the. As the court and the jury saw.

Blaine Alexander (19:45)

Sure, absolutely. Well, it was a fascinating story. And after this, we will be back to answer some of your questions from social media. As you can imagine, Keith, we have a lot of social media thoughts, comments, questions that we can bring forward. So let me Read a few of these. Adora 2000. This is a very simple statement. She says, this is the ugliest love triangle I have ever seen. And mind you, that's saying a lot because love triangles feature kind of prominently on Dateline.

Keith Morrison (20:16)

Well, yes, that's right. I think there were several triangles involved. But, yes, it was. It turned out rather ugly.

Blaine Alexander (20:24)

Ugly indeed, yes. This is from ealitydoc. I felt very conflicted about this case. Juror interviewed said they felt video could be a man or a woman. So if they ignored video and DNA, since hat wasn't tested and lab was compromised, what was there, aside from motive and proximity of the white truck?

Keith Morrison (20:44)

Which is precisely why that first jury said, no, can't convict, can't acquit. We don't know what to do.

Blaine Alexander (20:51)

Exactly. Exactly. You know, and I think this is interesting. We had several people online who disagreed with the conviction, which is notable because we don't always see that. So, IKEH 1990, how they convicted Eric on no evidence, I will never know. Similar comment from jbrainstorm4u. I don't agree with that conviction. Could the husband have done it? Yes, but I just don't think I could have been a juror on that case and convicted him. Interesting.

Keith Morrison (21:19)

There you go. But we waited for the result of that, of the jury's deliberation for quite a while, and there was great uncertainty about what they would decide because of that very problem.

Blaine Alexander (21:30)

This one's interesting from Tacy Delilah. She said she consulted a psychic for permission to have an affair. A lot of people had thoughts on the psychic thing.

Keith Morrison (21:38)

They do. There's some question as to whether or not the psychic was giving her permission to have an affair, but I think probably the psychic was. Who knows what that conversation was. Whatever it was, that's how it came out.

Blaine Alexander (21:51)

Okay, we have a few audio questions. Let's listen to one. This is from Tyler. Was John Tokohara the father of Joyce's baby?

Keith Morrison (22:00)

It seemed like there was a possible implication of that based on some of the things in the episode, but it wasn't fully confirmed.

Blaine Alexander (22:10)

Thanks. There were some questions about the baby. I could see how people wondered that.

Keith Morrison (22:15)

Well, yes, and we did, too, and just spent a certain amount of time trying to suss that out. But the investigation didn't seem to want to go there, at least not in any way that we were able to find out about. Your speculation is just as good as anybody else's speculation, but I don't think there's an answer to that question that has been revealed.

Blaine Alexander (22:39)

Yeah. Oh, goodness. Here's another, here's another audio question from Katie. Okay, so our question. My sister and I are watching the episode now. She finished it last night, I finished it tonight. And we are wondering what happens now. If the wife wants to divorce him and he's in jail for 15 to life, does he still get the kids and all the assets because of that post marital agreement or does she get that stuff now that he's in jail? Katie Baucus with a very smart question. That's a great question.

Keith Morrison (23:13)

I think that's the question of the day, don't you? That's a good one. And I don't think anybody has the answer to that question. You know, one would sort of assume if you've been convicted of murder, you're not going to be able to get the custody of your child, the ownership of your house away from your wife. But I don't know. I mean, these things can wind up in court for a long time.

Blaine Alexander (23:36)

Potentially that postmarital agreement, post nuptial agreement is just going to be stuck in my mind for a long time. I've never heard of something like that. Certainly not as aggressive as that one is. So that was just wild.

Keith Morrison (23:50)

That was unique.

Blaine Alexander (23:51)

Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Well, Keith, a lot packed into this two hour episode, my friend. Fascinating to watch as always. Thank you for talking Dateline with me.

Keith Morrison (24:01)

Thank you.

Blaine Alexander (24:01)

And that's it for talking DATELINE for this week. Thanks so much for listening. If there's a case that you want us to cover or if you have a question for our team, remember you can always reach us anytime on social media, DatelinenBC. You can also leave us a voicemail at 212-413-5252, which apparently goes directly to Josh's pager, I'm told. Or you can send a voice memo in a dm. And before you go, we wanna make sure that you check out Lester Holt's new four part podcast series. It's called the Last Appeal. It's an in depth look at the case of Robert Roberson, a Texas father who's set to be executed on October 16 for the 2002 murder of his two year old daughter, Nikki. Prosecutors say that the evidence against him is overwhelming. But a growing army of Roberson supporters, including the detective who led that investigation against him, say that new science and new evidence raise serious doubts about his conviction. The first three episodes are available right now. Wherever you get your podcasts, it is a fascinating listen. So thanks again for joining us and of course we will see you on Friday for an all new Dateline on NBC.