
Loading summary
A
Welcome to a new Experiment from Dialectic. I've been thinking about ways that I can add things to the world of dialectic, and one of the commonalities across many of the people I talk to is they are incredibly thoughtful in writing. I often expose that in the conversations. I often read little excerpts and have an exegetical type of conversation where we're going through various pieces. That said, with a number of people I've talked to in the past or may talk to in the future, I would strongly encourage people to go back and actually read their writing in full. And so today I'm excited to try an experiment where I read a new essay from a past guest of the show, Toby Shorin, that he just published. It's actually a piece based on a talk he gave back at FWB Fest in 2024, and he has since added some things, concretized it, and published it as Body Futurism. Obviously you can just go read the essay or listen to Toby's talk for that matter, but I thought it would be cool to bring a piece that I really loved and that I think is both provocative and inspiring to Dialectic listeners. Maybe an audiobook for essays, if you will. I had a fun and multifaceted conversation with Toby all the way back on episode seven where we briefly touched on some of these ideas and many more, and I would encourage you to go listen to that as well. With that, please sit back, relax, and enjoy Body Futurism from Toby Shorin. This was published on February 25, 2026, and the log line for this essay is as society turns toward the body, a new politics of the flesh is on the brink of eruption. Settle down, settle down. Look closely and take a minute to settle in. Beginning by imagining a plane of pure light at the top of your head. Now sense as it passes its way down the tip of your scalp, down to your forehead, notice it rolling over the bridge of your nose. Now, very slowly, visualizing this plane of light making its way past your throat. Are you making subtle movements there as you read, or as you listen? Down to your shoulders, down to your arms, Aware of the breathing as your chest fills and releases with air, Noticing your diaphragm scanning your whole body down further, but slowly, Slowly now, feeling the weight of your body on the chair, the points of contact between your clothes and skin, your feet, or the heft of that piece of glass and metal in your hand. Can you feel it? Can you notice the heat or cold of the air around you? And can you sense the newfound fascination with the body that permeates the airspace, the spirit of Bocconi, is alive and well in America. It was, after all, American industry and American cities, American modernity and an American century which inspired the Italian futurists to refashion the statuesque image of classical man into something dynamic, fluid, mechanical, technological. Now we Americans are at it again. Ancestral diets, crip cultures and diagnosed entities, health protocols, entrepreneurial interest in biomedicine, surrogacy, ubiquitous biometric measurement and trauma discourse are all facets of the body's increasing role in social thought. The new body futurism takes over from the now tired futurism of software, but it is made of the same raw materials mined from the California coast. Body futurism is the result of a republic turning its mind inward, of opponents of Cartesianism seizing the day in the academy of technologists moving their attention from virtual spaces to physical places. In other words, body futurism is over determined. So best get familiar, settle in, settle in. The embodied turn Bodies are eating the world. Up from the ground comes a great swell of bodies. Running, lifting, bathing, shaking down, thinning out and waking up. Bodies have taken over popular culture. Huberman is the biggest podcaster in the nation. One in eight Americans have tried GLP1s seed oil. Discourse has created a new physical purity drive. Van der Kolk's the Body Keeps the Score has been atop the New York Times nonfiction bestseller list for seven straight years. And healing practices like trauma release and somatic experiencing have earned mainstream adoption. These are just a few indications of the physicality of contemporary thought. The concerns of everyday Americans have turned to the embodied self. Numerous factors paved the way for this embodied turn. The reactions against enslopified bot infested social media is one. The bounce back from COVID era work from home policies is another. Lifestyle brand burnout is a third crucial factor in life after lifestyle. I wrote that conscious consumerism as a substitute for legitimate community was bound to fail. I said, we're going from D2C brands to D2C practices. Well, everything now is some kind of run club, surf club, lifting club, walking club, hiking club, tea club, sauna club. Among innumerable embodied associations. These micro communities leverage all of the tools of the D2C trade, but put embodied practice in the front seat. Dropshipped microbrands hosting meditation, micro retreats and bathhouse micro events. Social media micro influencers starting micro academies espousing the benefits of nervous system regulation and emotional literacy. Each will sell you a hat. The embodied turn is much more than a trend in The Marketplace of Ideas Body stuff is the moral source of what is fashionable. Even when the fashions themselves are competing. Paleo warriors wolfing down steak and eggs and ray peat heads on a carrot salad and ice cream diet are both capable of earnest moral posturing. That is the point. Anything that captures the popular imagination today, whether scientific or spiritual, unfailingly draws from the realm of embodied practice. The network ideologies that matter are the ones that promote diets, mindfulness and prayer practices, biometric monitoring systems and health protocols. These lived activities do what products never could fulfill the moral premise of a lifestyle through embodied practice. This body movement is being worked out across every segment of society. From policymakers to physical therapists, from the pulsating rhythms of ecstatic dancers to the Promethean efforts of tech entrepreneurs to extend life, everybody seems to have their own vision for the future of the body. Down some paths lie body based technocratic control, astroturfed protocols of self regimentation. Down others lie genuine liberation through true body awareness. Kinesthetic Media the vast adoption of kinesthetic social media in TikTok and Reels makes the newfound focus on the body a permanent societal shift. Every form of media takes a human faculty and extends it into the public domain. What the TikTok media format does is turn body practices into remixable, forkable content. Twitter is the marketplace of ideas where the IntelligenceSia debates diets. TikTok is the battlefield where body practices clash, evolve and are tweaked to gain maximum adoption. Scroll through a dozen 30 second clips and you'll see the embodied turn in action. People are breathing, they're tapping, they're shaking, they're stretching to release trauma. Just a few decades ago, many of these body practices were the exclusive knowledge of mind body therapists in hippie hotspots. Now the best of them are being traded around the noosphere with plenty of money to be made by the enterprising healer influencer. With the wheat comes the chaff. However, for every person who discovers yoga Nidra or trauma release exercises is another who psychs themselves into thinking they have Tourette's and then cures themselves next month. These phenomena were foreshadowed by teens doing weird dance trends and stealing cars. If a silly jingle can induce individuals to grand larceny, what are the political implications of TikTok's influence over bodily life? We have already seen what Twitter did for social discourse proliferate 100,000 bizarre micro ideological strains and make them resistant to the antibiotics of institutional authority. TikTok Reels and YouTube are now doing the same for the social body. Watch ballerina farms to learn how to embody the tradwife. Subscribe to Back from the Borderline to learn occult meditations. Bodies are online and they want your attention. The Charismatic Economy Attention is all you need the name of the white paper that inaugurated the current era of transformer models is a perfect catchphrase for the transition to a pure attention economy where bodies matter most. AI researchers in San Francisco have all started GLP1s and weightlifting routines, having convinced each other that physique will be the final competitive edge after AI takes all the white collar jobs. If their conclusion is excessive, the premise is correct. We have already entered an economy of charisma, which grants status to various kinds of extreme physicality or virtuosity. The combination of severely curtailed career mobility and the mainstreaming of gambling have created an economic environment characterized by grift. The biggest winners are naturally those who exude charisma and prowess. Charisma has long been the dominant mode in social media, but athleticism is now rewarded more than ever. Jake and Logan Paul pivoted into boxing Ishowspeed does exhibition races. Philosopher YouTuber Jonathan B lectures from exotic locations wearing the open linen shirts that reveal how fit he is. Less and less influencers are talking heads. More and more it is the bodies doing the talking. Only from this perspective can the preoccupation with testosterone levels, jaw angles and height maximizing be understood. Men are mewing and women are getting Botox at 30 instead of 50 because it is perceived as an economic necessity to appear hot online. Needless to say, the logic of body as asset is made quite explicit in OnlyFans. Even the wealthy have to play along with the charismatic economy. For some years the high status thing to do has been to start a company. Now all the founders want to be longevity influencers too. The same utopian fervor once reserved for distributed systems is being used to construct ideologies of the body. The next major section Bio Utopianism Software Utopianism the utopian fantasies of the past three decades were shaped profoundly by software. The cypherpunk and crypto anarchist movements of the 90s Laid out cryptography based visions of the future. Digital nations without states, anonymous peer to peer exchange, effortless information flow. Then the 2000s saw the rise of social media, hailed as a technology that would enable the spread of open societies. In the 2010s cryptocurrency launched a new wave of crypto idealism, pumping narratives of global coordination, private money and a world computer poised to disintermediate legacy institutions. In all of these variations, the software utopia is one accessed through a screen. In the late part of this cycle, Silicon Valley thought leadership commingled breathless cybertopian stylistics with business models fashioning concepts like the sharing economy, the gig economy, and the ownership economy. Geeks have always conflated operating systems and social systems, and rightly so. But in a classic media message mix up every technology soon became a disembodied space of utopian thought. On Twitter, where these narratives thrive, we had the crypto space, the AI space, the DTC space, the biotech space, and furthermore, niche spaces. Each space encapsulated business model, people, technologies, the discourse, and most importantly, a promised social vision. The relationship of the source technology to the space is that of the machine to the futurist artwork. Bocconi's unique forms of continuity in space or Baala's speed of a motorcycle transform industrial machinery and automobiles into dynamic sculptural forms of amplified speed, power and scale. Today's technologists do the same when they base social utopian imaginaries on machinic concepts. Simple concepts like digital cash transfers and business process automation become software based parallel societies with their own economic systems and AI faiths. The Collapse of Cloud Optimism but over the last few years, these disembodied cloud utopias have slowly begun to evaporate. Software has not delivered on its fantastical premises, turning formerly bright eyed millennials into techno pessimistic doomers. In the wake of the tech lash, what remain of the software futurists have consolidated around effective acceleration. Only the promise of an AI God still holds hope for software utopians. The surest sign of software exhaustion is that the tech positivism is in the process of escaping itself into a variety of other domains. You no longer need to work in tech to hold the cultural positions of tech workers. Now there are life scientists, housing lobbyists, warmongers and energy policy advocates who all take the techno progressive stance. Climate thinking is moving away from limiting consumption towards energy abundance. An identical move is underway in biomedicine with the transition from the ethos of harm reduction to the ethos of life extension. But very few grasp the most vital point of this moment. Whether in ignoring the role of violence in maintaining the state or meaning things into the discourse as a world building strategy, the futurist tendencies of recent decades made little room for the physical person. With the fall of software comes the return of the repressed, the body itself. Embodied ideologies builders have become bodybuilders, gray market peptides and gene therapies have replaced Soylent, the Muscle tee and chain has replaced Zuck's famous hoodie, and the Office Cold Plunge has replaced the office beanbag couch grinders and Quantified self Once fringe subcultures of Silicon Valley enthusiasts have now been mainstreamed and productized by whoop bands, Apple watches and eight sleep mattresses. Meanwhile, the rhetoric of body augmentation has become far more radical. Longevity, immortality, consciousness hacking, advanced meditative states, direct gnosis, enhanced Olympics and designer babies are all the relevant super meme complexes. The human body itself is the new site of utopian technosocial visions for the latest crop of techno Buddhists. The future is a world of super compassionate meditators operationalizing stream entry and scaling loving kindness practice. The Gene editors start by saying you can't fix your kids hereditary diseases in utero and and end up espousing a world of kid geniuses vibe coding their first company. Brian Johnson's Don't Die movement envisions a health tracking longevity religion with an eschatology to rival the most fantastical software reveries. Humanity's rebuttal into AI is its bare survival into an ever extending horizon. Full body biomonitoring is far out, but you can order blueprint olive oil and stick a glucose tracker in your arm today. In comparison with the disembodied ideologies of social media world building, these imaginaries are grounded in fully corporeal interventions, swap blockchains and transformer models for Pilates and peptides. The platform is different, the style of utopian extrapolation is the same. But body imaginaries are not just believed, they are physically lived. Protocolism if anything exemplifies the shift from software to the body, it is the word protocol, which has migrated from describing technical standards to signifying body practices. The new health protocols are the modernist architecture of kinesthetic behavior and the native social form of body futurism. Protocols for diet, breathwork, bodybuilding and supplementation are open source rule sets, vitamins, coaching apps and classes commercialize their implementation. Apple Health and WHOOP provide the substrate for various influencer led protocol schemas. These branded body practices are becoming hypercompetitive as health tech companies scramble for data on muscle movement, cardiovascular systems and the content of dreams. Weight watchers, arguably the ancestor of contemporary health protocols, had already incorporated rigorous self surveillance and social participation. Today's protocols function similarly while automating data collection via wearables and adding competitive social media layers. For example, sleep score open source communities for protocols such as 75 hard congregate on Reddit and sometimes on proprietary apps. Here we see an important feature of protocols. Inasmuch as they are tightly scripted scopes of action, they are also participatory institutions that connect bodies through regulation. Formally speaking then, the protocol is an embodied version of the E ideology, composed of a charismatic influencer, a social media mind virus and a fruiting body, a type of guy. While most of them seem to have an instrumental character, the moral is always embedded in the muscle fiber. Whether it's ancestral diets or Huberman sleep schedule, there is a normative message in all of these prescriptions. You have heard of protocols, but you need to understand protocolism. It is the format of social control suited to a world enchanted by body futurism. For the social elite, the old disciplinary institutions have loosened their grip, making way for a society based on location, independence, remote work, flexible romantic arrangements, easy credit, wellness services and other apparent freedoms. But these self chosen protocols require constant self monitoring and self regulation. Human potential 2.0 with the rise of these embodied ideologies and networked faiths, one might venture that the 70s are coming back. What's really happening is the Human Potential movement out of Esalen Institute all those years ago is finally fruiting into its full form. The Human Potential movement applied California frontierism to the human body itself, an evolutionary mysticism combining romantic self expression with the tools of science and that peculiar American taste for perfectionism. It aimed to access through mystical experience whatever latent capacities are dormant in man. Human Potential was obsessed with psychical research, with mind opening drugs, with peak experiences, with the idea that we only use 10% of the neurons in our brain. We now hear echoes of the same in today's body optimization movements, although technologies that augment our natural capacities play a bigger role. Thus we have an ultrasound headband to induce lucid dreams and unlock unheard of qualia, ultra rigorous diet protocols to maximize mitochondrial biogenesis and artificially ultra intelligent meditation instructions to create a society of sages. Both then and now, the goal of Human Potential is to create the superhuman. Everything happening now is downstream of Esalen in some way. Not only the superhumanism and the Ayahuasca retreats in Marin county and Byron Bay, but also the flush of unconventional social healing spaces that remix Esalen's core propositions. Mixed modality social sauna spaces in Toronto, Christian churches converted for pantheistic worship in Berlin, and community acupuncture clinics in Maine. Even the exploding popularity of somatic therapies can be traced to the Human Potential Movement. Rolfers Keegangers, tantricas, and mindbody practitioners of all stripes traveled through esalen in the 60s and 70s. New schools of body thought were born at Big Sur, and these practitioners settled west, sowing the seeds of an alternative American folk religion. Today, what they planted is taking root in Texas, sprouting vigorously through sidewalk cracks of New York, growing alien blooms in the dry California air, and blossoming across the vast plains of social media. From the superhuman bodies of dreaming technologists to the mythopoetic bodies of the new shamans, bodies across America are coming alive. Now we have thoroughly surveyed the terrain and visited the many varieties of embodiment at play in this uncertain moment. What remains is the question of what kind of body politics can emerge from this contested ground. The next major section Body Politics Social Sickness New understandings of the personal body have always led to new ideas of the social body, and vice versa. The medieval body politic was based on an anatomy of limbs, the head, the torso and feet, symbolically justifying the social hierarchy of kings, nobles and peasantry. Today's embodied ideologies, sciences and protocols likewise foreshadow its politics and its political bodies. To make one example, the political dimensions of the embodied turn is blatantly visible in the current vogue for the pathological body. Politics is the politics of a society convinced of its own sickness. The techno, pessimism, gerontocracy and senile nostalgia mongering of the 2010s had already fostered a general sense of dis ease. Now that very same restantemon has found a home in numerous embodied maladies. The loneliness epidemic, the toxic food system, the hormonal dysregulation, the microplastics, the neurotic fixation on declining sperm counts, declining sex rates, declining everything. An emaciated social body reminiscent of Egon Schiele's degenerate fond de chicles self portraits, pardon my French pronunciation there, although those portraits are worth googling. All this social sickness, hypochondriac or real, contributes to the atmosphere of political decline and the prevailing sense that America, or even Western civilization itself, is ending. Disability is not merely a metaphor here. Public administration has gone defunct in reality, as the embarrassing mishandling of COVID and chaotic policies of Trump demonstrate. Despite the attempts of very online people to counter the feeling of looming crisis with utopian what if thinking and institutional world building, software based political praxis, whether memeing things into the discourse or the right's predictable embrace of clicktivism and cancel culture, is totally impotent. Grand narrative worldbuilding like progress studies no longer seems possible now that Twitter has turned into Elon's personal propaganda machine. New institutions never arose. Decomposition. Some who preach the decline of the west have found their profit in historian Oswald Spengler, a thinker who himself likens culture to biology. According to Spengler, a culture in its old age becomes a civilization like ours. Rational, rigid, megalopolitan, bureaucratized, petrified, managerial, despiritualized, refined, ornamental, wedded to the politics of quote, unquote progress. The uselessness of conventional statecraft in digital lobbying indicates a fundamental exhaustion of civilizational vitality. If Spengler's model holds any truth, then the decay of our institutions and the protocol ish virtualization of selfhood are symptoms of a greater life cycle. An aging body breaks down and decomposes, but things grow from rot. The demise of our political and social organs is a necessary prelude to societal renewal. I believe that this is what is happening now. A literal decomposition of our tired political bodies, our geriatric institutional bodies, our abstracted social media bodies. A decomposition back into firm, energetic, sensual individual bodies. This is not walden ponding, nor atomization. Nor is it the mistake Esalen made when it abandoned 60s radical politics for a purely interior spirituality. The body is not a retreat from political but its basic political unit, the raw material of nerve and flesh, the foundation for a new form of communion. Spinoza saw this potential when he said we do not even know what a body can do. The enlightenment of the body. Bodies do things. When not encumbered with institutional fetters. Those bodies are immobilized, restless, desperate for movement. If institutions no longer serve us, we can only turn to local forms of self sufficiency, that is new bodily arrangements. Bodies are the foundation of what is real and of relationships to one another. At the core of every social form, every form of art, architecture, politics and music, every run, club and council meeting and dinner party is simply an arrangement of bodies. Bodies moving in space, sensing each other, touching, exploring from first principles what is actually good for this body. What social forms? Heal me, repair me. In 1670, Spinoza proposed an ethics derived from bodily interactions. That joy and goodness arises when bodies compound together and increase each other's power and sadness when they decompose each other. In this, he was more farsighted than most philosophers. These very same body sensations are a key to the source of cultural vitalization. This is a different use of the body than the homogenizing protocols and futurisms of self chosen control. It is an attunement to the microcosmos of felt experience. A phenomenological intuition that is the physical correlate of what is called wisdom. Capacities for resolving disputes in satisfying ways, handling conflict with grace, holding integrity in challenging moments, maintaining strength in political action. All these capacities are physiological sensitivity. The greatest potential of body futurism is just this, an enlightenment of the body. But for this enlightenment to unfold, the decomposition of social bodies into individual bodies must continue. The more fully one inhabits the senses, the more obvious becomes the extractive and domineering tendencies of defective institutions. Bodily autonomy arises as the natural counter. For when we return to the body, when we return to sheer sensation, it is possible to find what brings us joy, what compounds our power and assists us in becoming more free. And this freedom, this power, this joy, is not to be found in solitude, but in the joining of bodies. A new politics based on the possibilities of the enlightened body is on the brink of eruption. Enlightened social forms the enlightened body asks what arrangement of bodies, what patterns of interaction, what social architectures stoke within us a shared vitality? These questions point to what is yet unfelt by man. Enlightened social architectures grounded in the wisdom of the body. Phenomenological insight does not stop with the self, but extends to socially complex domains. Christopher Alexander worked out how to create architecture from these foundations. Restorative justice procedures reconcile broken social contracts on similar principles, Call these new vernaculars embodied languages of relationship and community that emerge from shared somatic experience. Or call new social forms the physical and cultural structures that shape how bodies come together and interact. And as a reference, Toby links to and has done a lot of work on new social forms. You may find cacao ceremonies and ecstatic dances distasteful, but these are fundamentally the same kind of innovation as mommy walking groups and warehouse raves. A word to the wise. The bodies that can create these new social forms are not the battling, emotionalized, vibrating, explosive bodies exalted by the Italian futurists. They are not the heroic, athletic, enthusiastic, homogenous bodies introduced by German National Socialism. Those are the bodily programs of fascism, which failed not just militarily and morally, but even productively, producing only a political dead end. These bodies are the warm and sweating bodies, the liquidly sobbing bodies, the bodies of lovers, bodies with bruised feet planted half in the earth, turbulent, fleshy, sensual, eating, drinking and breeding bodies black limbed and white limbed, Bodies at home on the range, bodies at home on the pounding asphalt bodies, bodies of every hue and caste, bodies of every rank and religion. These are the democratic bodies, these are the new American bodies. In the final section, you and your body, body relations. That is why you, you and your body, the very thighs you're sitting on, those very lungs you're breathing with, the very eyes you're reading with, the very hand you're gripping with, you and your body are the material, the resource at stake in this embodied turn. You have to sensitize yourself to the joyous affect to avoid the awful passion of hatred and remorse. Protocolism and parasociality foster remorse against the body and everything that emanates from it. This is a poisonous disintermediation of our relations with one another. Rather than making ideological questions into proxy battlefield for our embodied relational desires, we have to learn to build community out of our experience. To enlighten the body is to immerse in the practices that sensitize your physical perception to these relations. Whether focusing on somatic experiencing or hakomi or conscious sexuality or contact, improv or sound bathing or hot and cold exposure. Do not take these on as a form of wellness or self care, but as experiential learning. Mutual relations of joyous nature between bodies is the first principle for a new futurism, the futurism of your body. It would be wrong to construe this as navel gazing. Spinoza saw joyous relations between bodies as the foundation of the good Christ taught universal love between men. It is only in a society based on harmonious relations between and among people, and from the working out of harmonious body politics into more elaborate forms, that new social bodies can grow, become a body. So to be a body futurist, you have to become a body first and foremost. You must become intimately aware of the most basic phenomenological sensations. You have to know what is the sense I get from the air around me right now? What is it like to be near to whoever I'm sitting next to? Can I feel their presence right now? What is my experience of this space, this architecture, this social scene? Was this interaction successful? Did it make me feel nourished or enriched? Did I feel connected? Or did I feel blocked, stultified, threatened, or dominated in some way? And what role did I have in how this interaction played out? Did I carry myself at arm's length with distance, with rejection, with fear, or with openness, with a yes in my heart, with love, body, futurism. Spengler wrote the decline of the west, but I say that America is not the west, but something new. The decomposition of our institutions into merely bodily acts and back again is the natural cycle of cultural death and rebirth. It is time to let the old die. The corpse of an imminent God is the placenta of a new cosmology. There is nothing more important to the renewal of culture than the enlightenment of the body itself. The development of a new folk phenomenology, the mysticism and eroticism of the somatic in all its varieties and forms, the cultivation of a deep phenomenological insight is the foundation of a new idea of what life can be. This idea is very nascent, but if you sit here, listen closely, Settle in through your forehead, the bridge of your nose, your breathing chest. If you listen to your heart as it beats to you, if you hear what it whispers when you sit, when you stand, when you leave this place, when you meet another's gaze, you can feel it as through the gauze of a veil. That's Body Futurism by my friend Toby Shoren. If you enjoy the essay, I would encourage you to let him know and you can go read it at his website@writing.tobyshorin.com bodyfuturism I will link to it in the description. Once again, thanks for listening. This was an experiment, so your feedback is welcome, any and all. And the idea itself on my audiobook, narration, style and so on. We'll see. Maybe I'll do more of this. Otherwise we'll see you next time here on Dialectic with another interview and I hope you have a great week.
Host: Jackson Dahl
Date: March 15, 2026
Episode Theme: A reading and deep dive into “Body Futurism,” Toby Shorin’s provocative essay on the rise of embodied culture and a new politics of the flesh.
This episode is a unique experiment for Dialectic: instead of the usual interview, host Jackson Dahl reads and comments on “Body Futurism,” a recent essay by past guest Toby Shorin. The piece outlines a cultural shift from digital, software-driven futurism to a focus on embodied practice and physical presence, mapping societal trends across health, digital attention, politics, community, and selfhood. Dahl presents the essay as both a diagnosis of our moment and an invitation to reconceive how bodies—our own and collectively—form the basis for future politics and meaning.
| Segment | Timestamp | |---------------------------------------------|-------------------| | Introduction & Framing | 00:00–04:30 | | The Embodied Turn & Culture Shift | 04:30–11:00 | | Kinesthetic Media & TikTok's Role | 11:00–18:00 | | Attention Economy & The Body as Asset | 18:00–23:00 | | Bio-Utopianism vs Software Utopianism | 23:00–30:00 | | Protocolism & Health Culture | 30:00–36:30 | | Human Potential Movement Lineage | 36:30–42:00 | | Body Politics & Social Sickness | 42:00–49:00 | | Enlightenment of the Body | 49:00–54:00 | | Democratic & Sensual New Bodies | 54:00–59:00 | | Becoming a Body Futurist – Call to Action | 59:00–end |
The episode retains Toby Shorin’s rich, evocative style—blending art historical references, Silicon Valley argot, and philosophical reflection—with Jackson Dahl’s calm, attentive delivery. The language fluidly shifts from cultural diagnosis to poetic invocation, always foregrounding direct experience.
Jackson Dahl’s reading of Toby Shorin’s “Body Futurism” is a compelling tour of our evolving relationship to the body amidst technological exhaustion and institutional decay. The essay asserts that our current age is defined less by digital abstraction and more by embodied practice, kinesthetic communities, and the search for new forms of social and political life rooted in sensory engagement and bodily presence. It tracks the migration of utopian energies from software to flesh, argues for the opportunities and pitfalls of this shift (protocolism, social media contagion, charisma culture), and ends by urging listeners to anchor themselves in direct, joyous bodily relationship—the real grounds for a revitalized future.
Listen if you’re interested in:
Find the full essay at writing.tobyshorin.com/bodyfuturism