U.S. Attorney General (4:24)

And the minute missing from the video. We released the video showing definitively the video was not conclusive, but the evidence prior to it was showing he committed suicide. And what was on that? There was a minute that was off the counter. And what we learned from Bureau of Prisons was every year, every night they redo that video. It's old from like 1999. So every night the video is reset and every night should have the same minute missing. So we're looking for that video to release that as well, showing that a minute is missing every night.

Ashley Banfield (5:04)

And what else have the Feds been supposedly unable to account for? A new DOJ memo says, and I quote, this systematic review revealed no incriminating client list. There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. End quote. I'm joined now by Josh Schiffer, who has represented several of Epstein's accusers. So arguably, you follow this, you know, more carefully than just about anybody I know. Josh, first and foremost, does this settle it?

Josh Schiffer (5:40)

I don't believe so. And I clearly am not alone in that. The world has exploded on social media, you know, all over the place. People are not satisfied with this explanation, with this conclusion from the federal government, especially because it's coming from some really prominent individuals that for years have promised us that when in power, we're going to get to the bottom of this. And we want to know what investigation took place. I don't think anybody's really satisfied with the idea that he killed himself. We don't have proof we can really share that proves that. But here's a video that is admittedly got a pretty big chunk out of it missing. And we went through all the evidence and there's not any lists.

Ashley Banfield (6:36)

But I have to say, a minute 15, that's a lot, right? You know, a minute 15 is a lot, Josh, but it's not enough to suffocate someone. You can't get into a cell, choke somebody out and get out earlier than a minute 15.

Josh Schiffer (6:50)

No. And this video is getting picked apart by everyone. There are discussions about whether a smudge on the floor changes, whether you can see a flash of an orange uniform. But a minute and a few seconds doesn't seem like a until. That's the time when everything has to happen. And it really is a large amount of time. You can exit or enter that cell relatively quickly. There's obviously not a lot of people around. You do see the gentleman walking in the background there. But if you want to be quick acting, a minute is plenty of time to get in and, you know, do whatever happened. The problem is that we don't have the conclusory review of the investigation. We still don't know what happened. And no one wants to share that.

Ashley Banfield (7:41)

And it was weird, right? There were all the uniforms all over the cell. How do you get all these uniforms? He was tied up with one. It was crazy. All of it just made. And the videos just suddenly, surveillance videos weren't working. Now, suddenly there is. That's the big question. Why after all this time, 2019, this happened. Why after all this time, are we only now seeing this video? This could have been quieted so long ago. But no, everything was left out to, you know, and I get it, Ghislaine Maxwell needed to be, you know, adjudicated. But this doesn't seem to affect that.

Josh Schiffer (8:16)

But for what was Ms. Maxwell? You know, apparently there wasn't a list of people being cliented in Mr. Epstein's review or the review of Mr. Epstein. There's so many questions that this unsatisfactory conclusion from the federal investigation. There's so many questions left that we just know haven't been fully answered. And there's more information out there. There was a lot of time this minute.

Ashley Banfield (8:45)

Yeah, I was just gonna say, when you say there's a lot of information still out there, I gotta. I just gotta reread this quote from the doj because I actually find it. Laug says, and the FBI says, quote, systematic review revealed no incriminating client list. But Julie Brown, who's done so much reporting for the Miami Herald, arguably she kicked this thing off and he ended up in prison because of her reporting. She says, sure, yeah, maybe no client list, maybe he didn't have a black book. But it doesn't mean there wasn't a lot of digital evidence. It doesn't mean there weren't manifests. It doesn't mean there were lots of communications. A digital trail that equates to a black book.

Josh Schiffer (9:28)

That's what I keep talking about with people. There are lists upon lists upon lists, many of which we know already. Saying there's not a list. That's not really an answer. It's a red herring saying the list that we want to say doesn't exist. Doesn't exist. But it's like the blackmail. You're not gonna get a fulsome cooperation from people that are part of a blackmail. And it's not like many accused criminals really leave the clearest evidence. That's what investigators do, is they put it together. And the questions remaining all have to do with what investigation did the government actually perform? We wanna know what questions were asked. We wanna know who was contacted. We wanna know why is it mentioned earlier that there are thousands of videos that's been reported by everybody that has ever interacted with this man? Videos all over the place, yet we're suddenly hearing no, there's no videos, no, there's no information that just can't possibly be true if there are videos that can't release.

Ashley Banfield (10:31)

You like to tape things?

Josh Schiffer (10:33)

Yeah. They can't be released.

Ashley Banfield (10:35)

Yeah, we like to tape things. I have to. I gotta wrap it there, unfortunately, only because I've got about four more segments to go and time for three more segments. But Josh Schiffer, will you come back again? Always.

Josh Schiffer (10:45)

Thank you so much.

Ashley Banfield (10:47)

Thank you. Josh Schiffer. Good to see you again. Happy summer. So, my great thanks to Josh Schiffer. Good conversation. And I will say a few other things about the video because I know that people on the Internet have been, like, losing their collective minds about this. It's very confusing, right? I think you see cell number 46, and you're like, well, is that Epstein's cell? Because there's no information from the DOJ that says that's Epstein's cell. I don't believe it is. And I'll tell you why. Because if you go back to a 2023 report from the DOJ, their own investigations unit sent out this quote. Let me read it to you. I think it's going to make a lot of sense as to what the hell is the door that we're supposed to be looking at. Some of the Internet's reporting it so over down below. And some of the Internet's reporting it's out of view of the camera. And so why bother giving us a surveillance video that doesn't have Epstein's cell door? This might answer it for you. So here's the quote from the DOJ's own investigations unit, for what it's worth, quote, the available recorded video footage from the one special housing unit camera captured a large part of the common area of the special housing unit and portions of the stairways leading to the different special housing unit tiers, including Epstein's cell tier. Thus, anyone entering or attempting to enter Epstein's special housing unit tier from the special housing unit common area would have been picked up by that video camera. Epstein's cell door, however, was not in the camera's field of view. Now, that makes perfect sense. Yeah, it's not 46. It's out of the view of the camera, but no one could get to it without walking through that camera from the stairwell. Got it. Makes perfect sense. However, there is something that still pisses me off, as I'm sure many of you feel the same way. Why is it that several of the surveillance cameras that would have picked up Epstein's door just weren't working? Huh? Just. They just weren't working. Isn't that convenient? This is what fuels the conspiracy theorists. Wow. That's convenient that we have no view of Epstein's cell. Why do you suppose that is? That's what fuels the conspiracy theorists. I'm not saying I'm in on that. That I'm in on that conspiracy theory, but I do find it really annoying that when there's just the most important surveillance cameras not working, when a very high profile inmate is found dead. That's number one. Number two, and I think we've all discussed this for a long time. What the hell were all those orange suits all over the floor, right? Were they blankets or suits? I can't remember. It doesn't matter. Their fabric. And no one was allowed to have that many. So how did he accumulate that many? And were those all tied together to make one small noose? There's also issues with his hyoid bone. We've gone over that ad nauseam. So listen, as far as the public is concerned, I get you. I am with you. None of this is satisfactory. And like, I don't want to be way out there on the fringe, but I do think that we deserve fulsome investigation and very clear factual information and answers. When there's something this high profile with somebody who's got this many friends in high places who could have been doing really ugly stuff right alongside him on the Long Island Lolita Express. I call it that. It's actually the Lolita Express because there was a Long Island Lolita. Joey Buttafuoco. Google it. Anyway, I just wanted to put all that out for you so that you have sort of a clearer view of what it was the DOJ really gave us and why you still might have questions and how, you know, I got you. Hey, thank you everybody for listening. I am so appreciative. You every day. The truth isn't just serious folks, it's drop dead serious.