Transcript
Host (0:00)
Welcome, friends, to Economic Update Extra, a continuation of the conversation we had on the regular Economic Update program with my guest Professor Michael Peelias, part of a group that's starting a new Left University in New York City. And we were discussing the rationale, the audience, they're trying to reach the goals of this project. And I'd like to continue that conversation.
Sam (0:28)
Michael, I've heard you talk and I would like to share that with our audience about what it means that a university is committed to critical thought. On the one hand, there are people who wonder, gee, is it one sided to be critical? Shouldn't you also be appreciative in some sense of the society? And then there are others who say no. It has always been the goal of education to, to teach people how to think critically, to be able to go and improve the society you inherit as a new person, rather than simply live in the existing status quo. How do you see your project of a new university in relationship to the whole concept of critical thinking?
Michael Pelias (1:14)
I think that the aspect of critique.
Stanley Aronowitz (1:18)
Is very, very important. Critique comes from a Greek word, krainon, which means to separate out, separate out things from its wholeness into its parts.
Michael Pelias (1:29)
So a critique is really a very.
Stanley Aronowitz (1:31)
Positive word in the ancient philosophy. It's an effort to understand, effort to understand.
Michael Pelias (1:36)
So I see, you know, critical thinking as integral to where we are.
Stanley Aronowitz (1:41)
You know, it's something that has been.
Michael Pelias (1:43)
Left behind in the universities, or it's.
Stanley Aronowitz (1:45)
Been so diluted it's not really engaged critical thinking.
Michael Pelias (1:49)
And this is an activity people don't. It's not just trashing or saying this.
Stanley Aronowitz (1:55)
Is negative or we're being negative here.
Michael Pelias (1:57)
It's really about real engagement with what Gramsci would call common sense. How did the norm come to be defined? How did the common come to be such a thing? Why are we so accepting of something like student debt? Can't we argue that if you have a jubilee on student debt, that the consumer would be helped here, consumer society, that the students would spend $300 on goods and services and not on paying the banks. So anyway, the notion of critical thinking really would come out of philosophy where one learns how to question, one learns how to problematize. And so there would be a threefold moment, the description of the problems, the descriptive moment in terms of where we are historically, a critical moment that could separate that out and analytical, that loosens it up so that, as Marx once said, mankind poses problems so that they can be solved. Right? So how do we really build the.
