The Untold Truth About Digital Control 🌐 I Ian Carroll DSH # 1261

Summary

Digital Social Hour: The Untold Truth About Digital Control with Ian Carroll (Episode #1261)
Release Date: March 23, 2025

---

Introduction

In this gripping episode of Digital Social Hour, host Sean Kelly engages in a deep and unfiltered conversation with Ian Carroll, a prominent voice dissecting digital control and the intricate web of conspiracies he believes govern our modern world. The discussion navigates through controversial topics, historical events, and Carroll's personal experiences, offering listeners a raw and thought-provoking perspective on digital and governmental control mechanisms.

---

1. The Rogan Podcast and Initial Controversies

The episode opens with Ian Carroll reflecting on his recent appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience, which sparked significant backlash and widespread discussion.

• Key Discussion Points:

  • Carroll’s approach to debates: prioritizing understanding over confrontation.
  • The unexpected nature of the backlash, especially concerning Israel.

• Notable Quotes:

  • “Understanding is more important than debating.” [00:00]
  • “I was a little taken off guard by how much, like, controlled opposition... it's all in on this plan to control the media.” [00:38]

---

2. Navigating Media and Censorship

Carroll emphasizes his strategy to remain immune to censorship by diversifying his income and maintaining independence from traditional funding sources.

• Key Discussion Points:

  • Building a resilient network to withstand criticism.
  • The importance of protecting financial sources to ensure freedom of speech.

• Notable Quotes:

  • “I have no reliance on donors and no reliance on any of that kind of stuff that you can come after.” [01:17]
  • “If you're going to talk about controversial, you better have your sources of income, like, protected and diversified.” [01:43]

---

3. Deep State and Intelligence Agencies

A significant portion of the conversation delves into what Carroll describes as the "Deep State"—a network of intelligence agencies and corporate interests manipulating global events.

• Key Discussion Points:

  • Historical collaborations between the CIA and organized crime.
  • The role of intelligence agencies in covert operations and geopolitical manipulations.

• Notable Quotes:

  • “Right from the very founding of the CIA, before we even founded the CIA, we were already in bed with the mob and the mafia during World War II.” [15:17]
  • “The whole point of covert operations is that if your operation gets found out, it doesn't trace back to your government.” [15:54]

---

4. Corporate Interests and Eugenics

Carroll connects modern-day corporate and financial elites to historical eugenicist agendas, suggesting a continuity in efforts to influence and control populations.

• Key Discussion Points:

  • Bill Gates and the alleged depopulation agenda.
  • The intersection of corporate power with global policies to shape society.

• Notable Quotes:

  • “Bill Gates is openly a eugenicist and he openly talks about overpopulation as this massive problem.” [39:11]
  • “It's implementing population reduction by making it so that poor people die and rich people live.” [39:37]

---

5. COVID-19 Pandemic and Underlying Agendas

The pandemic serves as a focal point for Carroll's arguments about government overreach and the manipulation of public perception for ulterior motives.

• Key Discussion Points:

  • The concept of a "cyber pandemic" and its potential manipulation by governing bodies.
  • Vaccine mandates and their role in controlling populations.

• Notable Quotes:

  • “The pandemic was what really woke me up... I'm telling you we are being manipulated.” [42:26]
  • “If there's a cyber pandemic in the next year or two, it's pretty clear that the people that stand to benefit are the ones trying to control us.” [43:51]

---

6. Nationalism vs. Globalism

Carroll discusses the tension between national pride and globalist agendas, arguing that globalist elites seek to undermine national sovereignty for their own gains.

• Key Discussion Points:

  • The misconception of nationalism equating to extremism.
  • The impact of globalist policies on national identities and sovereignty.

• Notable Quotes:

  • “Nationalism is pride in America in this sense. Or if you were French, it'd be pride in France.” [34:09]
  • “We're all on the exact same team of... trying to free our country from these monetary influences.” [34:06]

---

7. Conflicts and Wars as Profit Mechanisms

A recurring theme is the use of wars and conflicts as means for financial elites to profit and expand their influence.

• Key Discussion Points:

  • Historical examples like Guatemala and the Iran-Contra scandal.
  • The perpetuation of conflicts to maintain economic and political control.

• Notable Quotes:

  • “All wars are bankers wars.” [50:32]
  • “We fund both sides 100%. We fund both sides... so we are prepared.” [50:35]

---

8. Concerns about Digital Control and Future Technologies

Carroll expresses anxiety over the advancement of technologies like AI and digital currencies, fearing they will lead to unprecedented levels of control and loss of personal sovereignty.

• Key Discussion Points:

  • The potential dangers of central bank digital currencies.
  • The ethical implications of AI in daily life, including self-driving cars and sex robots.

• Notable Quotes:

  • “Do you sacrifice sovereignty for safety?” [58:25]
  • “It sounds retarded and it sounds dystopian, but like, we are literally confronting those exact dystopian questions as we go.” [60:56]

---

9. Media Manipulation and the Daily Wire

The conversation shifts to media outlets, specifically the Daily Wire, highlighting internal conflicts and Carroll's critical perspective on their operations.

• Key Discussion Points:

  • Internal strife within the Daily Wire and its impact on content and staff.
  • The broader issue of media entities acting as controlled opposition.

• Notable Quotes:

  • “The Daily Wire is like a colander. There are more holes... it’s just jettisoning all their top talent.” [23:21]
  • “The Daily Wire is in big trouble.” [23:25]

---

10. Conclusion: The Path Forward

In wrapping up, Carroll emphasizes the necessity for individuals to seek truth, resist manipulation, and uphold personal sovereignty against pervasive control mechanisms.

• Key Discussion Points:

  • The importance of education, critical thinking, and community in combating deep state influences.
  • Encouraging proactive measures to protect freedoms and foster resilient societies.

• Notable Quotes:

  • “We need people to wake up to the fact that, like, the world is happening all around us.” [62:30]
  • “We are past the point of people being able to sit back and be like, it doesn't affect me. It affects all of us.” [60:53]

---

Final Thoughts

This episode of Digital Social Hour with Ian Carroll offers a relentless examination of perceived hidden controls shaping global events and individual freedoms. Through detailed discussions and pointed critiques, Carroll challenges listeners to question mainstream narratives, urging a deeper investigation into the forces he believes are steering society towards digital and authoritarian dominance. Whether one agrees or disagrees with his perspectives, the conversation undeniably stimulates critical thinking about the dynamics of power, control, and freedom in the digital age.

---

Where to Find Ian Carroll

For more insights and updates, listeners can follow Ian Carroll on X @IanCarrollShow and visit his website at canceliancarroll.com. Despite recent challenges, including the cancellation of his event due to backlash from his Rogan appearance, Carroll remains committed to expanding his platform and continuing his mission to uncover and discuss the truths he perceives are being hidden from the public.

Transcript

[Ian Carroll]

And realistically, like, I've had people ask, like, hey, would you debate, like, Nick Fuentes or would you debate, like, whoever the. It's like, no, I'd probably sit down and ask them a whole bunch of questions because I think that understanding is more important than, like, debating. Debating is. For once, we actually, like, you have two experts that really have elaborated their points and understand their points and, like, are going to engage in debate.

[Unknown Host]

All right, guys, Ian Carroll here, fresh off of Rogan. A lot of interesting feedback on my one.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah, dude, it was a firestorm. It was fun. I'm really proud of how it went. I thought it was really great conversation, ton of fun.

[Unknown Host]

Were you shocked with some of the feedback?

[Ian Carroll]

No, not. Not in the least. I. I was. I was not shocked about, like, the Israel pushback, even though that was not even, like. That was only, like, maybe 30 minutes. The podcast directly, I was a little taken off guard by how much, like, controlled opposition, like, he's. It's all. He's. They're all in on this plan to control the media con, like, from sort of our side of things. But I shouldn't have been shocked by that, like, obviously. So, you know, it. It is what it is.

[Unknown Host]

Yeah. You're in an interesting spot because a lot of people go against Israel and they have a business and then, you.

[Ian Carroll]

Know, it starts getting attacked, right? Yeah.

[Unknown Host]

They start losing money, they start losing sponsors.

[Ian Carroll]

But you.

[Unknown Host]

You're new to the space and you're just coming up.

[Ian Carroll]

And I personally kept myself. I have, like. No, I mean, now I am starting to build out more of, like, a network of people I'm working with and projects I'm on and I launching this event and kind of. That turned into a whole thing just now. But mostly it's like, I have no reliance on donors and no reliance on any of that kind of stuff that you can come after. Yeah. And so I was kind of immune to, like, I still am kind of immune to all that censorship. And I was intentional because.

[Unknown Host]

Good.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah, yeah, yeah. In this space, if you're going to talk about controversial, you better have your sources of income, like, protected and diversified and ready for that kind of criticism. Absolutely.

[Unknown Host]

You also went on Alex Jones recently, too, right?

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah, I've been doing a fair bit on Infowars. I just really enjoy the whole crew there, especially, like, I've got a huge amount of respect for Chase and for Harrison, for Owen, for the whole, like, team there. And obviously Alex, like, for being in the game since I was not even born yet. Oh, gee, yeah. And so when he. When he called me up, right? Like, everyone's been kind of talking about Alex for not talking about Israel, which I totally understand, with the amount of heat he's got on every other aspect. And, like, just seeing the amount of heat I got after the Rogan podcast, it's like, I get it that he's like, a, there's way more things wrong in this world than just Israel, and B, like, he doesn't need that heat. So when I posted, when the Rogan clip came out, he immediately was like, yes, Jeffrey Epstein clearly was working with Israel in some regard. And Alex was clearly ready to go in on that. So I was like, let's go, dude. Let's break this down. It's cool. It's cool show. Yeah.

[Unknown Host]

This all started from Ratio and Elon.

[Ian Carroll]

Musk, more or less. Yeah. I mean, I've been talking about it since October 7, but. But ratio and Elon Musk was a funny moment. And still, when I look at my analytics Twitter, it's like, everything looks, like, really tiny because there's this one day where it just spikes insanely high.

[Unknown Host]

I think that was the Ratio record, world record.

[Ian Carroll]

I probably was. I mean, it kind of. It's weird, but it might go down in, like, X history, at least for a while, until the next. Till the next big thing. But I couldn't.

[Unknown Host]

How many likes did I tweak it?

[Ian Carroll]

I don't know, dude. Several million?

[Unknown Host]

Like, yeah, it was tweet reply to get several million.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah, and it was like a whole thread of tweet replies, too. And it's just, like. Because Elon was replying and then I was replying, so it was, like, deep in there, and it just caught, like, fire, which says so much about how America feels and how America wants open discussion about information, not, like, political talking points. Well, you came with receipts.

[Unknown Host]

That's the difference between you and these conspiracy theorists. You have facts and data.

[Ian Carroll]

And I. I led that way intentionally from the very start on TikTok. I. I knew that just from kind of like thinking about how this works and how the space works. Like, when you're a nobody, no one gives a shit about your opinion and you're not going to grow. And so I knew that instead of focusing on me and what I think about, I'll just focus on information. And that's why I've always put sources in my videos. Partly because that's how you grow on social media, but also because that's how journalism works. That's how, like, the scientific method works. Is if you don't have a source, it's just your opinion. And so I'm way more fond of just showing sources and getting people talking and thinking for themselves rather than saying that I'm. Because I'm not always right, I'm often not. And when I'm not, because I focus on sources, I have no problem being like, oh, I misunderstood that, changed my opinion. No harm, no foul. Like, there's nothing wrong with that. We need more of that in this world today.

[Unknown Host]

What percentage would you say you're right versus wrong so far?

[Ian Carroll]

Oh, I don't know. I mean that'd be an impossible thing to say. I think it's like over 90% right.

[Unknown Host]

Oh, wow, that's.

[Ian Carroll]

I mean that's how I feel about it. And I'm sure that's debatable. People would dispute that. But there. It's also really hard to say because I don't see the world as black and white or simple in any way. Almost none of the things I talk about are. And so in some regards, it's like hard to even judge if someone is right or wrong unless they take a really hard, clear stance on something. And I generally tend to make my stances more of like, like Joe.

[Unknown Host]

Searching for the perfect job can be overwhelming. You know it's out there, you just don't know how to find it. The good news? You don't have to do it alone. Shout out to today's sponsor, Specialized Recruiting Group. Specialized Recruiting Group is here to help personalized job search support. Tailored to your skills and needs. They connect job seekers with contract and full time roles. The best part is that it's completely free for job seekers. Specialized Recruiting Group is ready to find the talent you need. Go to srgpros.com see how our recruitment specialists with a deep understanding of experience and expertise you need can find the right fit for your business. After all, you deserve to see the best candidates possible, both active and passive. Visit srgpros.com today to start your job search. If you don't see the right job listed SRG also recruits for confidential roles. Just call a local office to learn more. Take the next step in your career [e-mail].

[Ian Carroll]

Folks and intentionally because we don't know most of the things people pretend we know. Like it's in percentages of certainty and there's very few things I'm absolutely certain of. Um, and so I don't really focus on how much I get right, how much I get wrong. I focus on like, am I on the right Path. And am I staying humble and open to criticism? Because for me, that's the sort of ongoing metric of, like, are you getting locked into this paradigm of I know everything, which is an obvious dead end, or am I continually learning and change because the point is to learn, not to, like, gain followers?

[Unknown Host]

Yeah, for me, anyways, that famous quote, right? The only thing that's certain is life, death and taxes.

[Ian Carroll]

Shingo. Yeah. And, man, hopefully we can get rid of the taxes part.

[Unknown Host]

I mean, Elon's investigation and how these governments are spending the money is mind blowing. If these are true, Like, I don't know if they're true, what he's tweeting.

[Ian Carroll]

But the ones that I've looked into are. I mean, that's why. That's the other thing I try to do is, like, a lot of the stuff I got started on was there's all these conspiracy theories online. You usually see, like, an Instagram reel with no sources. So it's like, I'll just look up to the sources, like, can I find the information to back this up? And so a lot of the Doge stuff, I started digging through the publicly available government sources, and it's like, I mean, I found a whole bunch of. Right in line with what he's talking about.

[Unknown Host]

Checked out.

[Ian Carroll]

Oh, yeah, absolutely. I didn't find all the, like, transgender mice stuff and everything because there's so many receipts online already, but I don't doubt a single one of them. But I also am kind of disheartened by the fact that, like, they uncover all this Doge, and then we have this vote on continuing the budget, and Massey's the only one standing on principle saying, no, this budget. This budget funds all the things that you're speaking out against and trying to get rid of with Doge, and you're about to fund all of it all over again. And now Trump is coming out attacking Massey as though it's like, what's Primary Massey? Like, that feels such a misstep in my mind. I didn't see all of Twitter this morning is just raging against Trump on it, Even Trump supporters. Like, I'm really proud of the sort of Republican side of politics right now, especially on X, because they're standing on principle, at least at the moment, not on party. Yeah. And this is a clear call out. It's like, it feels like a war from Chris Las La Civita. And it's just ridiculous. It's like, fuck, you guys. We stand with Massey. We stand with America first.

[Unknown Host]

It does feel different. I feel like 16 Trump, his supporters would just support everything.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah.

[Unknown Host]

And now it feels like there's actually intellectual conversations going on.

[Ian Carroll]

But also, 16 Trump, I mean, we didn't have four years of him kind of failing to deliver on a lot of promises yet. And 16 Trump, he. I mean, like, the famous quote from the debate stage against Jeb Bush of like, I don't want your money. I don't need your money. Right. And that's why they're all clap. That's why they're all booing me right now. And, man, I wish we had that guy in office right now. And I. I do love a lot of the things that Trump has done more. I love the things he said he would do. I think a lot of us are starting to get a little disappointed about how many things we're not getting done that we said we'd get done. Yeah.

[Unknown Host]

I thought the files would be published by now. I don't know if that's on him or whatever.

[Ian Carroll]

But, I mean, so a clip came out just yesterday from Tucker Carlson talking to Cuomo on Carlson's podcast, where they were getting into, why aren't the files out yet? And Carlson said that he had inside information on someone that had someone in Congress that had pressured, you know, these people not to release files. And then Chris Cuomo was like, why don't you expose them? You know who they are? Like, say your names. It's like, yeah, yeah, it's Tom Cotton. And so that is just one great example of how inside of Congress, there are forces working against. Even if Cash and Pam Bondi actually want the files released, which I'm not convinced they do at this point, especially Pam, there's strong forces inside pushing against them. And we. And it's important to remember that we don't know if that's because they're blackmailed or if that's because they're trying to use the blackmail on the people that are blackmailed. And there's more complicated plans going on here. Like, I understand that there's complexities here and that there's certain amount of transparency that might actually be harmful to national security. Yeah. But at the same time, like, don't promise things you can't deliver on. And what we're seeing, regardless of how they're playing it, it's clearly not America First. Yeah.

[Unknown Host]

So how is Tom so influential that one person can be that.

[Ian Carroll]

That's a good question. He's on one of the important committees in Congress that I forget exactly which one it is, whether it's the House Intelligence Committee. Or what it is. But he's on one of those committees and that's how Congress kind of gets stratified where not every Congress person is made equal and some of them have way outsized amounts of power and influence because it's not just having a seat, it's having the right seats within those seats, like as in all those different committees. But then it's also having all of the political capital, all of the wheeling and dealing capital. And that's the, that's the rat race that ultimately like is that power corrupts and ultimate power corrupts like or absolute power corrupts absolutely. And Tom Cotton feels like the like quintessential shill in my mind anyways.

[Unknown Host]

Have you looked into Anna Paulina Luna? She's been on.

[Ian Carroll]

I have actually. And it was because of another of these kind of like conspiracy theory blow ups is when she made this task force. Yeah. About the Epstein files. And all the files actually blew up on her like the sort of like anti Israel and like anti Jews side of X really blew up on her of like she used to be a strapper and she's like, she's Jewish and all this. I was like, well, let's look into the details here. And, and so I don't have an opinion of like knowing one way or the other because I try not to judge people that I don't know and I try to watch actions. But I contacted a source that knows her well that I trust very deeply and all of my audience trusts very deeply. I don't want to name the source.

[Unknown Host]

Yeah.

[Ian Carroll]

But that source said that they trust Annapole and Luna deeply and that she's the real deal. And so I was like, good, that's a point, a point in her favor. And then when I dug into Anapolina Luna's history, it turns out that, that the whole stripper allegation thing, I mean, yeah, she did like, you know, sexy content, but when, you know the context. My understanding of the context is that her husband was fighting in, was fighting in the military and he got shot and they suddenly couldn't pay their bills and he had all these medical bills. And so it's like, like just there, there's more to those kinds of stories. So you have to kind of, you have to kind of dig a little deeper. And I'm not saying that I necessarily agree with her decisions on any of that stuff, but I, I'm ready to reserve judgment. The Jewish thing, for example, they're like, oh, she's Jewish. It's like they're kind of, but like she wasn't raised by the Jewish side of her family at all as far as I can tell. And she, it does not appear to be Jewish at all. Like, like it's easy to run away with conspiracies when the bait is there. Yeah. And maybe it's true, maybe Anna Paulina Luna is not all she's cracked up to be. But for me that's like this constant experience of pump the brakes and check the sources and make sure that you really want to stand on the hill you're about to stand on and shout whatever it is you're going to shout. So do you feel yourself getting pulled.

[Unknown Host]

In so many directions because Twitter's just so.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah, dude, especially because Twitter, I mean, it's not just the conspiracies. I'm kind of used to that because that's kind of why I got into the game is like double check all the conspiracies. But on, on X it's like news and information flows so fast that it's really easy to get caught up in that, that time warp of get out there first and get the, like get the views. And that is so detrimental to good journalism and so detrimental to like just learning. Because if you're going to learn something, you need to spend more than three hours on it and you can't if you're going to follow the X news cycle. And so I have partly, like, I'm so new, I have, you know, years worth of catching up to do to understand this world that I really try to like stay out of that rapid fire cycle and like do a project learning about this CIA operation, do a project learning about the history of that president. So that way I. Because history is not what we were told and if you don't understand history the real way it played out, you don't understand today. So I, I try to stay focused on like, yeah, keep your eyes on that news cycle but, but really like make sure you're doing projects, make sure you're spending the time to actually learn the real depth of what's going on and don't just get caught up in views and clicks and. Smart. Yeah, exactly.

[Unknown Host]

The weapon, weaponization of government agencies was a big selling point this election. Did you look into that?

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah, I mean that's. That sort of accidentally became my whole shtick in some ways. Like the way that Elon and Doge are and, and the current administration are taking it is like only one angle of it, as in they're going after wasted money through these corrupt programs, which is Huge. But it's part of this whole picture that is sort of the intelligence agency, like the deep state, like, blob that's been hiding behind the show that is Congress and, like, American politics. Right. And I thought I was going to be starting my channel to, like, talk about financial crimes, like the GameStop world, all these things. But in researching how, like, our government works, how money works and everything, I just realized that that blob, that intelligence agency, organized crime network, Deep State, that is so important to understanding how the world works that I just naturally, that's what I kind of always have been reporting on, and that it's all tied together because USAID is just a bunch of shell companies for laundering money into, like, either black budget programs or corporate programs or like, just straight up fraudulent programs to enrich wealthy people. Yeah. So it's. It's a huge piece of that same puzzle that is this bigger kind of deep state issue that we have all around the world right now.

[Unknown Host]

Dude, it's really fascinating because I've had Mafia guys on the podcast.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah. I say the.

[Unknown Host]

The government is a criminal organization 100%.

[Ian Carroll]

I mean, one of the biggest, like, red pills for me was just learning the history of intelligence agencies and how right from the very founding of the CIA, before we even founded the CIA, we were already in bed with the mob and the mafia during World War II. And right from the beginning, the whole point of intelligence agencies really not stated, but realistically, it was to access organized crime as a conduit for government operations. Wow. And they. And really intelligence agencies function in order to set up those sort of, like, obscure shell companies and corporate networks that allow you to access corporate and criminal networks so that you can do things you're not supposed to be doing. Because if you're allowed to be doing it, you would just send the military or send, like, a government. Government asset or send a diplomat, whatever. Right. The whole point of covert operations is that if your operation gets found out, it doesn't trace back to your government. Yeah. And. And that's always been the point. And they've always done that through these networks of, like, weird NGOs and weird shell companies. And when you learn about the history of the CIA and all other intelligence agencies too, you learn that, oh, there's so much precedent for this. Like, their entire history is the same pattern. So we shouldn't be surprised when we discover it now. We should be expecting it.

[Unknown Host]

That's so interesting. So from inception, they had this kind of plan out. I was under the assumption they kind of Got hijacked.

[Ian Carroll]

No. Yeah, a lot of people are. So the brief version is that Truman, the president that signed the CIA into. Into reality right after World War II, he wanted it to be like a newspaper. He wanted it to be like just my information briefing. But the founder of the CIA, Alan Dulles, and all the people around him, they thought that intelligence gathering was like peasant work. And they. They thought it was, and they were just utilizing that to get Truman on the hook because they wanted covert operations because they were all corporate lawyers. And really what founding the CIA was was corporations being like, yeah, we can get the government to sanction violence on our behalf. Yeah. And so one of the first operations we did that's really famous is we overthrew the government of Guatemala on behalf of United Fruit, because Guatemala was fucking with United Fruits Land over there. And the Alan Dulles, who's like the godfather of the CIA, he was a lawyer for this law firm that represented that fruit company. And so it's. Right from the start, it's been the CIA acting on behalf of their corporate interests, on behalf of organized crime interests, on behalf of the people that are at the top of their networks, whatever their personal interests are. It's. It's been a real shit show right from the start. And Guatemala is just one of numerous examples. Like, we bought the government of Italy right after World War II by just passing bags of cash to the Mafia because we were afraid that communists would take over. Right. Like, we bought the government of Japan out all throughout the 50s, more or less 50s and 60s, and it's just a pattern that repeats over and over.

[Unknown Host]

And over that those are the black budgets you're referencing.

[Ian Carroll]

Right, Exactly. And the problem is that early on, so Truman signs the CIA into law, and he. The CIA always had funding problems first because they. No one really knew their authority or what their mission was, because it wasn't what they were saying it was. And so they never had enough money. And so really early on, and this is sort of where this is like, the missing link that most people don't realize is that the CIA needed a shitload more money than they were getting for operations they weren't supposed to be doing. But was the real goal was these covert operations. And so they realized, well, we can fund covert operations with covert operations. And what that quickly turned into was drug smuggling. And so the CIA in Vietnam was. Was helping to cultivate the heroin in the poppy fields in Laos, in Vietnam, and they were smuggling that and getting black budget money from that. They were doing the Iran Contra Scandal, which was cocaine trafficking, which has largely been exposed now Central and South America, and it's not really been fully exposed yet. But Afghanistan was the exact same operation where we go in and over. Like the Taliban comes in and takes over Afghanistan, and they outlaw opium cultivation and they burn all the fields down and they. They destroy 90 to 95% of opium production in Afghanistan. And at the time, Afghanistan was the world's top opiate producer.

[Unknown Host]

Yeah.

[Ian Carroll]

And so that's like Big pharma hates that, the drug smugglers hate that. The CIA hates that. And all of a sudden, we go to war in Afghanistan, and then we have US Special Forces guarding the poppy fields. And on the Joe Rogan show, he actually showed the clip of Man, I forget the reporter's name. Total clown. Going and interviewing a Marine about like, so how does it feel to be guarding opium fields? This is like, we have to do this out of respect for their culture. Because it's like the most ridiculous interview ever, because it was right in front of all of our faces. And right then, the opioid epidemic kicked off and totally annihilated my whole generation. Like, our generation is full of people that we lost to heroin, Right. And that was through legal opioid prescriptions as well as illegal heroin. And there's. When you do the math, like, more than 95% of the world's heroin supply and opiate supply is coming from Afghanistan from those poppy fields. So that just implies mathematically that both the illegal heroin supplies and the legal opioid supplies are all coming from those same suppliers. So, like, how separate are they really? It's the same pattern over and over and over is sell drugs and traffic humans and traffic guns and do all these things in the. In the shadows that you can kind of explain is for, like, national interest, but needs to be kind of black operations. But those funds are getting funneled into black bank accounts that are then funding more operations. And you get this just like compartmentalization on compartmentalization on compartmentalization, where even most of the CIA doesn't know what they're up to. Most of the Special Forces don't know what they were up to because it's need to know. And you just, like, it only takes one guy at the top to sort of, like, pull a lot of strings to help his buddies out. And suddenly the deep state gets out of control. Yeah. And I thought I was going to fudgeing research Gamestop, and suddenly I'm like. Suddenly I'm like, okay, so our government has been in bed with Human traffickers and organized crime, like drug smugglers from the start. Like, there's. There's a whole set of files and reports on the one in Vietnam where we're smuggling heroin for the first time, kind of realizing how lucrative that could be. And George H.W. bush, Bush's dad, he was one of the primary culprits in that. In that whole organization. That's the time when he said he wasn't involved in the CIA, but he was. They were not just smuggling heroin out of Laos to sell around the world. The allegations in the official FBI documents that I see and I have are literally that they were selling them to the Vietnam. The soldiers, the American soldiers in Vietnam in order to make money. And that's why so many Vietnam veterans came home addicted to heroin, is because we were the supply and we were making money off. And that's one that, like, they were pretty slick about that. So it didn't really come out in the same way that Iran Contra came out because the guy in charge of Iran Contra was a giant retard. Yeah. But, yeah, those guys pretty much got away with that whole operation and. And now most of them are dead.

[Unknown Host]

This is crazy.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah.

[Unknown Host]

Elon literally said on Rogan if he.

[Ian Carroll]

Exposes some of this stuff, like 100%. Yeah. I mean, I'm pairing right now like. Like out of Amy. Yeah. After what happened to. To Jamie White, it's like rest in pen. I don't think that that was necessarily intentional, but rest in peace to him and like such a tragedy for the whole Infowars crew. And for. And if anyone doesn't know, it's that this writer for Infowars was murdered two nights ago. And we don't have any answers yet. We don't know what the story is. He was on a list. The enemies of Ukraine, like list, whatever it is. Are you list. I don't know. If I'm not, I'll probably get there soon. I'm on the ADL's list now. So, you know, it's just, you know, one list at a time. You can only get so many awards in one week.

[Unknown Host]

So would you win anti semi of the year yet?

[Ian Carroll]

Probably even despite not being. I've. So I made an edit from. From the Rogan podcast of all the times I said it's not all Jews and I don't. I do not hate Jewish people. And Jewish people are regular people because like I said that over and over and over on that podcast and it's just such a glaring, like, representation of what's going on here that, that the news tried to smear me as being anti Semitic, despite all the times that I said that this is a deep state government problem and is Israel is just as vulnerable to this government problem as every other government. And. And it's very telling that when you try to criticize that corrupt government concept, you get smeared as an anti Semite instead of addressing the problem. Yeah.

[Unknown Host]

So I think people are catching on. You're seeing it with the decline of Daily Wire 100.

[Ian Carroll]

Dude, the Daily Wire is in big trouble. And I'm. I have a lot of sources in the Daily Wire at this point, and even around the Daily Wire, people that have left the Daily Wire, like, like people in my Instagram account. Like when I did the reporting on. I think it was Brett Cooper. So Candace Owens, when she got kicked out, I reported a little bit on that and I got a few sources in there and that then when Brett Cooper started to get pushed out, I kind of got the scoop on, like, what was really going on there. And in my Instagram comments about Brett Cooper. Yeah, I had ex Daily Wire employees being like, hey, I'll tell you more. I hate the Daily Wire. And I didn't take the money or sign the NDAs. And so it's like the Daily Wire is like a colander. There is more holes in that ship than I have ever seen. And. And the. Actually there is a story that's going to break before too long about them because it's just like, I mean, everyone in the Daily Wire kind of knows there's something wrong. And. And people all around the Daily Wire know there's something wrong. And it's. Yeah, Jeremy's on a bit of a.

[Unknown Host]

He's been commenting on my Jake Shields clips.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah, Jerry, Jeremy's having a public meltdown. And it's not because of Israel. It's because of other things. Really. There's a. I mean, there's trouble in paradise there. Jeremy. I mean, Jeremy is. He. He always had dreams and this is public. You can just look up like, his history and look up like articles about him is like, he was. His dream was to be in LA and to make it in movies and to make it in film. And so the Daily Wire was his, like, big break.

[Unknown Host]

Yeah.

[Ian Carroll]

And. And I don't know the story of what money started the Daily Wire and how he got that break or anything like that. And I'm not speculating on that, but once he made it with the Daily Wire, he immediately tried to turn it into a Hollywood film studio. And the difference between running a podcast and making a blockbuster movie is like the difference between farming on Earth and flying to Pluto to terraform it. And so he's trying to do this multiple gigantic budget films that they don't have the money for and they never did. And having the Brett Cooper thing break in the middle of that was just a whole extra chip and icing on that cake. Yeah. So, yeah, I'm not sure the Pen Dragon cycle is ever going to come out. Yeah, she was probably a large percentage of the revenue. Do you.

[Unknown Host]

What was the exact story you said you knew what really happened with her?

[Ian Carroll]

No, I don't know what re. I don't know the exact. For real, everything that really happened with her. I mean, I've still to this day never talked to her directly. I might have shared past one message with her after it all broke. I forget. But. But I have a lot of sources all around and inside the Daily Wire and like the story that eventually came out is basically the story like. And anything. Just like the stuff about Reagan taking over and them kind of like training Reagan to take over, them trying to take her tick tock. I mean, what's in the public square is basically the whole story and everything that's not in the public square that I know I don't want to share because I want to respect breath privacy and it's not my job to share anymore. I just, I just didn't want them to get away with litigating her in secret court and having her under NDAs and trying to keep her silent while they took everything that she had built for them. That was just atrocious what they tried to do to her. And now what they're. They're doing, more is, it's more will come out. And it's not my place to break more about Brett specifically, but there is a story that I've, I've heard the rumblings of that will be breaking before long. I think it's already kind of broken, so. Wow. Stay tuned for that.

[Unknown Host]

Yeah. Because I didn't believe what Daily Wire was saying personally.

[Ian Carroll]

No, no, no. And. And it was interesting too is I wasn't paying attention back when Crowder kind of had his spat with them. But once you go back and look at what Crowder said about their contracts and they did to Brett Cooper, it's like a one to one match. Wow. And. And you, Jeremy was on record like back then saying like they have to wage slave and work their way up and, and earn their place. And it's like Brett Cooper is Your place. Like, you already kicked out Candace Owens. Now you're kicked out Brett Cooper in the worst possible ways imaginable. I can only imagine what Matt Walsh is feeling right now, especially when you look at the kind of things he's posting online versus the kind of things that his overlords post online. And without them, they are nothing. Like the Daily Wireless is just jettisoning all their top talent because they think they're invincible. And that's like, you can't replace Brett Cooper's show with a different person. It's. That's not how media works. Right. Like, you can't replace me with a different person. You can't replace you with a different person. That's the way we, this whole industry operates on relationships. And so when you try to burn down a relationship and just slide in another personality, not only does that not work, but it actually works against you because we all see how fake that is. And that is just. I think that's the global perspective on the Daily Wire at this point is anyone that doesn't feel that way is not paying attention. Yeah. Wow.

[Unknown Host]

So Crowder might get vindicated on this.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah, I mean, he sure feels vindicated to me. And I. I don't agree with all the Crowder's by any means. I don't know all the drama around. Around him. But Uber canceled a few years ago. Yeah, for real. I mean, he was instrumental in me kind of waking up and red pilling. I don't. I don't watch much of his stuff anymore, but at the first, it was the 2020 election and I was watching their. Their coverage of the training Tony Bates.

[Unknown Host]

Back in the day.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah. I mean, and you know, that's the thing that I love about this industry is that love people or hate them, it's like some people just are smart and are good at arguing their points. And even if I ultimately disagree, I still, like, love that spirit of America of like, of just debate and just like, you know, the best idea should win, not the biggest projectbook.

[Unknown Host]

Yeah. Are you going to start getting into debates or. No?

[Ian Carroll]

I really don't think so. And I've had like, Piers Morgan invited me onto his show to debate Rabbi Shmuley after the Rogan episode. And it's like, bro, how long is this grift gonna go? Like, why would you be propping up Rabbi Shmuley as a representative of Israel or Judaism or whatever the fuck that represents? That's a horrible representation.

[Unknown Host]

They don't even like him, right?

[Ian Carroll]

No, I mean, like, who would like Rabbi Shmuley, if I was Jewish, I would definitely not. And I'm not. But, like, I wouldn't want Rabbi Shmuli representing my perspective. That is like a horrible grift. And so. And, like, the thing about debates is that I, like, experts should be debating. And I'm an expert on very, very few things. And realistically, like, I've had people ask, like, hey, would you debate, like, Nick Fuentes or would you debate, like, whoever the. It's like, no, I'd probably sit down and ask them a whole bunch of questions because I think that understanding is more important than, like, debating. Debating is. For once, we actually, like, you have two experts that really have elaborated their points and understand their points and, like, are going to engage in debate, whereas 99% of people that are talking about debates online, they should be trying to understand the other side, because they don't. And until you understand all sides of an argument, you're not qualified to debate.

[Unknown Host]

I don't view pure show as a debate.

[Ian Carroll]

I see it as not what it. It's entertainment and clicks and views. And that's why he keeps on trying to push Rabbi Shmuley around. Like, it'd be way more productive to have someone confident and intelligent on there to represent the Israeli viewpoint, to actually have a conversation.

[Unknown Host]

Yeah, Rogan's held some good debates. I like the Flint Dibble one with Graham Hancock.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah, I mean, it was a good debate, but I couldn't watch the whole thing because Flint Dibble was just so cringy and so controlled that it was just, this is not real, dude. And also the other thing is that in a debate format, especially these days, evidence is so important and missing, like misrepresentation and misinformation about evidence is rampant, like wildfire. And so if I were to debate someone like Flint Dibble, what would need to happen is I would need to be like, tell me your sources for your claims. Show me all your sources and I'll go research them for a week. Because you have to research, like, you have to understand sources. You have to actually, like, dig into the information. You can't just claim something and not have anything to back it up. And if someone makes a claim, you can't, unless you already are familiar with that exact source, which maybe you are. That's why you should be an expert to debate things. Otherwise, you need to go look it up, you need to read it. Otherwise, how are you going to debate that source?

[Unknown Host]

Yeah, because a lot of these debates, they link an article they found on Google as a Source.

[Ian Carroll]

Bingo. And maybe the article is legit. Maybe it is, but maybe it's paid for by the person that you're promoting. Maybe it's actually just total bullshit and there's no truth to it at all. And Google is one of the most controlled, like controlled opposition elements of the system today. It's funded by the CIA. It is clearly. Oh yeah, 100%. Google is one of the biggest CIA contractors there is. We think of them as just a humble little search engine. But Google is deeply tied into the intelligence state, deeply tied into the Israeli question, like deeply tied into all of these power systems in the world. And that's how they became so powerful. I mean like our technology infrastructure is not an accident. It was grown out of money by money from, from Google to Apple to Microsoft is a great example with Bill Gates. Holy that dude. Straight up to our social media too. So.

[Unknown Host]

So the CIA has a lot more power than people.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah. And I mean to be clear, I use the CIA as kind of the catch all term for all intelligence agencies because for the average person, they don't know like all the other names of like all 35, whatever. I don't even know how many intelligence agencies we have. And I bet we have ones we aren't told about. I don't know. But I just say the CIA is in our intelligence state, whether it's NSA or DOD or CIA or whatever it is. And a lot of it is CIA, a lot of it is FBI, you know, and a lot of it, I think that they wouldn't even be able to identify exactly who is who. Because that's the whole point is that it's very gray area so that it can kind of get covered up and swept under the rug. I mean a lot of it is done by non government organizations like usaid, this whole USAID scandal specifically. So that when something gets found out it's like, oh, that was just some private company making decisions on their own. Like we didn't. It's like, oh, Facebook was censoring you. Until Facebook shows the, you know, the records that show that actually the government was pressuring us. Which should not exempt Facebook from liability for censoring Americans over facts. Right. But it certainly also passes blame on to the government that pressured them to do so. So crazy.

[Unknown Host]

I remember when Deep State was a conspiracy theory.

[Ian Carroll]

I know, right? And I. Five years ago the term deep state is almost a little tired because it was so conspiratorial for so long. But it's a really like effective term for it. Deep politics, Deep State, the unelected government, whatever you want to call it. I think now every American left and right has had enough examples of that affecting their side and their issues that I hope that Americans en masse are waking up to the fact that it's. It's not left versus rights like we are. That's two wings of the same bird and both are manipulated. And there's this growing center mass of center left and center right libertarians and rational liberals that all understand that like, yeah, we disagree on policies, but we are all on the exact same team of. We're all on the bottom and outside of this club. Yeah. You know, trying to, trying to free our country from these monetary influences. And our enemy is these people on top. Like, and I'm not saying our enemy is rich people. Like, we need rich people on our team. Our enemy is corrupt people. Right. People that are getting rich and fat on this corrupt deep state system. That is what we need to do, need to take on. So I wonder if there's a fix.

[Unknown Host]

For this, because I'd imagine if it's happening here, it's happening almost every government.

[Ian Carroll]

Right, Absolutely. And that was the point I was trying to make on Rogan, is that like, Israel is just as vulnerable to this as every other country. Sudan is just as vulnerable as every other country. I mean, some countries are certainly more vulnerable. Like, the more impoverished, the more corrupt, the more histories of power struggles. Certainly you're more vulnerable to it. But like, we don't live in a nationalist world anymore. Like the moment that you had steam engines and, and ships sailing across the world, we were globalized. And that's been going on for hundreds of years. And at this point, this whole oligarchical class of billionaires, of corporate executives, of like, intelligence operatives, all of those things are operating on a international scale. They are not tied to any one nation. And I think that's why there's so much pushback against nationalism. And they try to smear. Nationalism is like, oh, so you're a Nazi? It's like, no, that, that is a completely different thing. Nationalism is pride in America in this sense. Or if you were French, it'd be pride in France. And there's nothing wrong with that because if you don't have nationalism, you have one homogenous soup of people that have no cultural differences, that have no. Like, diversity is only our strength if we keep it diverse. Right, and you only keep it diverse if you keep that culture to being that culture and that culture being that culture. And like, yeah, we should mingle and we should be friends. But we want British nationalism, we want American nationalism, we want, like, Lebanese nationalism. And as long as it's not violent and as long. Well, sometimes it super is. Yeah, but as long as it's not violent, and as long as it's not, you know, harming others, it's like the golden rule applies to individuals and the golden rule applies to nations. And hopefully we are starting to wake up to the fact that, like, we just need to be calling out the violence, we need to be calling out the extremists, because often we're learning those extremists are actually fucking plants put there by the deep state. Like, often, whether it's a political protest that there's feds inside of, trying to instigate violence to discredit that movement, get people arrested, or whether it's entire countries like Ukraine, where there's an entire opposition party being funded, and then they coup the country in 2014 in the Maidan revolution that's funded by the CIA. We funded that. That, that overthrow. Same with Bashar Al Assad in Syria. Right now it's just breaking that Syria is just like totally just Muslim extremism murdering Christians in the streets. And Candace Owens, like last year, said, hey, if we overthrow Bashar Al Assad, he's not great, but he's been protecting the religious diversity in this country. And if we overthrow him, we are going to see Christians massacred in the streets. And lo and behold, now we are seeing Christians massacre brutally in the streets. And that coup was on behalf of us and Israel, the Western nation's interests in overthrowing that strong leader that was holding that country down. And now it's back into chaos again.

[Unknown Host]

Wow. So all of this is just orchestrated?

[Ian Carroll]

I mean, yeah, it's. I don't mean to imply that there's like six shadowy dudes around a table with the Illuminati sign in the center. That is not at all what I'm implying. But it is orchestrated in the sense that, like, imagine all the giant piles of money that these various groups and people have. Like Bill Gates has his pile of money. The World Economic Forum and their friends have their piles of money. BlackRock has their pile of money. All these different people, and there's governments involved in that too. And all those piles of money represent massive amounts of leverage and influence. And most of them tend to align on most things. Like, most of them do not want a strong, educated, intelligent American populace. Right. Because it doesn't benefit any of them. Most of them do not want healthy, young Americans that are fit and capable and having strong marriages and strong families, because that doesn't benefit any of them. It's like, so on a lot of these issues that feel like some grand conspiracy. You don't need a grand conspiracy because incentives are all aligned. Every one of them makes money. If we're all fat and sick and depressed, whether it's because they're selling us drugs or it's because they're selling us advertising, or it's because they just need us to stay the fuck out of their political process so they can run their show the way they want. That makes sense. Yeah. So it's just interest, alignment. Like, the world is, what, 8 billion people? So there's 8 billion different people at the table that are influencing the world, but most of us are just regular people that only have one person's worth of influence. And then you get the Bill Gates of this world that represent, like, billions of dollars worth of interest who's like, I'm going to vaccinate all of Africa with these experimental drugs that just so happen to sterilize millions of people against their consent. Or I'm going to test out remdesivir in Africa and it's going to. It killed Remdesivir, the COVID drug that he pushed on us. It killed more than 50% of the people in this trials. Holy crap. It's crazy, dude. The story of remdesivir's trials in 2019, I'm pretty sure it was maybe 2018. It's crazy what happened in the remdesivir trials in Africa. And I'm pretty sure they were testing it on Ebola, trying to see if it would help for Ebola. And it was so bad that they had to shut the trials down after a couple months because it was just clearly killing people. And then it became our wonder drug for Covid because they could make a shitload of money off of it. And because it was a treatment after you're so sick you're in the hospital, rather than a preventative that would stop them from having their emergency youth authorization. And that that information is all sourced and cited in RFK's book, the real Anthony Fauci. Everyone should read that book.

[Unknown Host]

That is nuts. Yeah, I know. He's buying up farmland. He's trying to do fake meat companies.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah. Bill Gates is a madman. And. And I more and more suspect that it is not just, like, him being naive and just doing billionaire things. I more and more suspect that it is some sort of. I hesitate to say Agenda, but kind of an agenda. And I don't understand what it is, but it's fudgeing evil. It's not good.

[Unknown Host]

I mean, there's that wild theory of the depopulation agenda.

[Ian Carroll]

Well, that looks, I mean, yes, because that is this eugenicist trend in these, in science that's been always been around this idea that if you really get scientific enough about it, some people suck and some people rock. And if we really wanted to be really evil about it, it's true that the world would be better off with all the good people and none of the bad people. And so there's always been this problem with, with scientific minds, men especially, where if you get rational enough, you can justify killing off all the bad people. Whether that's extermination camps or whether that's depopulation or sterilization, eugenics has always been a problem. And Bill Gates is openly a eugenicist and he openly talks about overpopulation as this massive problem. And when you actually look at his solutions, it basically comes down to they're implementing population reduction by making it so that poor people die and rich people live. And whether that's through vaccinating poorer countries and it happens to sterilize a bunch of people on accident, or whether it's through just quality of living is so bad that poor people can't afford to have kids or poor people are killing each other in the streets or starving to death, those kinds of things are eugenicist policies, whether intended or not, because they're killing off what they see as undesirables. Because if you can't make it in this modern capitalist world, you're not good enough. And we're the, you know, we're the ones that understand the system. So we deserve to, you know, have 19 kids or whatever the fuck it is, 13 kids. So it really is sinister. And when you dig into history of groups like the Club of Rome, the World Economic Forum, they have very clear roots in straight up eugenics. And a lot of their founding members and people who've been involved in those sort of globalist groups, you can find speeches on record talking about how the world would be a better place if we had more desirables and like that. That is so wild because yeah, some.

[Unknown Host]

Of the most successful people I know come from poverty households.

[Ian Carroll]

Exactly.

[Unknown Host]

Or upbringings.

[Ian Carroll]

Exactly. And some of the, like, you never know. So I worked in teaching as a younger person. My parents were teachers. And the number one thing you learn when you actually work with young people is never know what kind of gifts a young person has, and especially young people that come from struggle, that come from poverty, they often overcome, like, they become the strongest people so often. And. And if you had a system that was truly trying to elevate young people, teach them well, and to give them what they needed to thrive, we would have such a better world. But instead, we have the system that intentionally does not educate young people and puts them at every disadvantage and tries to actively take them away from their parents so the state has control over their education so that we can educate a bunch of mindless little drones that will just go along with a mask mandate that will go along with vaccines that aren't tested. Because the more of that institutionalized prison, like, education you give to American kids when they're young, the more they're going to accept that institutionalized prison, like, condition when they're adults. Right.

[Unknown Host]

Was the pandemic one of the first ones you looked into?

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah, well, the pandemic was what really woke me up is, like, I had a lot of these tendencies in my personality before I started doing this research. But I grew up a liberal and, like, I grew up in Washington state just totally not paying attention. And I didn't. I wasn't engaged with it. I just was uninformed. And I was, like, out in the woods running and doing rock climbing and snowboarding and, like, I didn't care. And then the pandemic hit, and it's in all of our homes and all of our faces, and they're, like, taking away our liberties. And I'm like, literally running multiple ultramarathons a week do as a running guide. And they're telling me that I need to take an experimental medication because I can't survive what is essentially a cold. Yeah. When I've already had it once and I have natural immunity, it's like the questions just did not add up. And then I'm a younger brother, and when someone starts to, like, like, try to control me and hold me down, it's like, fuck you. I will fucking die over this shit. Like, the more you try to take away my free speech, the more free speech I'm gonna do. The more you try to take away my liberties, the more I will rebel. And so I just didn't go anywhere. Like, my whole town, everywhere wanted vaccine, passports. Like, fuck you.

[Unknown Host]

You.

[Ian Carroll]

I won't give you my business. I'll go to the gym that lets me in, and I'll work out every day and get bigger and stronger. I will stay at home and do research and learn and get smarter. And I'll just do that until the world opens back up. You don't get my money anymore. Yeah, and I never went to any of those businesses again. The ones that required vaccine passports, them. I'm not giving you my business.

[Unknown Host]

Yeah, like, sorry, I wonder if they'll attempt something like that again.

[Ian Carroll]

Oh, certainly. I suspect it's a cyber pandemic. So the pandemic, they were warning us about the pandemic. They were running scenarios about the pandemic. There was this whole industry, if you noticed it, which most people did not, but a few smart ones did, like Mickey Willis, who made the plandemic films. He interviewed a lot of doctors that were starting to blow the whistle on this, that there's an industry not only around vaccines, that it's been growing for, you know, a decade or more, multiple decades, but there's actually an industry around the COVID virus itself, around the creation of coronaviruses. And that is actually like a biological weapons program that the US was funding. And that's why the bio labs weren't always in Ukraine. They used to be. We used to be doing that research here in the United States. But then eventually it got a little hot because we're not supposed to be doing that. It's obvious why. And so they moved it all to Ukraine and then to China because that way they keep it off the books. And. And so there was so much money to be made off of patents on coronavirus technologies. Not just vaccines, but actually the viruses. And I'm not saying that like, I'm not saying that the whole conspiracy is true. I'm saying watch Plandemic 2 indoctrination. Dig into sources for yourself. Like, read for yourself. Think carefully. But it's just that is this world where they prepare to make money off of a crisis and it's really easy to cloak the response to the crisis. Or like the preparation is like, we were supposed, of course we should be preparing for pandemics. And how would we know as regular citizens looking at it of like, were you just trying to prepare for the crisis or were you getting into position to make money off the crisis? And right now they're all talking about the potential dangers of a cyber pandemic and all these things and we're being warned there's going to be a cyber attack and a cyberp, the EMPs. And yeah, that's real. That's absolutely something we should be concerned about. But we should be concerned about who is actually going to fucking start it and who's actually going to make money off of it and who stands to benefit. And in the case of if there's a cyber pandemic in the next year or two, it's pretty clear that the people that stand to benefit are the ones trying to control us because we are breaking out of all of our chains using the Internet right now. And it's the Internet that's allowing all of our communication. The Internet's just allowing all this free flow of ideas. And they don't. There's no way for them to stop it. It like the way that, that just my platform has worked like I'm a regular dude that just wanted to get involved and now I'm ratioing Elon Musk over Israel and like starting all these controversies like that is. There's no answer to that except to shut it down and then to try to do something while it's shut down. So I'm, I'm worried and I'm not saying I know it's going to happen. I'm just one of the things I'm most worried about is false flag attacks on America that they blame on Iran and pull us into World War III and cyber pandemics, cyber attacks, EMP attacks, and those could be the exact same thing. You know, if they do cyber attack us, it will light. It's very likely they'll blame it on Muslim terrorists or on Russian terrorists or whatever just so they can start a war. Because every war they start with false flag attacks. They start with whether it's Gulf of Tonkin or 9 11. And I'm not saying that all the 911 conspiracies are true, but I am saying that we did not have sufficient evidence or reasoning from 911 to go not only to war in Afghanistan in the way we did, but especially to war Iraq. Wow. Like the war in Iraq is the perfect example of a manufactured conflict for totally nefarious reasons that had nothing to do with 9 11. And they actually, they realized as they were starting an Iraq war, they realized that, you know, we don't really actually have enough to link this. And then all of a sudden this anthrax scare happens because they were trying to say like they have weapons of mass destruction, they have biological weapons. And then suddenly anthrax gets mailed out to all the people in, in Congress and not all, but like a bunch of these guys in Congress that are against the Iraq war, they all get all these anthrax letters and a couple of them get sick. I think one or two of them died and then a couple fake anthrax letters go out to people that are in support of the Iraq war. And then when they actually tested that anthrax. Anthrax is such a specific biological agent that it only is manufactured in a few places in the world. And the spores in those anthrax letters came from a CIA lab. And we didn't know that at the time, but it took a little bit of time for them to do that analysis and realize that there's literally only one lab in the world that can make this type of anthrax and it is a CIA lab. And that was 100% a deep state operation intended to be like, look, Saddam is sending anthrax to us, he's trying to kill us. And just stoke all this fear so they could convince Colin Powell to go out and toe the line so that Condoleezza Rice could go out and tow the line and say we need to get those fucking Iraqis when they had nothing to do with it. And Iraq has been in turmoil ever since. Like we do this over and over in the Middle East.

[Unknown Host]

You messed up a whole country for our.

[Ian Carroll]

Absolutely. Well, for Israel's gain too. Because there was a report called the Clean Break Report written by a whole bunch of neocons and Zionists years before, even before 9 11. And they were saying that we need, in order to reshape the Middle east in the interest of Israel, we need to go to war with these seven countries. And I never remember the whole list, but it was like Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Iran, Somalia. I think maybe, maybe I forget. And to this day we have gone to war with basically every single one of them. Wow. And it was one after the other after the other after the other. And it was explicitly stated that this is, this is. The Clean Break Report was explicitly stated that this is how we need to reshape the Middle east and Israel's and America's interest in order to, you know, basically control the geopolitical nature of Middle East. And 911 just seemed to play directly into the hands of that whole neocon like agenda that was the heart of the George Bush presidency. Like not just the Richard Pearls of this world that most people never heard of, that were kind of of under the administration, but like the Dick Cheneys and Donald Rumsfelds that were right at the top of that administration. That's not to mention that George Bush is from the Skull and Bones secret society. He's the son of this long line of very sketchy motherfuckers. Like clearly that whole presidency was a carefully orchestrated like not coup of The American government, because we were already fucked. But it was that. That was not like, oh, no, a terrorist attacked our buildings. Now we'll respond by going to Afghanistan and Iraq. It was, we want to go to war with these guys over here. Oh, look, a terrorist attacked our buildings. We're going to war over there. Right?

[Unknown Host]

It's so messed up because I have a lot of veterans on the show and some of them are waking up. You're like pawns, basically.

[Ian Carroll]

It's so tragic to watch because, like, respect to them for fighting for their country and for serving to protect American values. But it's so sad how many of the. The veterans that come home later have to realize that they were lied to and that they weren't actually protecting American values. And. And so I've got all the respect in the world for veterans, but, man, all the condemnation I could ever level against the politicians and corrupt oligarchical class that are manipulating these conflicts for their financial gain. I always come back to the phrase, all wars are bankers wars. And the more you learn about history, the more that is true over and over and over with every war that you could possibly research.

[Unknown Host]

Yeah, I've heard back in the day, certain banks would fund both sides, right?

[Ian Carroll]

Oh, absolutely. Still to this day, we. We fund both sides 100%. And. And like, and sometimes that's funding both sides. I mean, like, for example, all these wars against terrorists. We founded those terrorists. We funded those terrorists. Like, we founded the mujahideen, which later morphed into Al Qaeda. The Taliban. We've been funding the Taliban. Like isis. We funded isis. All of those things. We built them up. And we built them up as, you know, rebel groups to fight against communism or rebel groups to fight against that evil guy or that evil guy. And then we fund them until it's like, oh, we need an enemy. They're the enemy. Now that they're. They become the scapegoat to take us to war. And that's true now with these terrorist groups, but it was true all the way back in the day in, like, the Vietnam conflicts, the Korea conflicts. Like, especially in the World War II situation. It's like a whole wild rabbit hole. Like, The World War II one is going to break open in a huge way, I think, in the next year. Because, yeah, there's like, all this holocaust questioning that people get into, which I don't really give a shit to get into, because it's just so muddied and convoluted and there's so much hatred around it. And, like, Certainly the Holocaust did happen. Like, certainly it was atrocious and it was evil. And it's well documented, not just in ways that you can disprove, but. But, like, to avoid that, we funded the German miracle. Like, after World War I, the Treaty of Versailles was designed to destroy the German economy. It was designed to, after World War I, make Germany pay, like, trillions of marks of reparations they could have never paid off. And that turned into this Weimar Republic that just cratered all of Germany and destroyed their economy. And then Western industrialists from around the world came in and bought it up for pennies on the dollar and rebuilt Germany. Germany didn't just, like, magically invent money that just suddenly came out of nowhere. Money flowed in from investors. And that's why when World War II started, like, our CIA, Alan Dulles, the founder of the CIA, he was a lawyer at this company that represented all these other companies, like IG Farben, the company that was manufacturing the Zyklon B. He was. He worked for them. Like, he was friends with all of them. American industrialists helped build that German economy. Like, I haven't been able to, like, source it a hundred percent yet, but there's lots of evidence and accusations that American and Western corporations helped to maintain and run the concentration camps. Like, that's crazy. Yeah. And like, that's a very complicated one because there's so much propaganda around it. But, like, there. There is evidence out there that is starting to be dug up. And. And I'm certainly not saying that the Nazis were good. I'm not saying Hitler was a good guy. He was a psychopath, especially by the end of the war and all that meth. But it's not as simple as, like, we're the good guys and they're the bad guys. It's like, the. Are mostly normal people tend to be the good guys unless they get psyoped by a crazy political class that turns them into bloodthir monsters, which you can see several examples of now around the world and in the past around the world. And I certainly would include Muslim extremists in those categories. They can get crazy and horrible. But, like, it's the rich on top that are funding all of these conflicts and making money and investments into everything. Like, first fund the conflict that destroys something, then fund the rebuilding, and you're making money on every single piece of these systems, not to mention the inflation that comes out of printing all this money. It's just. It's such a scandal. It's so. I mean, it can be A real black pill if you. If you forget about all the good in this world.

[Unknown Host]

Well, a lot of people in history class growing up were taught about the war, so they're so programmed to think it was good versus evil.

[Ian Carroll]

Bingo. The more you. The more you learn about, like, what's really going on out here, the more you realize that everything in mainstream public education is essentially paid programming. Because who publishes those books? I'm not going to say it. Y'all can look it up. Like, who writes those history. Who funds the historians? Who funds the colleges where the historians are getting their degrees? And it's a very complex system. I'm not saying it's as simple as, like, I paid you to tell them all lies. It's like, it's a complex network of censorship and of grant funding and knowing, like, I'm not going to get my study funded if it. If I don't, you know, support this donor's interest or whatever it is. There's a super complex. But we're seeing it more and more. Like, Covid is such a great example because it exposed so many people to how you can purchase science and how you can purchase mainstream education. You can purchase the Ivy League institutions, and we saw that they have over the last, last many, many decades. And when you start to realize that that is not just about science in the vaccine field or in the medical fields, but it's about science in the history fields, it's about science in all these other fields. And it's really like the veil is coming down. And so it feels like the world is so shitty right now because we're learning all these things. But I would argue that that's the step towards the light is first you shine the light on all the evil that was already going on our whole lives. Like, when I was born, our president had come to power by helping smuggle drugs at the Ran contrabas situation. He'd been smuggling cocaine through Mena, Arkansas, and then he was hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein, raping kids on an island, allegedly. And so, like, it seemed hunky dory. It's like the 90s. Everything's great. No one even realizes. So good. Like, Bill Clinton rocks, whatever. But then you shine a light back on, you're like, oh, that's super dark. Yeah. But that's how we expose it and get to a better world. Yeah.

[Unknown Host]

Because Epstein was the guy back in the day.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah. And it's pretty crazy. So, like, we just got a new, new prime minister of Canada up north who's like a ultra uber banker. Super sketchy, technocratic banker just appointed him, like, two days ago. And then it comes out. There's a photo of him hanging out with Ghislaine Maxwell. Wow. It's like, God damn it. Every single time I thought Justin resigned. Is he still. Yeah, he resigned. I don't know what the. I don't know how fucking Canadian politics work. He resigned a long time ago. And it's like pending finding a suitable replacement. And so they have found a suitable replacement. And that suitable replacement just so happens to have managed the bank of Canada, if I remember correctly, during the 08 financial collapse, like, after it. And then he became the top seat at the bank of England, which is like, that's fucking sketchy. He's in this. He's in this thing called the group of 30, the G30, which is essentially a group of 30 of the most powerful financial overlords of our world that get together and have, I'm sure, really great conversations about how to make the world better for all regular people. No, Soros is not, but I'm sure he's friends with all of them. It's like, like, it's like people that are at the top of, like, the bank of International Settlements and the bank of England and a Federal Reserve. It's like literally the banker elite look UP group of 30, read their Wikipedia page, and then go look for other articles. It's crazy. Yeah. And so he's this guy that just got put in, in Canada, just north of us, and he's been openly against Trump. He's openly pushing for. We need to have. What was it called? He called it global hegemony. He's like, we need to replace the US Dollar supremacy around the world with this, a new digital currency. And the term they use on his Wikipedia page that I haven't had time to dig into yet is something like a global hegemonic currency, a digital hegemonic. They literally use the word hegemonic, which is like, hegemony is. I mean, it's a complicated word, and I don't actually have a really great definition, but hegemony is like. Like when your overlords rule you. It's like when the. The rich and powerful rule over everything. It's not. It's not good. It's a very weird choice of words to. To use.

[Unknown Host]

That's not looking better.

[Ian Carroll]

No, no, no. I mean, it's really looking like he's. He's getting put. I mean, I hate to get optimistic about Trump because he's been up so much but it kind of looks like they're putting in a guy who's super competent and liberal and evil in Canada to kind of try to fight back against Trump and to fight Trump's like, economic policies and the tariff war and hopefully, like, because we're about to have a dollar collapse, our economy is about to completely explode. Oh yeah, it's been, I mean the dollar has. Whether it happens this year or in four years or in eight years, it's coming. We are at the end of the dollar cycle and every economist knows that everyone has been talking about it. And the con, like the stock market is at this crazy fucking bubble of fake made up like Nvidia value right now. That is not real.

[Unknown Host]

Tesla has been cracking.

[Ian Carroll]

It's crazy. And it could crash at any moment. And they have the power to pop that bubble. All these, like during COVID they printed what, like a quarter, two, two thirds, a third of all the dollars that are in circulation. I forget the stat, all that money, they got it during COVID and they like, they can't just, didn't just put it into us in our. They invested into all these companies. That's why Nvidia stock went crazy. That's why all these stocks bubbled up during COVID like that. And they have the ability to pull that out and to pop at any time. And so it really is looking like we're prepared. They are preparing. We're fucked in that regard. They're preparing to hopefully, I think in their eyes is you've got this bubble and you're ready to pop it, you're ready to crash the economy and suddenly here's the solution. We've got these brand new digital currencies, central bank digital currencies that'll solve all the problems, will fix all the debt. And that is like the road straight to technocratic servitude. Like, that's the road straight to hell. If we accept a centralized digital currency where they can turn it off if you say the wrong things. They can take your bank accounts, they can limit what you can buy. They can say like, if that's the road that leads to, oh, I'm sorry, you're only allowed to drive five miles today because your, your words on that podcast the other day were not sufficiently in line with government. Government policy. Like, that is literally how China does it. Canada is already talking about things that are very reminiscent of that. They did that to the truckers, despite it being actual banking infrastructure that they took down. Like we are in a, we are in a fight for control. Of our own lives. And we need people to wake up to the fact that, like, the world is happening all around us. Like, whether you like it or not, it's all going on. And. And whether you think that, like, whether you care about how the rest of the world works or not, there are enough extremely rich and powerful people in this world that think they're gonna, like, think they are gods, that think they can fucking know better for everyone, that they're doing things like manufacturing coronaviruses in laboratories that just so happen to get out. They're doing things like mandating you take experimental vaccines that they have no data. Well, they have bad data on that shows it's not safe, right? And then they're tricking you and lying to you through their teeth to tell you to take it, which can, you know, harm your children, harm yourself, harm your family members. So, like, we are past the point of people being able to sit back and be like, it doesn't affect me. It affects all of us. Absolute. If we don't do something about it, if we don't, like, get educated about it and stand up, our kids are not going to be living in the same world that we are.

[Unknown Host]

That's scary. We are living in a Black Mirror episode.

[Ian Carroll]

Oh, yeah. And robots are just getting started. Like, our children are going to have to make the choice, do I want a girlfriend or do I want a lifelike sex robot that can fulfill my every need and be anything I want it to be, and can actually change its skin to be different, looks different at any time. And that choice is going to decimate young people if we don't start strengthening young people against it, if we don't start educating about religion and faith, start educating about family values, start rebuilding our culture around, like, just basic humanity, because you can already see how porn is ravaging our generations. And it's not a simple con. Like, it's not a simple question because, like, loneliness sucks and, like. Like, the world is hard and people are disconnected and, like. And a lot of these things actively prey on, whether it's like, the drugs in our food that get us addicted to food or whether it's the drugs in our screens that get us addicted to our screens. Like, all of these things are. They're designed to make money off of us, and they're designed to exploit our weaknesses. And so I totally have sympathy for everyone that falls into all these traps. I understand it. I mean, I fall into lots of traps, too. But it's. I think, as a culture, we really got to start Talking about how do we strengthen ourselves and our families and our communities. Because a lot of the choices that our children are going to have to make we can't even begin to understand. Like, do you want a brain chip or not? Right. How do you even like approach that question? Like, yeah, the benefits are going to be amazing until you say the wrong thing and then shut you off. Yeah, whatever it is. I don't know.

[Unknown Host]

I don't trust these self driving cars, to be honest.

[Ian Carroll]

Dude, I get sketched out by them. But there, it's a perfect example. Check this out. Self driving cars are obviously getting to the point where give them 10 years, they're never going to crash. They will not crash once. And it will be so easy for politicians to explain. We're outlawing humans driving cars because last year in 2029, 500,000 people died from car crashes. Every single one of those car crashes, the car was piloted by a human. Self driving cars didn't cause a single crash. They avoided crashes. So in the interest of safety, we're going to outlaw humans driving cars. Would we accept that policy? Because obviously it's true and we know it's going to be true that we would be, that it would be safer if robots were driving all of our cars. But do you sacrifice sovereignty for safety? Because if you do, where does that end? Right? Because we would be safer if you stayed in that fucking bubble and got fed through a tube and they just put you in a nice video game your whole life and you never even opened your eyes into the real world and suddenly you live in the Matrix because it is safer. And so it sounds retarded and it sounds dystopian, but like, we are literally confronting those exact dystopian questions as we go. And I would urge every American to realize that you do not want safety over sovereignty, you do not want comfort over fulfillment. You do not want these solutions that sound so nice when they take away what it means to be a human at the most basic level. Right? Risk is a part of being a human. Like, you know, experiencing love and joy and passion and all these things. That's part of being human. And so like, no, I would not take a sex robot that is perfect in every way because I want the whole human experience, not some fucking fake ass made up bullshit that can play to all of my weakest parts and basically just put me into this like infinite addiction to ease and simplicity and pleasure. So if you like soulless. Exactly. I mean, it is. That's the definition of soulless.

[Unknown Host]

Did you see that movie with Megan Fox. Fox and the AI robot?

[Ian Carroll]

No, I avoid anything that Megan Fox touches like the plague. But she's a great one to play an AI robot. I mean, does she have three trans kids in the movie too? Because. Holy, that's messed up.

[Unknown Host]

I bet you don't watch any modern Hollywood film.

[Ian Carroll]

I avoid most of them. I watch some of the ones that like. Like when I watch film and tv, it's always so that I can use it as a vessel to get my mind thinking about how the world really works. So I'm not really thinking about the movie as much as I am thinking about like my own research and. And using it as like a creative way to kind of rearrange ideas. How.

[Unknown Host]

So you're thinking about the programming going on in the.

[Ian Carroll]

A little bit, yeah. A little bit, yeah. But I do. I've rewatched the series called Blacklist like three times. Blacklist is. Is written and directed by a guy named Boz who is a expert on human trafficking. He's an ex CIA guy that goes after human trafficking and he. That show is like his magnum opus of like, what if like the criminal world. Like, what if I told the story of the criminal world from being a guy that fights it, I was like, oh, I understand why. I love this show so much. It's a fun show show.

[Unknown Host]

It's super cool.

[Ian Carroll]

Yeah.

[Unknown Host]

And it's been really fun. Man, I can't wait to see what you do next. Where can people find you?

[Ian Carroll]

You find me on X at Ian Carol show and I'm just launching a new website with a new partner that is going to help me actually not be like a poor solo guy. Actually professionalize. It's cancel Ian carroll.com which is very timely as I've just been canceled. And so that's where for now there's just a couple of quick shirts and products on there, but there's. I'll have resource and updates on it. Canceling Carol.com too.

[Unknown Host]

That's junk. First in Boston is your event, right?

[Ian Carroll]

No, my event got cancele because of what I did on the Joe Rogan Experience. Because of what I said. Who knows why. They started getting all kinds of threats. I put out a video about it the other day. It was a real, real bummer. But ultimately, like, I don't blame the family. The venue had to cancel and I do not blame them at all. Like totally not their responsibility to deal with hate and harassment. And so we have postponed and we're actually like, the flood of support was overwhelming and I got. I spent all day on the phone yesterday with people just, like, fighting for, like, Ian, we've got a venue for you. No, we want you to do it here. No, we want you to do it here. And I've got, like, three different meetings scheduled this week. And I'm so stoked because we're going to do it even bigger and even better. And I like. And realistically, it was a huge blessing in disguise. So it's not June 1st, but the website is still up. Bottomupboston.com and we'll eventually be redirecting that to the new website when we change locations from Boston, but it's going to be sick. We're probably going to bring it to Austin is what I'm saying.

[Unknown Host]

I'll be be there, man. Thanks for hopping on.

[Ian Carroll]

See you next.