Kamala vs. Trump Rallies: The Truth About Attendance | Harry Sisson DSH #855

Summary

Digital Social Hour Episode Summary: "Kamala vs. Trump Rallies: The Truth About Attendance | Harry Sisson DSH #855"

Release Date: November 4, 2024

In this compelling episode of Digital Social Hour, host Sean Kelly engages in an in-depth conversation with Harry Sisson, a prominent Democratic content creator and political commentator. The discussion centers around the contrasting atmospheres and outcomes of recent rallies held by Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, delving into broader themes such as social media censorship, election integrity, economic policies, and immigration. Throughout the episode, Harry shares personal anecdotes, provides critical analysis of current political landscapes, and offers insights into his experiences navigating a highly polarized environment.

---

1. Rally Attendance and Atmosphere

Harry's Experiences at the Rallies

Harry begins by comparing his experiences attending both Kamala Harris's and Donald Trump's rallies. He expresses a clear preference for Harris's event, highlighting the positive energy and enthusiasm he observed.

• Timestamp [00:33]: "I have to say the Kamala Harris rally. You know what I mean? It was the Kamala Harris rally. Like, the energy was really great. There was a lot of joy, a lot of excitement."

In contrast, Harry notes a more contentious environment at Trump's rally, where he encountered hostility and accusations.

• Timestamp [00:34]: "But, you know, we. I love the debate. So it was, it was fun. It was just kind of intense at the beginning."

2. Interactions with Attendees

Good Faith Conversations vs. Hostility

Harry shares his mixed interactions at the Trump rally, encountering both open hostility and attempts at genuine dialogue.

• Timestamp [01:03]: "There were some people there that were Trump supporters who were like, good faith. They weren't, you know, they were trying to engage in a good way and like, actually have conversation."

• Timestamp [01:16]: "But I'd say the majority of people we ran into, they were not interested in like a cordial conversation."

3. Social Media Censorship and Misinformation

Balancing Free Speech and Regulation

The conversation shifts to the topic of social media regulation. Harry advocates for necessary regulation to curb misinformation without stifling free speech.

• Timestamp [05:15]: "I think there has to be some regulation on that, whether it be, like, a fact check, that's on it."

He critiques Twitter's Community Notes system, citing its perceived biases and delays.

• Timestamp [06:12]: "I've gotten Community Notes on my post saying that I'm paid by the DNC. I've never received a dime from the DNC. That's annoying. That's an abuse of the system."

4. Election Integrity and Legal Challenges

Trump's Indictments and Claims of Weaponization

Harry discusses the ongoing legal battles facing Donald Trump, emphasizing the lack of evidence for claims that federal agencies are weaponized against him.

• Timestamp [17:45]: "I think it's nonsense. When they say something like the FBI or the Department of Justice is targeting Trump, there's quite literally no evidence of that."

He elaborates on the potential long-term impact of Trump's legal issues on his presidential aspirations.

• Timestamp [15:30]: "He's facing over 700 years... of felony counts."

5. Economic Policies: Taxes, Inflation, and Federal Agencies

Funding the IRS vs. Defunding the FBI

The discussion delves into fiscal policies, with Harry advocating for increased funding for the IRS to target wealthy tax evaders, contrasting it with Republican calls to defund the FBI.

• Timestamp [18:25]: "I think that we have to get back to, like, sticking to the facts and focusing on information we know to be true..."

• Timestamp [19:06]: "A lot of Republicans saying, like, oh, my taxes have gone up under Joe Biden... we're still under Donald Trump's tax plan."

Harry underscores the importance of the IRS in maintaining economic fairness and supporting public services.

• Timestamp [19:31]: "If we can hold those people accountable, make them pay their fair share, that makes all of our lives better."

6. Immigration and Border Policies

Analyzing Migration Numbers and Economic Impact

Harry addresses the surge in migration, debunking myths about mass illegal immigration and highlighting the economic benefits of legal immigration.

• Timestamp [51:34]: "Immigration has absolutely nothing to do with what we do inside the country. It'll still come because of what's happening outside."

He explains that most encounters at the border do not result in entry, countering claims of millions entering illegally.

• Timestamp [53:00]: "I would argue, you know, the Biden administration has been one of the best in modern American history in terms of policy passed and things done."

Harry also discusses the positive economic projections associated with immigration.

• Timestamp [54:43]: "Our economy is going to be $7 trillion bigger and our federal revenue will be $1 trillion more."

7. Debates and Media Conduct

Comparing Trump and Harris's Public Engagements

The episode touches on the differing styles of public engagement between Trump and Harris. Harry praises Harris's professionalism and focus on policy, while criticizing Trump's off-script and confrontational approach.

• Timestamp [41:39]: "Trump brings a lot of nonsense, a lot of chaos... We are far better as a people when the president's boring."

Harry further commends Harris's preparedness and policy-driven discussions.

• Timestamp [42:20]: "Kamala Harris getting up there, sounding really professional, talking about the issues, having the data beforehand..."

8. Personal Experiences and Resilience

Facing Online Harassment and Swatting

Harry opens up about the personal challenges he has faced as a political content creator, including being swatted and receiving bomb threats. Despite these hardships, he demonstrates remarkable resilience.

• Timestamp [43:41]: "I've got swatted four times. I got bomb threats... it's still kind of hard to hear that."

He discusses coping mechanisms developed over time to handle online hate.

• Timestamp [44:19]: "I get hate and it doesn't really bother me. They've phased me when I was 17 and, like, young."

9. Critiques of Conservative Figures

Assessing Influential Conservative Voices

Harry offers his perspectives on conservative figures like Charlie Kirk and Ben Shapiro, highlighting their alignment with Republican agendas and their handling of controversial topics.

• Timestamp [66:43]: "Charlie Kirk is still going out there saying, well, you know, what's a woman? It's like, who the hell cares?"

He criticizes their focus on divisive issues and their support for Trump despite his legal troubles.

• Timestamp [67:06]: "He also, like, ignores the Trump legal cases. He ignores all that stuff."

10. Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Looking Ahead to the Election Outcome

As the election draws near, Harry expresses his hope for Kamala Harris to win, emphasizing the importance of accepting election results to maintain national stability.

• Timestamp [47:17]: "I hope she does. Will you be really upset if Trump wins? Yeah, I'd be really upset."

He reiterates his belief in Harris's policies and vision for the country, contrasting them with Trump's self-serving approach.

• Timestamp [47:19]: "I fundamentally believe that Kamala Harris winning is in my interest, in your interest, in everybody's interest. It helps the country."

---

Key Takeaways

• Rally Atmosphere: Kamala Harris's rallies exhibit higher attendance and positive energy compared to Donald Trump's more hostile events.

• Social Media Regulation: Harry advocates for balanced regulation to prevent misinformation without infringing on free speech, critiquing platforms like Twitter for their flawed Community Notes system.

• Election Integrity: Strong criticisms of Trump's legal challenges and claims of weaponization of federal agencies against him, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based evaluations.

• Economic Policies: Support for funding the IRS to target wealthy tax evaders and opposition to defunding essential federal agencies like the FBI.

• Immigration: Clarification that most migrants encountered at the border are not entering illegally, highlighting the economic benefits of legal immigration and the challenges of deportation policies.

• Public Engagement: Praise for Kamala Harris's professional and policy-focused public engagements versus criticism of Trump's confrontational and off-script approach.

• Personal Resilience: Insight into the personal toll of political content creation, including harassment and threats, and the development of resilience over time.

• Critique of Conservative Figures: Critical assessment of influential conservative voices for focusing on divisive issues and supporting Trump despite his legal controversies.

• Election Outlook: Hopeful outlook for Kamala Harris's victory, paired with a call for peaceful acceptance of election outcomes to preserve national unity.

---

Notable Quotes

• Harry Sisson at [00:33]: "I have to say the Kamala Harris rally... the energy was really great. There was a lot of joy, a lot of excitement."

• Harry Sisson at [05:15]: "I think there has to be some regulation on that, whether it be, like, a fact check, that's on it."

• Harry Sisson at [17:45]: "I think it's nonsense. When they say something like the FBI or the Department of Justice is targeting Trump, there's quite literally no evidence of that."

• Harry Sisson at [19:31]: "If we can hold those people accountable, make them pay their fair share, that makes all of our lives better."

• Harry Sisson at [51:34]: "Immigration has absolutely nothing to do with what we do inside the country. It'll still come because of what's happening outside."

• Harry Sisson at [41:39]: "Trump brings a lot of nonsense, a lot of chaos... We are far better as a people when the president's boring."

• Harry Sisson at [47:19]: "I fundamentally believe that Kamala Harris winning is in my interest, in your interest, in everybody's interest. It helps the country."

---

Stay Connected with Harry Sisson

To follow Harry Sisson's insightful analyses and stay updated on his latest content, connect with him on all major social media platforms under the username Harry J. Sisson.

---

Disclaimer: This summary is based on the provided transcript and aims to capture the essence of the discussions between Sean Kelly and Harry Sisson. For the full experience and complete context, listening to the actual podcast episode is recommended.

Transcript

[A]

Divides us.

[B]

Right.

[A]

We have to be careful about that.

[B]

So that being said, are you a fan of some sort of censorship on social media?

[A]

I think there has to be regulation. Like, I like, not to the point where, you know, you can't express a political view. Like, if you're like, I'm supporting Donald Trump, I think you should be able to say that. If you're saying I'm supporting Trump because of X, Y and Z, no problem. But if you're saying that, like, Haitians are eating dogs and cats, I mean, that there has to be some regulation on that.

[B]

All right, guys, Harry Sisson here today. Just went to a rally yesterday, right.

[A]

I went to both Trump and Kamala Harris rally. It was good.

[B]

Which one was better?

[A]

I have to say the Kamala Harris rally. You know what I mean? It was the Kamala Harris rally. Like, the energy was really great. There was a lot of joy, a lot of excitement. But the Trump rally, I went to, the first people I started talking to, like, recognized me, and they were like, oh, you're a DNC shill, you're a communist. You want to indoctrinate our kids. I'm just like, were really in our. In our face from the get go. But, you know, we. I love the debate. So it was, it was fun. It was just kind of intense at the beginning.

[B]

Did you go there to film content?

[A]

Yeah, we went there to do some in person debates.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

And I got to be honest, there were some people there that were Trump supporters who were like, good faith. They weren't, you know, they were trying to engage in a good way and like, actually have conversation. But I'd say the majority of people we ran into, they were not interested in like a cordial conversation.

[B]

Which. Which rally had more people?

[A]

Oh, the Kamala Harris rally.

[B]

Really?

[A]

Yeah, yeah. The Kamala Harris rally was packed. The Trump rally, I actually posted a video on TikTok about he was still on stage and people were leaving. Like, a lot of people were leaving really early. Wow. And some of these people had red hat on. Some people, I think were just kind of maybe interested or just attending the rally to see what was up. Yeah, but a lot of people were leaving early.

[B]

Damn.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

That's wild. I thought Trump got more people, honestly.

[A]

Yeah, I don't, I don't. I mean, I don't know the specific numbers when it comes to venue sizes that they were at. Just from my eye, which is obviously not like a reliable indicator, but from my eye, it seemed like.

[B]

Did you see LeBron's video yesterday?

[A]

I did.

[B]

What did you think about it?

[A]

I thought it was great. I'm glad that, you know, a lot of these, these celebrities, these people with huge platforms are coming out and endorsing Kamala Harris. I mean, obviously, I think that's the right move for the country. So it's. I'm glad that people like Taylor Swift or LeBron James and she's gotten some big ones lately. Yeah, there have been a lot of big celebrities in recent days. I think that's probably deliberate. I don't think the timing is coincidence. But yeah, it was a great video.

[B]

How are you feeling with four days left? Because there's a lot of different polls. There's the polymarket stuff, there's the actual polls. Like, how are you feeling?

[A]

I think it's a true toss up. I mean, there's a lot of, I'd say people on both sides who are like, oh, my candidate's definitely going to win or whatever, or it's like decided practically. I totally disagree. I think that I would say it's 50, 50 coin flip. It's going to come down to turnout. I think genuinely think 50% of the country supports Harris, 50% supports Trump. It's just like we will the 50% for your candidate get out and that will decide. It's going to be like tens of thousands of votes.

[B]

Okay. You know, so you're pretty objective.

[A]

Yeah, I mean, I think, like, I obviously have my opinions when it comes to Kamala Harris, but when it comes to, like, the data, like, you know, the numbers don't lie. We have to be honest and, like, set expectations properly. But, you know, I also try to be objective with the political views. I'm not, you know, just buying into Democratic politics because it's fun or, you.

[B]

Know, which I think is important in your space.

[A]

Yeah, I mean, 100%, I think. And like, I think what's lacking in politics right now is genuinely, like, good faith discussions. People who want to have a conversation with someone they disagree with, you get a lot of screaming, you get a lot of name calling. And I'm not innocent in that. You know what I mean? But, you know, I've had my fair share.

[B]

It's human nature.

[A]

It's human nature. Right. But I think we have to get back to, like, sticking to the facts and focusing on information we know to be true as opposed to, like, what we want to be true, which I think, and I think this is almost objective, which I think the Trump supporting side suffers from more now, you know, with what happened in 2020, denying the election results. And, you know, Trump's just lies about virtually every single topic. It's incredibly concerning how a lot of Trump supporters just kind of buy into it automatically. And, like, one of my goals is trying to be like, pull these people out and be like, hey, you can be more conservative. That's okay. Like, we at least have a factual conversation, you know?

[B]

Yeah, yeah. The election result is definitely a big one. And he seems to be very serious about this upcoming election. He's now accusing Pennsylvania of cheating. Right. See that?

[A]

Yes, I did see. And it's already been debunked. Like, a lot of this. Yeah, a lot of this stuff has been debunked. There was a video alleging to show a person from Haiti illegally voting with, like, multiple ballots. The FBI just came out today and. And talked about how that video was created by Russia.

[B]

Oh, wow.

[A]

Spread by Russia. And so this is what's so concerning to me. It's like, I think a lot of people are voting based off of misinformation. And especially on Twitter right now, with the way that it's run, like, these videos are just able to explode. And they did. Like, Elon Musk was talking about it, all these huge accounts were talking about it, and it really hurts the trust in the institution of our democracy and voting. And I think that's really concerning. So that's why I'm like, just focus on the facts. You know, we can disagree, but just be honest.

[B]

Yeah, Video spreads so fast these days, especially on Twitter.

[A]

Like, you know, video posted an hour ago alleging to show some nefarious plot can have, like, 10 million views. And it's just like, that's like 10 million people. Or, you know, however many people it is believing. Total misinformation, something that's spread by a foreign actor that, you know, they want to blow up. So it further divides us, and we have to be careful about that.

[B]

So, that being said, are you a fan of some sort of censorship on social media?

[A]

I think there has to be regulation. Like, I like, not to the point where, you know, you can't express a political view. Like, if you're like, I'm supporting Donald Trump, I think you should be able to say that. If you're saying, I'm supporting Trump because of X, Y, and Z, no problem. But if you're saying that, like, Haitians are eating dogs and cats, I'm saying, I mean, that there has to be some regulation on that, whether it be, like, a fact check, that's on it. Like, I guess Instagram kind of does that something along those lines. Because just look at the way that Twitter's run. Like, so much of the misinformation that I encounter that a lot of people in politics encounter comes from Twitter. And we have to be like, well, it's not true because of X, Y and Z. So I'm a huge proponent of free speech. I think everybody should be able to say what you want. But, you know, social media is just a different beast. Yeah.

[B]

To be fair to Twitter, don't they have a fact checking thing on the.

[A]

Do they have Community Notes? I think that Community Notes is a really flawed system as it stands. I would love to see it get better. It's just. It can take a long time to appear. Some of the community notes are certainly, like, politically driven.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

And I've seen it on both sides happening to Democrats and Republicans. Like, I've gotten Community Notes on my post saying that I'm paid by the dnc.

[B]

I've seen that. Yeah.

[A]

I've never received a dime from the dnc. And it's like, you know, it's just kind of like, that's annoying. That's obviously an abuse of the system. So there was more objectivity in the Community Notes. I'd be like, great. You know.

[B]

Yeah. So I'm glad you said that because I saw that came out with the whole Bryce hall thing. Yeah. You said you got paid, so could you explain what happened there exactly?

[A]

Yeah. I don't really know where it came from. People have just said that, you know, since I'm, you know, young, I'm 22, and I'm supporting Kamala Harris in such a strong way that I must be getting paid for it. That must be receiving compensation. It's like, no, the majority. I'm not going to lie. I make money from social media just like anybody else on social media, but it doesn't come from a political party paying me. There's certain laws and regulations that actually prevent that or I have to disclose that.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

So, you know, that's something that, like, Bryce and Republicans have made up and they've said that I've. It's been funneled through my management team, and it's just. It's a bunch of nonsense. But, you know, for example, that's a community note that I've gotten, you know.

[B]

Yeah. That's wild. So I wonder how the Community Notes are made then.

[A]

I mean, I think. I'm not an expert in the system, so I don't take my word for it, but my understanding is that people can sign up to Be writers and you can get approved or rejected. And so I think that's how it works. But I'm not 100% sure. And I have some people who do that. I know that I'm like decently friends with that write community notes, but again, not an expert.

[B]

Yeah. So it sounds similar to Wikipedia then, where there's like a seniority level.

[A]

You can 100.

[B]

That makes sense.

[A]

100.

[B]

Were you one of the first people that did those TikTok live debates? Because those are viral now, right?

[A]

Yeah. So I mean, I wouldn't say I was the first. I have some friends of mine, Parker and Dean, who have really been doing the live streams for longer, but I've been doing them for like, I'd say eight months. Eight months now. And they're fun and those are wild.

[B]

To me because I'll pull on on any hour and it'll be 10,000 people. It'll be either midnight or like 10am and it's just like packed.

[A]

Yeah, I mean, I think that, you know, those debates are really important. I think I described it in a recent interview I did for a newspaper as like the new version of door knocking. Right. If you're on the ground, which on the ground work still is, is crucial, but if you're on the ground, you can hope to hit like a hundred houses in a day or like 200 houses in a day. Whereas with a live stream you can hit like hundreds of thousands of people a night and they're listening to arguments and points that they hadn't heard before. So these live streams have been really great in like spreading the word. And I have to say I think that the Democrats or left leaning people have really utilized them better than Republicans, which obviously I'm very happy about, you know, 100%.

[B]

Especially on TikTok.

[A]

Yeah. Yeah. I think like the Republican social media game still is, just not that.

[B]

Yeah. I would say on Twitter they're pretty prevalent.

[A]

Oh yeah. Oh yeah.

[B]

But in terms of debates. Yeah. Jubilee has taken over the debate game lately.

[A]

They've been, they've been great. Yeah, Jubilee and like the 20v ones that they do.

[B]

Yeah. One Democrat, I just saw the Destiny one.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

I was actually really impressed with Destiny on that one.

[A]

He's a fantastic debater. I mean, you know, I've had disagreements with Destiny, but like when it comes to the knowledge, the way to articulate his arguments, he's one of the best in the game.

[B]

He's up there. What were your disagreements with him about?

[A]

I mean, he's just, I think he's said some things in the past. You know, I'd say like some, some slurs maybe. I describe it as that. I obviously, I wouldn't say he's. Obviously he doesn't really, I think, buy into that stuff of like, oh, I can't say this or I can't say that or I shouldn't say this or that. So he's just kind of different in that way. But you know, some of that stuff I wouldn't personally say that makes sense. A lot of people should either.

[B]

Have you been on those jubilee debates yet?

[A]

I have not. Oh no, I've. We've tried to make it happen. It's just. I live in New York there in la. It's kind of like a tough trip. But I, I would love to. I want to do one of the 20v one.

[B]

I'd love to see you on a one off.

[A]

I want to do one of the 20v ones, you know.

[B]

Would you want to be the one or the 20?

[A]

The one.

[B]

Oh yeah.

[A]

I want to take all the, all the people on the debates. I think that'd be really.

[B]

Did you debate growing up?

[A]

I actually was never part of a debate team or I never did Model UN or anything like that. I, you know, my, my father used to be a lawyer, so we would debate a lot and I would debate a lot with like friends and family. So I kind of grew up in my own way debating. Never through like a program or any stuff, but I've been doing. I really like debate. I really like arguing people.

[B]

I thought you held your own on Steinie's debate.

[A]

Thank you. I appreciate it. Yeah, it was like, it was, you know, kind of a 2v1 a little bit. But Steiny, it was fun, you know, it was great and it was fun. You know, I like the debates and that was. I forget her name.

[B]

I forget Emily.

[A]

Emily.

[B]

Emily Alston.

[A]

Yeah, she was nice. And I also think she was good faith. I don't think she was.

[B]

Yeah, she's got experience going on up here. Morgan, which you've been on as well. Those debates on Pierce get wild.

[A]

Yeah, I mean, you know, I have disagreements with Pierce as well, but he really does bring like a diverse group of people together. It's like it's just always such an interesting collaborations on Pierce. Yeah. You know, they have like foreign presidential candidates. Former Sarah Palin was just on the other day with Destiny.

[B]

I saw that.

[A]

Which was fascinating. So they bring together some cool people, you know.

[B]

Yeah. Since you're in New York, were you at The Trump rally at msg, I was not.

[A]

I deliberately stayed away. I was like, got it. Got to stay away from that. But it looked huge. It was packed. It was packed. I've heard that the numbers were really big there, but I've. I just saw a memo from the Harris campaign today that their data is showing that undecided voters are now breaking for them by double digits because of Trump's MSG rally.

[B]

Damn. Because of Tony's talk. Holy crap.

[A]

What? Tony said what other people said. Like, I think he also made a joke about, like, people of color eating watermelons. Like, just the most racist kind of garbage stuff you've ever heard. And that has really swayed people. They're like, you know, this is, in my view, what a second Trump administration would bring.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

And I think a lot of people are seeing that as well. And the data is actually showing that as well, which is.

[B]

Yeah, I'll say. Just being objective about it. Having a comedian as an opening act is risky.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

Like, that's especially this late in the game, like a week before.

[A]

Yeah. And the thing about it is, like, there's no ability for people I disagree with to say, oh, you know, he has free rein. He just made this joke by himself. It's not representative of Trump or anything.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

The Trump campaign, like, reviewed his speech and approved it. They were perfectly okay.

[B]

Oh, really? So they have to review all the opening act speeches.

[A]

Oh, yeah. All the speeches are approved.

[B]

I didn't know that.

[A]

Yeah, 100%. Because they want to avoid something like we see right now. And they just totally dropped the ball when it came to the Puerto Rico's garbage comment. The watermelon comments, the comments that Hillary about Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris. Those have all been in the media. But, like, they approve those things. They said. Yeah. Call Puerto Rico garbage. That's fine by us. And I think that's, you know, wrong. Wow. Yeah.

[B]

I did not know that about rallies. So they have to prove all those.

[A]

Oh, yeah. All of this stuff is approved. You know, they. There's nothing that Trump or I'd say Harris does that isn't, like, reviewed line by line.

[B]

Wow.

[A]

They're very particular.

[B]

And there's speech. Their things are written out for them, right?

[A]

Yeah. They have speech writers.

[B]

Speech writers.

[A]

Speech writers. So, like, Trump is never, you know, writing his own speeches. He has somebody that's doing it for him.

[B]

Oh, really?

[A]

100%. I mean, he goes off the teleprompter a lot, and then he. I think that always ends very badly for him because he'll talk about Hannibal Lecter, he'll talk about boat sinking and things like that with batteries. It's all nonsense. But that's like, I think important for people to see because that's who Trump is. Like a lot of people have worked around him are saying, yeah, this guy's incompetent. He has no idea what he's doing. He has no understanding of U.S. history. And so when he goes off teleprompter, like that's who would be getting for four more years. And I don't think anybody I view would want that.

[B]

He is 78. I just saw Pac man drop the video. That there is signs of mental decline. Yeah. And actually proof of it. So I thought that was interesting.

[A]

Yeah, I mean also, you know, not, not a doctor, not an expert in this stuff, but you know, when you compare the Trump of now versus the Trump of like eight years ago, it is different. And that doesn't mean that he's suffering from dementia or like some form of mental decline, but he has gotten like more unhinged, more unstable in my view. And you can really see it in his rhetoric. Like, why is he talking about Hannibal Lecter? Why is he doing that? Like, what does that mean? Why are you doing that? It's just very strange to me.

[B]

Yeah. Have you ever talked to him?

[A]

Oh my God, no.

[B]

He's never tweeted at you or anything?

[A]

Not to my knowledge.

[B]

He just went out. Mark Cuban?

[A]

Yeah, they have a few. They've had a few going on for a long time.

[B]

Yeah. What did you think of that whole debacle? I guess.

[A]

Yeah. I mean, I don't know. I think that. I think that Trump sometimes projects his insecurities onto people he knows are like, better than him. So like, I think he's incredibly jealous of Obama. You know, he's really a two term president, you know, admired by, I'd say the majority of the country in terms of like the numbers. Nobel Prize winner, you know, really accomplished man, Harvard educated lawyer. And Trump is really none of those things. So I think he like does that to Obama. I think he does it with Mark Cuban as well. Because Mark Cuban is also like, like t is really successful and all this stuff.

[B]

And he's got 6 billion.

[A]

Yeah, right, exactly.

[B]

Got a lot of money.

[A]

He's got a lot of money. And not saying that Trump doesn't either, of course. Yeah, a lot of money.

[B]

But you got to meet Obama, right?

[A]

I did get to.

[B]

I saw a video with you and him.

[A]

He is like fantastic. You know, he's so smart, so, so kind. And I think like, fundamentally a really good person. And I think he got involved in politics for all the right reasons. And I'd say that about like, you know, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. These are people who dedicated their life to public service. Kamala Harris was District Attorney of San Francisco, then Attorney General in California. Senator, vice president, like she spent her life fighting for people. Whereas I think Trump got involved in politics for all the wrong reasons. Right. This is somebody who had a silver spoon in his mouth growing up. He's a wealthy billionaire and ran for President 2016, I think unexpectedly won and then of course ran for reelection in 2020 loss. And now I think he's running to keep himself out of prison personally.

[B]

Wow.

[A]

Yeah. Cuz he's facing over 700 years.

[B]

Holy crap.

[A]

Oh, yeah. If he's convicted, I mean, that's incredibly unlikely. But if he's convicted of all the crimes alleged against him and he gets the maximum for all of them, he'd be spending over 700 years.

[B]

Were those the 34 felony counts?

[A]

It's those and the other indictments that are pending.

[B]

Oh, there's pending. There's.

[A]

Oh, yeah, he has two. He has one in Georgia for trying to overturn the election. There he is one in D.C. for January 6th and trying to overturn the election nationally. And then one is still going on in Florida. It's currently dismissed. But the 11th Circuit, which is the court that kind of covers that area, is going to reinstate it, almost certainly.

[B]

What was that one about in the one in Florida?

[A]

That was a. Classified documents.

[B]

Oh, classified, Damn.

[A]

Yeah. So, yeah, so Trump, after he left office, he took classified documents from the White House. He knowingly did it. And he.

[B]

I saw this. The raid at Mar a Lago. Right.

[A]

Yeah. When that's what they were looking for. Like he had the nuclear secrets of foreign countries.

[B]

White.

[A]

Yeah. And a lot of these documents had information on human assets in other countries, meaning, like US Spies. And that's, you know, that's really dangerous. These people, if their names get revealed, they could be killed. Right. These are people are in Russia, Iran, China. And he had these documents just kind of lying around. And he knowingly had them. He refused to give them back. And of course he was indicted for retaining national defense information. And the thing is, if either you or I did that, we'd be sitting in jail right now for the rest of our goddamn lives. So it's weird how, you know, a lot of people are voting for that.

[B]

Yeah, I feel that. So when you see, these conservatives like Vivek say government agencies have been weaponized.

[A]

Yes.

[B]

What do you think about that?

[A]

I think it's nonsense.

[B]

Really?

[A]

I think it's nonsense. Yeah. When they say something like the FBI or the Department of Justice is targeting Trump, there's quite literally no evidence of that. In fact, it's the contrary. Like, Trump has so much evidence against him in these cases. I'd say a lot of legal experts on both sides are saying if these went to trial, he would almost certainly be convicted. So it's just that it's not weaponization. It's like if you break the law and there's evidence you broke the law, you're going to be indicted. And they're not doing this. There's no evidence that, like, Biden coordinated or Kamala Harris coordinated. It's just that, like, Trump is on audio acknowledging he stole classified documents. Are we, is the Vex argument that we should just ignore that and not indict him and not hold him accountable legally? It's also like, erodes the trust in the Department of Justice. It erodes the trust in the FBI. We even have Republicans saying we should defund the FBI.

[B]

Damn.

[A]

It's nonsense, right? Yeah.

[B]

I don't know if that'd be good.

[A]

I mean, the, the thing about the FBI is that they do so much work behind the scenes that we don't appreciate.

[B]

Right.

[A]

So like every single day there are terrorist attacks, they stop, they're going after predators, murderers, things like that. And if they were defunded, we wouldn't be able to do that. But Trump and the Republicans have called for them to be defunded, call for the Department of Justice to be kind of like, have a bunch of these lawyers fired and also defund the FBI. That is like, I can't even like, put into words how bad that would be.

[B]

You know, FBI one I probably don't agree with, but irs.

[A]

Yeah. You know, you know, I think a lot of your friends would probably agree with you on that.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

I don't know. I think, you know, we should fund the irs, but that's.

[B]

Oh, really?

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

Okay. Why, why do you feel that way?

[A]

When we fund the irs, I think the data shows that, you know, they're not going to go after like middle income earners.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

They're not like, if a middle income American, like, misses their taxes by like a little bit and they're not trying to deliberately commit fraud, they're not going to be indicted. But if we fund the irs, we have the ability to go after really Wealthy people who evade their taxes, and they benefit the most from evading their taxes. You know what I mean? So if we can hold those people accountable, make them pay their fair share, that makes all of our lives better, because we can invest that in things like health care and building roads and bridges and improving our water systems. And that's things that Kamala Harris has talked about. Trump, not so much.

[B]

I will say the very wealthy, there's so many loopholes that most of them aren't even paying.

[A]

Exactly. And so that's also a huge issue in this election that, you know, Kamala Harris is talking about closing these loopholes, making the wealthy pay their fair share. And it's not like you have to give us 100% of your income. It's just pay your fair share like everybody else has to. But Trump is saying, let's give them another tax cut. It's like, what? They're not. They're already not paying. Does Elon Musk need another yacht? I don't think so.

[B]

He did cut it when he was in office. Right.

[A]

For 83% of the benefits went to the top 1%.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

And everybody else kind of got screwed over. And so I hear from a lot of Republicans saying, like, oh, my taxes have gone up under Joe Biden. The funny thing is, we're still under Donald Trump's tax plan.

[B]

Oh, really?

[A]

Yeah. That doesn't expire. Some of it expires 2025. Most of it expires 2027. So right now, we are still under Donald Trump's.

[B]

Wow, I didn't know that.

[A]

So if your taxes have gone up in recent years, you can thank Donald Trump.

[B]

Yes. You can't blame Biden for that one.

[A]

100%.

[B]

Now, you're young, so you're going to start making serious money as you get older. Do you think your opinion on this will change as you make more money?

[A]

No. I mean, look, I don't like taxes. I don't like paying taxes. I'm not a fan of it. I mean, I don't think anybody is. But I like. I shouldn't say I don't like paying taxes I don't like, because I would obviously like to have more money.

[B]

Right.

[A]

But I understand that taxes are a necessity to run a country well. And you can just see that in the United States compared to other countries. Like, I would argue that we are the greatest country on earth, and there's a reason for that. There's a reason that we're able to have the best military, invest in our healthcare system. Invest in manufacturing, whatever. It's because we have taxes. Yeah, well, I don't like it. It's really important.

[B]

You know, my thing is, and you might disagree with this, is I feel like there's a lot of overspending going on.

[A]

Sure.

[B]

And you also don't really see where the tax money is going to. Exactly.

[A]

Yeah. I mean, I wouldn't argue against more transparency with that stuff to see, like, where our tax dollars are going. And I think that there's probably waste somewhere in the government that we could, you know, address. But maybe, you know, I wouldn't be opposed to what you talked about, more transparency.

[B]

So when you see Elon stepping and one new fix that, what do you think about that?

[A]

Well, I think that Elon being in charge of a government agency would be really terrible. He was talking about cutting the. The. I think it was spending by $3 trillion a year. But the thing is, our discretionary spending is like 2.7 trillion. So it's like, how would that even work? Right. That makes no sense. And the fact that Trump is saying, hey, this guy is going to run a government agency to do this, and he doesn't know how much our discret discretionary spending is, it's like, that's really concerning. We should have experts and people who've been doing this their entire lives in these agencies, not like Trump's buddies. Like, he's also talking about putting RFK Jr in charge of all of the health agencies.

[B]

Right.

[A]

Why would we do that? He put a bear cub in Central Park. He cut off a whale's head. I mean.

[B]

Wait, what?

[A]

Oh, you've not heard about this?

[B]

No.

[A]

Yeah, yeah. RFK Jr. Like, he put a bear cub carcass in Central park in New York City and then never told anybody. It came up, like, 10 years later.

[B]

Why did he do that, though?

[A]

Your guess is as good as mine.

[B]

Bear carcass.

[A]

A bear cub carcass. He cut off a whale's head and, like, tried to put it in his car and bring it home.

[B]

What?

[A]

Yes. Yes.

[B]

Yeah. I never heard about this.

[A]

So strange. And one of my main criticisms of RFK Jr. Aside from, like, the vaccine stuff that he talks about, is he was asked about, like, sexual assault allegations against him, and his response was, I'm no church boy. What? What? Like, what does that mean? Why. Why would that be your response? Does that mean that you've done something wrong? But aside from that, his opinions on health is awful. So Overall, like, having RFK Jr, Elon Musk and all these in strange individuals Running these agencies, I think would be really catastrophic for the country.

[B]

So you feel like his messaging, though, of Make America Healthy again is awful, or where do you disagree with him on the health aspect?

[A]

I mean, the whole, like, I never really like his messaging of Make America X, Y, or Z again. I don't like referencing the past as, like, a version of prosperity.

[B]

Okay.

[A]

I think we should be looking more forward. Not again. I just don't really agree with the phrase. But I have no problem with, like, making America more healthy, like, encouraging, like, healthy eating, exercising. But when it comes to, like, criticizing things like vaccines or just general health care, I think that's insane. You know, we have so much data that suggests that these things work. You know, there's a reason why you don't see anybody with an iron lung anymore because we have a polio vaccine. Right. So RFK Jr. Criticizing that. And, you know, Covid, generally, it's just crazy.

[B]

So you're. You're pro vaccine? Because now kids are getting 74, ages 0 to 18.

[A]

What was that?

[B]

74 vaccines?

[A]

Oh, yeah. Yeah. I'm definitely pro.

[B]

So you like all of those? All 74?

[A]

Yeah. I mean, unless there's, like, a specific one you can point to that has data that suggests it's not. Yeah, yeah, I'm in favor. I mean, these are all, like, tried and tested and investigated by people who are, again, virologists. They're experts in these fields. They're not just being like, oh, let's just give the kids vaccines because it's fun. No, these are. These are really necessary.

[B]

Well, they've done studies on them individually, and none of them have issues. I think the problem is when you give five in one day, and then there's heavy metals in them. You know what I mean?

[A]

I mean, is there data to suggest that that's a problem?

[B]

I wouldn't know of any studies yet.

[A]

I don't know. Why?

[B]

Yeah, I don't know.

[A]

I mean, I. I don't think that there's any problem with that. I mean, people underestimate how strong the human body is and, like, how strong our immune system is. And you can have two viruses at once and have your body fight both of those.

[B]

Really?

[A]

Yeah, 100%. That's why we have, like. That's what the purpose of a vaccine is, like, producing the antibodies to fight it. And of course, again, no virologist here, so not an expert, but that's my understanding.

[B]

So Trump announced, I think, yesterday that he wants to get rid of big pharma, or it might have been rfk, Big Pharma advertising on television. Did you see that?

[A]

I did not actually see it.

[B]

Okay, so they basically. There's only two countries in the world that allow big Pharma to advertise on commercials. It's United States and New Zealand.

[A]

Wow.

[B]

So what do you think about them trying to remove them from advertising?

[A]

I mean, I don't know. I think. I think, like, intuitively it sounds attractive as an idea, but then you kind of get into like, well, can the government really prevent people from advertising that? Like, with cigarettes you can do stuff like that? Because there's gen. There's evidence that obviously cigarettes are bad for you, you shouldn't smoke, you'll get lung cancer primarily. But, you know, with health companies, I think the argument is like, well, are you infringing on their ability to be a business? Are you infringing on their right to engage in the market? And it's like, I don't know, maybe that's something that people are. They put, you know, not advertising over that. They prioritize that more. So. But I'd say I probably stay away from that a little bit. In my view. I probably wouldn't side with that.

[B]

Okay, that makes sense. Did you go to college?

[A]

I'm currently in college.

[B]

Oh, you're in college. So this whole student loan forgiveness, where do you stand on that side?

[A]

I'm a. I'm a fan of student loan forgiveness. I also think that there's data that says that it's helpful. Look, if you. President Biden talks about this a lot. If you can give people a little bit of breathing room, take a little bit of that debt off their table, they can do so much more. They can invest in a house, they can start a family. Maybe they want to move somewhere. They get out of their hometown and start a small business, they have more room to do that. And I think that's a good thing. I think, you know, student loan forgiveness, people just kind of view it in very two dimensional way, in the sense that, oh, there's nothing, there's no benefit to it. Right. You just give the money and then like, nothing else happens. Like, no, the economy actually grows when people don't have debt. They are more financially stable when they don't have debt. They're more willing to invest when they don't have debt. So if we can do that and help millions and millions of people, I mean, I think that the benefits are.

[B]

Endless, you know, so 100 forgiveness, or is there a certain percent you want forgiven?

[A]

Well, I don't Think that there's a way right now for the government legally to forgive. Forgive 100% of the debt without going through Congress, but through the mechanisms we have right now. And like Biden's plan of $10,000 or $20,000 for Pell Grant recipients, I have no problem with that. I think that'd be great.

[B]

I thought they passed something a year ago because my fiance told me they forgave it. But did something happen along the way?

[A]

Yeah, I mean, so President Biden signed an executive order for the plan. I just talked about the 10,000, 20,000. It was blocked by the Supreme Court. They said that he didn't have the authority to. That lawsuit was actually brought by Republicans. So, you know, if folks out there have student loan debt and they want it forgiven, you can thank the Republicans for that not being the case.

[B]

Wow.

[A]

So, yeah.

[B]

So do the Republicans have control over the Supreme Court right now?

[A]

They do. It's a 6, 3 majority.

[B]

Interesting.

[A]

And that's also another really important reason that Kamala Harris wins, because the President appoints Supreme Court justices. So if Trump wins, it's likely that two of them. Who are the older ones, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, they'll retire and he'll get two more appointments.

[B]

And so it'll be. It'll be eight to one.

[A]

No, they'll. They're Republicans or they're conservatives, so their seats would just be replaced, but they would have that 6, 3 majority for, like, the next 20, 30 years. Because they're all very young.

[B]

Yeah, 20, 30 years.

[A]

So if you don't like this. Supreme Court has overturned things like Roe v. Wade, taking reproductive rights away from women, at least on a federal protection level. They've obviously overturned the Supreme. The student loan forgiveness. They've rolled back gun regulation. They've rolled back climate regulation. They rolled back the Chevron deference, which is huge, which essentially gave federal agencies discretion over, like, if a law is vague, they'll say, well, the agency like the FDA or, or the EPA has discretion to interpret that law, to enforce the regulation. Got it. So it gives more power to them to actually do their jobs. Now, the Supreme Court overturned that, saying that basically you have to go to courts and have them decide what a vague law means. So unless a law is written in the exact way to address every possible outcome from the epa, then you have to go to courts and get it figured out. And I don't think that judges should be deciding what's good EPA regulation and not. I think that experts in environmental science and, and, and who are Experts in the environment generally and climate change and things like that. Those folks should be deciding what is good regulation and what isn't.

[B]

I can agree with that.

[A]

And that's what the Supreme Court overturns. So if you don't want that anymore, if you want what I would say are justices that follow the law and interpret it not in a conservative or liberal way, then I would argue people should vote for Kamala Harris.

[B]

Makes sense from that point of view. When you see conservatives say they want more power towards the states and towards local communities, what do you think about that?

[A]

I mean, I'm not opposed to states having authority and having power to, you know, deal with their own problems. I think that the problems of somebody living in Idaho are vastly different than the problems of someone living in New York.

[B]

Right.

[A]

So I think that states can have, you know, discretion in deciding that, but when it comes to things like reproductive rights, I don't think that a state should be able to decide that.

[B]

Okay, so you want a federal on that level?

[A]

Yeah, I think we should go back to we had with Roe v. Wade, which said that up until viability, which at the time was around 20 to 24 weeks, states before that point do not have an interest, meaning that they can't regulate that. They can't say, no, you can't get an abortion at 16 weeks. But after that point, then states could. But I think even in the third trimester, women should be able to get abortions in the event of a medical emergency.

[B]

Fair.

[A]

So, yeah, Kamala Harris stands for that. Donald Trump, not so much.

[B]

Really?

[A]

Yeah. No, Trump. Trump. I mean, his record is so terrible on reproductive rights. In 2015, when he was running for president the first time, he said women should be punished if they get an abortion. And now he brags about overturning Roe v. Wade, which has led to women even dying, because.

[B]

Really?

[A]

Yeah. And they've died because they haven't been able to get critical reproductive care. So, like, quick, brief story is a woman named Amber Nicole Thurman. She was living in Georgia. She went to North Carolina and took abortion pills, which is the primary method of abortion. Now she came back to Georgia. Fortunately, she still had fetal matter in her uterus, and she went to a hospital in Atlanta. And the procedure she was meant to be getting is very typical. It's like, you know, it doesn't take long. It's not all that intrusive on the woman. It's not like they have to cut her open. It's very simple. Right.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

But the doctors there were unsure if they could perform the procedure because of the way that the law is written in Georgia. So they waited and waited and waited to see, can they do this? Are they permitted? And they waited 20 hours and then they eventually started operating after tracking her infection. And she died. She had a six year old son. She wanted to go to nursing school. And now she's dead because Republicans pass these really archaic and. And I would say, like generally evil laws that restrict a woman's right to do that. So I want that to not happen anymore.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

And that's why, you know.

[B]

Yeah, that's a sad story. Rest in peace. Yeah, I gotta look into that one. When did that happen?

[A]

That was. I believe she died in 2022.

[B]

Wow. A couple years ago.

[A]

Yeah, a couple years ago. The story is only coming out now because there is often a lag in these states reviewing these cases. There's often like a two year lag.

[B]

Oh, wow.

[A]

Just doesn't get that much funding. It doesn't have the ability to like do comprehensive reviews really quickly. So we're only kind of learning now about all these women who have lost their lives because they were denied reproductive care. And unfortunately, she is one of those women.

[B]

Dang. Yeah. You see woman coming out with essay accusations too, right?

[A]

Yes. Yeah.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

I mean, I mean, against a bunch of people for sure.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

Just generally. Yeah.

[B]

I think the timing on that's a little weird, though, to be honest.

[A]

Against Trump.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

I mean, I don't really agree. I think that, you know, if a woman sees somebody who assaulted them, like, running for President of the United States, I think that they have an interest in being like, well, this guy's actually a really bad person and kind of informing the public. And so, you know, that actually happened with Eugene Carroll. She's a woman who sued Trump for sexual assault. And they went to court in New York and the jury found him liable for doing it. That he. And he assaulted her. Really? Yeah. And he defamed her as well.

[B]

Oh, wow.

[A]

So, like, you know, he is a proven sexual abuser. This is who is running to be the Republican side. And I think that, you know, there's a lot of Republicans out there that, you know, I talk to that don't really care about this stuff. They. They don't care about the sexual abuse, they don't care about the felonies, they don't care about the business fraud. They're just saying, like, you know, I want my. I want to make more money. Right. And so I disagree with that. I think that we should care about the character of a president. They're just saying, hey, you know, I focus on this. But the problem with that argument I see is that, first of all, he's a terrible person. But second of all, he's actually not good for people. Like, his policies are just bad. So from both aspects, if you care about character and you care about policy, and I'm happy to elaborate, he's not good for you. He will not make your life better.

[B]

Really, 100%, because I have a lot of entrepreneurial friends, as I'm sure you do, too. And they. They do say the economy is better under Trump.

[A]

Yeah. So that's, I think, the. The trap that a lot of people fall into, which is they saw a good economy under Donald Trump, and they're like, well, he's just going to do it again. But I think we have to think a little bit more critically about that. We have to ask why. Why was the economy good under Donald Trump? Was it because of Trump or was it because of something else? And every data point, in my view, and I think a lot of people's view, is that it's obviously not because of Trump. Obama had the longest stretch of positive job growth in American history, and Trump then inherited that economy and said, oh, it's great. Look what I did. You know, I did all this. No, he didn't. It's Obama's economy. He didn't pass any law or any regulation or do anything that actually made the economy better. And obviously, Covid happened. He lost a bunch of jobs. I'm not blaming that on him. But you're asking. People say, well, you know, Biden and Harris, they had a bunch of inflation. Well, the inflation is caused because of COVID It's not. The president doesn't actually control the economy. I'd say it's more to the Federal Reserve. So inflation going up is not because of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. You know, even if Trump was president, that wouldn't have changed. Yeah, but we have to be, like, honest about why these things are occurring. Like, Trump didn't do anything for the economy, and he's not going to do anything. Now he wants to impose a bunch of tariffs, which would increase the taxes for your average American. It's like, I don't know.

[B]

Fair enough. No, a lot of people do put the blame on the president for the economy.

[A]

Right? They do.

[B]

When you're saying it's the Federal Reserve, mainly.

[A]

Yeah. I mean, but also, I wouldn't even blame, like, the Federal Reserve for what happened during COVID and The inflation. It's like these things are so out of our control. Like, inflation was global. It happened in all of these different major developed economies. You know, there's. It's not a coincidence that Great Britain, France and Germany and Japan had their inflation rates spike at the same time. It's because we were all suffering from a global pandemic that shut down people's economies. It's not because of Biden, it's not because of Harris. But in that same vein, a good economy under Trump is not because of him. He actually didn't do anything to help the economy.

[B]

Right.

[A]

That's what I've been trying to, like, Hammer, you know?

[B]

Cause a lot of people do connect those dots. Trump and good economy.

[A]

Yeah, they say that. Oh, I also hear that. Oh, he's a good businessman. He knows how to run the economy. That I also think is nonsense.

[B]

I hear that a lot, too.

[A]

He's gone bankrupt six times. He committed a bunch of business fraud. The Trump Organization was found guilty of all tax charges against them.

[B]

Really?

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

Tax charges. So not paying taxes?

[A]

Yeah, like tax fraud and things like that. I think it was 11. I think was 11 charges. They were found guilty on all.

[B]

I didn't know about that one.

[A]

It's crazy.

[B]

I knew about the bankruptcies. You could argue that some very successful people have experienced bankruptcies.

[A]

Yeah, I think you can argue that for sure. But I think that, like, Trump's business failures in particular are not just like, oh, somebody, you know, they learned from this and they became a better entrepreneur. It's like, Trump was always wealthy because he inherited a bunch of money from his parents. He didn't really, like, do all that. And I would argue that he made a lot of his wealth through fraud. I mean, that's what the court in New York found. That he had access to a lot of different opportunities that you or I would not have access to because he committed fraud. It's like, I also don't think we would want a proven fraudster as president. You know what I mean?

[B]

So.

[A]

I don't know.

[B]

Yeah, I'm surprised there's not a law against that, that you can't run as president if you're a fraud.

[A]

Yeah, I mean, it's. The Constitution is pretty open when it comes to running for president. You can run for president as a felon, as some sexual assaulter, as. Yeah, there's no law. Murder, Murder, you can. President, you've committed murder.

[B]

Damn. You think there should be an age limit on the upper end? I know minimum is 35 or is it 45?

[A]

It's 35.

[B]

35. Do you think there should be one on the upper end?

[A]

I. I don't. I think that the way that, like, medicine is evolving and like, science is evolving, that it's not inconceivable that in, like, 30 years from now, your average life expectancy is significantly higher than it is now. And thus somebody that's 80 in 30 years from now might be perfectly fit to run the country and be as energetic as, like, today's 60. You know, I mean, fair enough.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

I think that putting a cap on that might be unnecessary given how, you know, society is evolving in the future, produce a different result.

[B]

I started seeing people talk about that with Biden.

[A]

I mean, I think that Biden's perfectly fed. I mean, really. Yeah, I've met him.

[B]

I. When did you meet him?

[A]

I met him in May of this year. So May of 2024.

[B]

And you didn't see any issues?

[A]

No, I actually interviewed him.

[B]

How long was the interview?

[A]

Like, five or six minutes.

[B]

I don't know if that's long enough to gauge a full cognitive ability.

[A]

I mean, probably not. I mean, I was more with him, like, for 15. The interview was just a short amount of time, but, yeah, no, I mean, I watch his speeches often. I've met him and, you know, he was great. He didn't have the questions beforehand or anything, like, answered off the dome. And he was great. He was comprehensive. So I think a lot of people have a bad view of Biden. They kind of see, like, certain clips on social media that make him look bad.

[B]

Falling.

[A]

Yeah, yeah, right. Like. And my argument to them is like, well, look, if you or I or anybody had a camera on us every single time we stepped out of the house, we are bound to make a mistake. We're bound to do something dumb. And, you know, everybody has these embarrassing moments where you're like, God, I really hope nobody saw that.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

So imagine. But imagine everybody did. And if you take all these little clips and put them together, you can paint a picture about anybody. You know what I mean? You can. You can make you or I look stupid.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

So I think that's my argument. When people are like, oh, look, he fell. It's like, whatever.

[B]

But there were definitely some cognitive decline signs, I believe.

[A]

I mean, I would argue. No, no, none at all. Because. Well, I. I might just be biased because I've got him. I've actually stood in front of him. And also, he had a neurology report this year.

[B]

Oh, he did.

[A]

It's public. Yeah. Whitehouse.gov Everybody can go read it. And these are not. I hear the argument all the time that these are biased doctors. They're not. They're people who work at Walter Reed, which is dedicated to serving, like, service members and government officials. They're not making millions of dollars doing that. You know, they're public servants. And they had neurology experts and general physicians do these reviews of President Biden. They found no.

[B]

Really?

[A]

Yeah. So I'm. I'm big on, like, trusting the experts, trusting the science. And, you know, if they didn't find anything, I'm not going to say, well, you know, my eye tells me a different story.

[B]

Yeah, makes sense. I mean, I felt like he performed poorly in the debate, though.

[A]

It was not a fantastic performance, to put it lightly. It was not a fantastic performance. I think that a lot of people said that Trump won the debate.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

I think that, like, from a presentation standpoint, I understand why people said that, But I think from a policy standpoint, Biden did, really, from 100%. Like, in that debate, Biden talked about a lot of the issues. He focused on policy. And while I don't think he was great at articulating it, the substance, in my view, is what matters. Whereas Trump, he did a lot of, like, personal attacks. He lied a lot, just like he did with the debate with Kamala Harris.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

So I don't think that you win debates by lying. So I almost, like, by default, Biden was going to, you know, take that debate because he was more honest and he was focusing on the things that matter.

[B]

Makes sense. Did you see Trump on Rogan?

[A]

I didn't watch that.

[B]

Oh, you didn't watch it?

[A]

I didn't watch it. I've heard terrible things about it, though, that he was rambling, and I've seen clips, and it's just, I can't, like, when I watch stuff like that, when I've seen the certain clips, I genuinely have a hard time understanding how people see that. They're like, that's my guy. That's who I want to be president. You know, he was, again, talking about the things that only affect him, the election in 2020, that he still cares about, the FBI investigating him, the DOJ indicting him, and things like that. It's like, that doesn't make our lives better. It doesn't make anybody watching his lives better. It's only kind of helps him. It's like, it's not. There's no future talk there, you know?

[B]

Yeah. Like me, I saw Vance just Go. I didn't watch the Vance one yet, but he just went on too.

[A]

Vance did.

[B]

I wanted Kamala to go on. Dude.

[A]

I also wanted Kamala to go on. Yeah, I really, really did go on. But, yeah, I think Joe Rogan said that. I think he put out a statement saying that it's not off the table. He wanted her to travel to Texas and she's campaigning, so. Yeah, you know, she wanted them to come to her and whatnot.

[B]

And she wanted the questions before. Right?

[A]

I don't know. I didn't see anything about that.

[B]

Oh, okay.

[A]

I. I can't imagine that being the case.

[B]

Really.

[A]

No, I don't think that. I have not seen any interviews or anything like that where she's had questions beforehand.

[B]

I gotta look into that, because I thought she did, but I'm not sure.

[A]

I'm not. Again, I haven't seen it. I haven't, like, really paid attention to them all that much.

[B]

Yeah, well, just with her answers in general, like, I saw her on Fox News and a couple other podcasts. They seem more scripted than just natural responses.

[A]

Yeah. I mean, but I. I almost think that that's, like, how politics should be.

[B]

That's how it has been.

[A]

Yes.

[B]

But Trump kind of turned a new leaf, I feel like.

[A]

Right. Trump. Trump. Has he. Certainly off script. Yeah, a lot. But I don't actually think that's a good thing. Really think that. I think that leaders should be prepared. They should know the points they want to hit on and hit on those points. Trump doesn't do any of that. Right. He doesn't stick to the. The issues that he's talking about. He doesn't stick to the policy, and that leads him to go off script and sounding really stupid, in my view. And I think it's quite embarrassing when Trump goes off script for the United States. So Kamala Harris getting up there, sounding really professional, talking about the issues, having the data beforehand, I think represents a good leader, someone who is prepared, and I think we want our leaders to be prepared. When Trump goes on to Rogan and he's rambling about the most incoherent, random topics you've ever heard, it's like, well, is that really a good look for the United States? Do we want our leader to do that?

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

You know, I don't mind being genuine. I'm not saying don't be genuine, but I'm saying if you're conducting an interview, you know, you don't see the leaders in Europe talking about fictional movie characters like Trump does.

[B]

That's a Good point. Actually. I could see that. That side. Yeah. I think people just want to see them more humanized.

[A]

Yeah. And that's why. That's what I mean. Like, I don't mind being genuine if, you know, Kamala Harris, I think, does a lot of genuine media appearances, and you kind of see it when she's talking to people after rallies or before rallies and she's taking photos with people. Like, that's who she is.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

But when she's, like, in the mode of campaigning, I do want Kamala Harris to be focused and. And prepared and talking about the issues that are affecting people. Trump just doesn't do that.

[B]

I could see that. Have you met her yet?

[A]

I have. So I met her at the White House in 2022.

[B]

Nice. So it's on my bucket list to go there one day, so congrats.

[A]

Oh, thank you. I appreciate that. It's a gorgeous building. It's really just beautiful. But we were there. I was there for an event. It was the Inflation Reduction act celebration. It was a bill that Biden signed into law.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

And she, like, you know, worked the photo line, and I talked to her for, like, two or three minutes. That's the only time.

[B]

So that was when she was vp or she still is, but.

[A]

Yeah. Yeah, that's when she was like, you know, not even nice.

[B]

What was your elevator pitch to her?

[A]

What do you.

[B]

What do you tell her?

[A]

I think I honestly can't really remember. The conversation just happened so quick.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

But I think I talked about, like, content creation and stuff and how, you know, that's what I do. And I think the work she's doing is really important and how. I was really appreciative of the administration, but, you know, she. I kind of. I didn't want to take too much time. She had a lot of people, so I was kind of like, do your thing.

[B]

You were probably one of the first liberal content creators I've ever seen.

[A]

Were you really?

[B]

Were you early on to that?

[A]

Yeah, I started. So I'm 22 now. Yeah, I started when I was 17.

[B]

Okay. Five years.

[A]

Yeah. So five years. I started in, like, April of 2020. So Covid kind of hit. My school was shut down. I was still in high school. The school shut down. All my internships shut down. So I like, pivoted to social media to try to still impact the election. And then I just kept doing it. Now we're here. So very. I've been doing it for, like, over four years, close to five years now.

[B]

And were you getting hate Right away or like, when did the hate come in?

[A]

Yeah, I mean, yeah, the hate was kind of immediate. You know, people that disagree with me.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

But I think the hate has elevated in recent years. Like, I've been swatted. I've got.

[B]

Damn. You got swatted?

[A]

I've got swatted four times.

[B]

Holy crap.

[A]

I got bomb threats to my university, to my house.

[B]

Oh, my God.

[A]

Yeah. So I'm not 100% sure how much I could talk about it, but, like, it's. This is a point of investigation.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

Still kind of hard to hear that.

[B]

That's terrible.

[A]

It is. What. It's part of the game now. It's. I just have kind of accepted that. But, like, those are the. Those are the extremes, right? Those are like the very rare extremes. But I'd say, like, you know, I get hate and it doesn't really bother me.

[B]

Like, all the comments on social media don't. Don't ever get to you?

[A]

No, they've. They phased me when I was 17 and, like, young and.

[B]

Yeah, same. I used to crawl in my room.

[A]

Right, right.

[B]

Curl up and shit.

[A]

And like, how. So how old were you when you started social media?

[B]

Yeah, around the same age. 18, 19.

[A]

Yeah. So, like, you're still developing. You're still very young, a lot of, you know, and a bunch of people saying things at once that you don't know. It's like, that can be intimidating.

[B]

But 100. Because if you back Trump in 16, you got hate.

[A]

Oh, yeah.

[B]

Tons of.

[A]

Yeah, yeah. And. And I'd say, like, it was kind of almost the same in 2020, I'd say, of both sides, because the country was just so divided is now as well, so. But, you know, I got. When I was 17, I think the comments bothered me, but now I'm 22. I'm just like, almost. They almost make me laugh.

[B]

Thicker skin. Yeah, same. Yeah, I crack up now.

[A]

Yeah, they're almost kind of funny. Like, when I see these people, like, in my Twitter replies, especially, like, saying the most outrageous stuff, like posting edits of me. Like, I show my friends, I'm like, dude, how crazy.

[B]

No, it's hilarious. Yeah, I got a ton on the Pacman one, but honestly, I took some. I took some feedback.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

I could have done better on that interview.

[A]

What do you mean by that?

[B]

Like, I wasn't as prepared as I should have been. I didn't know who Backman was going into that.

[A]

Oh, really?

[B]

Yeah. So I could have taken a lot more time, done some proper research, and I did look pretty stupid on that.

[A]

Interview, were you, like, debating him or.

[B]

It didn't. It was supposed to be an interview, but you know how his style is.

[A]

Yeah, he's confrontational.

[B]

Yeah, he's confrontational. So, yeah, he would just outclass me in certain arguments. But, yeah, shout out to PAC Man. I like what he does.

[A]

He's. He's awesome. And, like, he's also, like an inspiration of mine. You know, he's been doing it for a while and I've been watching him for a while, so it's kind of cool that, like, I've talked to him and he follows me on TikTok and stuff. So.

[B]

Yeah, no, you're up there, man. Are you live every day on TikTok?

[A]

I try to be. So right now, I'm in Vegas right now.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

So I haven't been able to go live the past couple of days, but when I'm home and just like in my apartment. Yeah, I try to go live and debate every day, dude. I don't know if that happens after the election, though, because.

[B]

Yeah, but how do you not get burnt out? Like, you're on there all day debating. I mean.

[A]

Yeah, I mean, I don't know. I. There. There are, you know, times. There are periods where I'm a little bit more like, I don't really want to do this than others. Yeah. But I think probably it's just the energy with the election being so close that's very motivating. So, you know, after the election, maybe there'll be like a downturn where I'm like, you know, maybe I'll just relax today.

[B]

Yeah. I can't wait till after I could finally chill. I know I've been cranking these podcasts with political.

[A]

I'm telling you, man, I. I feel the same way. And you're here in a swing state, so I can only imagine, like, oh.

[B]

It'S been nice, dude. They're here every week. Like either Tromb or Kamala.

[A]

Yeah. Yeah. And they were again, both here the same day yesterday.

[B]

Yeah, I was crazy.

[A]

Yeah. Yeah. Like, not that far away from each other as well.

[B]

Yeah. Where was her rally?

[A]

I don't. Actually, I don't. It was like the. Some amphitheater.

[B]

Okay.

[A]

Some amphitheater. I can't remember that. Anyway, I can't remember the address, but his was in Henderson.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

So it was like a 30, 40 minute Uber.

[B]

Okay.

[A]

We took.

[B]

That's not bad, man. Yeah, we'll see what happens next week. Big week.

[A]

It's. We're right now four days away as a Filming four days away, and it's gonna be huge, man. I'm just, as you said, I'm excited for it to be over, but she really needs to win. I hope she does.

[B]

Will you be really upset if Trump wins?

[A]

Yeah, yeah, I'd be really upset. And it's also not because I'm just a Democrat. Like, I fundamentally believe that Kamala Harris winning is in my interest, in your interest, in everybody's interest. It helps the country. She has actual policy. She has a vision. Whereas Trump, I really do think he's running to save himself. He hasn't really told us what he's going to do about housing or how he's really going to make the economy better. He hasn't responded to criticisms of his tariff policy. It's just like, that's going to be upsetting. But, yeah, you know, I think it's important that whoever wins, the American people accept them as the winner.

[B]

You know, I have seen him want to lower energy. Energy bills. Have you seen that?

[A]

Yeah. He's talked about, you know, wanting to lower energy, but he doesn't have, like, a plan to actually go about that. Like, yeah, he always says, you know, I'm going to lower energy by drilling more gas or more oil. And it's like, well, how does that actually lower energy prices? Because gas prices are based on global markets. So we can be drilling a bunch of oil here in the United States. It doesn't mean that our gas prices are going to go lower. And that's exactly what we're seeing right now. We are right now drilling more oil than ever before in American history. We are drilling more oil than any country in the world.

[B]

Really?

[A]

Yeah. Biden is drilling more than Donald Trump.

[B]

Wow.

[A]

But as you'll notice, gas prices are not a dollar a gallon. It's because they're based on global markets. And the President doesn't obviously control global markets. So Trump just saying, hey, I'm gonna lower your gas prices when I get into office is crazy, because he's just lying to people. He's just saying. He's saying this to try to win people's votes. And so if Trump wins, you know, I hope people are prepared for the reality that that's just not gonna happen.

[B]

That's interesting to me. I thought the president could control gas prices, but you're saying it's a global thing.

[A]

It's global.

[B]

Wow. So everyone's high right now on gas, not just America.

[A]

If you look at, and especially when gas prices peak, the United States, again, we. With inflation. It was Happening all over the world. Canada had higher gas prices than we did. Ireland, Great Britain, France, all these countries we're allied with, they all had very, very high gas prices, often higher than us. And so it's not the President. And I always say to Trump supporters, I'm like, think about it this way. Just think about it logically. If Biden could control gas prices and there was just like a lever he could pull to do, why wouldn't he?

[B]

That's true.

[A]

And if that's the case, then why didn't Trump make gas prices a dollar a gallon when he was president? Right.

[B]

Why not?

[A]

If they can do it, why not? Because it just doesn't work that way.

[B]

Yeah. People try to simplify the issue, right?

[A]

Yeah. They try to say that, oh, you know, Biden can just lower inflation, just do X, Y and Z, or he could just shut the border down or just lower gas prices. It's like unfortunately. Well, I would argue fortunately, because we don't, we don't live in a dictatorship or have a king. The President can't control these things, Right?

[B]

Yeah. They only have a certain amount of power.

[A]

Yeah, really, like that's. And that's the thing. It's like, you know, the President has a lot of influence over certain things. Like I would say judges are really important and of course they sign or veto bills their commander in chief when it comes to the military. But on these economic factors like inflation and gas prices, it's like, no, the President doesn't control that. That'd be insane. Right? You know, the President did that.

[B]

That's interesting because I see that argument a lot with gas and grocery prices.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

People are like, it's too high.

[A]

I'm telling you. I don't know who else you have lined up for your podcast, but like I would argue that if you have more conservatives coming in here, just ask them, what did Biden and Kamala do to raise gas prices or raise inflation? And if they say spending, well, Trump actually spent more over a 10 year period. He has almost double the amount of borrowing that Biden has for a 10 year period. Yeah.

[B]

Oh, wow.

[A]

It's like his is around including non Covid and Covid spending around 8 trillion. With Biden, it's around 4.2.

[B]

Interesting.

[A]

So it's just, it's just always funny. Like the Trump supporters, the Republicans try to say, oh, Biden did X, Y and Z when it comes to inflation, ask them why, how did that happen? And there's never a really great answer.

[B]

I think it's hard to Just compare presidents. Because also timing and so many things you can't control.

[A]

Right? Yes.

[B]

Like Covid happened.

[A]

Yes, 100%.

[B]

That's not a fair comparison anymore.

[A]

Yeah. And, you know, the presidents deal with different issues. So the issues of Obama's time are not the issues of Trump's time and are not the issues of Biden's time. Right. So it's kind of hard to. But I would argue that, you know, the Biden administration has been one of the best in modern American history in terms of policy passed and things done. I'd argue that Trump's is one of the worst. So it's. But it is kind of hard to make those comparisons.

[B]

Yeah, for sure. We do have to talk about the border, though, because that seems to be the number one issue these days. Right, let's talk about that.

[A]

I'd love to. What would you like to discuss?

[B]

So when you see these crazy numbers, like 20 million people coming in, or like they're stationed around the world and they're getting paid to come in and they're getting phones and they're getting hotels, like, what do you think about all that?

[A]

Well, again, I think my response is similar to what it is with inflation and gas prices. They say, well, you, you know, the numbers are so high under Biden and Kamala Harris, it's like, okay, but why. Why are the numbers high? Why are people coming to the border? And I would say that immigration has, or like, you know, people coming to the border has absolutely nothing to do with what we do inside the country. Right. Like, you know, Biden legislating does not prevent people from coming to the border. They'll still come. It has everything to do with happening, with things happening outside of our country. And what happened in recent years that led to this Covid, and in war happening in Southern American countries, or at least political division and instability. So Venezuela primarily has had a lot of folks coming over from. From there in recent years, including under Donald Trump. So. But the point is that immigrant high numbers of people coming to the border has not been because of Biden just opening the doors. It's been because, you know, Covid shut down a lot of these Southern American economies. Their economies didn't bounce back as fast as ours did. So they're seeking economic opportunity, just like a lot of people. So that's why there was a mass influx. And especially with countries like Venezuela and countries like that, a lot of people have been coming from there. And the interesting thing is this trend is consistent all around the world. So France recently passed One of their most restrictive immigration bills that they've done in their history. Why? It's because they're experiencing the same thing that we did.

[B]

Oh, wow.

[A]

African countries did not bounce back. Middle Eastern countries did not bounce back in the way that we did. So these folks are coming up seeking economic opportunity. That's how you know that it's not just an American problem.

[B]

Oh, that's good to know. Because people don't talk about that.

[A]

No. If you look at the trends in Asia, in Europe, in North America, it's the same. Canada last year took in the most amount of immigrants they've ever taken.

[B]

Really?

[A]

Yeah. This is.

[B]

Wow.

[A]

It's not just the United States. So that's number one. But number two, when it comes to people coming in, the majority of people that come to the border are rejected. The numbers you see are apprehensions or encounters, which just means that somebody was physically encountered. It doesn't mean they got in. It would just mean that they were interacted with by border patrol. So the majority of these people are rejected. And you see, like, there have been 10 million encounters. So if the majority have been rejected, that's at least over 5 million people who have not come in. And then also encounters can happen twice. So if you encounter the same person twice, that accounts. That counts for two encounters. Got it. So, you know, people saying there have been 20 million people come in. Absolutely not true. But on the issues that you mentioned, like hotels and phones and things like that, the hotels are mostly state policy. So like New York City, for example, they've been housing migrants in hotels. That's New York City specific. That's not federal, and you live there.

[B]

So how do you feel about that?

[A]

I mean, I. I think that's the right thing to do because. Well, also, I have to just quickly preface that these are legal immigrants. They're coming through asylum, which is a legal process. So if they're let into the country, they're legally here. So they're not. New York City is not housing undocumented.

[B]

That's an important distinction.

[A]

They're exactly. They're. They're all legal. So these folks are in hotels. If they've been given phones, they're legal. And those phones are not, like, you can go play, like, I don't know, Candy Crush on your phone. Right. They're mostly for tracking your court date. So they're like, imagine your phone, but it has one app.

[B]

Okay.

[A]

You can't do anything else. So it's just for tracking your court date. But a lot of this is state Policy. So you're saying, well, what about food, what about housing? That's New York City specific or state specific? That's not Joe Biden doing that, you know. Okay, so that was a lot of. That was a lot.

[B]

No, that was a lot. Thank you for sharing that. Because, yeah, I see these crazy numbers and I've never had someone break it down for me like that. So you're saying under 5 million is more realistic?

[A]

Yeah. And those are, I would still argue, are just encounters. We don't actually have like a solid number as to how many people have come in. But there's also another, another side to this argument that while there has been a lot of strain on the system with so many people coming to the border and a lot of people being granted temporary asylum, it's also been really good for the economy. Fun fact. So the Congressional Budget Office released a study, I believe, in either early 2024 or late 2023, talking about how because of the influx in migration over 10 years, our economy is going to be $7 trillion bigger and our federal revenue will be $1 trillion more.

[B]

Really?

[A]

Yeah, because more people are working, jobs, people are coming in, they're working. And it's also important to note that America's workforce, the native born American citizens right now, can actually not keep up. Older people are retiring faster than younger people are getting involved in the workforce. So these migrants coming in and filling a lot of these jobs has kept the American economy afloat.

[B]

Hmm.

[A]

And Trump's proposal to just deport everybody would dramatically hurt our gdp, dramatically hurt our federal revenue, decrease the size of our economy. And also we'd be spending like hundreds of billions of dollars, maybe trillions of dollars to deport people.

[B]

Right. It'd be expensive. But he wants to deport the illegal ones, right?

[A]

Well, yeah, there's Currently, I think 11 million undocumented migrants in the country. Okay. But also, again, a lot of these people are working jobs. A lot of these people. The majority of people in the country who are undocumented are folks that just overstayed their visas or overstayed their green cards. They didn't come in through the border and like sneak in or anything like that. There are folks who were here once legally their green cards have expired and now they're like working a job. They're part of their community. They might be the soccer coach at their local school. And it's like, do you really think that we should deport these people? Like, they're law abiding, they're working, they're part of their community. Is that really somebody you think, yeah, you have to get out of here. That just doesn't make much sense.

[B]

I can see that. Do you think there's any place for deportations?

[A]

100%. If you're a criminal, you're breaking our laws, something along that line, no problem. Deport them or a lot of these folks are actually in jail in the United States if they've committed crimes. Perfectly happy with that. And I think that there is some merit to deporting some people who have come in recently. But this whole like mass deportation thing that Trump talks about just logistically makes no sense.

[B]

It sounds scary because they'd have to go door to door. Right. Practically send people to houses. Practically.

[A]

And it's also like, how do you do that legally? I mean, there's a lot of laws preventing you from like invade entering someone's home or, you know, respecting somebody's privacy and even that. Also those protections apply to undocumented migrants. So, you know, how do you legally go door to door and like raid the house and deport these people? And it's like, you know, a lot of these folks have kids who were born in the United States. Why would we do that?

[B]

Right. You know, another concern I've seen on the conservative side is these illegal immigrants being able to vote.

[A]

Yeah, that's utter nonsense.

[B]

They're not going to be able to.

[A]

No, no, there is no. There's no law or part of the Constitution that allows someone who's undocumented to vote. There are certain very. There's only like, I think six or seven in the United States. Actually, don't quote me on that. I don't want to. I'm not 100 sure what the number is, but there's only, there's some certain jurisdictions in the United States where undocumented migrants can vote on very local elections. So like school board, for example. But when it comes to governor, senator, anything statewide, anything national undocumented migrants cannot vote. And I would point people to the 14th Amendment, which says that only native born American citizens or people who have obtained American citizenship can vote.

[B]

Right.

[A]

So then that's one of Trump's big lies, that undocument.

[B]

It's just, I've seen that a lot. All over X.

[A]

There you go.

[B]

All over.

[A]

All over.

[B]

And that's why I try to get both perspectives. Here's where people mess up. They only have one perspective.

[A]

Oh, yeah.

[B]

So that's why, like you, because you're debating, you're getting the other side's perspective every day.

[A]

Well, it's really important to listen to the other side. And I want to be clear. Like, I think Republicans concerns with inflation and gas prices and migration is totally valid. Like, if you care about these issues, you're not a bad person.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

Like, you're not. You're not evil. I don't think you're wrong. I don't think that you're terrible or you're trying to oppress anybody. None of that. I think those are perfectly valid concerns. But then again, we got to be honest about what the problem is. So with undocumented, with migration, right now, the problem is actually not people coming across the border illegally. Our border has never been more fortified, really. There's more wall, more border patrol agents, more security measures, more laws regulating our border than ever before in American history. But right now, the asylum system is being abused. So Kamala Harris is offering reforms and policy that would actually change the asylum system for the better, so people can't abuse it. Whereas Donald Trump, his whole thing is just, let's just build the wall. It's like the wall doesn't stop people from seeking asylum. You could have a wall with big turrets on top of them with spikes. It's like, people can still come to the border and seek asylum, and they'll be granted temporary stay. So we have to reform the laws and be smart about it, logical about it, and follow the facts, as opposed to just listening to, like, sensationalized political rhetoric from Trump of, like, mass deportation. Build a big wall.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

Like, so, you know, I think those concerns are valid. We just have to be honest about them.

[B]

Agreed. I will say coming here legally is very difficult.

[A]

Oh, it's. It's. It's. It's incredibly difficult. Right. I mean, and that's another thing, you know, not to keep bringing you back to Kamala Harris, but she wants to make the legal immigration system smoother. She wants to give out more green cards, more work permits, which, of course, comes with vetting, and that also helps our economy. Whereas when Donald Trump was president, he actually reduced the amount of green cards and work permits we give out. And my argument to Republicans is, like, okay, if that's who you're voting for, don't you think that if somebody can't come to the country legally, they'll try to come in illegally? Like, do you really think that depriving somebody of a work permit or a green card is going to keep them away?

[B]

Right. It's like, no, it's a good point.

[A]

So we should incentivize legal immigration, make that system Far easier. And make it much harder to come in illegally.

[B]

I agree. Because it could help our economy, too.

[A]

100.

[B]

Narrow that down. Yeah. I'm getting married next year. And congratulations. Thank you. But, yeah, we have family overseas. It's very difficult.

[A]

It's incredibly difficult. Incredibly difficult. So. And that's what Kamala Harris is all about. She's like, I want to secure the border, but let's do it in a humane way and a way that makes folks coming into the country who want to work or, like, your family coming into the country, let's just make it easier for them. That makes sense to me. I think that would make sense to a lot of people.

[B]

Yeah, 100%. Because there's people waiting over 10 years right now.

[A]

10 years.

[B]

Crazy.

[A]

And that's. That's the thing with, like, you know, Trump's talk or Elon Musk's talk of undocumented migrants voting. Like, people who came in during Obama's, like, first term are now only able to obtain citizenship.

[B]

Oh, wow.

[A]

It's like, do you really, like, it's so difficult to get citizenship. It's so difficult to become a legal American. That. Is that really the argument that you think that somehow magically, these folks are voting en masse illegally? It just makes sense.

[B]

But, you know, you see Elon's giving out a million dollars a day.

[A]

Yeah. That's, like, definitely illegal.

[B]

You think it's illegal?

[A]

100%. Like. Or it's walking the line because there's federal law that says you can't give financial incentive or any incentive to register for your party and vote for a given candidate. So Trump saying, like. Or, excuse me, Elon Musk saying, hey, sign this petition, which you have to be registered to vote to sign, but I'll give you a million dollars. It's like, that's. That's really illegal in my view.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

And I think that it's telling that that's the lengths that the Republican side is going to. To try to get Trump elected. It's like, do we. Do we really. Do we really want people and very wealthy people walking the line of the law to get their candidate elected? I certainly don't think so.

[B]

Yeah. Sounds like a lottery almost. The lottery stuff is no joke. Got to be careful with those.

[A]

And there's, you know, pretty stiff penalties, so.

[B]

Oh, yeah.

[A]

And I just. Before, actually, we came on Elon Musk's, his. His request to move the case that he was sued for, at least investigated for, to federal court was rejected.

[B]

So I think they're already Suing him.

[A]

Yeah, there's some. There's some legal movement there.

[B]

Damn, I was quick.

[A]

Yeah, they don't, you know, they don't mess around. You know. Mess around.

[B]

Yeah. With the election on the line, there's high stakes, for sure.

[A]

High stakes. A lot. And, you know, a lot of. There's going to be a lot of legal challenges if Kamala Harris wins. Like, just expect Trump to file lawsuits in virtually every single state to try to overturn it, which also, again, I think is a reason to not.

[B]

Well, he did that last election.

[A]

Right? He did that last time. He did a lot last time, and that's. That's why he's been indicted for that. You know, he's been indicted for trying to defraud the American people, which I think is what the charge was actually labeled as the statute. And I don't think we want that again. I mean, just like, we have to get to a time of, like, here's the. Even if you disagree with Kamala Harris, I would argue it is objectively more peaceful or more stable with her as president. With Trump, there's more chaos.

[B]

Yeah, I could see that.

[A]

You know what I mean?

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

That in 2020.

[B]

Yeah. If you're being objective, I think you could definitely argue that.

[A]

Yeah, sure.

[B]

I just.

[A]

I just. I think Trump brings a lot of nonsense, a lot of chaos, and I think, like, we are far better as a people when the president's boring.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

Like, we don't want, like, an entertainer as president. We want somebody who you can forget about and be like, oh, yeah, they're president, but I'm not really thinking about politics every single day. And what the leader tweeted, you know.

[B]

You do want a strong leader.

[A]

Yeah.

[B]

You know, that can negotiate with other countries, handle all the business.

[A]

Yeah. Trump's not that. Not. Not at all. I think Trump is very weak.

[B]

Love that man. Is there anything you agree with him on, policy wise or just as a person? Damn, you're struggling.

[A]

Yeah, I mean, definitely not as a person, but there are some things he did as president that I thought were good. There was a first. The Law of the First Step act was passed, some criminal justice reform. Okay, no problem. He also had Operation Warp Speed, which was the development of the COVID vaccine. No problem with that. But in terms of, like, the big things that Trump tried and failed to accomplish, or some of them he did accomplish. Yeah. No, I. I totally disagree with him.

[B]

I feel that. What do you think of Charlie Kirk? Because you're in college right now. He's out here Saying college is a scam, you know, how do you feel about that as someone that's actively in.

[A]

College right now about that specific statement?

[B]

I guess that. And we can move on to others.

[A]

Yeah, yeah. I don't know how you can make that argument when the data is really clear. Like there's no problem with somebody not going to college. Like if you want to go be an engineer or a plumber, like those are, those are noble jobs. Right. And any job you work in the United States, if you're working at McDonald's or you're a garbage man or whoever you are though, there's, there's pride in that work. Right. So you don't have to go to college to hold a good job and be a productive member of society. But the data is pretty clear that if you go to college and the more education you obtain, you're more financially stable, you have more access to opportunity and things like that.

[B]

Is that industry based though data or is that overall.

[A]

I think it's just overall. Okay. I don't know what the industry data is like. Well, of course, if you, you know, if you're looking at being a plumber.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

Most people don't go to college, they go to high school.

[B]

Because I would argue for entrepreneurship. It doesn't matter.

[A]

I would argue, I would probably agree. I mean, I'm not an entrepreneur myself, so I can't really speak to like running, you probably have more knowledge on this stuff in terms of running a business. But I think there's, you know, probably some value in obtaining like a business degree.

[B]

Basic stuff like accounting maybe. But just overall entrepreneurship, it's so ever changing that you can't really learn it in a textbook, in my opinion. Sure. There's so many trends and stuff.

[A]

Yeah. And I think that like in business, entrepreneurship, if, you know, having a mentor would probably be more beneficial.

[B]

Oh, way more. Yeah.

[A]

So I could see how that makes sense for like, and that's what I mean, like certain industries it might just make more sense to not. And also like, you know, specific people are different. So college and going into business school for, for some person might work and for maybe for you or somebody else, it doesn't. It's like I have no qualms with that.

[B]

But yeah.

[A]

You know, generally I think that, you know, calling college a scam is like, you know, I know there's a lot of debate around it, I just don't agree.

[B]

I think certain professions, it's no longer needed. I could see that point of view. But yeah, college overall as a Scam. That's a tough. Yeah, because you got doctors, you got lawyers. I mean, it's a tough thing to say.

[A]

Yeah, right. Exactly. And, like, you know, you learn a lot in college, and I think that being a young person, interacting with other young people, learning from people who are different parts of the country, I think is really beneficial. There's also, like, the social aspect, you know.

[B]

Yeah, that's huge.

[A]

Being introduced to different viewpoints.

[B]

So what are you majoring in?

[A]

I'm studying politics and law with a focus on constitutional law.

[B]

Makes sense. You're gonna be a lawyer one day. Let's go. Maybe that's gonna help you in your gates because.

[A]

Yeah, yeah.

[B]

It's a whole nother notch.

[A]

Right, Exactly. That's. That's hopefully. Hopefully the goal. So we'll see where that. Where that goes.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

You know, but Charlie Kirk also just sucks generally.

[B]

What else do you not agree with him on?

[A]

Well, you know, he. He. He. He's very pro life. He's very pro Trump. And I think he ignores a lot of the negatives of Trump. Like, he always tries to pull it back to, like, can you define a woman? And how many genders? It's like, who the hell care? Like, I just don't care. You know, if somebody wants to be whatever they want, I couldn't care less.

[B]

We're past that argument. I feel like that was like. Yeah, that was like.

[A]

So, like, that was like 2020.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

I mean, like, people cared about that in 2020, but if somebody wants to identify as a different gender, I'm gonna be like, okay. Like, I couldn't care less what you do. If you're happy, fine by me.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

But Charlie Kirk is still going out there saying, well, you know, what's a woman?

[B]

It's like, it gets views. So I could see why he's doing it.

[A]

Yeah, yeah. There's an incentive for views, 100%, but, you know, just from that. And he also, like, ignores the Trump legal cases. He ignores all that stuff. He ignores Trump trying to overturn the election, which I think is. I think it's wrong. If you want to be good faith, you kind of have to engage with the pros and the cons.

[B]

Yeah, well, I think he's so tied in that, if he just speaks negatively about it, it's, you know, it's a bad look.

[A]

Well, that's also the case. I think, like, he's very much embedded in the Republican Party, just like folks like Ben Shapiro are.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

That, you know, if they criticize Trump, that'll be its own headline.

[B]

Right.

[A]

If they say, like, oh, you know, actually, Trump's tariff policy is bad. Charlie Kirk is going to get slammed. And I'm sure he's. He has friends in the Republican Party and on the Trump campaign who would have something to say about it. So.

[B]

Yeah. What do you think of the Ben shapiro1 on 25?

[A]

I actually didn't watch it.

[B]

Oh, you didn't watch it?

[A]

No, I didn't watch it. Okay. So I, I can't really comment on it, but I also. I think Ben Shapiro kind of falls into the same category as Charlie Kirk.

[B]

Charlie did one too.

[A]

Did he really?

[B]

Yeah, your buddy Dean was on there. I think that might be how Dean blew up.

[A]

Oh, actually, I did watch the Charlie Kirk one.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

I didn't watch the bench.

[B]

That's where Dean really started taking off.

[A]

Yeah. Yeah. So that's where. And I. I saw his. Charlie Kirk's debate with Parker, who's a friend of mine.

[B]

Parker, too. Yeah.

[A]

He saw his and I saw Dean's part of it. I didn't watch the entirety thing, but I saw some. Some clips.

[B]

Yeah, no, Parker and Dean really crushed on that, man.

[A]

Yeah, they're. They're really great debaters.

[B]

I was impressed because they're young.

[A]

Yeah. I think Parker is. I think he's 22. I think he's my age, and I think Dean's 20 or 20.

[B]

Crazy.

[A]

Yeah. Like, yeah, they're going out of young. Yeah.

[B]

Shout out to you guys. You three are like the face of the. The party now.

[A]

I appreciate that.

[B]

Yeah.

[A]

For real.

[B]

Can't wait to see what you guys do in the future. But where can people find you and keep up with you, man?

[A]

Yeah, I'm on everything. I'm on Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat, all under the username Harry J. Sisson. So, yeah, everywhere.

[B]

Boom. We'll link below. Thanks for coming on, man.

[A]

Thanks, man.

[B]

Thanks for watching, guys. Check out the links below. See you next time.