Podcast Summary: Deadline: White House – “A clown show”
Date: September 17, 2025
Host: Nicolle Wallace, MSNBC
Episode Overview
This episode of Deadline: White House dives deeply into the explosive and contentious House Judiciary Committee hearing featuring FBI Director Kash Patel. The focus is on the Trump administration’s handling—and apparent cover-up—of the Epstein sex trafficking files, with new scrutiny on Director Patel's evasiveness and confrontational demeanor. The discussion broadens to examine the implications for institutional trust, political violence, the politicization of law enforcement, and the erosion of democratic norms. Key legal and political minds join Nicolle Wallace to dissect it all, including Christy Greenberg (former Criminal Division deputy chief, SDNY), NYU Law Professor Melissa Murray, and Rick Stengel (former Undersecretary of State). Later, Congressman Dan Goldman joins for firsthand insights into Patel’s testimony and the committee’s attempts to get the truth.
Key Discussion Points & Insights
1. Kash Patel’s “Clown Show” Testimony
The central drama is the House hearing with FBI Director Kash Patel, who repeatedly dodges direct questions about the Epstein files and Trump's potential involvement.
-
Repeated Evasions:
- Kash Patel is grilled by lawmakers (notably Dan Goldman) regarding whether he informed the Attorney General that Trump’s name appeared in the Epstein files. Patel dodges with “alphabet jokes” and never gives a straight answer.
“Who you tell the Attorney General that Donald Trump's name is in the Epstein files? Yes or no?”
Interviewer / Host [01:37]
“Why don’t you try spelling it out?”
Kash Patel [01:44]
- Kash Patel is grilled by lawmakers (notably Dan Goldman) regarding whether he informed the Attorney General that Trump’s name appeared in the Epstein files. Patel dodges with “alphabet jokes” and never gives a straight answer.
-
Deflection & Aggression:
- Rather than answering, Patel suggests the committee focus on violent crime and accuses Democrats of protecting pedophiles—a clear attempt to deflect.
“Why don’t you try serving your constituency by focusing on reducing violent crime ... and the number of pedophiles that are legally harbored in your sanctuary cities in California?”
Kash Patel [01:55]
- Rather than answering, Patel suggests the committee focus on violent crime and accuses Democrats of protecting pedophiles—a clear attempt to deflect.
-
Legal Jargon and Stonewalling:
- Repeated references to protective orders and sealed witness statements, but as expert guests explain, these do not prevent the release of the critical Epstein interview reports.
“...protective order would never govern what the FBI has in its own file ... the judge said ... you can produce the Epstein files, including those interview reports, you can produce all of that ... they don’t have a leg to stand on with respect to keeping some of this material secret.”
Christy Greenberg [09:03–10:42]
- Repeated references to protective orders and sealed witness statements, but as expert guests explain, these do not prevent the release of the critical Epstein interview reports.
2. Political and Legal Analysis: The Depth of the Cover-Up
-
Hypocrisy & Gaslighting:
- Patel is called out for his reversal—from once demanding House Republicans “put on your big boy pants and tell us who the pedophiles are” to now stonewalling on releasing those names himself.
“Kash Patel is now in charge ... His answers are not only illogical, legally, they're totally unrelated to everything he ever said he believed House Republicans could do in the past.”
Host [10:42–11:26]
- Patel is called out for his reversal—from once demanding House Republicans “put on your big boy pants and tell us who the pedophiles are” to now stonewalling on releasing those names himself.
-
Performance for “an audience of one”:
- Analysts note Patel’s bombastic style seems designed for Donald Trump’s approval rather than the MAGA base or the wider public.
“Maybe it's for an audience of one ... but we're not talking about what he could do and why he hasn't done it, because we're so riveted by his absolutely bombastic demeanor.”
Rick Stengel [12:47]
- Analysts note Patel’s bombastic style seems designed for Donald Trump’s approval rather than the MAGA base or the wider public.
-
New Revelations & Lack of Qualifications:
- Patel’s ignorance of notorious white supremacist Dylann Roof, referenced by the committee to illustrate his unfitness for office.
“Of all the things he has said yesterday and today, this was the single most disqualifying thing—that the head of the FBI didn't know who Dylann Roof was.”
Melissa Murray [16:04]
- Patel’s ignorance of notorious white supremacist Dylann Roof, referenced by the committee to illustrate his unfitness for office.
3. Impact on Law Enforcement & National Security
-
Decimation of Expertise:
- The mass firing of senior FBI officials with counterterrorism backgrounds is highlighted as weakening the agency and the country.
“They’ve decimated the ability of the FBI to protect anyone from anything.”
Host [21:08]
- The mass firing of senior FBI officials with counterterrorism backgrounds is highlighted as weakening the agency and the country.
-
Shift of FBI Priorities:
- Shift away from domestic extremism to immigration enforcement under White House direction.
“The priorities are shifting within the FBI to not focus on domestic terrorism and instead shift the focus to immigration enforcement, which historically has never been part of the mission of the FBI.”
Christy Greenberg [19:21]
- Shift away from domestic extremism to immigration enforcement under White House direction.
4. Congressman Dan Goldman’s Firsthand Account ([24:26–32:53])
-
Coordination and Cover-Up:
- Congressman Goldman accuses the FBI, DOJ, and House Republicans of coordinating to conceal information in the Epstein files that could implicate Trump.
“There’s a coordinated effort from the White House, the Department of Justice and House Republicans to conceal and cover up the materials in the Epstein files that would have Donald Trump’s name, likeness or image.”
Rep. Dan Goldman [24:41]
- Congressman Goldman accuses the FBI, DOJ, and House Republicans of coordinating to conceal information in the Epstein files that could implicate Trump.
-
Witness Statements & Incomplete Disclosures:
- Goldman underscores that key witness statements and interviews with Epstein’s victims are being withheld despite no legal barrier.
“Those are the files ... not included in the list of documents that the Republicans confirmed ... are the full Epstein files, when in reality they’re not.”
Rep. Dan Goldman [26:48]
- Goldman underscores that key witness statements and interviews with Epstein’s victims are being withheld despite no legal barrier.
-
Direct Accusation of Perjury:
- Goldman says Patel “lied under oath” regarding Epstein’s trafficking activity.
“He said that ... did Epstein traffic women to anyone else? And he said no, flat out. No.”
Rep. Dan Goldman [28:09]
- Goldman says Patel “lied under oath” regarding Epstein’s trafficking activity.
-
Manipulation of Ghislaine Maxwell’s Prison Transfer:
- Goldman argues the decision to move Maxwell to a less secure facility was a coordinated effort, not a Bureau of Prisons decision alone, to keep her silent.
“The Bureau of Prisons ... ultimately did execute that request. But it is absurd to say they made that decision alone.”
Rep. Dan Goldman [29:26]
- Goldman argues the decision to move Maxwell to a less secure facility was a coordinated effort, not a Bureau of Prisons decision alone, to keep her silent.
-
Signature Forgery and Legal Maneuvering:
- Goldman mocks Trump’s claim that the birthday book signature is forged, noting Trump hasn’t sued over it and that comparable “investigations” are used to stall or distract.
“If it was truly a forgery ... he would of course file a lawsuit and he didn’t.”
Rep. Dan Goldman [31:10]
- Goldman mocks Trump’s claim that the birthday book signature is forged, noting Trump hasn’t sued over it and that comparable “investigations” are used to stall or distract.
5. Political Violence & The Loss of Democratic Norms
-
Reactions to Charlie Kirk’s Murder:
- Recent uptick in political violence, highlighted by the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, leads to calls for civil dialogue and rejection of vengeance.
-
President Obama and Governor Shapiro’s Words:
- Obama and Shapiro are contrasted against the current White House for their calls for unity and for upholding the First Amendment.
“We have to be able to disagree and have sometimes really contentious debates without resort to violence.”
Barack Obama [36:24]
- Obama and Shapiro are contrasted against the current White House for their calls for unity and for upholding the First Amendment.
-
Expert Analysis on Free Speech:
- The panel dissects Attorney General Pam Bondi’s call to “go after hate speech”—pointing out that hate speech is protected under the First Amendment and that suppressing speech is antithetical to American values.
“The Attorney General ... did not know that hate speech is protected whether we like it or not.”
Melissa Murray [38:05]
- The panel dissects Attorney General Pam Bondi’s call to “go after hate speech”—pointing out that hate speech is protected under the First Amendment and that suppressing speech is antithetical to American values.
-
Deterioration of the Rule of Law:
- Dangerous implications for equitable justice when top law enforcement officials pre-judge cases in the press, potentially undermining prosecutions by poisoning jury pools.
“All she had to say was, ‘Hey, we have this person in custody ...’ But she felt the need to take it further ... this kind of rhetoric is the way you can inadvertently lose a slam dunk case.”
Christy Greenberg [44:52]
- Dangerous implications for equitable justice when top law enforcement officials pre-judge cases in the press, potentially undermining prosecutions by poisoning jury pools.
6. The Epstein Files, Accountability & The Bigger Picture
- Moms As Key to Accountability:
- Advocacy by Jess Michaels that mothers, regardless of politics, are the group most likely to demand justice for Epstein’s victims.
“I think moms. Moms understand this. Moms are hurting with us ... this is a nonpartisan issue.”
Jess Michaels [46:12]
- Advocacy by Jess Michaels that mothers, regardless of politics, are the group most likely to demand justice for Epstein’s victims.
Notable Quotes & Memorable Moments
| Timestamp | Speaker | Quote | |------------|---------------------|----------------------------------------| | 01:44 | Kash Patel | “Why don’t you try spelling it out?” | | 03:30 | Cong. Dan Goldman | “I want to understand what the court order prevents you from releasing witness statements ...” | | 09:03 | Christy Greenberg | “[T]hey don’t have a leg to stand on” (re: withholding FBI’s Epstein files). | | 12:47 | Rick Stengel | “This is a kind of clown show that we are all riveted by.” | | 14:58 | Christy Greenberg | “Dylann Roof, who followed white supremacist propaganda, murdered nine black parishioners ... Do you deny this?” | | 16:04 | Melissa Murray | “This was the single most disqualifying thing—that the head of the FBI didn’t know who Dylann Roof was.” | | 19:21 | Christy Greenberg | “...the leadership in those counterterrorism roles, are the ones being fired ... priorities are shifting ... to immigration enforcement ... never been part of the mission of the FBI.” | | 24:41 | Rep. Dan Goldman | “There’s a coordinated effort ... to conceal and cover up the materials that are in the Epstein files that would have Donald Trump’s name, likeness, or image.” | | 28:09 | Rep. Dan Goldman | “He said ... did Epstein traffic women to anyone else? And he said no, flat out. No.” | | 31:10 | Rep. Dan Goldman | “If it was truly a forgery... he would of course file a lawsuit and he didn’t.” | | 36:24 | Barack Obama | “We’re at an inflection point ... we ... have to fight for our democracy ... to disagree ... without resort to violence.” | | 38:05 | Melissa Murray | “There’s no greater contrast between demeanor and temperament than Kash Patel in front of the Senate and Barack Obama.” | | 46:12 | Jess Michaels | “If you were to ask me what demographic can make the most difference? I think moms.” |
Timestamps for Key Segments
- Kash Patel grilled on Epstein files: [01:13–04:50]
- Legal analysis: why hiding the files is bogus: [07:20–11:26]
- Patel’s demeanor and Trump “audience of one”: [11:26–13:38]
- Patel’s ignorance on Dylann Roof: [14:58–16:52]
- Firing of counterterror experts; FBI’s priorities: [19:21–21:08]
- Congressman Dan Goldman interview: [24:26–32:53]
- Discussion of political violence, Charlie Kirk, Obama’s comments: [34:28–44:44]
- Moms and the Epstein justice movement: [46:12–46:29]
Conclusion
This episode uses a raw, clarifying lens to scrutinize the Trump administration’s efforts to contain the Epstein scandal’s political fallout, documenting how top law enforcement officials' evasions undermine public trust and security. With legal, historical, and contemporary analysis, the guests expose the disconnect between performative politics and public service, making a compelling case for transparency and adherence to democratic principles in the face of ongoing political turbulence.
